Log in

Union responses to quality improvement initiatives: Factors sha** support and resistance

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Labor Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We analyze how, between 1989 and 1996, four unions in a Canadian hospital responded to a two-stage quality improvement (QI) initiative comprising a total quality management effort and a reengineering campaign. Results indicate that union leaders' responses to QI were a function of the extent to which the leaders perceived QI as a threat to their vested interests in union survival and protecting members'well being. The evolution of the relationship between QI and union responses, in turn, was shaped by the extent to which the unions and management accommodated each other's vested interests and by the parties' balance of power.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alberta Labour Relations Board. The Labor Relations Code and Staff Nurses Association of Alberta and University Hospital Board. File No. GE-01662, June, 1995.

  • Andrews, Heather A., Lynn M. Cook, Janet M. Davidson, Donald P. Schurman, Eric W. Taylor, and Ronald H. Wendell. Organizational Transformation in Health Care. San Francisco, Calif.. Jossey-Bass, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, Heather A. “Customer Satisfaction: Redesigning Care Delivery.” In Andrews, Heather A., Lynn M. Cook, Janet M. Davidson, Donald P. Schurman, Eric W. Taylor, and Ronald H. Wendell. Organizational Transformation in Health Care. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, 1994, pp. 163–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • —, and Donald P. Schurman. “Empowerment and Decentralization: A Model for Staff Involvement”. In Andrews, Heather A., Lynn M. Cook, Janet M. Davidson, Donald P. Schurman, Eric W. Taylor, and Ronald H. Wendell. Organizational Transformation in Health Care. San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey-Bass, 1994, pp. 71–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • AUPE (Local 054). Self-Directed Work Teams. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1992.

  • Bartunek, J. M. “Changing Interpretive Schemes and Organizational Restructuring: The Example of a Religious Order”. Administrative Science Quarterly 29 (June 1984): 355–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daft, Richard L. and Selwyn W. Becker. Innovation in Organizations: Innovation Adoption in School Organizations. New York: Elsvier, 1978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deming, W. Edwards. Out of the Crisis. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1986.

    Google Scholar 

  • Famsworth, Clyde H. “Budget Cuts Paying Off for Premier of Alberta.” New York Times, January 1, 1995.

  • Fund, John. “Learning from Canada’s Reagan.” Wall Street Journal, February 23, 1995.

  • Grant, Robert, Rami Shani, and R. Krishnan. “TQM’s Challenges to Management Theory and Practice”. Sloan Management Review 35 (Winter 1994): 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hackman, Richard J. and Ruth Wageman. “Total Quality Management: Empirical, Conceptual, and Practical Issues”. Administrative Science Quarterly 40 (June 1995): 309–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Michael and James Champy. Reengineering the Corporation. New York: Harper Business, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammer, Tove H. and Robert N. Stern. “A Yo-Yo Model of Cooperation: Union Participation in Management at the Rath Packing Company”. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 39 (April 1986): 337–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison, Trevor and Gordon Laxer. The Trojan Horse: Alberta and the Future of Canada. Montreal, Quebec: Black Rose, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ishikawa, Kaoru. What Is Total Quality Control? The Japanese Way. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1985.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran, Joseph M. Juran on Planning for Quality. New York: Free Press, 1988.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kizilos, Mark and Yonatan Reshef. “The Effects of Workplace Unionization on Worker Responses to HRM Innovation”. Journal of Labor Research 18 (Fall 1997): 641–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, Thomas A. and Paul Osterman. The Mutual Gains Enterprise: Forging a Winning Partnership Among Labor, Management, and Government. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School, 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kochan, Thomas A. and Lee Dyer. “A Model of Organizational Change in the Context of Union-Management Relations”. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science 12 (January 1976): 59–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, Pradeep. “Canadian Labour’s Response to Work Reorganization”. Economic and Industrial Democracy 16 (1995): 39–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lisac, Mark. The Klein Revolution. Edmonton, AB: NeWest, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacBride-King, Judith. “Prescription for Change: An Interview on Improving Canada’s Health Care System with Donald P. Schurman, President, University of Alberta Hospital”. Canadian Business Review 20 (Summer 1993): 6–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, William Johnson. “A Working Definition for TQM Researchers”. Journal of Quality Management 1 (1996): 149–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montgomerie, Heather. Report of the Cost Survey — C.A.R.E. Model. Edmonton, AB: University of Alberta Hospital, 1993.

