Log in

Expanding treatment horizons: transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement in bridging to heart transplant

  • Case report
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Transcatheter mitral valve (MV) replacement is an option in complex MV disease with potentially more predictable treatment outcomes and less invasiveness that increases the treatment spectrum to high-risk or non-surgical patients. We present an interesting case of failed MV bioprosthesis who presented with progressively worsening heart failure for heart transplant evaluation, but was successfully managed with transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement (TMViVR). This case illustrates the pivotal role of TMViVR utilization in addressing complex cardiac scenarios, particularly when re-operative surgical MV replacement poses a high risk and also bridging the gap between the present and future heart transplantation preparations by paving the way for a well-prepared patient in the subsequent phase. The lifetime disease management and patient-centric approach with meticulous risk assessment reinforces the importance of shared decision-making in complex cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Eleid MF, Whisenant BK, Cabalka AK, Williams MR, Nejjari M, Attias D, et al. Early outcomes of percutaneous transvenous transseptal transcatheter valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic mitral valves, ring annuloplasty, and severe mitral annular calcification. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2017;10:1932–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Yoon SH, Whisenant BK, Bleiziffer S, Delgado V, Schofer N, Eschenbach L, et al. Transcatheter mitral valve replacement for degenerated bioprosthetic valves and failed annuloplasty rings. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017;70:1121–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Côté N, Pibarot P, Clavel MA. Incidence, risk factors, clinical impact, and management of bioprosthesis structural valve degeneration. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017;32:123–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/HCO.0000000000000372.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Mehaffey HJ, Hawkins RB, Schubert S. Contemporary outcomes in reoperative mitral valve surgery. Heart. 2018;104:652–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/heartjnl-2017-312047.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sengupta A, Yazdchi F, Alexis S, Percy E, Premkumar A, Hirji S, et al. Reoperative mitral surgery versus transcatheter mitral valve replacement: a systematic review. J Am Heart Assoc. 2021;10: e019854. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.019854.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dvir D, Webb JG, Bleiziffer S, Pasic M, Waksman R, Kodali S, et al. Investigators for the V‐VIDR. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation in failed bioprosthetic surgical valves. JAMA. 2014;312:162–170. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.7246.

  7. Schäfer U, Bader R, Frerker C, Schewel D, Thielsen T, Schmoeckel M, et al. Balloon-expandable valves for degenerated mitral xenografts or failing surgical rings. EuroIntervention. 2014;10:260–8. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV10I2A42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kamioka N, Babaliaros V, Morse MA. Comparison of clinical and echocardiographic outcomes after surgical redo mitral valve replacement and transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve therapy. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11:1131–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Watkins SC, Williamson K, Davidson M, Donahue BS. Long-term mortality associated with acute kidney injury in children following congenital cardiac surgery. Paediatr Anaesth. 2014;24:919–26. https://doi.org/10.1111/pan.12419.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Simard T, Lloyd J, Crestanello J. Five-year outcomes of transcatheter mitral valve implantation and redo surgery for mitral prosthesis degeneration. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;99:1659–65. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.30059.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kishore Gupta.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Informed consent

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for the publication of this case report and its accompanying images.

Statement of human and animal rights

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chag, M., Gupta, K., Shah, D. et al. Expanding treatment horizons: transcatheter mitral valve-in-valve replacement in bridging to heart transplant. Indian J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 40, 479–483 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-023-01680-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12055-023-01680-8

Keywords

Navigation