Log in

The impact of crop residue burning (CRB) on the diurnal and seasonal variability of the ozone and PM levels at a semi-urban site in the north-western Indo-Gangetic plain

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ozone and particulate matter (PM), \(\hbox {PM}_{10}\) and \(\hbox {PM}_{2.5}\), were monitored along with meteorological parameters at a semi-urban location, Patiala, in the north-western Indo-Gangetic plain from December 2013 to November 2014. The annual mean concentration levels of \(\hbox {PM}_{10}, \hbox {PM}_{2.5}\) and ozone were recorded as 178 \(\upmu \hbox {g} \hbox { m}^{-3}, 88~\upmu \hbox {g}\hbox { m}^{-3}\) and 39 ppb, which also exceeded the national standards on a 24-h average basis, by 77.3% (335 days), 53.2% (338 days) and 20 days, respectively. High levels of PM (\(\hbox {PM}_{10}\) and \(\hbox {PM}_{2.5}\)) were observed in winter (58–381 and 42–270 \(\upmu \hbox {g}\hbox { m}^{-3})\) and in the post-monsoon (71–320 and 39–320 \(\upmu \hbox {g}\hbox { m}^{-3})\) season and a rise in the level of ozone was observed in summer (22–72 ppb) and in the post-monsoon season (23–73 ppb), respectively. The rate of ozone production was the highest during the post-harvest fire period (\(3.94~\hbox {ppb }\hbox {O}_{3}\hbox {/h}\) in May and 4.23 ppb \(\hbox {O}_{3}\hbox {/h}\) in November). A Pearson correlation study showed the strong dependency of PM and ozone on meteorological variables. Relative humidity has the highest ranking for ozone and \(\hbox {PM}_{10}\), while wind speed has the lowest rank for ozone, \(\hbox {PM}_{10}\) and \(\hbox {PM}_{2.5}\) in the order of factors affecting the level of pollutants. The generalised linear model and the neural network model (for ozone) and the random forest model (for PM) outperformed on the basis of performance indices and further cross-validation was done.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agarwal R, Awasthi A, Singh N, Mittal S K and Gupta P K 2013 Epidemiological study on healthy subjects affected by agriculture crop-residue burning episodes and its relation with their pulmonary function tests; Int. J. Environ. Health Res.  23 281–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ali K, Chate D, Beig G, Srinivas R, Parkhi N and Satpute T 2013 Spatial temporal variation and deposition of fine and coarse particles during the common wealth games in Delhi; Aerosol. Air Qual. Res.  13(2) 748–755.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashworth K, Wild O, Eller A S D and Hewitt C N 2015 Impact of biofuel poplar cultivation on ground-level ozone and premature human mortality depends on cultivar selection and planting location; Environ. Sci. Technol.  49(14) 8566–8575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awasthi A, Agarwal R, Mittal S K, Singh N, Singh K and Gupta P K 2011 Study of size and mass distribution of particulate matter due to crop residue burning with seasonal variation in the rural area of Punjab, India; J. Environ. Monit.  13 1073–1081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badarinath K V S, Chand T R K and Prasad V K 2006 Agriculture crop residue burning in the Indo-Gangetic Plains – A study using IRS-P6 AWiFS Satellite Data; Curr. Sci.  91(8) 1085–1089.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badarinath K V S, Kharol S K, Sharma A R and Prasad V K 2009 Analysis of aerosol and carbon monoxide characteristics over Arabian Sea during crop residue burning period in the Indo-of plains using multi-satellite remote sensing datasets; J. Atmos. Sol.-Terr. Phys.  71 1267–1276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee T, Singh S B and Srivastva R K 2011 Development and performance evaluation of statistical models correlating air pollutants and meteorological variables at Pantnagar, India; Atmos. Res.  99(3–4) 505–517.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barmpadimos J K, Oderbolz D, Hueglin C and Prevot A S H 2012 One decade of parallel fine (PM2.5) and coarse (PM10–PM2.5) particulate matter measurements in Europe: Trends and variability; Atmos. Chem. Phys.  12(7) 3189–3203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beig G, Gunthe S and Jadhav D B 2007 Simultaneous measurements of ozone and its precursors on a diurnal scale at a semi urban site in India; J. Atmos. Chem.  57(3) 239–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blanco-Becerra L C, Gafaro-Rojas A I and Rojas-Roa N Y 2015 Influence of precipitation scavenging on the PM2.5/PM10 ratio at the Kennedy locality of Bogota, Colombia; Rev. Fac. Ing. Univ. Antioquia  76 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers J M 1977 Computational methods for data analysis; Appl. Stat.  1(2) 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng I, Zhang L, Blanchard P, Dalziel J and Tordon R 2013 Concentration-weighted trajectory approach to identifying potential sources of speciated atmospheric mercury at an urban coastal site in Nova Scotia, Canada; Atmos. Chem. Phys.  13(12) 6031–6048.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chung A, Chang D P Y, Kleeman M J, Perry K D, Cahill T A and Dutcher D 2011 Comparison of real-time instrument used to monitor air-borne particulate matter; J. Air Waste Manag.  51(1) 109–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dragan M M, Dragan A M, Anka J, Lazar L and Zoran M 2008 Determination of O3, NO2, SO2, CO, and PM10 measured in Belgrade urban area; Environ. Monit. Assess.  145(1–3) 349–359.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dubey J, Singla V, Maharaj K and Lakhani A 2014 Influence of meteorology on surface ozone, \(\text{NO}_{2}\) and fine particulate matter at a tropical site in India; Asian Reson.  4(1) 82–88.

