Abstract
Background
Radiological investigation plays an important role in the management of conditions affecting the hepatobiliary system. However, multiple imaging modalities exist and inappropriate requesting can lead to delays in diagnosis and subsequent treatment.
Aims
To assess the approach to biliary imaging amongst Irish gastroenterologists across a number of scenarios, and examine and seek to explain any variations.
Methods
A survey to determine “best practice” radiological investigation of real-life clinical scenarios was designed and distributed to fully trained and trainee gastroenterologists nationally.
Results
The responses to scenarios ranged from near unanimity, with up to 97% agreement, to notable lack of consensus amongst both registrars and consultants.
Conclusion
An algorithm for the management of hepatobiliary disease was formulated.
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11845-010-0529-8/MediaObjects/11845_2010_529_Fig1_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11845-010-0529-8/MediaObjects/11845_2010_529_Fig2_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11845-010-0529-8/MediaObjects/11845_2010_529_Fig3_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11845-010-0529-8/MediaObjects/11845_2010_529_Fig4_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11845-010-0529-8/MediaObjects/11845_2010_529_Fig5_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11845-010-0529-8/MediaObjects/11845_2010_529_Fig6_HTML.gif)
![](http://media.springernature.com/m312/springer-static/image/art%3A10.1007%2Fs11845-010-0529-8/MediaObjects/11845_2010_529_Fig7_HTML.gif)
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Cieszanowski A, Chomicka D, Andrzejewska M, Pruszyński B, Pawlak J, Mustafa AM (2000) Imaging techniques in patients with biliary obstruction. Med Sci Monit 6(6):1197–1202
Tse F, Barkun JS, Romagnuolo J, Friedman G, Bornstein JD, Barkun AN (2006) Nonoperative imaging techniques in suspected biliary tract obstruction. HPB (Oxford) 8(6):409–425
Jain MK, Jain R (2006) Acute bacterial cholangitis. Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol 9(2):113–121
Ferrari FS, Fantozzi F, Tasciotti L, Vigni F, Scotto F, Frasci P (2005) US, MRCP, CCT and ERCP: a comparative study in 131 patients with suspected biliary obstruction. Med Sci Monit 11(3):8–18
Ang TL, Teo EK, Fock KM (2007) Endosonography- vs. endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-based strategies in the evaluation of suspected common bile duct stones in patients with normal transabdominal imaging. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 26(8):1163–1170
Bruix J, Sherman M (2005) Management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 42(5):1208–1236
Moff SL, Kamel IR, Eustace J et al (2006) Diagnosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis: a blinded comparative study using magnetic resonance cholangiography and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography. Gastrointest Endosc 64(2):219–223
Berstad AE, Aabakken L, Smith HJ, Aasen S, Boberg KM, Schrumpf E (2006) Diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance and endoscopic retrograde cholangiography in primary sclerosing cholangitis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 4(4):514–520
Garrow D, Miller S, Sinha D et al (2007) Endoscopic ultrasound: a meta-analysis of test performance in suspected biliary obstruction. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 5(5):616–623.e1
Verma D, Kapadia A, Eisen GM, Adler DG (2006) EUS vs MRCP for detection of choledocholithiasis. Gastrointest Endosc 64(2):248–254
Hunt GC, Faigel DO (2002) Assessment of EUS for diagnosing, staging, and determining resectability of pancreatic cancer: a review. Gastrointest Endosc 55(2):232–237
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murray, T., Murray, F.E. & Donnellan, F. Approach to biliary imaging amongst consultant and specialist registrars in gastroenterology in a national setting. Ir J Med Sci 179, 539–543 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0529-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-010-0529-8