Log in

An empirical investigation based quality of service aware transmission power prediction in low power networks

  • Published:
Sādhanā Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In low-energy networks, energy consumption is a significant concern. The adjustment of transmission power can save considerable energy at nodes during communication. The commonly used power control schemes maintain the transmission power based on the received signal strength indicator (RSSI) that depends on the interference in the environment. It is necessary to consider interference for retaining the lowest transmission power since low-energy network signals are vulnerable to interference changes. The earlier investigations suggested only linear models for power prediction in low-power networks. Hence, this paper investigates a classification-based transmission power prediction approach with the presence of interference. The approach works for linear and non-linear models based on RSSI, link quality indicator, neighbour node distance, and receiver power to maintain reliable communication with low energy consumption. The experiments were conducted in natural environments with common interference causes such as the human body, concrete walls, trees, and metallic bodies. The performance of the approach is analyzed with different prediction algorithms such as regression and classification. The investigation results demonstrate that it is possible to build a classification-based power prediction for linear and non-linear models by considering different spatial effects with 99% accuracy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hanumanthaiah Aravind, Arjun D and Liya M L, Arun Chandni and Gopinath Athira 2019 Integrated cloud based smart home with automation and remote controllability. IEEE International Conference on Communication and Electronics Systems (ICCES) 1908–1912

  2. Prabha Rekha, Sinitambirivoutin Emrick, Passelaigue Florian Ramesh and Maneesha Vinodini 2018 Design and development of an IoT based smart irrigation and fertilization system for chilli farming. IEEE International Conference on Wireless Communications, Signal Processing and Networking (WiSPNET) 1–7

  3. Malar A Christy Jeba, Kowsigan M, Krishnamoorthy N, Karthick S, Prabhu E and Venkatachalam K 2020 Multi constraints applied energy efficient routing technique based on ant colony optimization used for disaster resilient location detection in mobile ad-hoc network. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing, Springer 1–11

  4. Alsharif M H, Kim S and Kuruolu N 2019 Energy harvesting techniques for wireless sensor networks/radio-frequency identification: A review. Symmetry 11: 865

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Natarajan A, De Silva B, Yap K K and Motani M 2009 September. Link layer behavior of body area networks at 2.4 ghz. In: Proceedings of the 15th annual international conference on Mobile computing and networking, pp. 241–252

  6. Mathi S, Nivetha R, Priyadharshini B and Padma S 2017 A certificateless public key encryption based return routability protocol for next-generation IP mobility to enhance signalling security and reduce latency. Saādhanaā, 42(12): 1987–1996

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Alippi C, Anastasi G, Di Francesco M and Roveri M 2009 Energy management in wireless sensor networks with energy-hungry sensors. IEEE Instrumentation & Measurement Magazine 12: 16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Niewiadomska-Szynkiewicz E and Sikora A 2019 Performance Analysis of Energy Conservation Techniques for Wireless Sensor Networks. In: 2019 International Conference on Military Communications and Information Systems (ICMCIS), IEEE, pp. 1–6

  9. Vidhya S S and Mathi S 2018 Investigation of next generation internet protocol mobility-assisted solutions for low power and lossy networks. Procedia computer science 143: 349–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Amgoth T and Jana P K 2015 Energy-aware routing algorithm for wireless sensor networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering 41: 357–367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sajwan M, Gosain D and Sharma A K 2018 Hybrid energy-efficient multi-path routing for wireless sensor networks. Computers & Electrical Engineering 67: 96–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ogundile O O and Alfa A S 2017 A survey on an energy-efficient and energy-balanced routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Sensors 17: 1084

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Carrano R C, Passos D, Magalhaes L C and Albuquerque C V 2013 Survey and taxonomy of duty cycling mechanisms in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 16: 181–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Molisch A F, Balakrishnan K, Dajana Cassioli, Chong C C, Emami S, Fort A, Karedal J, Kunisch J, Schantz, H, Schuster U and Siwiak K 2004 IEEE 802.15. 4a channel model-final report. IEEE P802 15: 0662

