Log in

Different Characteristics of Radar Signal Attenuation Depending on Concrete Condition of Bare Bridge Deck

  • Highway Engineering
  • Published:
KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering Aims and scope

Abstract

This paper examined the attenuation method, which is used abroad, to derive a method to evaluate the condition of bare concrete bridge decks using ground penetrating radar (GPR) technology. For this purpose, 12 GPR surveys of 10 bridge decks in public service from the beginning of its service to 25 years of service were carried out to examine the attenuation characteristics of GPR signals under various concrete conditions. The survey revealed the signal below the top rebar of concrete bridge deck under the condition of using de-icing chlorides for snow removal was not clear. Therefore, using the receiving wave signal from top rebar was reasonable when attenuation of GPR signal was to be used for bridge deck evaluation. Examining the signal attenuation by the condition of concrete, dispersion of the attenuated signal was overall large in the initial performance period. However, since this is not due to deterioration, exclusion of the large dispersion from the evaluation of bridge deck condition was desirable. The attenuation size was linearly proportional to its two way travel time (signal transmission time), i.e., the depth of the top rebar, in a sound bridge deck. Also, the dispersion of the attenuation was small and symmetric to the linear regression line. If the bridge deck was maintained adequately, the linear regression correlation was also maintained similarly for the next several years. However, if deterioration occurred to be accompanied by increased attenuation and dispersion, correlation coefficient of the linear regression line declined. Nonetheless, the upper value of the attenuation representing sound concrete condition was still tended to be linearly proportional to two way travel time. Since the attenuation quantity could result in considerable debilitation just by the construction error, it is necessary to deal with the depth-error of top rebar for evaluating the concrete condition by using the GPR signal attenuation. Calibration was carried out by deriving a linear regression line for the signal two way travel time and the upper 90th percentile values of the attenuation obtained from the top bar position of the bridge and then removing it from the total attenuation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASTM D 4580-86 (1986) Standard practice for measuring delaminations in concrete bridge decks by sounding. ASTM D 4580-86, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D 6087-08 (2008) Standard test method for evaluating asphalt-covered concrete bridge decks using ground penetrating radar. ASTM D 6087-08, ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes CL, Trottier JF, Forgeron D (2008) Improved concrete bridge deck evaluation using GPR by accounting for signal depth-amplitude effects. NDT and E International 41(6):427–433, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2008.03.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho SY (2003) Pre-wetted salt spreading. Journal of the Korean Society of Civil Engineers 51(5):16–19 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Construction Division (1988) Seoul-Cheongju Jungbu expressway construction magazine. Korea Expressway Corporation, Seongnam, Korea (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Daniels DJ (2004) Ground penetrating radar: IET radar, sonar, navigation and avionics series 15. The Institution of Engineering and Technology, London, UK

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dinh K, Gucunski N, Kim J, Duong TH (2016) Understanding depth amplitude effects in assessment of GPR data from concrete bridge decks. NDT and E International 83:48–58, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ndteint.2016.06.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GSSI (2009) RADAN version 6.6. Geophysical Survey Systems, Inc., Salem, NH, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Gucunski N, Pailes B, Kim J, Azari H, Dinh K (2016) Capture and quantification of deterioration progression in concrete bridge decks through periodical NDE surveys. Journal of Infrastructure Systems 23(1):1–11, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)IS.1943-555X.0000321

