Log in

Public and Private-Led Urban Developments in Post-colonial Zimbabwe: a Comparative Study in Ruwa Town

  • Published:
Urban Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article compares private-led development with public-led development within the private-public partnership approach framework in the growth process of Ruwa Town in Zimbabwe. The comparison gives insights into the best alternatives to post-colonial urban development in Zimbabwe in general and Ruwa Town in particular at a time when the government of Zimbabwe is contemplating adopting the private-public partnership approach to urban development. Ruwa has been involved in a transition in urban development approach, from public-led development to private-led development. The town is outstanding for involving private land developer companies (PLDCs) in develo** its urban infrastructure. The companies were invited by the public sector to create a partnership in service provision and infrastructure development. Upon entering the land market in Ruwa, from 1987, the companies bought land from commercial farmers around the town which they developed into residential, commercial and industrial areas before selling it to individuals and other entrepreneurs. Public-led development in Ruwa was driven by the Government and the Ruwa Town local authorities, and these public entities developed their own industrial areas and residential parks. In comparing private- and public-led developments, the article uses qualitative research methods to derive research data. The comparison proves that the companies were more effective in providing quality infrastructure. Although the companies had some shortcomings which retarded growth in the area, the article argues that they were the most appropriate vehicles of transformation in Zimbabwe’s urban development process from a public-led approach to a neo-liberal approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Garikai/Hlalani Kuhle are vernacular words which means good living.

  2. Kuma USAID means areas developed by USAID.

  3. Murambatsvina is a Shona word which means to remove filth.

  4. SEDCO is an organ under the Ministry of Small and Medium Enterprises and Cooperative Development. It should be noted that this organ had nothing whatever to do with the Operation Garikai/Hlalani Khuhle programme.

  5. These statics and figures were collected during Zimbabwe’s hyperinflation period which normalised in 2009 after the adoption of a multi-currency system.

  6. The Ruwa Housing Waiting List is a list of home seekers in Ruwa. People pay a small amount of money to buy an application form for their names to be listed on the list. One should be a Ruwa resident and should not own any house to be on the Housing List. Whenever there is a housing project for the low-income earners, the council considers the people on the Housing List first to be beneficiaries.

References

  • Bond, P. (2000). Cities of gold, townships of coal: essays on South Africa’s new urban crisis. Asmara: Africa World Press Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, N., & Theodore, N. (2002). Cities and the geographies of “actually existing neoliberalism”. Antipode, 33, 349–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chakaodza, A. M. (1993). Structural adjustment in Zambia and Zimbabwe: reconstructive or deconstructive? London: Third world Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chirisa, I. (2013). Housing and stewardship in peri-urban settlements in Zimbabwe: a case study of Ruwa and Epworth. PhD thesis, Department of Rural and Urban Planning, University of Zimbabwe.

  • Didier, S., & Peyroux, M. M. (2013). The adaptive nature of neoliberalism at the local scale: fifteen years of city improvement districts in Cape Town and Johannesburg. Antipode, 45(1), 121–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dzimiri, P., & Runhare, T. (2012). The human security implications of operation restore order on urban habitation in Zimbabwe. Journal of Human Ecology, 38(3), 191–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedmann, J. (1980). The right to the city. California: University of California Graduate School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. A. (2005). Brief history of neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, D. (2013) The right to the city. Available at http://www.davidharvey.org/media/righttothecity.pdf. Accessed 11 Nov 2014.

  • Jessop, B. (2002). Liberalism, neoliberalism, and urban governance: a state–theoretical perspective. Antipode, 34, 452–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kamete, A. (2001). USAID’s private sector housing programme in urban Zimbabwe: examining the terrain from the terraces. Journal of Environment and Urbanisation, 13(1), 125–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, M. (2015). Public-private partnerships: promise and hype. Washington DC: World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Leigland, J. (2018). Public-private partnership in develo** countries: the emerging evidence base critique. The World Bank Research Observer, 33, 103–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mashonaland Holdings Private Limited (2014). Company profile, Available at http://www.masholdings.co.zw . Accesses 19 Oct 2014.