    Google Scholar 

  • Murray, Alan I. and Yonatan Reshef. “American Manufacturing Unions’ Stasis: A Paradigmatic Perspective”. Academy of Management Review 13 (October 1988): 615–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nissen, Mark E. “A Focused Review of the Reengineering Literature: Expert Frequently Asked Questions”. Quality Management Journal 3 (1996): 52–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rankin, Tom. New Forms of Work Organization: The Challenges for North American Unions. Toronto, Ont.: University of Toronto Press, 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reger, Rhonda K., Loren T. Gustafson, Samuel M. DeMarie, and John V. Mullane. “Refraining the Organization: Why Implementing Total Quality Is Easier Said than Done?” Academy of Management Review 19 (October 1994): 565–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubinstein, Saul, Michael Bennett, and Thomas Kochan. “The Saturn Partnership: Co-Management and the Reinvention of the Local Union.” In Bruce E. Kaufman and Morris M. Kleiner, eds. Employee Representation. Madison, Wisc.: IRRA, 1993, pp. 339–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, Herman. Kiwi or Not Kiwi: Exporting the New Zealand “Model” to Alberta, Canada. Paper presented at the 1996 American Political Science Association Annual Meeting. San Francisco, August-September, 1996.

  • Schwartz, Herman. “Public Choice Theory and Public Choices: Fiscal Bureaucrats and State Reorganization in Australia, Denmark, New Zealand and Sweden in the 1980s”. Administration and Society 26 (July 1994): 48–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shani, A.B. (Rami) and Yoram Mitki. “Reengineering, Total Quality Management and Sociotechnical Systems Approaches to Organizational Change: Towards an Eclectic Approach?” Journal of Quality Management 1 (1996): 131–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SNAA (Local 1). The Union Perspective on TQM. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1992.

  • Taylor, Laurie and Donald P. Schurman. “Key Organization Processes: One Hospital’s Experience”. Canadian Journal of Quality in Health Care 10 (July 1993): 12–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. “Gurus in Government.” May 20, 1995.

  • UAH. Guiding Philosophy for Human Resources during the Patient Care Design Project. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1993.

  • UAH. Workforce Adjustment Data. Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1996.

  • Unions In Action. “Who Is in Charge of the Store?” Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1994a.

  • Union in Action. “You Can Make a Difference.” Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, 1994b.

  • U.S. General Accounting Office. Workplace Reductions: Downsizing Strategies Used in Selected Organizations. Washington, D.C.: GAO, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Warrian, Peter. The End of Public Sector “Industrial” Relations in Canada? Toronto, Ont.: KPMG Center for Government Foundation, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wever, Kirsten R. “Toward a Structural Account of Union Participation in Management: The Case of Western Airlines”. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 42 (July 1989): 600–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • —. Negotiating Competitiveness: Employment Relations and Organizational Innovation in Germany and the United States. Boston, Mass.: Harvard Business School Press, 1995.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

We are grateful to all those who participated in this study for making it possible. The excellent research assistance of Deanna Chevrier is highly appreciated. We are also indebted to Kay Devine, Joseph Gebran, Francis Lau, and Lloyd Steier for helpful comments on versions of this paper. The research was supported by a NOVA Fellowship, Faculty of Business, University of Alberta.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Reshef, Y., Lam, H. Union responses to quality improvement initiatives: Factors sha** support and resistance. J Labor Res 20, 111–131 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-999-1028-4

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12122-999-1028-4

Keywords

Navigation