Abstract
This research examines the roles that dispositional ethical self-identity (ESI) and situational priming play in socially conscious consumption choices, using an experimental design approach. We advance the literature of socially conscious consumption by specifically comparing the competing explanations of assimilation, licensing, compensation, and neutralization. Consistent with real-world pricing, participants considered a more expensive socially conscious product vs. a less expensive conventional product. Individuals who feel an ethical orientation is part of their self-identity were more inclined toward environmental product choice. In addition, an assimilation effect took place; priming positive environmental behaviors led to a more environmental product choice than a neutral prime. Priming negative environmental behaviors suggested a neutralization response, where participants may have denied or cognitively minimized the effects of their previous negative behavior. This study contributes to theory by testing competing explanations for environmental choices. It demonstrates a tendency toward assimilation rather than licensing when positively primed, and a tendency toward neutralization rather than compensation or assimilation when negatively primed. It also demonstrates that there is a practical benefit of prompting consumers to consider their past positive environmental behaviors to encourage further environmentalism. Additionally, prompting those who are already “on board” with environmentalism may help to attain even better outcomes.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
Here we use ethical, socially conscious, and socially responsible consumer behavior interchangeably, consistent with the literature.
References
Abbas, M., & Bashir, F. (2020). Having a green identity: Does pro-environmental self-identity mediate the effects of moral identity on ethical consumption and pro-environmental behaviour? Studies in Psychology, 41(3), 612–643.
Accenture (2020). COVID-19 Increasing consumers’ focus on “Ethical Consumption,” Accenture survey finds. Downloaded April 4, 2022, from: https://newsroom.accenture.com/news/covid-19-increasing-consumers-focus-onethical-consumption-accenture-survey-finds.htm
Amin, S., & Tarun, M. T. (2022). Boosting ecological food consumption behavior among millennials: role of health consciousness, perceived consumer effectiveness and ethical self-identity. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 33(6), 1344–1361. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-07-2021-0180
Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1423–1440.
Aquino, K., Freeman, D., Reed, A., II., Lim, V. K., & Felps, W. (2009). Testing a social-cognitive model of moral behavior: the interactive influence of situations and moral identity centrality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 123.
Blanken, I., Van De Ven, N., & Zeelenberg, M. (2015). A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 540–558.
Burger, A. M., Schuler, J., & Eberling, E. (2022). Guilty pleasures: Moral licensing in climate-related behavior. Global Environmental Change, 72, 102415.
Campbell, M. C., Manning, K. C., Leonard, B., & Manning, H. M. (2016). Kids, cartoons, and cookies: Stereotype priming effects on children’s food consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 2(26), 257–264.
Caruana, R. (2007). A sociological perspective of consumption morality. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 6(5), 287–304. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.222
Çekirdekci, ŞO., & Latif, F. O. B. (2019). Users and non-users of counterfeits: motivations, emotional outcomes and neutralization processes. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 28(6), 733–746.
Chartrand, T. L., Huber, J., Shiv, B., & Tanner, R. (2008). Nonconscious goals and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 189–201.
Chatterjee, S., Sreen, N., Rana, J., Dhir, A., & Sadarangani, P. H. (2021). Impact of ethical certifications and product involvement on consumers decision to purchase ethical products at price premiums in an emerging market context. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-021-00288-1
Chatzidakis, A., Hibbert, S., & Smith, A. P. (2007). Why people don’t take their concerns about fair trade to the supermarket: The role of neutralisation. Journal of Business Ethics, 74, 89–100.
Chatzidakis, A., Smith, A., & Hibbert, S. (2006). Ethically concerned, yet unethically behaved”: Towards an updated understanding of consumer’s (un) ethical decision making. In C. Pechmann & L. Price (eds.), NA—Advances in Consumer Research, 33, 693–698.
Cone Communications/Ebiquity (2015). Global CSR Study. https://www.porternovelli.com/findings/2015-cone-communications-global-csr-study/. Accessed 3 July 2022.
Cotte, J., & Trudel, R. (2009). Socially conscious consumerism: A systematic review of the body of knowledge. Network for Business Sustainability: Knowledge Project Series, 1–65. https://eldis.org/document/A44981.
Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2004). Business ethics: a european perspective. Oxford University Press.
D’Astous, A., & Legendre, A. (2009). Understanding consumers’ ethical justifications: A scale for appraising consumers’ reasons for not behaving ethically. Journal of Business Ethics, 87(2), 255–268.
Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., & Sweitzer, V. L. (2008). Moral disengagement in ethical decision making: A study of antecedents and outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(2), 374–391. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.93.2.374
Dickenbrok, C., & Martinez, L. F. (2018). Communicating green fashion across different cultures and geographical regions. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 15(2), 127–141.
Freestone, O., & McGoldrick, P. (2008). Motivations of the ethical consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(4), 445–467.
Fukukawa, K., Zaharie, M. M., & Romonţi-Maniu, A. I. (2019). Neutralization techniques as a moderating mechanism: Ethically questionable behavior in the Romanian consumer context. Psychology & Marketing, 36(2), 138–149.
Hameed, I., Waris, I., Amin, & Haq, M. (2019). Predicting eco-conscious consumer behavior using theory of planned behavior in Pakistan. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(15), 15535–15547.