  15. ** S, Fu J and Xu L 2012 The transmission power control method for wireless sensor networks based on LQI and RSSI. In: Asian Simulation Conference pp, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp. 37–44

  16. Fu Y, Sha M, Hackmann G and Lu C 2012 Practical control of transmission power for wireless sensor networks. In: 2012 20th IEEE International Conference on Network Protocols (ICNP), pp. 1–10

  17. Lee W S, Choi M and Kim N 2012 Experimental link channel characteristics in wireless body sensor systems. In: The International Conference on Information Network 2012, IEEE, pp. 374–378

  18. Ko J and Terzis A 2010 Power control for mobile sensor networks: An experimental approach. In: 2010 7th Annual IEEE Communications Society Conference on Sensor, Mesh and Ad Hoc Communications and Networks (SECON), pp. 1–9

  19. Ismat N, Qureshi R and Mumtaz ul Imam S 2019 Adaptive Power Control Scheme for Mobile Wireless Sensor Networks. Wireless Personal Communications 106: 2195–2210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Srivastava R and Koksal C E 2010 Energy optimal transmission scheduling in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications 9: 1550–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang T, Wu P, Shen B and Kwak K 2009 A novel fuzzy algorithm for power control of wireless sensor nodes. In: 2009 9th International Symposium on Communications and Information Technology, IEEE, pp. 64–68

  22. Zhang J, Chen J and Sun Y 2009 Transmission power adjustment of wireless sensor networks using fuzzy control algorithm. Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing 9: 805–818

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kazemi R, Vesilo R and Dutkiewicz E 2011 A novel genetic-fuzzy power controller with feedback for interference mitigation in wireless body area networks. In: 2011 IEEE 73rd vehicular technology conference (VTC Spring), IEEE, pp. 1–5

  24. Lee J S and Lee Y C 2018 An application of grey prediction to transmission power control in mobile sensor networks. IEEE Internet of Things Journal 5(3): 2154–2162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lin S, Miao F, Zhang J, Zhou G, Gu L, He T, Stankovic J A, Son S and Pappas G J 2016 ATPC: Adaptive transmission power control for wireless sensor networks. ACM Transactions on Sensor Networks (TOSN) 12: 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sabitha R and Thangavelu T 2011 Performance enhancement of fuzzy logic based transmission power control in wireless sensor networks using Markov based RSSI prediction. European Journal of Scientific Research (EJSR) 59: 68–84

    Google Scholar 

  27. Khilare P A 2016 A Review on Wireless Networking Standard-Zigbee. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology 3: 754–757

    Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson M, Healy M, Van de Ven P, Hayes M J, Nelson J, Newe T and Lewis E 2009 A comparative review of wireless sensor network mote technologies. SENSORS, 2009 IEEE 1439–1442

  29. Borges L M, Velez F J and Lebres A S 2014 Survey on the characterization and classification of wireless sensor network applications. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 16: 1860–1890

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Osborne J W 2000 Prediction in multiple regression. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation 7: 2

    Google Scholar 

  31. Duraipandian M 2019 Performance evaluation of routing algorithm for Manet based on the machine learning techniques. Journal of trends in Computer Science and Smart technology (TCSST) 1: 25–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Weston J and Watkins C 1998 Multi-class support vector machines, pp. 98-04. Technical Report CSD-TR-98-04, Department of Computer Science, Royal Holloway, University of London, May.

  33. Sakthivel N R, Sugumaran V and Nair B B 2010 Application of support vector machine (SVM) and proximal support vector machine (PSVM) for fault classification of monoblock centrifugal pump. International Journal of Data Analysis Techniques and Strategies 2: 38–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mathi Senthilkumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vidhya, S.S., Senthilkumar, M. & Anantha Narayanan, V. An empirical investigation based quality of service aware transmission power prediction in low power networks. Sādhanā 47, 239 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-01982-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-022-01982-4

Keywords

Navigation