    Google Scholar 

  • Hasan MI, Yazdani N (2014) Ground penetrating radar utilization in exploring inadequate concrete covers in a new bridge deck. Case Studies in Construction Materials 1:104–114, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cscm.2014.04.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Korea Expressway Corporation (2000) 30 years of Korea Expressway Corporation. Korea Expressway Corporation, Gimcheon, Korea (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • KS F 2596-04 (2004) Method for measuring carbonation depth of concrete. KS F 2596-04, Korean Standards Association, Seoul, Korea (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • KS F 2712-02 (2002) Standard test method for corrosion potentials of uncoated reinforcing steel in concrete. KS F 2712-02, Korean Standards Association, Seoul, Korea (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • KS F 2713-02 (2002) Standard test method for analysis of chloride in concrete and concrete raw materials. KS F 2713-02, Korean Standards Association, Seoul, Korea (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Maser KR (1989) New technology for bridge deck assessment. Phase I report, FHWA-NETC-89-01, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Center for Transportation Studies, Federal Highway Administration, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Construction Division (1984) 88 Olympic expressway construction magazine. The Ministry of Construction Division, Gwacheon, Korea (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • MLIT & KISTEC (2012) Inspection manual for the bridge. Minister of Land Infrastructure and Transport (MLIT) & Korea Infrastructure Safety and Technology Corporation (KISTEC), Ilsan, Korea (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • MOCT & KISTEC (2003) Inspection and diagnosis. Ministry of Construction and Transportation (MOCT) & Korea Infrastructure Safety and Technology Corporation (KISTEC), Ilsan, Korea (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Olhoeft GR (1984) Applications and limitations of ground penetrating radar. SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 147–148, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1190/1.1894192

  • Rhee JY, Choi JJ, Kim HS, Park KE, Choi MJ (2016) A study on the integrity assessment of bare concrete bridge deck based on the attenuation of radar signals. Journal of the Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection 20(4):84–93, DOI: https://doi.org/10.11112/jksmi.2016.20.4.084 (in Korean)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rhee JY, Kim HS, Do JN, Shim JW, Kim IS (2018) An advances in evaluating asphalt-covered concrete bridge decks using Ground Penetrating Radar. EXTRI-2018-54-534.9607, Expressway & Transportation Research Institute, Hwaseong, Korea (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero FA, Barnes CL, Azari H, Nazarian S, Rascoe CD (2015) Validation of benefits of automated depth correction method: Improving accuracy of ground-penetrating radar deck deterioration maps. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board 2522(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/2522-10

  • Suh J, Lee I, Rhee J (1998) Condition evaluation of concrete bridge decks. Report No. 98-67-65, Highway Research Center, Korea Highway Corporation, Seongnam, Korea (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh JW, Rhee JY, Cheong HM (2004a) A study on the construction and maintenance of bare concrete bridge decks (RT-ST-04-03). Korea Highway Research Center, Hwaseong, Korea (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh J, Rhee J, Suh S, Shin J (2004b) Condition evaluation of bare concrete bridge decks. Journal of Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection 8(3):217–224 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Suh J, Ku B, Rhee J (2007) Penetration of de-icing salt in bare concrete bridge decks in highways. Journal of Korea Institute for Structural Maintenance and Inspection 11(2):85–92 (in Korean)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tarussov A, Vandry M, De La Haza A (2013) Condition assessment of concrete structures using a new analysis method: Ground-penetrating radar computer-assisted visual interpretation. Construction and Building Materials 38:1246–1254, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.05.026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaghefi K, Ahlborn TTM, Harris DK, Brooks CN (2013) Combined imaging technologies for concrete bridge deck condition assessment. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 29(4):04014102, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000465

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnavina AV, Khamzin AK, Sneed LH, Torgashov EV, Anderson NL, Maerz NH, Boyko KJ (2015) Concrete bridge deck assessment: Relationship between GPR data and concrete removal depth measurements collected after hydrodemolition. Construction and Building Materials 99:26–38, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.09.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varnavina AV, Sneed LH, Khamzin AK, Torgashov EV, Anderson NL (2017) An attempt to describe a relationship between concrete deterioration quantities and bridge deck condition assessment techniques. Journal of Applied Geophysics 142:38–48, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jappgeo.2017.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sang-Yum Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rhee, JY., Shim, J., Kee, SH. et al. Different Characteristics of Radar Signal Attenuation Depending on Concrete Condition of Bare Bridge Deck. KSCE J Civ Eng 24, 2049–2062 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-1840-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12205-020-1840-1

Keywords

Navigation