Log in

Network lifetime optimization and route selection strategy towards energy enrichment in wireless body area networks

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Medical breakthroughs are currently being made to widen human beings' existence. For the vast majority of online medical care applications, Wireless Body Area Networks (WBANs) have emerged as an intriguing and important invention. Route loss and obstacles in offering essential information are significant criteria that drain power from the battery source and impair battery lifespan. By employing Optimal K-Means Clustering (OKMC), all body sensor nodes are positioned in tandem to construct cluster head selection. This research explores a novel metaheuristic method for strengthening network lifetime optimization and a sophisticated route selection strategy incorporating the Energy Enrichment Multi-Hop Routing (EEMR) protocol. The EEMR is intended to operate in a pair of phases. The Enhanced Flower Bee Optimisation Algorithm (EFBOA) is laid out as the initial phase, with the key objective of augmenting the network lifetime of the WBAN by laying down a network of clusters. The next phase employs Dynamic Local Hunting and Location Discarding (DLH-LD) to figure out the fastest route among all possible paths. The results of this analysis are validated and implemented in real-time using MATLAB and the Network Simulator. Various protocols, such as Mobility-supporting Adaptive Threshold-based Thermal-aware Energy-efficient Multi-hop Protocol (M-ATTEMPT), Even Energy Utilization Convention Routing (EECR), and Energy Mindful Posterior Routing (EMPR), are being compared to parameters such as path loss, throughput rate, energy consumption, cost estimation, and network lifetime. The outcomes revealed that, in comparison with conventional approaches, the suggested EEMR performs substantially better than existing routing protocols, spanning a range of performance indicators. Additionally, the research and simulation findings show that the suggested protocol is 30% more energy efficient than existing protocols, extending the life of the network. The numerical results exhibit an extensive performance enhancement of 95% in network throughput rate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and material

Not Applicable.

Code availability

Not Applicable.

References

  1. Amjad O, Bedeer E, Ikki S (2019) Energy-efficiency maximization of self-sustained wireless body area sensor networks. IEEE Sens Lett 3(12):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2019.2946851. Art no. 7501204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Arafat MY, Pan S, Bak E (2023) distributed energy-efficient clustering and routing for wearable IoT enabled wireless body area networks. IEEE Access 11:5047–5061. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2023.3236403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yang X, Wang L, Zhang Z (2018) Wireless Body Area Networks MAC protocol for energy efficiency and extending lifetime. IEEE Sens Lett 2(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1109/LSENS.2018.2795566. Art no. 7500404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hu J, Xu G, Hu L, Li S, **ng Y (2023) An Adaptive Energy Efficient MAC Protocol for RF Energy Harvesting WBANs. IEEE Trans Commun 71(1):473–484. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOMM.2022.3222872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wu D, Yang B, Wang H, Wu D, Wang R (2016) An energy-efficient data forwarding strategy for heterogeneous WBANs. IEEE Access 4:7251–7261. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2016.2611820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Olatinwo DD, Abu-Mahfouz AM, Hancke GP (2022) Energy-Aware Hybrid MAC Protocol for IoT Enabled WBAN Systems. IEEE Sens J 22(3):2685–2699. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3133461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Amjad O, Bedeer E, Abu Ali N, Ikki S (2020) Robust energy efficiency optimization algorithm for health monitoring system with wireless body area networks. IEEE Commun Lett 24(5):1142–1145. https://doi.org/10.1109/LCOMM.2020.2971493

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ibarra E, Antonopoulos A, Kartsakli E, Rodrigues JJPC, Verikoukis C (2016) QoS-aware energy management in body sensor nodes powered by human energy harvesting. IEEE Sens J 16(2):542–549. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2015.2483064