  • Miraftab, F. (2004). Private-public partnerships: the Trojan horse of neo-liberal development. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 24, 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirowski, P. (2013). Never let a serious crisis go to waste: how neoliberalism survived the financial meltdown. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mlambo, A. S. (1997). The economic structural adjustment programme: the case of Zimbabwe, 1990–1995. Harare: University of Zimbabwe Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moszoro, M. & Krzyzanowska, M. (2011). Implementing public-private partnership in municipalities. available at http://www.iese.edu/research/pdfs/DI-0908-E.pdf. Accessed 2 July 2015.

  • Muzorewa, T. T. (2017). The role of private land developers in urban development in Zimbabwe: the case of Ruwa Town, 1980–2015. PhD thesis, Department of Development Studies, Midlands State University.

  • Muzorewa, T. T., & Nyandoro, M. (2019). Investment by private land developer companies and postcolonial urban growth in Ruwa (Zimbabwe), 1986-2015. Town and Regional Planning, 74, 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noorloos, F., & Klooserboer, M. (2018). Africa’s new cities: the contested future of urbanisation. Urban Studies, 55(6), 1223–1241.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyandoro, M., & Muzorewa, T. T. (2017). Transition from growth point policy to liberal urban development in Zimbabwe: the emergence of Ruwa Town, 1980-1991. The Journal for Transdiciplinary Research in Southern Africa, 13(1), 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parliament of Zimbabwe. (2006). Second report of the portfolio committee on local government on progress made on the operation Garikai/Hlalani Khuhle Programme, first session of the sixth parliament, Harare.

  • Peck, J., & Tickell, A. (2002). Neoliberalizing space. In N. Brenner & N. Theodore (Eds.), Spaces of neoliberalism: urban restructuring in Western Europe and North America. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinson, G., & Journel, M. C. (2016). The neo-liberal city-theory, evidence, debates. Politics, Governance, Territory, 4(2), 137–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potts, D. (2000). Urban unemployment and migration in Africa: evidence from Harare 1985–1994. Development and Change, 31, 879–910.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • RTR (1995). Letter from RLB town engineer to CNM and partners. Ruwa.

  • RTR (1996). USAID/MPCNH private sector housing programme, cost report variation order 1, 6. Ruwa.

  • RTR (2000). Letter to the department of physical planning from B. Saich Land Surveyor.

  • RTR Letter from Garikai Stand Owners Association to the Secretary Ruwa Town Council, 24 September 2009.

  • RTR (2012). Correspondence between the Ruwa Town Council and the Permanent Secretary of the Ministry of National Housing and Social Amenities. Ruwa.

  • Ruwa Town Council (RTC) (2011). Ruwa town council at a glimpse, unpublished report. Ruwa.

  • Tama Consulting Surveyors (1999). Proposed subdivision of the remaining extent of York of Galway Estate, paper prepared for Wentspring Investments.

  • Tasan-Kok, T., & Baeten, G. (2012). Contradictions of neo liberal planning. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Veen, M. (2009). Contracting for better places: a relational analysis of development agreements in urban development projects. Amsterdam: IOS Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ZIMRE Property investments private limited, company profile, available at http://www.zimre.co.zw, retrieved 19 October 2014.

  • Zinyama, T., & Nhema, A. G. (2016). Public-private partnerships: critical review and lessons for Zimbabwe. Public Policy and Administration Research, 5, 39–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terence Tapiwa Muzorewa.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muzorewa, T.T. Public and Private-Led Urban Developments in Post-colonial Zimbabwe: a Comparative Study in Ruwa Town. Urban Forum 31, 197–213 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-020-09386-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12132-020-09386-5

Keywords

Navigation