Log in

Postoperative Outcomes Following KTP-532 LASER Versus Coblation Assisted Paediatric Tonsillectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Otolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to compare postoperative outcomes such as pain, healing of tonsillar fossa and return to normal diet following KTP-532 LASER versus Coblation assisted tonsillectomy. Methods: A prospective randomised clinical study was conducted over a 24-month period at a tertiary referral centre. Children aged 3–16 years underwent KTP-532 LASER assisted versus Coblation assisted tonsillectomy. A total of 60 children were randomly allocated into two groups–Group A underwent KTP-532 LASER assisted tonsillectomy, and Group B underwent Coblation assisted tonsillectomy (n = 30 in each). Postoperative pain and tonsillar fossa slough formation was evaluated on postoperative day 0, 1, 7, 14 and 28, and average duration taken to resume regular diet. Result: There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative pain between the two groups. There was significantly lesser slough formation in Group B on 1st postoperative day (p < 0.000), 7th postoperative day (p < 0.014), and 14th postoperative day (p < 0.010) when compared with Group A. Complete mucosalisation was achieved significantly earlier in Group B when compared to Group A (p < 0.01). Average duration for resumption of normal diet was 13.5 days for Group A and 12.6 days for Group B postoperatively, which was statistically insignificant (p < 0.830). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in postoperative pain between the two groups. Postoperative slough formation was significantly lesser and tonsillar fossa mucosalisation was faster in Group B. There was no statistical difference in time taken to resume normal diet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Younis RT, Lazar RH (2002) History and current practice of tonsillectomy. Laryngoscope 112:3–5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Walner DL, Parker NP, Miller RP (2007) Past and present instrument use in pediatric adenotonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Neck Surg 137:49–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Júnior JFN, Hermann DR, dos Reis Américo R et al (2006) A brief history of tonsillectomy. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol 10(4):314–317

    Google Scholar 

  4. Temple RH, Timms MS (2001) Paediatric coblation tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 61:195–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Wong DL, Baker CM (1988) Pain in children: comparison of assessment scales. Pediatr Nurs 14:9–17

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Downie WW, Leatham PA, Rhind VM et al (1978) Studies with pain rating scales. Ann Rheum Dis 37:378

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Isaacson G (2012) Tonsillectomy care for the pediatrician. Pediatrics 130:324–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ahmed J, Arya A (2021) Lasers in Tonsillectomy: revisited with systematic review  Ear Nose Throat J 100:14S-18S. https://doi.org/10.1177/0145561320961747

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Verma R, Verma RR, Verma RR (2017) Tonsillectomy-comparative study of various techniques and changing trend. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 69:549–558

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Davidoss NH, Eikelboom R, Friedland PL, Santa Maria PL (2018) Wound healing after tonsillectomy—a review of the literature. J Laryngol Otol 132:764–770. https://doi.org/10.1017/S002221511800155X

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Babademez MA, Yurekli MF, Acar B, Günbey E (2011) Comparison of radiofrequency ablation, laser and coblator techniques in reduction of tonsil size. Acta Otolaryngol 131:750–756. https://doi.org/10.3109/00016489.2011.553244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Belloso A, Chidambaram A, Morar P, Timms MS (2003) Coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy: postoperative hemorrhage. Laryngoscope 113:2010–2013

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Mitic S, Tvinnereim M, Lie E, Šaltytė BJ (2007) A pilot randomized controlled trial of coblation tonsillectomy versus dissection tonsillectomy with bipolar diathermy haemostasis. Clin Otolaryngol 32:261–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hegazy HM, Albirmawy OA, Kaka AH, Behiry AS (2008) Pilot comparison between potassium titanyl phosphate laser and bipolar radiofrequency in paediatric tonsillectomy. J Laryngol Otol 122:369–373

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Magdy EA, Elwany S, El-Daly AS et al (2008) Coblation tonsillectomy: a prospective, double-blind, randomised, clinical and histopathological comparison with dissection–ligation, monopolar electrocautery and laser tonsillectomies. J Laryngol Otol 122:282–290

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ansari MA, Erfanzadeh M, Mohajerani E (2013) Mechanisms of laser-tissue interaction: II. Tissue thermal properties. J lasers Med Sci 4:99

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Subasi B, Oghan F, Tasli H et al (2020) Comparison of three tonsillectomy techniques in children. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405-020-06299-8. Eur Arch Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

  18. Polites N, Joniau S, Wabnitz D et al (2006) Postoperative pain following coblation tonsillectomy: randomized clinical trial. ANZ J Surg 76:226–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Philpott CM, Wild DC, Mehta D et al (2005) A double-blinded randomized controlled trial of coblation versus conventional dissection tonsillectomy on post‐operative symptoms. Clin Otolaryngol 30:143–148

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Urvashi Singh.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, U., Arunachalam, R. Postoperative Outcomes Following KTP-532 LASER Versus Coblation Assisted Paediatric Tonsillectomy. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 75, 880–885 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03271-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12070-022-03271-2

Keywords

Navigation