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mosavat-Jahromi H, Maham B, Tsiftsis TA (2017) Maximizing spectral efficiency for energy harvesting-aware WBAN. IEEE J Biomed Health Inform 21(3):732–742. https://doi.org/10.1109/JBHI.2016.2536642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Samarji N, Salamah M (2021) ERQTM: Energy-Efficient Routing and QoS-Supported Traffic Management Scheme for SDWBANs. IEEE Sens J 21(14):16328–16339. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2021.3075241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu Z, Liu B, Chen CW (2017) Buffer-aware resource allocation scheme with energy efficiency and QoS effectiveness in wireless body area networks. IEEE Access 5:20763–20776. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2017.2758348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ullah Z, Ahmed I, Ali T, Ahmad N, Niaz F, Cao Y (2019) Robust and efficient energy harvested-aware routing protocol with clustering approach in body area networks. IEEE Access 7:33906–33921. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2904322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singla R, Kaur N, Koundal D, Lashari SA, Bhatia S, Imam Rahmani MK (2021) Optimized energy efficient secure routing protocol for wireless body area network. IEEE Access 9:116745–116759. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3105600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng H, Tian Y, Kurths J, Li L, Yang Y, Wang D (2017) Secure and energy-efficient data transmission system based on chaotic compressive sensing in body-to-body networks. IEEE Trans Biomed Circuits Syst 11(3):558–573. https://doi.org/10.1109/TBCAS.2017.2665659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Deepak KS, Babu AV (2016) Energy efficiency analysis of IEEE 802.15.6 based wireless body area networks in scheduled access mode. Wireless Netw 22:1441–1459. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-015-1041-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yang G, Wu XW, Li Y et al (2020) Energy efficient protocol for routing and scheduling in wireless body area networks. Wireless Netw 26:1265–1273. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-019-02150-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rasheed MB, Javaid N, Imran M et al (2017) Delay and energy consumption analysis of priority guaranteed MAC protocol for wireless body area networks. Wireless Netw 23:1249–1266. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11276-016-1199-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hayajneh T, Griggs K, Imran M et al (2019) Secure and efficient data delivery for fog-assisted wireless body area networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 12:1289–1307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-018-0705-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Mansura A, Drieberg M, Aziz AA et al (2022) An energy balanced and nodes aware routing protocol for energy harvesting wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw Appl 15:1255–1280. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-022-01292-w

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Moosavi H, Bui FM (2016) Delay-aware optimization of physical layer security in multi-hop wireless body area networks. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 11(9):1928–1939. https://doi.org/10.1109/TIFS.2016.2566446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu H, Hu F, Qu S, Li Z, Li D (2019) Multipoint wireless information and power transfer to maximize sum-throughput in WBAN with energy harvesting. IEEE Internet Things J 6(4):7069–7078. https://doi.org/10.1109/JIOT.2019.2914147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Taleb H, Nasser A, Andrieux G, Charara N, Cruz EM (2022) Energy consumption improvement of a healthcare monitoring system: application to LoRaWAN. IEEE Sens J 22(7):7288–7299. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSEN.2022.3150716

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Otaibi S, Al-Rasheed A, Mansour RF, Yang E, Joshi GP, Cho W (2021) Hybridization of metaheuristic algorithm for dynamic cluster-based routing protocol in wireless sensor networksx. IEEE Access 9:83751–83761. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3087602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ali H, Tariq UU, Hussain M, Lu L, Panneerselvam J, Zhai X (2021) ARSH-FATI: A novel metaheuristic for cluster head selection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Syst J 15(2):2386–2397. https://doi.org/10.1109/JSYST.2020.2986811

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shokouhifar M (2021) FH-ACO: Fuzzy heuristic-based ant colony optimization for joint virtual network function placement and routing. Appl Soft Comput 107:107401. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107401. ISSN 1568–4946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Aryai P, Khademzadeh A, Jassbi SJ, Hosseinzadeh M, Hashemzadeh O, Shokouhifar M (2023) Real-time health monitoring in WBANs using hybrid Metaheuristic-Driven Machine Learning Routing Protocol (MDML-RP). AEU - Int J Electron Commun 168:154723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aeue.2023.154723. ISSN 1434 8411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Esmaeili H, Bidgoli BM, Hakami V (2022) CMML: Combined metaheuristic-machine learning for adaptable routing in clustered wireless sensor networks. Appl Soft Comput 118:108477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2022.108477. ISSN 1568-4946

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Fanian F, Rafsanjani MK (2023) CFMCRS: Calibration fuzzy- metaheuristic clustering routing scheme simultaneous in on-demand WRSNs for sustainable smart city. Expert Syst Appl 211:118619. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2022.118619. ISSN 0957 4174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Zhao W, Wang L, Zhang Z, Fan H, Zhang J, Mirjalili S, Khodadadi N, Cao Q (2024) Electric eel foraging optimization: A new bio-inspired optimizer for engineering applications. Expert Syst Appl 238(Part F):122200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.122200. ISSN 0957 4174

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to this research work. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by [R.Pradeep] and [Dr.G.Kavitha]. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to R. Pradeep.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The submitted work is original and it is not published elsewhere in any form or language.

Consent to publish

I/We give our consent for the publication of identifiable details, which can include photograph(s) and/or videos and/or details within the text (“Material”) to be published in the in the Journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pradeep, R., Kavithaa, G. Network lifetime optimization and route selection strategy towards energy enrichment in wireless body area networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 17, 1158–1168 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-023-01612-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-023-01612-8

Keywords

Navigation