  • Galanter M, Levy H and Carmichael G R 2000 Impacts of biomass burning on tropospheric CO, \({\rm NO}_{X}\) and \({\rm O}_{3}\); J. Geophys. Res.  105 6633–6653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaur A, Tripathi S N, Kanawade V P, Tare V and Shukla S P 2014 Four-year measurements of trace gases (SO2, NOx, CO, and O3) at an urban location, Kanpur, in Northern India; J. Atmos. Chem.  71(4) 283–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghazali N A, Ramli N A, Yahaya A S, Yusof N F F, Sansuddin N and Madhoun W A 2009 Transformation of nitrogen dioxide in to ozone and prediction of ozone concentration using multiple linear regression techniques; Environ. Monit. Assess.  165(1–4) 475–489.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunthe S S, Beig G and Sahu L K 2016 Study of relationship between daily maxima in ozone and temperature in an urban site of India; Curr. Sci.  110(10) 1994–1999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P K, Sahai S, Singh N, Dixit C K, Singh D P and Sharma C 2004 Residue burning in rice-wheat system crop** system: Causes and implications; Curr. Sci.  87(12) 1713–1717.

    Google Scholar 

  • Han S, Bian H, Feng Y, Liu A, Li X and Zeng F 2011 Analysis of the relationship between \({\rm O}_{3}\), NO and \({\rm NO}_{2}\) in Tian**, China; Aerosol. Air Qual. Res.  11 128–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopke P K 2003 Recent developments in receptor modeling; J. Chemom.  17 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Icaga Y and Sabah E 2009 Statistical analysis of air pollutants and meteorological parameters in Afyon, Turkey; Environ. Model. Assess.  14(2) 259–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacob D J 2000 Heterogeneous chemistry and tropospheric ozone; Atmos. Environ.  34 2131–2159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jain N, Bhatia A and Pathak H 2014 Emissions of air pollutants from crop residue burning in India; Aerosol. Air Qual. Res.  14 422–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaskaoutis D G, Kumar S, Sharma D, Singh R P, Kharol S K, Sharma M, Singh A K, Singh S, Singh A and Singh D 2014 Effect of crop residue burning on aerosol properties, plume characteristics, and long-range transport over northern India; J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.  119 5424–5444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V, Sarkar C and Sinha V 2016 Influence of post-harvest crop residue fires on surface ozone mixing ratios in the N.W. IGP analyzed using 2 years of continuous in situ trace gas measurements; J. Geophys. Res. Atmos.  121(7) 3619–3633.

    Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Huang X, Zhu L, Li J, Song Y, Cai X and **e S 2012 Analysis of the transport pathways and potential sources of PM10 in Shanghai based on three methods; Sci. Total Environ.  414 525–534.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaw A and Wiener M 2002 Classification and regression by random forest; R. News  2(3) 18–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Londhe A L, Jadhav D B, Buchunde P S and Kartha M J 2008 Surface ozone variability in the urban and nearby rural locations of tropical India; Curr. Sci.  95(12) 1724–1729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mittal S K, Singh N, Agarwal R, Awasthi A and Gupta P K 2009 Ambient air quality during wheat and rice crop stubble burning episodes in Patiala; Atmos. Environ.  43(2) 238–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muezzinoglu A 1987 Growth of environmental technology as foreseen by the recent administrative and legislative developments; Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Dordrecht.

    Google Scholar 

  • Naja M, Mallik C, Sarangi T, Sheel V and Lal S 2014 SO2 measurements at a high altitude site in the central Himalayas: Role of regional transport; Atmos. Environ.  99 392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishant T and Kumar S M K 2011 Diurnal variation of surface ozone with meteorological parameters at Kannur, India; Adv. Appl. Sci. Res.  2(3) 407–417.

    Google Scholar 

  • Punia M, Nautiyal V P and Kant K 2008 Identifying biomass burned patches of agricultural residue using satellite remote sensing data; Curr. Sci.  94(9) 1185–1190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinlan J R 1986 Introduction of decision trees; Mach. Learn.  1(1) 81–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raja S, Biswas K F, Husain L and Hopke P K 2010 Source apportionment of the atmospheric aerosol in Lahore, Pakistan; Water Air Soil Pollut.  208(1–4) 43–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy K K, Naja M, Ojha N, Mahesh P and Lal S 2012 Influences of the boundary layer evolution on surface ozone variations at a tropical rural site in India; J. Earth Syst. Sci.  121 911–922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy B S, Kumar K R, Balakrishnaiah G, Gopal K R, Reddy R R and Sivakumar V 2013 Analysis of diurnal and seasonal behavior of surface ozone and its precursors (\({\rm NO}_{X})\) at a semi-arid rural site in southern India; Aerosol Air Qual. Res.  12(1) 1081–1094.

