Abstract
Benevolence, morality, and authoritarianism are the three critical dimensions of paternalistic leadership rooted in Chinese cultures and may represent the relation-oriented, values-oriented, and task-oriented leadership styles under the western research framework. Using the person-centered latent profile analysis, this study investigated the profiles of paternalistic school leaders as perceived by teachers in order to determine whether these profiles in educational setting align with theories and evidence obtained from other settings. A total of 653 primary school teachers from Bei**g and 731 primary school teachers from Jilin province participated in this study. The Bei**g sample was used in initial profile identification, while the Jilin sample and the integrated sample were used in profile confirmation. The final results generally supported a 5-profile model, with the five profiles labelled as dictatorial paternalistic leaders, semi-ideological paternalistic leaders, semi-benefactor paternalistic leaders, selfless benefactor paternalistic leaders, and authentic paternalistic leaders, respectively. The automatic BCH approach was then used to estimate and compare the means of distal continuous outcomes across the five latent profiles. The results indicated that when teachers perceived leadership profiles as high in benevolence and morality, they also reported greater work engagement and teacher efficacy. When teachers perceived leadership profiles as high in authoritarianism, they also reported greater emotional exhaustion and turnover intention. Teachers under the leadership of authentic paternalistic leaders reported the highest levels of work engagement and teacher efficacy, as well as the highest levels of emotional exhaustion and turnover intention.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12144-024-05835-7/MediaObjects/12144_2024_5835_Fig1_HTML.png)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs12144-024-05835-7/MediaObjects/12144_2024_5835_Fig2_HTML.png)
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2014). Auxiliary variables in mixture modeling: Using the BCH method in Mplus to estimate a distal outcome model and an arbitrary second model. Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/examples/webnote.shtml.
Aycan, Z. (2006). Paternalism: Towards conceptual refinement and operationalization. In K. S. Yang, K. K. Hwang, & U. Kim (Eds.), Scientific advances in indigenous psychologies: Empirical, philosophical, and cultural contributions (pp. 445–466). Sage Ltd.
Bauer, D. J., & Shanahan, M. J. (2007). Modeling complex interactions: Person-centered and variable-centered approaches. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling contextual effects in longitudinal studies (pp. 255–283). Routledge.
Bono, J. E., & Judge, T. A. (2004). Personality and transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 901–910.
Bradley, G. (2007). Job tenure as a moderator of stressor–strain relations: A comparison of experienced and new-start teachers. Work and Stress, 21(1), 48–64.
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595–616.
Chan, S. C. (2014). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice: Does information sharing matter? Human Relations, 67(6), 667–693.
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., & Farh, J. L. (2000). A triad model of paternalistic leadership: The constructs and measurement. Indigenous Psychological Research in Chinese Societies, 14(1), 3–64.
Cheng, B. S., Chou, L. F., Wu, T. Y., Huang, M. P., & Farh, J. L. (2004). Paternalistic leadership and subordinate responses: Establishing a leadership model in Chinese organizations. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 7(1), 89–117.
Chou, W. J., Sibley, C. G., Liu, J. H., Lin, T. T., & Cheng, B. S. (2015). Paternalistic leadership profiles: A person-centered approach. Group & Organization Management, 40(5), 685–710.
Cummings, G. G., MacGregor, T., Davey, M., Lee, H., Wong, C. A., Lo, E., & Stafford, E. (2010). Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 47(3), 363–385.
Erben, G. S., & Güneşer, A. B. (2008). The relationship between paternalistic leadership and organizational commitment: Investigating the role of climate regarding ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(4), 955–968.
Farh, J. L., & Cheng, B. S. (2000). A cultural analysis of paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations. In J. T. Li, A. S. Tsui, & E. Weldon (Eds.), Management and organizations in the Chinese context (pp. 84–127). Macmillan.
Farh, J. L., Liang, J., Chou, L. F., & Cheng, B. S. (2008). Paternalistic leadership in Chinese organizations: Research progress and future research directions. In C. C. Chen, & Y. T. Lee (Eds.), Leadership and management in China: Philosophies, theories, and practices (pp. 171–205). Cambridge University Press.
Harms, P. D., Credé, M., Tynan, M., Leon, M., & Jeung, W. (2017). Leadership and stress: A meta-analytic review. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(1), 178–194.
Hernandez, M., Eberly, M. B., Avolio, B. J., & Johnson, M. D. (2011). The loci and mechanisms of leadership: Exploring a more comprehensive view of leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 22(6), 1165–1185.
Hiller, N. J., Sin, H. P., Ponnapalli, A. R., & Ozgen, S. (2019). Benevolence and authority as WEIRDly unfamiliar: A multi-language meta-analysis of paternalistic leadership behaviors from 152 studies. The Leadership Quarterly, 30(1), 165–184.
