Log in

Comparison of Pelvic Radiographs in Weightbearing and Supine Positions

  • Symposium: Developmental Dysplasia of the Hip
  • Published:
Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Abstract

We asked whether radiographic angles and signs of hip osteoarthrosis differ between radiographs of the pelvis taken in standing and supine positions. We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs of 61 patients (72 hips) with developmental dislocation of the hip. The minimum followup after closed reduction was 15 years (mean, 44 years; range, 15–64 years). We used pelvic radiographs in supine and standing positions taken at the same time and determined the following parameters: minimal joint space width, acetabular roof obliquity (AC angle), depth of the acetabulum (ACM angle), and center-edge angle. Osteoarthrosis was assessed according to Kellgren and Lawrence. Two independent observers measured all radiographs manually with a goniometer. AC angle, center-edge angle, and minimum joint space width differed between the radiographs taken in supine and standing positions at followup, whereas osteoarthrosis grading and the ACM angle did not. The AC angle depended on patient position and predicted development of osteoarthrosis. The minimum joint space width was influenced by the radiographic position with greater values in the supine position. ACM angle and the osteoarthrosis grade according to Kellgren and Lawrence were unaffected by the patient’s position.

Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Classic. Translation: Hilgenreiner on congenital hip dislocation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;6:202–214.

  2. Ball F, Kommenda K. Sources of error in the roentgen evaluation of the hip in infancy. Ann Radiol. 1968;11:298–303.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular im**ement. A cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Idelberger K, Frank A. A new method for determination of the angle of the pelvic acetabulum in child and in adult [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1952;82:571–577.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494–501.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Malvitz TA, Weinstein SL. Closed reduction for congenital dysplasia of the hip. Functional and radiographic results after an average of thirty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:1777–1792.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Millis M, Kim Y. Rationale of osteotomy and related procedures for hip preservation: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:108–121.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;407:241–248.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Siebenrock KA, Schoeninger R, Ganz R. Anterior femoro-acetabular im**ement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:278–286.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tönnis D. Über Änderungen des Pfannendachwinkels der Hüftgelenke bei Dreh- und Kippstellung des kindlichen Beckens. Z Orthop. 1962;96:462–478.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tönnis D. Congenital Dysplasia, Dislocation of the Hip in Children and Adults. New York, NY: Springer; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Tönnis D, Brunken D. Eine Abgrenzung normaler und pathologischer Hüftpfannendachwinkel zur Diagnose der angeborenen Hüft- dysplasie. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1968;64:197–228.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wedge JH, Wasylenko MJ. The natural history of congenital disease of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61:334–338.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Weinstein SL. Natural history of congenital hip dislocation (CDH) and hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;225:62–76.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetebula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint with special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1939;58:83.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank all patients taking part in this study. Moreover, we thank the staff of the Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Hospital and Clinics, in particular the xray technicians, for contributing to our study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Susanne Fuchs-Winkelmann MD.

Additional information

Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.

Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent was obtained.

About this article

Cite this article

Fuchs-Winkelmann, S., Peterlein, CD., Tibesku, C.O. et al. Comparison of Pelvic Radiographs in Weightbearing and Supine Positions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466, 809–812 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0124-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0124-8

Keywords

Navigation