Hosta, M., & Zabkar, V. (2021). Antecedents of environmentally and socially responsible sustainable consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 171(2), 273–293.
Janiszewski, C., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2014). Content and process priming: A review. Journal of consumer psychology, 24(1), 96–118.
Khan, U., & Dhar, R. (2006). Licensing effect in consumer choice. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(2), 259–266.
Kossmann, E., & Gómez-Suárez, M. (2018). Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 15(3), 353–370.
Li, M., Li, J., Tan, M., & Zhong, Y. (2021). Exposure to money modulates the processing of charitable donation: An event-related potentials study. Neuroscience Letters, 765, 136277.
Mazar, N., & Zhong, C. B. (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21(4), 494–498.
McDonald, S., Oates, C. J., Young, C. W., & Hwang, K. (2006). Toward sustainable consumption: Researching voluntary simplifiers. [Article]. Psychology & Marketing, 23(6), 515–534.
McGregor, S. (2008). Conceptualizing immoral and unethical consumption using neutralization theory. Family and Consumer Sciences Research Journal, 36(3), 261–276.
Markowitz, D. M., & Levine, T. R. (2021). It’s the situation and your disposition: A test of two honesty hypotheses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 12(2), 213–224.
Megicks, P., Memery, J., & Williams, J. (2008). Influences on ethical and socially responsible shop**: Evidence from the UK grocery sector. Journal of Marketing Management, 24(5/6), 637–659.
Memery, J., Megicks, P., & Williams, J. (2005). Ethical and social responsibility issues in grocery shop**: A preliminary typology. Qualitative Market Research, 8(4), 399–412.
Michaelidou, N., & Hassan, L. (2008). The role of health consciousness, food safety concern and ethical identity on attitudes and intentions towards organic food. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32(2), 163–170.
Mohr, L. A., Webb, D. J., & Harris, K. E. (2001). Do consumers expect companies to be socially responsible? The impact of corporate social responsibility on buying behavior. The Journal of Consumer Affairs, 35(1), 45.
Prendergast, G. P., & Tsang, A. S. (2019). Explaining socially responsible consumption. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 36(1), 146–154.
Rotella, A., & Barclay, P. (2020). Failure to replicate moral licensing and moral cleansing in an online experiment. Personality and Individual Differences, 161, 109967.
Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20(4), 523–528. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02326.x
ShabbirHusain, R. V. (2022). Green offering: more the centrality, greater the scepticism. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-021-00324-0.
Shaw, D., Grehan, E., Shiu, E., Hassan, L., & Thomson, J. (2005). An exploration of values in ethical consumer decision making. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 4(3), 185–200.
Snyder, M., & Monson, T. C. (1975). Persons, situations, and the control of social behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 32(4), 637.
Soares Júnior, A. P., Zucoloto, C. R. F., de Freitas André, O., & Mainardes, E. W. (2019). Healthy food purchasing behavior for children. International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, 16(1), 103–124.
Strahan, R., & Gerbasi, K. (1972). Short, homogenous versions of the Marlowe-Crowne social desirability scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 28(2), 191–193.
Sykes, G. M., & Matza, D. (1957). Techniques of neutralization: A theory of delinquency. American Sociological Review, 22(6), 664–670.
Szmigin, I., Carrigan, M., & McEachern, M. (2009). The conscious consumer: Taking a flexible approach to ethical behavior. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 33(2), 224–231.
Tanford, S., Kim, M., & Kim, E. J. (2020). Priming social media and framing cause-related marketing to promote sustainable hotel choice. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 28(11), 1762–1781.
Trudel, R. (2019). Sustainable consumer behavior. Consumer Psychology Review, 2(1), 85–96.
Urban, J., Braun Kohlová, M., & Bahník, Š. (2021). No evidence of within-domain moral licensing in the environmental domain. Environment and Behavior, 53(10), 1070–1094.
van Birgelen, M., Semeijn, J., & Behrens, P. (2011). Explaining pro-environment consumer behavior in air travel. Journal of Air Transport Management, 17(2), 125–128.
Walsh, D. (2014). Attenuating depletion using goal priming. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 24(4), 497–505.
Yarimoglu, E., & Binboga, G. (2019). Understanding sustainable consumption in an emerging country: The antecedents and consequences of the ecologically conscious consumer behavior model. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(4), 642–651.
Zhong, B., Liljenquist, J. A., & Cain, D. M. (2009). Moral self-regulation: Licensing and compensation. In De D. Cremer (Ed.), Psychological perspectives on ethical behavior and decision making (pp. 75–89). NC Information Age Publishing.
Acknowledgements
This research was funded in part by the University of Lethbridge MSc Management program.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
This article utilizes thesis research conducted by the first author, under the supervision and guidance of the second author. The second author drafted the article, drawing in part on text and analyses from the first author’s thesis as well as adding additional text and analyses.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
This research received ethics approval from the Authors’ university internal review board, and participants were provided with informed consent.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no known competing interests or conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Hanel, V., Basil, D.Z. Socially conscious consumer behavior: the role of ethical self-identity and priming. Int Rev Public Nonprofit Mark 20, 427–445 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-022-00348-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12208-022-00348-0