Abstract
We asked whether radiographic angles and signs of hip osteoarthrosis differ between radiographs of the pelvis taken in standing and supine positions. We retrospectively reviewed the radiographs of 61 patients (72 hips) with developmental dislocation of the hip. The minimum followup after closed reduction was 15 years (mean, 44 years; range, 15–64 years). We used pelvic radiographs in supine and standing positions taken at the same time and determined the following parameters: minimal joint space width, acetabular roof obliquity (AC angle), depth of the acetabulum (ACM angle), and center-edge angle. Osteoarthrosis was assessed according to Kellgren and Lawrence. Two independent observers measured all radiographs manually with a goniometer. AC angle, center-edge angle, and minimum joint space width differed between the radiographs taken in supine and standing positions at followup, whereas osteoarthrosis grading and the ACM angle did not. The AC angle depended on patient position and predicted development of osteoarthrosis. The minimum joint space width was influenced by the radiographic position with greater values in the supine position. ACM angle and the osteoarthrosis grade according to Kellgren and Lawrence were unaffected by the patient’s position.
Level of Evidence: Level II, prognostic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11999-008-0124-8/MediaObjects/11999_2008_124_Fig1_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11999-008-0124-8/MediaObjects/11999_2008_124_Fig2_HTML.jpg)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11999-008-0124-8/MediaObjects/11999_2008_124_Fig3_HTML.jpg)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Classic. Translation: Hilgenreiner on congenital hip dislocation. J Pediatr Orthop. 1986;6:202–214.
Ball F, Kommenda K. Sources of error in the roentgen evaluation of the hip in infancy. Ann Radiol. 1968;11:298–303.
Ganz R, Parvizi J, Beck M, Leunig M, Nötzli H, Siebenrock KA. Femoroacetabular im**ement. A cause for osteoarthritis of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:112–120.
Idelberger K, Frank A. A new method for determination of the angle of the pelvic acetabulum in child and in adult [in German]. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb. 1952;82:571–577.
Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1957;16:494–501.
Malvitz TA, Weinstein SL. Closed reduction for congenital dysplasia of the hip. Functional and radiographic results after an average of thirty years. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1994;76:1777–1792.
Millis M, Kim Y. Rationale of osteotomy and related procedures for hip preservation: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2002;405:108–121.
Siebenrock KA, Kalbermatten DF, Ganz R. Effect of pelvic tilt on acetabular retroversion: a study of pelves from cadavers. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;407:241–248.
Siebenrock KA, Schoeninger R, Ganz R. Anterior femoro-acetabular im**ement due to acetabular retroversion. Treatment with periacetabular osteotomy. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85:278–286.
Tönnis D. Über Änderungen des Pfannendachwinkels der Hüftgelenke bei Dreh- und Kippstellung des kindlichen Beckens. Z Orthop. 1962;96:462–478.
Tönnis D. Congenital Dysplasia, Dislocation of the Hip in Children and Adults. New York, NY: Springer; 1987.
Tönnis D, Brunken D. Eine Abgrenzung normaler und pathologischer Hüftpfannendachwinkel zur Diagnose der angeborenen Hüft- dysplasie. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1968;64:197–228.
Wedge JH, Wasylenko MJ. The natural history of congenital disease of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1979;61:334–338.
Weinstein SL. Natural history of congenital hip dislocation (CDH) and hip dysplasia. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987;225:62–76.
Wiberg G. Studies on dysplastic acetebula and congenital subluxation of the hip joint with special reference to the complication of osteoarthritis. Acta Chir Scand Suppl. 1939;58:83.
Acknowledgments
We thank all patients taking part in this study. Moreover, we thank the staff of the Department of Radiology, University of Iowa, Hospital and Clinics, in particular the xray technicians, for contributing to our study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Each author certifies that he or she has no commercial associations (eg, consultancies, stock ownership, equity interest, patent/licensing arrangements, etc) that might pose a conflict of interest in connection with the submitted article.
Each author certifies that his or her institution has approved the human protocol for this investigation, that all investigations were conducted in conformity with ethical principles of research, and that informed consent was obtained.
About this article
Cite this article
Fuchs-Winkelmann, S., Peterlein, CD., Tibesku, C.O. et al. Comparison of Pelvic Radiographs in Weightbearing and Supine Positions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 466, 809–812 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0124-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-008-0124-8