Log in

Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery in Patients Needed Total Colectomy: A Meta-analysis

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study is to evaluate intraoperative and postoperative outcomes of hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy (HALC) and open colectomy in the management of patients needed to removal total colon or colorectum. A systematic literature search with no limits was performed in PubMed and the Cochrane Library. Estimated blood loss, operative time, length of hospital stay, and post-operation complications including ileus, wound infection and leak were extracted. Six researches reporting a total number of 271 patients who underwent HALC or open surgery within restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) or total abdominal colectomy (TAC) were included. There was a significant difference between HALC and open surgery groups in the estimated blood loss (mean difference (MD) = 93.44, 95%CI [51.33, 135.54], p < 0.0001), operative time (MD =  − 41.17, 95%CI [− 54.41, − 27.94], p < 0.00001) and length of hospital stay (MD = 1.56, 95%CI [0.24, 2.88], P = 0.02). In the terms of post-operation complications, the incidence of ileus (OR 1.27, 95% CI [0.55, 2.95], P = 0.57) and wound infection (OR 1.21, 95% CI [0.53, 2.79], P = 0.66) were similar between the two groups. HALC could have more effect and safety over open surgery in patients underwent RPC and TAC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data in this study is not sensitive and could be accessible in the public domain. The data is therefore available and all the data used in the study have been included in the article/Supplementary Material.

References

  1. Helavirta I et al (2016) Restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis in 1985–2009. Scand J Surg 105(2):73–77

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. AH K et al (1996) Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis as the first choice operation in patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a ten-year experience. Surgery 119(6):615–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Martel G, Boushey RP (2006) Laparoscopic colon surgery: past, present and future. Surg Clin North Am 86(4):867–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Meijerink WJ et al (1999) Laparoscopically assisted bowel surgery for inflammatory bowel disease. Surgical Endoscopy 13:882–886

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ng LW et al (2012) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus total laparoscopic right colectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Colorectal Dis 14(9):e612–e617

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ozturk E et al (2010) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery may be a useful tool for surgeons early in the learning curve performing total abdominal colectomy. Colorectal Dis 12(3):199–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Maartense S et al (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS): a report of 150 procedures. Surg Endosc 18(3):397–401

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Aalbers AG et al (2008) Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 22(8):1769–1780

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakajima K et al (2010) Hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis: the optimization of instrumentation toward standardization. Surg Today 40(9):840–844

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Wan X et al (2014) Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range. BMC Med Res Methodol 14:135

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Maartense S et al (2004) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis. Ann Surg 240(6):984–992

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Nakajima K et al (2010) The role of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in subtotal and total colectomy for Crohn’s colitis. Surg Endosc 24(11):2713–2717

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sheng QS et al (2014) Comparison of hand-assisted laparoscopy with open total colectomy for slow transit constipation: a retrospective study. J Dig Dis 15(8):419–424

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Shimada N et al (2016) Hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis. World J Gastrointest Surg 8(8):578–82

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang DY et al (2013) The role of hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery in total colectomy for colonic inertia: a retrospective study. J Korean Surg Soc 85(3):123–127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. **ng C, Zhu P (2017) Hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for ulcerative colitis. J Minimal Access Surg 13(4):256–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu Q et al (2017) Laparoscopic colectomy versus open colectomy for treatment of transverse colon cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 27(10):1038–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim RH, Kavanaugh MM, Caldito GC (2017) Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer: improved compliance with guidelines for chemotherapy and survival. Surgery 161(6):1633–1641

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ding J et al (2013) Laparoscopic versus open right hemicolectomy for colon cancer: a meta-analysis. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 23(1):8–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Aalbers AG et al (2010) Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open approach in colorectal surgery: a systematic review. Colorectal Dis 12(4):287–295

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhang X et al (2017) Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery in intraoperative and postoperative outcomes for colorectal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore) 96(33):e7794

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Ziqiang Wang contributed to the conception of the study and edit the manuscript;

Zechuan ** contributed significantly to analysis and manuscript preparation;

Anqing Lu performed the data analyses and wrote the manuscript;

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ziqiang Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

All authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lu, A., **, Z. & Wang, Z. Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic Surgery Versus Open Surgery in Patients Needed Total Colectomy: A Meta-analysis. Indian J Surg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-024-04038-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-024-04038-5

Keywords

Navigation