    Google Scholar 

  • Riedmmiller M and Braun H 1993 A direct adaptive method for faster back propagation learning: The RPROP algorithm; In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Neural Networks, San Francisco, 28 March–1 April 1993, pp. 586–591, https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNN.1993.298623.

  • Sagar K, Srivastava R K and Sarkar S 2015 Diurnal and seasonal variability of PM10 with surface ozone concentration at Jabalpur; Brit. J. Environ. Sci.  3(3) 62–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sahu L K and Lal S 2006 Distribution of \({\rm C}{2}\)\({\rm C}_{5}\) NMHCs and related trace gases at a tropical urban site in India; Atmos. Environ.  40 880–891.

  • Saini R, Singh P, Awasthi B B, Kumar K and Taneja A 2014 Ozone distributions and urban air quality during summer in Agra – A world heritage site; Atmos. Pollut. Res.  5(3) 796–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Satsangi G, Lakhani A, Kulshrestha P R and Taneja A 2004 Seasonal and diurnal variations of surface ozone and preliminary analysis of exceedance of its critical levels at a semi-arid site in India; J. Atmos. Chem.  47 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma A, Mandal T K, Sharma S K, Shukla D K and Singh S 2016 Relationship of surface ozone with its precursors, particulate matter and meteorology over Delhi; J. Atmos. Chem.  74(4) 451–474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha B, Singh K, Sangwan Y, Maurya V K, Sarkar C and Chandra B P 2015 Assessment of crop yield losses in Punjab and Haryana using 2 year of continuous in situ ozone measurement; Atmos. Chem. Phys.  15(16) 9555–9576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarasova O A and Karpetchko A Y 2003 Accounting for local meteorological effects in the ozone time-series of Lovozero (Kola Peninsula); Atmos. Chem. Phys.  3(4) 941–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardoulakis S and Kassomenos P 2008 Sources and factors affecting PM10 levels in two European cities: Implications for local air quality management; Atmos. Environ.  42(17) 3949–3963.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Ghan S, Ovchinnikov M, Liu X, Easter R, Kassianov E, Qian Y and Morrison H 2011 Aerosol indirect effects in multi-scale aerosol-climate model PNNL-MMF; Atmos. Chem. Phys.  11 5431–5455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y Q, Zhang X Y and Draxler R R 2009 Trajstat: GIS-based software that uses various trajectory statistical analysis methods to identify potential sources from long-term air pollution measurement data; Environ. Modell. Softw.  24(8) 938–939.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World health statistics 2018: monitoring health for the SDGs, sustainable development goals. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO.

  • Yadav R, Sahu L K, Beig G and Jaffrey S N A 2016 Role of long-range transport and local meteorology in seasonal variation of surface ozone and its precursors at an urban site; Atmos. Res.  176–177 96–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yadav R, Sahu L K, Beig G, Tripathi N and Jaffrey S N A 2017 Ambient particulate matter and carbon monoxide at an urban site of India: Influence of anthropogenic emissions and dust storms; Environ. Pollut.  225 291–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoo H J, Kim J, Yi S M and Zoh D K 2011 Analysis of black carbon, particulate matter, and gaseous pollutants in an industrial area in Korea; Atmos. Environ.  45(40) 7698–7704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao C X, Wang Y Q, Wang Y J, Zhang H L and Zhao B Q 2014 Temporal and spatial distribution of PM2.5 and PM10 pollution status and the correlation of particulate matters and meteorological factors during winter and spring in Bei**g; Environ. Sci.  35(2) 418–427.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are thankful to the Indian Institute of Tropical Meteorology (IITM), Pune for the data collected on the Ambient Air Quality Monitoring System (AAQMS) established at Thapar University, Patiala, under the MAPAN project. The authors are also thankful to the director, Thapar University, Patiala, for providing the research facilities. Madhvi Rana thankfully acknowledges the financial support under the INSPIRE-fellowship program (IF-140931) from the Department of Science and Technology (DST), Government of India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susheel K Mittal.

Additional information

Corresponding Editor: Suresh Babu

Supplementary material pertaining to this article is available on the Journal of Earth System Science website (http://www.ias.ac.in/Journals/Journal_of_Earth_System_Science).

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (docx 1901 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rana, M., Mittal, S.K., Beig, G. et al. The impact of crop residue burning (CRB) on the diurnal and seasonal variability of the ozone and PM levels at a semi-urban site in the north-western Indo-Gangetic plain. J Earth Syst Sci 128, 166 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1164-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-019-1164-z

Keywords

Navigation