Huang, S. (2020). The Roles of Paternalistic Leadership and Emotional Labor in Chinese Teachers’ Work (Publication No. 28663045) [Doctoral dissertation, The Chinese University of Hong Kong]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
Hwang, K. K. (2013). Confucian and Legalist basis of leadership and business ethics. In C. Luetge (Ed.), Handbook of the philosophical foundations of Business Ethics (pp. 1005–1026). Springer.
Kristof-Brown, A., & Guay, R. P. (2011). Person–environment fit. In S. Zedeck (Ed.), APA handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 3): Maintaining, expanding, and contracting the organization (pp. 3–50). American Psychological Association.
Lee, Y. T., Haught, H., Chen, K., & Chan, S. (2013). Examining daoist big-five leadership in cross-cultural and gender perspectives. Asian American Journal of Psychology, 4(4), 267–276.
Li, R., & Yao, M. (2022). What promotes teachers’ turnover intention? Evidence from a meta-analysis. Educational Research Review, 100477.
Li, R., Chen, Z., Zhang, H., & Luo, J. (2021). How do authoritarian leadership and abusive supervision jointly thwart follower proactivity? A social control perspective. Journal of Management, 47(4), 930–956.
Lin, T. T., Cheng, B. S., & Chou, L. F. (2019). Paternalistic Leadership: An indigenous concept with global significance. In K. H. Yeh (Ed.), Asian indigenous psychologies in the global context (pp. 115–138). Springer.
Luthans, F. (2002). The need for and meaning of positive organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 695–706.
Ma, L. (2000). A comparison of the legitimacy of power between Confucianist and Legalist philosophies. Asian Philosophy, 10(1), 49–59.
Ma, L., & Tsui, A. S. (2015). Traditional Chinese philosophies and contemporary leadership. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 13–24.
McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Anderson, R. D. (2002). Impact of leadership style and emotions on subordinate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 13(5), 545–559.
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: A Monte-Carlo simulation study. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 14(4), 535–569.
Pellegrini, E. K., & Scandura, T. A. (2008). Paternalistic leadership: A review and agenda for future research. Journal of Management, 34(3), 566–593.
Peus, C., Braun, S., & Knipfer, K. (2015). On becoming a leader in Asia and America: Empirical evidence from women managers. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 55–67.
Reynolds, K. (2011). Servant-leadership as gender-integrative leadership: Paving a path for more gender-integrative organizations through leadership education. Journal of Leadership Education, 10(2), 155–171.
Schaufeli, W. B., & Salanova, M. (2007). Efficacy or inefficacy, that’s the question: Burnout and work engagement, and their relationships with efficacy beliefs. Anxiety Stress and Co**, 20(2), 177–196.
Schaufeli, W. B., Bakker, A. B., & Salanova, M. (2006). The measurement of work engagement with a short questionnaire: A cross-national study. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 701–716.
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17(7), 783–805.
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., & Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 202–248.
Wang, A. C., Tsai, C. Y., Dionne, S. D., Yammarino, F. J., Spain, S. M., Ling, H. C., & Cheng, B. S. (2018). Benevolence-dominant, authoritarianism-dominant, and classical paternalistic leadership: Testing their relationships with subordinate performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(6), 686–697.
Wong, C. S., Lan, J., Peng, K. Z., & Iun, J. (2022). Should we stop using the label of paternalistic leadership? Evidence from three Chinese samples. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 43(6), 909–927.
Wu, M., Huang, X., & Chan, S. C. (2012a). The influencing mechanisms of paternalistic leadership in Mainland China. Asia Pacific Business Review, 18(4), 631–648.
Wu, M., Huang, X., Li, C., & Liu, W. (2012b). Perceived interactional justice and trust-in-supervisor as mediators for paternalistic leadership. Management and Organization Review, 8(1), 97–121.
Yin, H., Huang, S., & Lee, J. C. K. (2017). Choose your strategy wisely: Examining the relationships between emotional labor in teaching and teacher efficacy for Hong Kong primary schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 127–136.
Zhang, Y., Huai, M. Y., & **e, Y. H. (2015). Paternalistic leadership and employee voice in China: A dual process model. The Leadership Quarterly, 26(1), 25–36.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
This research is funded by the National Social Science Fund of China (Education, 2022, grant number CHA220293). This article is based on the PhD disseration compeleted by Dr. Shenghua Huang (Huang, 2020). There is no other financial or non-financial interest that are directly or indirectly related to this current work.
Ethics approval
The studies involving human participants were reviewed and approved by the Survey and Behavioural Research Ethics Committee of the Chinese University of Hong Kong.
Consent to participate
Informed consent was obtained from all individual adult participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, S., Yin, H. & Li, X. The typology of school leaders and teachers’ outcomes: a latent profile analysis of paternalistic leadership. Curr Psychol 43, 20235–20249 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05835-7
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-024-05835-7