SpringerLink
Log in

Hydraulic bulge testing to compare formability of continuous and stretch broken carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites

  • Original Research
  • Published:
International Journal of Material Forming Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites has increased with the increased need for high-strength, low-density materials, particularly in the aerospace industry. Stretch broken carbon fiber (SBCF) is a form of carbon fiber created by statistically distributed breakage of aligned fibers in a tow at inherent flaw points, resulting in a material constituted of collimated short fibers with an average length larger than chopped fibers. While continuous carbon fiber composites have desirable material properties, the limited ability to form in complex geometries prevents their wide adoption. SBCF composites exhibit pseudo-plastic deformation that can potentially enable the use of traditional metal forming techniques like stam** and press forming, widely used for mass production applications. To investigate the formability of carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites prepared with either continuous or stretch broken Hexcel IM-7 12 K fibers and impregnated with Huntsman RDM 2019–053 resin, hydraulic bulge testing was performed at atmospheric pressure and elevated temperature to explore the strain behavior under biaxial stress conditions for the material system. Results based on deformation of surface patterning, bulge apex displacement and measurement of the bulge internal surface and volume, support the enhanced formability of the SBCF material when compared to its continuous counterpart. The SBCF enhanced formability is characterized by an axisymmetric stress response and a failure mechanism similar to the one observed for sheet metal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hull D, Clyne TW (1981) B. An Introduction to Composite Materials, Cambridge. 1st Edition Solid State Sci Ser 9–38

  2. Ning F, Cong W, Hu Z, Huang K (2017) Additive manufacturing of thermoplastic matrix composites using fused deposition modeling: A comparison of two reinforcements. J Compos Mater 51(27):3733–3742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee K, Lee SW, Ng SJ (2008) Micromechanical modeling of stretch broken carbon fiber materials. J Compos Mater 42(11):1063–1073

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Li Y, Chen Z, Xu H, Dahl J, Zeng D, Mirdamadi M, Su X (2017) Modeling and simulation of compression molding process for sheet molding compound (SMC) of chopped carbon fiber composites. SAE Int J Mater Manuf 10(2):130–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Eyckens DJ, Arnold CL, Simon Ž, Gengenbach TR, Pinson J, Wickramasingha YA, Henderson LC (2021) Covalent sizing surface modification as a route to improved interfacial adhesion in carbon fibre-epoxy composites. Compos A Appl Sci Manuf 140:106147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Den Uijl NJ, Carless LJ (2012) Advanced metal-forming technologies for automotive applications. In: Advanced materials in automotive engineering (pp. 28–56). Woodhead Publishing

  7. Schuster J, Kazmi SMR, Lutz J (2015) Manufacturing and Testing of Curved Fibre composites Using Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Moulding (VARTM). In: 20th International Conference on Composite Materials (ICCM-20), Copenhagen, pp 19–24

  8. Campbell FC (2010) Structural Composite Materials. ASM International, Ohio

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Medina C, Canales C, Arango C, Flores P (2014) The influence of carbon fabric weave on the in-plane shear mechanical performance of epoxy fiber-reinforced laminates. J Compos Mater 48(23):2871–2878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Wang F (2017) Carbon fibers and their thermal transporting properties. In: Thermal transport in carbon-based nanomaterials. Elsevier, pp 135–184

  11. Rahmani H, Najafi SHM, Saffarzadeh-Matin S, Ashori A (2014) Mechanical properties of carbon fiber/epoxy composites: Effects of number of plies, fiber contents, and angle-ply layers. Polym Eng Sci 54(11):2676–2682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Rahmani H, Najafi SHM, Ashori A (2014) Mechanical performance of epoxy/carbon fiber laminated composites. J Reinf Plast Compos 33(8):733–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Janicki JC, Egloff MC, Amendola R, Ryan CA, Bajwa DS, Dynkin A, Cairns DS (2021) Formability Characterization of Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites Using a Novel Test Method. J Test Eval 50(2). https://doi.org/10.1520/JTE20210250

