Log in

Dark or light? Preference of anuran tadpoles to background illumination in response to food and predators

  • Brief communication
  • Published:
Journal of Biosciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background illumination and its intensity are crucial factors in visual interaction among organisms. In the present study, we used tadpoles of eight sympatric anuran species (Duttaphrynus melanostictus, Microhyla ornata, Uperodon globulosus, Kaloula taprobanica, Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis, Fejervarya orissaensis, Polypedates maculatus, and Polypedates teraiensis) to examine species-specific responses towards background illumination (shade and light), combined with four treatments [without food and predator (F−P−), with food and without predator (F+P−), without food and with predator (F−P+), and with food and with predator (F+P+)], with four coloured backgrounds (green, red, brown, and black) during different hours of a day (early morning, late morning, noon, and afternoon). Anuran tadpoles choose shaded sides over lighter sides, as such microhabitats are used as an effective means of camouflage, but most of the M. ornata tadpoles preferred the opposite. The observations were similar for red, green, and brown backgrounds simulating different natural conditions. The developmental stage and co-occurrence of tadpoles of multiple species do not affect their behavioural responses. These results draw attention to the importance of low illuminated/shaded backgrounds for behavioural responses of anuran tadpoles to environmental changes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4

References

  • Adler FA and Harvell CD 1990 Inducible defences, phenotypic variability and biotic environments. Trends Ecol. Evol. 5 407–410

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Batabyal A, Gosavi SM and Gramapurohit NP 2014 Determining sensitive stages for learning to detect predators in larval bronzed frogs: Importance of alarm cues in learning. J. Biosci. 39 701–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Beiswenger RE 1977 Diel patterns of aggregative behavior in tadpoles of Bufo americanus, in relation to light and temperature. Ecology 58 98–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branch LC 1983 Social behavior of the tadpoles of Phyllomedusa vaillanti. Copeia 1983 420–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan BW 2006 Observed and potential effect of artificial night lighting on anuran amphibians; in Ecological consequences of artificial night lighting (Eds.) C Rich and T Longcore (Washington, DC: Island Press) pp. 192–220

  • Cruz MJ, Pascoal S, Tejedo M, et al. 2006a Predation by an exotic crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, on natterjack toad, Bufo calamita, embryos: its role on the exclusion of this amphibian from its breeding ponds. Copeia 2006 274–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz MJ, Rebelo R and Crespo EG 2006b Effects of an introduced crayfish, Procambarus clarkii, on the distribution of south-western Iberian amphibians in their breeding habitats. Ecography 29 329–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuthill IC, Stevens M, Sheppard J, et al. 2005 Disruptive coloration and background pattern matching. Nature 434 72–74

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dall SRX, Giraldeau LA, Olsson O, et al. 2005 Information and its use by animals in evolutionary ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 20 187–193

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ding GH, Lin ZH, Zhao LH, et al. 2014 Effects of light intensity on activity in four sympatric anuran tadpoles. Zool. Res. 35 332–337

  • Duellman WE and Trueb L 1994 Biology of amphibians (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Eidietis L 2005 Size-related performance variation in the wood frog (Rana sylvatica) tadpole tactile-stimulated startles response. Can. J. Zool. 83 1117–1127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Espanha J, Vasconcelos MF and Eterovick PC 2016 The role of tadpole coloration against visually oriented predators. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 70 255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eterovick PC and Sazima I 1999 Description of the tadpole of Bufo rufus with notes on aggregative behavior. J. Herpetol. 33 711–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eterovick PC, Oliveira FFR and Tattersall GJ 2010 Threatened tadpoles of Bokermannohyla alvarengai (Anura: Hylidae) choose backgrounds that enhance crypsis potential. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. Lond. 101 437–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eterovick PC, Mendes IS, Kloh JS, et al. 2018 Tadpoles respond to background colour under threat. Sci. Rep. 8 4085

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrari MCO, Wisenden BD and Chivers DP 2010 Chemical ecology of predator prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 88 698–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golden DR, Smith GR and Rettig JE 2000 Effects of age and group size on habitat selection and activity Level in Xenopus laevis tadpoles. Transact. Nebraska Acad. Sci. 26 23–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths RA, Getliff JM and Mylotte VJ 1988 Diel patterns of activity and vertical migration in tadpoles of the common toad, Bufo bufo. Herpetol. J. 1 223–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Hairston NG 1980 The experimental test of an analysis of field distributions. Competition in terrestrial salamanders. Ecology 61 817–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoff KS, Blausteinr AR, McDiarmid RW, et al. 1999 Behavior: Interactions and their consequences; in Tadpoles: The biology of anuran larvae (Eds.) RW McDiarmid and R Altig (Chicago: The University of Chicago Press) pp. 215–239

