Log in

Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Caspofungin Versus Micafungin in Pediatric Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Analysis

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Advances in Therapy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Introduction

The high morbidity and mortality associated with invasive fungal infections (IFIs) provide the rationale for antifungal prophylaxis in immuno-compromised pediatric patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). Caspofungin and micafungin are antifungal agents of interest for prophylaxis of IFIs because of their potency against Candida and minimal toxicity or interactions with other drugs. Few studies have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of such echinocandins as prophylaxis for IFIs in patients undergoing HSCT.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study compared caspofungin and micafungin for prevention of IFIs in 93 pediatric patients undergoing HSCT for oncological or non-oncological disease. The observation began with the first dose of antifungal agent and ended 3 months after transplantation.

Results

Patients in the micafungin group had a higher overall treatment success rate of 87.2 versus 84.8% in the caspofungin group, but the difference was not significant. There were no statistically significant differences in the incidence or type of proven/probable IFIs between the 2 groups. The low incidence of death did not differ statistically between the groups. Patients in the caspofungin group presented more frequently with fever, during and after neutropenia. In both groups, we observed an expected worsening of blood chemistry parameters. There were no adverse events definitely attributable to the two antifungal agents.

Conclusion

These results demonstrate good efficacy and tolerability for caspofungin and micafungin. However, better results with respect to the incidence and resolution of fever in the micafungin group may suggest its use in preference to that of caspofungin.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chou LS, Lewis RE, Ippoliti C, Champlin RE, Kontoyiannis DP. Caspofungin as primary antifungal prophylaxis in stem cell transplant recipients. Pharmacotherapy. 2007;27(12):1644–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Girmenia C, Barosi G, Piciocchi A, et al. Primary prophylaxis of invasive fungal diseases in allogeneic stem cell transplantation: revised recommendations from a consensus process by Gruppo Italiano Trapianto Midollo Osseo (GITMO). Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2014;20:1080–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Matsumura-Kimoto Y, Inamoto Y, Tajima K, et al. Association of cumulative steroid dose with risk of infection after treatment for severe acute graft-versus-host disease. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2016;22(6):1102–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hol JA, Wolfs TF, Bierings MB, et al. Predictors of invasive fungal infection in pediatric allogeneic hematopoietic SCT recipients. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49(1):95–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Tragiannidis A, Dokos C, Lehrnbecher T, Groll AH. Antifungal chemoprophylaxis in children and adolescents with haematological malignancies and following allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation: review of the literature and options for clinical practice. Drugs. 2012;72(5):685–704.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Groll AH, Castagnola E, Cesaro S, et al. Fourth European Conference on Infections in Leukaemia (ECIL-4): guidelines for diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of invasive fungal diseases in paediatric patients with cancer or allogeneic haemopoietic stem-cell transplantation. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(8):e327–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang JF, Xue Y, Zhu XB, Fan H. Efficacy and safety of echinocandins versus triazoles for the prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections: a meta-analysis of RCTs. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2015;34(4):651–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kohno S, Izumikawa K, Yoshida M, et al. A double-blind comparative study of the safety and efficacy of caspofungin versus micafungin in the treatment of candidiasis and aspergillosis. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2013;32(3):387–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Lehrnbecher T, Groll AH. Micafungin: a brief review of pharmacology, safety, and antifungal efficacy in pediatric patients. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2010;55(2):229–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hope WW, Castagnola E, Groll AH, et al. ESCMID guideline for the diagnosis and management of Candida diseases 2012: prevention and management of invasive infections in neonates and children caused by Candida spp. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2012;18(Suppl 7):38–52.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Döring M, Hartmann U, Erbacher A, Lang P, Handgretinger R, Müller I. Caspofungin as antifungal prophylaxis in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2012;12:151.