Log in

Development and Validation of a Weight Estimation Tool for Acutely Ill Children Who Cannot be Weighed

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To develop and validate weight estimation tools using mid upper arm circumference (MUAC) and body length, and determine accuracy and precision of Broselow tape in children 6 mo to 15 y of age.

Methods

Data of 18,456 children aged 6 mo to 5 y and 1420 children aged 5 to 15 y were used to develop linear regression equations using length and MUAC to estimate weight. These were validated on prospectively enrolled populations of 276 and 312 children, respectively. Accuracy was measured by Bland-Altman bias, median percentage errors, and percentage of predicted weight within 10% of true weight. Broselow tape was tested on the validation population.

Results

Gender specific equations were developed which estimated weight within 10% of true weight in 69.9% (64.1–75.2%) and 65.7% (60.1–70.9%) of children aged 6 mo to 5 y, and 5 to 15 y, respectively. Broselow tape predicted weight within 10% of the true weight in 40.5% (34.7–46.6%) and 32.5% (26.7–38.7%) of children aged 6 mo to 5 y and 5 to 15 y, respectively.

Conclusions

The model developed from MUAC and length accurately estimated weight in children aged 6 mo to 15 y, and is potentially useful during emergencies. The Broselow tape frequently overestimated weight in authors’ setting.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Greig A, Ryan J, Glucksman E. How good are doctors at estimating children’s weight? Emerg Med J. 1997;14:101–3.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lim CAE, Kaufman BJ, O’Connor J, Cunningham SJ. Accuracy of weight estimates in pediatric patients by prehospital Emergency Medical Services personnel. Am J Emerg Med. 2013;31:1108–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Uesugi T, Okada N, Sakai K, Nishina K, Mikawa K, Shiga M. Accuracy of visual estimation of body height and weight in supine paediatric patients. Pediatr Anesth. 2002;12:489–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Partridge RL, Abramo TJ, Haggarty KA, et al. Analysis of parental and nurse weight estimates of children in the pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2009;25:816–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Nosaka N, Fujiwara T, Knaup E, Okada A, Tsukahara H. Validity of mothers’ reports of children’s weight in Japan. Acta Med Okayama. 2016;70:255–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Krieser D, Nguyen K, Kerr D, Jolley D, Clooney M, Kelly A-M. Parental weight estimation of their child’s weight is more accurate than other weight estimation methods for determining children’s weight in an emergency department? Emerg Med J. 2007;24:756–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Luscombe MD, Owens BD, Burke D. Weight estimation in paediatrics: a comparison of the APLS formula and the formula “Weight = 3(age) + 7. Emerg Med J. 2011;28:590–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Nguyen K, Krieser D, Kerr D, Jolley D, Clooney M, Kelly A-M. Failed validation of the argall weight formula for estimating children’s weight in an australian emergency department. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14:486–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wells M, Goldstein LN, Bentley A. It is time to abandon age-based emergency weight estimation in children! A failed validation of 20 different age-based formulas. Resuscitation. 2017;116:73–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Geduld H, Hodkinson PW, Wallis LA. Validation of weight estimation by age and length based methods in the Western Cape, South Africa population. Emerg Med J. 2011;28:856–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. House DR, Ngetich E, Vreeman RC, Rusyniak DE. Estimating the weight of children in Kenya: do the Broselow tape and age-based formulas measure up? Ann Emerg Med. 2013;61:1–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Loo PY, Chong S-L, Lek N, Bautista D, Ng KC. Evaluation of three paediatric weight estimation methods in Singapore: paediatric weight estimation methods. J Paediatr Child Health. 2013;49:E311–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pukar KC, Jha A, Ghimire K, Shrestha R, Shrestha AP. Accuracy of Broselow tape in estimating the weight of the child for management of pediatric emergencies in nepalese population. Int J Emerg Med. 2020;13:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sinha M, Lezine MW, Frechette A, Foster KN. Weighing the pediatric patient during trauma resuscitation and its concordance with estimated weight using Broselow Luten emergency tape. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2012;28:544–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Khouli M, Ortiz MI, Romo-Hernández G, Martínez-Licona D, Stelzner SM. Use of the Broselow tape in a mexican Emergency Department. J Emerg Med. 2015;48:660–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Iloh ON, Edelu B, Iloh KK, et al. Weight estimation in paediatrics: how accurate is the broselow-tape weight estimation in the nigerian child. Ital J Pediatr. 2019;45:146.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ramarajan N, Krishnamoorthi R, Strehlow M, Quinn J, Mahadevan SV. Internationalizing the Broselow tape: how reliable is weight estimation in indian children. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:431–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Wells M. A validation of the PAWPER XL-MAC tape for total body weight estimation in preschool children from low- and middle-income countries. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0210332.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Abdel-Rahman SM, Ahlers N, Holmes A, et al. Validation of an improved pediatric weight estimation strategy. J Pediatr Pharmacol Therap. 2013;18:112–21.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Abdel-Rahman SM, Paul IM, James LP, Lewandowski A. Evaluation of the mercy TAPE: performance against the standard for pediatric weight estimation. Ann Emerg Med. 2013;62:332–9. .e6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Batmanabane G, Jena PK, Dikshit R, Abdel-Rahman S. Using the mercy method for weight estimation in indian children. Glob Pediatr Health. 2015;2:2333794X14566625.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. de Onis M, Onyango AW, Van den Broeck J, Chumlea WC, Martorell R. Measurement and standardization protocols for anthropometry used in the construction of a new international growth reference. Food Nutr Bull. 2004;25:27–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Indian Academy of Pediatrics (IAP). IAP Growth Charts [Internet]. Available at: https://iapindia.org/iap-growth-charts/. Accessed on 11th Feb 2023.

  24. World Health Organization. Training Course on Child Growth Assessment, 2008. Available at: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241595070. Accessed on 14th June 2018.

  25. Kapil U, Pandey R, Bansal R, et al. Mid-upper arm circumference in detection of weight-for-height Z -score below – 3 in children aged 6–59 months. Public Health Nutr. 2018;21:1794–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Lodha R, Mukherjee A, Singh V, et al. Effect of micronutrient supplementation on treatment outcomes in children with intrathoracic tuberculosis: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Clin Nutr. 2014;100:1287–97.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Ralston ME, Myatt MA. Weight estimation for children aged 6 to 59 months in limited-resource settings: a proposal for a tape using height and mid-upper arm circumference. PLoS ONE. 2018;13:e0197769.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Shah V, Bavdekar SB. Validity of Broselow tape for estimating weight of indian children. Indian J Med Res. 2017;145:339–46.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Luten R, Zaritsky A. The sophistication of simplicity. optimizing Emerg dosing Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15:461–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Satya Prakash, Dr. M. Aakash, Dr. Chinthana L. and Dr. Umang Bhardwaj (Department of Pediatrics, AIIMS, New Delhi) for their valuable inputs.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

KS and RL were involved in study concept and design, analysis and interpretation of data and drafting of the manuscript; KS, RL and UK helped in acquisition of the data; RMP provided statistical expertise; SKK and JS were involved in critical revision of the manuscript. RL will act as guarantor for this manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rakesh Lodha.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Setlur, K., Sankar, J., Kapil, U. et al. Development and Validation of a Weight Estimation Tool for Acutely Ill Children Who Cannot be Weighed. Indian J Pediatr 91, 344–350 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-023-04600-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-023-04600-1

Keywords

Navigation