Abstract
Introduction
Reconstruction around the neck still represents a challenge as both functional and cosmetic outcomes need to be considered. Locoregional fasciocutaneous flaps are often the best, and sometimes the single, reconstructive option available. This work is intended to highlight the versatility of the supraclavicular artery island flap (SCAIF) for cervical reconstruction.
Patient and Methods
The authors present a case series analysis of cervical reconstruction using this fasciocutaneous flap, reporting clinical outcomes and complications.
Observations
An array of defects of different nature and magnitude, from skin only to composite defects were successfully reconstructed with the SCAIF, highlighting a simple, reproducible, and resourceful flap.
Discussion
The SCAIF is characterized for its versatility, making it an essential tool in the reconstruction of simple and complex defects in the cervical region. Regarding neck reconstruction, this flap has an unquestionable role as a first reconstructive option (either tumoral in nature, trauma, or iatrogenic complications) and/or as a salvage procedure after a free flap failure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lamberty BG (1979) The supra-clavicular axial patterned flap. Br J Plast Surg 32(3):207–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0007-1226(79)90033-x
Chiu ES, Liu PH, Friedlander PL (2009) Supraclavicular artery island flap for head and neck oncologic reconstruction: indications, complications, and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 124(1):115–123. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181aa0e5d
Kokot N, Mazhar K, Reder LS, Peng GL, Sinha UK (2013) The supraclavicular artery island flap in head and neck reconstruction: applications and limitations. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 139(11):1247–1255. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2013.5057
Teixeira S et al (2018) Pharyngocutaneous and tracheoesophageal fistula closure using supraclavicular artery island flap. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 275(7):1921–1926. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-018-4961-0
Z. Michael, “Supraclavicular Artery Flap” in Flaps and reconstructive surgery (2016), W. Fu-Chan and M. Samir Eds.: Elsevier, ch. 33, pp. 387-395
Ariyan S, Cuono CB (1980) Myocutaneous flaps for head and neck reconstruction. Head Neck Surg 2(4):321–345. https://doi.org/10.1002/hed.2890020411
Brainard D (1844) Case of deformity from burn successfully treated by plastic operation. Ill Med Surg J 1(4):57–60
Pallua N, Machens HG, Rennekampff O, Becker M, Berger A (1997) The fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap for releasing postburn mentosternal contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 99(7):1878–1884; discussion 1885-6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199706000-00011
Pallua N, Magnus Noah E (2000) The tunneled supraclavicular island flap: an optimized technique for head and neck reconstruction. Plast Reconstr Surg 105(3):842–851; discussion 852-4,. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200003000-00003
Pallua N, Demir E (2008) Postburn head and neck reconstruction in children with the fasciocutaneous supraclavicular artery island flap. Ann Plast Surg 60(3):276–282. https://doi.org/10.1097/SAP.0b013e3180db2775
Wu H, Chen WL, Yang ZH (2012) Functional reconstruction with an extended supraclavicular fasciocutaneous island flap following ablation of advanced oropharyngeal cancer. J Craniofac Surg 23(6):1668–1671. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e318266f948
Sandu K, Monnier P, Pasche P (2012) Supraclavicular flap in head and neck reconstruction: experience in 50 consecutive patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 269(4):1261–1267. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-011-1754-0
Levy JM, Eko FN, Hilaire HS, Friedlander PL, Melgar MA, Chiu ES (2011) Posterolateral skull base reconstruction using the supraclavicular artery island flap. J Craniofac Surg 22(5):1751–1754. https://doi.org/10.1097/SCS.0b013e31822e62e9
Emerick KS, Herr MW, Lin DT, Santos F, Deschler DG (2014) Supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstruction of complex parotidectomy, lateral skull base, and total auriculectomy defects. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 140(9):861–866. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2014.1394
Kokot N, Mazhar K, Reder LS, Peng GL, Sinha UK (2014) Use of the supraclavicular artery island flap for reconstruction of cervicofacial defects. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 150(2):222–228. https://doi.org/10.1177/0194599813514205
Di Benedetto G, Aquinati A, Pierangeli M, Scalise A, Bertani A (2005) From the “charretera” to the supraclavicular fascial island flap: revisitation and further evolution of a controversial flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 115(1):70–6
Epps MT et al (2011) Aesthetic restoration of parotidectomy contour deformity using the supraclavicular artery island flap. Plast Reconstr Surg 127(5):1925–1931. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820cf40a
Quang VV, Van AT, Rei O, Hiko H (2009) Anatomical and clinical studies of the supraclavicular flap: analysis of 103 flaps used to reconstruct neck scar contractures. Plast Reconstr Surg 123:1471–1480
Razdan SN et al (2015) Safety of the supraclavicular artery island flap in the setting of neck dissection and radiation therapy. J Reconstr Microsurg 31(5):378–383. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0035-1546294
Zhou J, Ding YM, Zhou MJ, Kuang YX, Ma TY, Chen XH (2020) Application of bilateral supraclavicular artery island flaps in the repair of hypopharyngeal and cervical skin defects: a case report. Chin Med J 133(11):1380–1382. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000000831
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
This is an observational study. The regional ethics committee has confirmed that no ethical approval is required. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. Furthermore, all the patients provided informed consent for the publication of clinical data and accompanying images.
Competing Interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Level of evidence: Level IV, therapeutic study
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Poleri, F., Monteiro, D., Correia-Pinto, J.M. et al. Versatility of the Supraclavicular Artery Island Flap in Neck Reconstruction. Indian J Surg 86, 394–400 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03893-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03893-y