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Park HJ, Park M, Han M, et al. Efficacy and safety of micafungin for the prophylaxis of invasive fungal infection during neutropenia in children and adolescents undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2014;49(9):1212–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ascioglu S, Rex JH, de Pauw B, et al. Defining opportunistic invasive fungal infections in immunocompromised patients with cancer and hematopoietic stem cell transplants: an international consensus. Clin Infect Dis. 2002;34(1):7–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. De Pauw B, Walsh TJ, Donnelly JP, et al. Revised definitions of invasive fungal disease from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Invasive Fungal Infections Cooperative Group and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group (EORTC/MSG) Consensus Group. Clin Infect Dis. 2008;46(12):1813–21.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Schwartz GJ, Haycock GB, Edelmann CM Jr, Spitzer A. A simple estimate of glomerular filtration rate in children derived from body length and plasma creatinine. Pediatrics. 1976;58(2):259–63.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sucher AJ, Chahine EB, Balcer HE. Echinocandins: the newest class of antifungals. Ann Pharmacother. 2009;43(10):1647–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yoshikawa K, Nakazawa Y, Katsuyama Y, et al. Safety, tolerability, and feasibility of antifungal prophylaxis with micafungin at 2 mg/kg daily in pediatric patients undergoing allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Infection. 2014;42(4):639–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. van Burik JA, Ratanatharathorn V, Stepan DE, et al. Micafungin versus fluconazole for prophylaxis against invasive fungal infections during neutropenia in patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Clin Infect Dis. 2004;39(10):1407–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yuan X, Wang R, Bai CQ, Song XJ, Liu YN. Caspofungin for prophylaxis and treatment of fungal infections in adolescents and adults: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Pharmazie. 2012;67(4):267–73.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Hashino S, Morita L, Takahata M, et al. Administration of micafungin as prophylactic antifungal therapy in patients undergoing allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Int J Hematol. 2008;87(1):91–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kusuki S, Hashii Y, Yoshida H, et al. Antifungal prophylaxis with micafungin in patients treated for childhood cancer. Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2009;53(4):605–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mattiuzzi GN, Alvarado G, Giles FJ, et al. Open-label, randomized comparison of itraconazole versus caspofungin for prophylaxis in patients with hematologic malignancies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006;50(1):143–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Cattaneo C, Monte S, Algarotti A, et al. A randomized comparison of caspofungin versus antifungal prophylaxis according to investigator policy in acute leukaemia patients undergoing induction chemotherapy (PROFIL-C study). J Antimicrob Chemother. 2011;66(9):2140–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shalhoub S, Wang L, Ching A, Husain S, Rotstein C. Micafungin compared with caspofungin for the treatment of febrile episodes in neutropenic patients with hematological malignancies: a retrospective study. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2014;25(6):299–304.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Viscoli C, Bassetti M, Castagnola E, et al. Micafungin for the treatment of proven and suspected invasive candidiasis in children and adults: findings from a multicentre prospective observational study. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:725.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Gratwohl A, Stern M, Brand R, et al. Risk score for outcome after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a retrospective analysis. Cancer. 2009;115(20):4715–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. The journal’s article processing charges were funded by the authors. All named authors meet the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) criteria for authorship for this manuscript, take responsibility for the integrity of the work as a whole, and have given final approval to the version to be published.

Disclosures

Natalia Maximova, Giulia Schillani, Roberto Simeone, Alessandra Maestro, and Davide Zanon declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Compliance with Ethics Guidelines

This study was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Institute for Maternal and Child Health Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy. All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1964, as revised in 2013.

Written informed consent for the use of any clinical data for research was obtained from the parents of all subjects at the time of admission to the Bone Marrow Transplant Unit.

Data Availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on appropriate request.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Natalia Maximova.

Additional information

Enhanced content

To view enhanced content for this article go to http://www.medengine.com/Redeem/7818F06012754B6C.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Maximova, N., Schillani, G., Simeone, R. et al. Comparison of Efficacy and Safety of Caspofungin Versus Micafungin in Pediatric Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients: A Retrospective Analysis. Adv Ther 34, 1184–1199 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0534-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12325-017-0534-7

Keywords

Navigation