  • Laurila A and Crochet PA and Merilä J, 2001 Predator-induced effects on hatchling morphology in the common frog (Rana temporaria). Can. J. Zool. 79 926–930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL and Dill LM 1990 Behavioral decision made under the risk of predation— a review and prospectus. Can. J. Zool. 68 619–640

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lima SL 1998 Nonlethal effects in the ecology of predator-prey interactions: What are the ecological effects of anti-predator decision-making? BioScience 48 25–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClure KV, Mora JW and Smith GR 2009 Effects of light and group size on the activity of wood frog tadpoles (Rana sylvatica) and their response to a shadow stimulus. Acta Herpetol. 4 103–107

    Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA 1990a Determination of species composition in the Enallagma damselfly assemblages of permanent lakes. Ecology 71 83–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McPeek MA 1990b Behavioral differences between Enallagma species (Odonata) influencing differential vulnerability to predators. Ecology 71 1714–1726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merilaita S and Stevens M 2011 Crypsis through background matching; in Animal camouflage: Mechanisms and function (Eds.) M Stevens and S Merilaita (London: Cambridge University Press) pp. 17–33

  • Nelson DWM, Crossland MR and Shine R 2011a Behavioural responses of native predators to an invasive toxic prey species. Austral. Ecol. 36 605–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson DWM, Crossland MR and Shine R 2011b Foraging responses of predators to novel toxic prey: effects of predator learning and relative prey abundance. Oikos 120 152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson AG, Bull CM and Wheeler LM 1992 Habitat choice and predator avoidance in tadpoles. J. Herpetol. 26 142–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA 2004 Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85 172–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA 2005 The heritability of inducible defences in tadpoles. J. Evol. Biol. 18 856–866

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson JML 2001 A comparative study of activity levels in larval anurans and response to the presence of different predators. Behav. Ecol. 12 51–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rout J, Mahapatra S, Asrafuzzaman S, et al. 2019 Oviposition site selection by the Asian common toad Duttaphrynus melanostictus (Schneider, 1799), in an Indian biosphere reserve. Herpetozoa 31 157–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudh A and Qvarnström A 2013 Adaptive colouration in amphibians. Semin. Cell. Dev. Biol. 24 553–561

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santos FJM, Protázio AS, Moura CWN, et al. 2016 Diet and food resource partition among benthic tadpoles of three anuran species in Atlantic forest tropical streams. J. Freshw. Ecol. 31 53–60

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Skelly DK 1996 Pond drying, predators, and the distribution of Pseudacris tadpoles. Copeia 1996 599–605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GR, Burgett AA, Temple KG, et al. 2008 The ability of three species of tadpoles to differentiate among potential fish predators. Ethology 114 701–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith GR and Awan AR 2009 The roles of predator identity and group size in the antipredator responses of American toad (Bufo americanus) and bullfrog (Rana catesbeiana) tadpoles to different predators. Behaviour 146 225–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uveges B, Szederkényi M, Mahr K, et al. 2019 Chemical defense of toad tadpoles under risk by four predator species. Ecol. Evol. 9 6287–6299

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J 2000 The costs of an inducible defense in anuran larvae. Ecology 81 2813–2821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells KD 2007 The ecology and behavior of amphibians (Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE and McPeek MA 1994 Direct and indirect effects of predators on two anuran species along an environmental gradient. Ecology 751 368–1382

    Google Scholar 

  • Zug GR, Vitt LJ and Caldwell JP 2001 Herpetology. An introductory biology of amphibians and reptiles (San Diego: Academic Press)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India, through a Senior Research Fellowship (File No. 09/173(0134)/2020-EMR-I). The authors are grateful to the Head, Department of Zoology, Utkal University, for extending the necessary facilities to carry out the work.

Funding

Council of Scientific & Industrial Research (CSIR), Government of India, through Senior Research Fellowship (File No. 09/173(0134)/2020-EMR-I).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gunanidhi Sahoo.

Additional information

Corresponding editor: Renee M Borges

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 1601 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rout, J., Panda, S.K. & Sahoo, G. Dark or light? Preference of anuran tadpoles to background illumination in response to food and predators. J Biosci 48, 23 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-023-00347-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12038-023-00347-1

Keywords

Navigation