  14. Jacobsen G, Schimpf W (2008) Process Development and Characterization of Stretch Broken Carbon Fiber Materials. Hexcel Corp., Utah. www.hexcel.com/innovation/Documents/Process%20Development%20and%20Characterization%20of%20Stretch%20Broken%20Carbon%20Fiber%20Materials.pdf. Accessed 2 Apr 202

  15. Şükür EF, Türköz M, Dilmeç M, Halkacı HS, Halkacı M (2016) Comparison of flow curves of AA 5457-O sheet material determined by hydraulic bulge and tensile tests at warm forming temperatures. J Test Eval 44(2):952–966

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Srbislav A, Milentije S, Dragan A, Vukić L (2009) Variation of Normal Anisotropy Ratio" r" during Plastic Forming. J Mech Eng 55(6):392–399

    Google Scholar 

  17. Eyckens D, Arnold C, Simon Ž, Gengenbach T, Pinson J, Wickramasingha Y, Henderson L (2021) Covalent sizing surface modification as a route to improved interfacial adhesion in carbon fibre-epoxy composites. Composites 140:106147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106147

  18. Jacobsen G (2010) Mechanical characterization of stretch broken carbon fiber materials IM7 fiber in 8552 resin, SAMPE 10 Spring Symposium Technical Conference Proceedings, pp 17–20

  19. Pavan kumar J, Uday kumar R, Ramakrishna B, Ramu B, Baba Saheb K (2018) Formability of sheet metals–A review. International Conference on Advancements in Aeromechanical Materials for Manufacturing; Telangana (India); July 13-14, https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/455/1/012081

  20. Bruschi S, Altan T, Banabic D, Bariani PF, Brosius A, Cao J, Tekkaya AE (2014) Testing and modelling of material behaviour and formability in sheet metal forming. CIRP Ann 63(2):727–749

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. ASTM International (2015) E643–15 Standard Test Method for Ball Punch Deformation of Metallic Sheet Material. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  22. ASTM International (2015) E2712–15 Standard Test Methods for Bulge-Forming Superplastic Metallic Sheet. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  23. Miranda SS, Santos AD, Amaral RL, Malheiro LT (2019) Characterization and Formability Analysis of a Composite Sandwich Metal-Polymer Material. In: Materials Design and Applications II. Springer, pp 487–508.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-02257-0_33

  24. Hueber C, Fischer G, Schwingshandl N, Schledjewski R (2019) Production planning optimisation for composite aerospace manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 57(18):5857–5873

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hextow IM7 carbon fiber datasheet, Hexcel Corp., Connecticut (2020). www.hexcel.com/user_area/content_media/raw/IM7_HexTow_DataSheet.pdf. Accessed 10 Apr 2022

  26. Huntsman RDM 2019-053 Data Sheet (The Woodlands, TX: Huntsman, 2020).

  27. Sur F, Blaysat B, Grédiac M (2018) Rendering deformed speckle images with a Boolean model. J Mathe Imaging Vis 60(5):634–650

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. ASTM International (2015) E2218–15 Standard Test Method for Determining Forming Limit Curves. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA

  29. Weisstein Eric W (n.d.) "Oblate Spheroid." From MathWorld--A Wolfram Web Resource. https://mathworld.wolfram.com/OblateSpheroid.html. Accessed 3 Mar 2022

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by the US Department of the Army under the award number W911W6-18-C-0050. The views and conclusions contained in this document are those of the authors and should not be interpreted as necessarily representing the official policies, either expressed or implied, of the Government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical and Industrial Engineering Department, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT, 59717, USA

    Yoni Shchemelinin, Cecily Ryan, Dilpreet Bajwa, Doug Cairns & Roberta Amendola

  2. Sustainable Product Design & Innovation, Keene State College, Keene, NH, 03435, USA

    Jared W. Nelson

Authors
  1. Yoni Shchemelinin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jared W. Nelson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Cecily Ryan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Dilpreet Bajwa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Doug Cairns
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Roberta Amendola
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Roberta Amendola.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shchemelinin, Y., Nelson, J.W., Ryan, C. et al. Hydraulic bulge testing to compare formability of continuous and stretch broken carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites. Int J Mater Form 16, 21 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01743-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12289-023-01743-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation