Log in

Feasibility and Efficacy of Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis in Critically Ill Children with Severe Acute Kidney Injury

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Pediatrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To examine the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of sustained low-efficiency dialysis (SLED) in hemodynamically unstable, critically ill children.

Methods

Critically ill patients, 1–18 y old with hemodynamic instability (≥ 1 vasoactive drugs) and severe acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring kidney replacement therapy (KRT) in a tertiary care pediatric intensive care unit were prospectively enrolled. Patients weighing ≤ 8 kg or with mean arterial pressure < 5th percentile despite > 3 vasoactive drugs, were excluded. Patients underwent SLED until hemodynamically stable and off vasoactive drugs, or lack of need for dialysis. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients in whom the first session of SLED was initiated within 12 h of its indication and completed without premature (< 6 h) termination. Efficacy was estimated by ultrafiltration, urea reduction ratio (URR), and equilibrated Kt/V. Other outcomes included: changes in hemodynamic scores, circuit clotting, adverse events, and changes in indices on point-of-care ultrasonography and echocardiography.

Results

Between November 2018 and March 2020, 18 patients with median age 8.6 y and vasopressor dependency index of 83.2, underwent 41 sessions of SLED. In 16 patients, SLED was feasible within 12 h of indication. No session was terminated prematurely. Ultrafiltration achieved was 4.0 ± 2.2 mL/kg/h, while URR was 57.7 ± 16.2% and eKt/V 1.17 ± 0.56. Hemodynamic scores did not change significantly. Asymptomatic hypokalemia was the chief adverse effect. Sessions were associated with a significant improvement in indices on ultrasound and left ventricular function. Fourteen patients died.

Conclusions

SLED is feasible, safe, and effective in enabling KRT in hemodynamically unstable children with severe AKI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mehta P, Sinha A, Sami A, et al. Incidence of acute kidney injury in hospitalized children. Indian Pediatr. 2012;49:537–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Roy JP, Devarajan P. Acute kidney injury: diagnosis and management. Indian J Pediatr. 2020;87:600–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sethi SK, Mittal A, Nair N, et al. Pediatric Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy (PCRRT) expert committee recommendation on prescribing prolonged intermittent renal replacement therapy (PIRRT) in critically ill children. Hemodial Int. 2020;24:237–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee CY, Yeh HC, Lin CY. Treatment of critically ill children with kidney injury by sustained low-efficiency daily diafiltration. Pediatr Nephrol. 2012;27:2301–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Sethi SK, Bansal SB, Khare A, et al. Heparin free dialysis in critically sick children using sustained low efficiency dialysis (SLEDD-f): A new hybrid therapy for dialysis in develo** world. PLOS One. 2018;13:e0195536.

  6. Sethi SK, Sinha R, Jha P, et al. Feasibility of sustained low efficiency dialysis in critically sick pediatric patients: A multicentric retrospective study. Hemodial Int. 2018;22:228–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marshall MR, Ma T, Galler D, Rankin AP, Williams AB. Sustained low-efficiency daily diafiltration (SLEDD-f) for critically ill patients requiring renal replacement therapy: towards an adequate therapy. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2004;19:877–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Abe M, Okada K, Suzuki M, et al. Comparison of sustained hemodiafiltration with continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration for the treatment of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Artif Organs. 2010;34:331–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Abe M, Maruyama N, Matsumoto S, et al. Comparison of sustained hemodiafiltration with acetate-free dialysate and continuous venovenous hemodiafiltration for the treatment of critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Int J Nephrol. 2011;2011:432094.

  10. Basu RK, Zappitelli M, Brunner L, et al. Derivation and validation of the renal angina index to improve the prediction of acute kidney injury in critically ill children. Kidney Int. 2014;85:659–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Davis AL, Carcillo JA, Aneja RK, et al. American college of critical care medicine clinical practice parameters for hemodynamic support of pediatric and neonatal septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2017;45:1061–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singer M, Deutschman CS, Seymour CW, et al. The third international consensus definitions for sepsis and septic shock (Sepsis-3). JAMA. 2016;315:801–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Bouchard J, Soroko SB, Chertow GM, et al. Program to Improve Care in Acute Renal Disease (PICARD) Study Group. Fluid accumulation, survival and recovery of kidney function in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. Kidney Int. 2009;76:422–7.

  14. Gaudry S, Hajage D, Schortgen F, et al. AKIKI Study Group. Initiation strategies for renal-replacement therapy in the intensive care unit. N Engl J Med. 2016;375:122–33.

  15. Lobo V. Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis (SLED) and Hybrid Therapies in Children. In: Deep A, Goldstein SL, editors. Critical Care Nephrology and Renal Replacement Therapy in Children. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2018. p. 291–306.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Kramer H, Yee J, Weiner DE, et al. Ultrafiltration rate thresholds in maintenance hemodialysis: An NKF-KDOQI controversies report. Am J Kidney Dis. 2016;68:522–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mushatt DM, Mihm LB, Dreisbach AW, Simon EE. Antibiotic dosing in slow extended daily dialysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49:433–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schwartz GJ, Muñoz A, Schneider MF, et al. New equations to estimate GFR in children with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20:629–37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Tattersall JE, DeTakats D, Chamney P, Greenwood RN, Farrington K. The post-hemodialysis rebound: predicting and quantifying its effect on Kt/V. Kidney Int. 1996;50:2094–102.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Daugirdas JT. Physiologic principles and urea kinetic modeling. In: Daugirdas JT, Blake PG, Ing TS, editors. Handbook of dialysis, Fifth Edition. Philadelphia, PA:Wolters Kluwer Health; 2015;34–65.

  21. Mishra SB, Azim A, Prasad N, et al. A pilot randomized controlled trial of comparison between extended daily hemodialysis and continuous veno-venous hemodialysis in patients of acute kidney injury with septic shock. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2017;21:262–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Chacko J, Brar G. Bedside ultrasonography: Applications in critical care: Part I. Indian J Crit Care Med. 2014;18:301–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Furtado S, Reis L. Inferior vena cava evaluation in fluid therapy decision making in intensive care: practical implications. Rev Bras Ter Intensiva. 2019;31:240–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Ostermann M, Bellomo R, Burdmann EA, et al. Controversies in acute kidney injury: conclusions from a kidney disease: improving global outcomes (KDIGO) conference. Kidney Int. 2020;98:294–309.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Kellum JA, Lameire N. KDIGO AKI Guideline Work Group. Diagnosis, evaluation, and management of acute kidney injury: a KDIGO summary (Part 1). Crit Care. 2013;17:204.

  26. WHO. Application tools: WHO AnthroPlus software. Available at: http://www.who.int/growthref/tools/en/. Accessed on 11 Nov 2021.

  27. Zhang L, Yang J, Eastwood GM, Zhu G, Tanaka A, Bellomo R. Extended daily dialysis versus continuous renal replacement therapy for acute kidney injury: a meta-analysis. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66:322–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nash DM, Przech S, Wald R, O’Reilly D. Systematic review and meta-analysis of renal replacement therapy modalities for acute kidney injury in the intensive care unit. J Crit Care. 2017;41:138–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Ali US, Arya MK. Efficacy and safety of prolonged daily hemodialysis in critically ill children weighing less than 10 kg. Hemodial Int. 2020;24:108–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Messmer AS, Zingg C, Müller M, Gerber JL, Schefold JC, Pfortmueller CA. Fluid overload and mortality in adult critical care patients-a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Crit Care Med. 2020;48:1862–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang L, Chen Z, Diao Y, Yang Y, Fu P. Associations of fluid overload with mortality and kidney recovery in patients with acute kidney injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2015;30:860.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. VA/NIH Acute Renal Failure Trial Network, Palevsky PM, Zhang JH, O’Connor TZ, et al. Intensity of renal support in critically ill patients with acute kidney injury. N Engl J Med. 2008;359:7–20.

  33. Douvris A, Malhi G, Hiremath S, et al. Interventions to prevent hemodynamic instability during renal replacement therapy in critically ill patients: a systematic review. Crit Care. 2018;22:41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors acknowledge the commitment and support of the nursing staff of pediatric hemodialysis and intensive care units.

Funding

The Indian Council of Medical Research provided funding to the Advanced Center for Research in Pediatric Kidney Diseases, Division of Nephrology, Department of Pediatrics, AIIMS [5/7/1090/2013-RHN].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

MY made substantial contribution to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of data and drafted the manuscript; ANT and PK helped in clinical work; ANT supervised dialysis sessions; AS, PH, JS, RL, and AB made substantial contributions to the conception and design of the work; revised the work critically for important intellectual content. AB will act as the guarantor for this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aditi Sinha.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

Institute Ethics Committee, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Ansari Nagar, New Delhi; IECPG-465/27.09.2018, RT-12/18.10.2018/RT-5/14.11.2018.

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yadav, M., Tiwari, A.N., Lodha, R. et al. Feasibility and Efficacy of Sustained Low-Efficiency Dialysis in Critically Ill Children with Severe Acute Kidney Injury. Indian J Pediatr 90, 355–361 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-022-04214-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-022-04214-z

Keywords

Navigation