Log in

Users’ Reactions to the Primer on Tree Registration Policies: Lessons for Designing Extension Materials and Improving Information Flow

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Small-scale Forestry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the Philippines, only a few farmers and plantation owners register their tree farms with the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR), the office in charge of tree registration. One of the major reasons is their lack of knowledge of government policy on tree registration. To help improve the flow of information and understanding of tree registration policies among smallholder tree farmers and other stakeholders, a Primer on Tree Registration, Harvesting, Transport and Marketing Policies on Private Land was developed. Produced through the participation of stakeholders, including tree farmers, the DENR, and local government officers, police, and timber dealers, the Primer is highly visual and has been released in English as well as Waray–Waray and Cebuano dialects. This paper reports findings of focus group discussions conducted to gauge user reactions to the Primer. The Primer was considered as a valuable source of information about tree registration policies. Aside from being comprehensible, FGD participants found it attractive, perceived it to be intended for them and free from content that confused them. However, farmers suggested that illustrations need to be improved by making the persons portrayed more presentable and reflective of their actual tree farm operations. Participants said that aside from the Primer, the flow of information on tree registration policies could be improved through the use of multi-media including posters, radio broadcasts, and presentation in seminars for farmers.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bertrand J (1978) Communications pre-testing. University of Chicago Community and Family Study Centre, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Debus M (1988) A handbook for excellence in focus group research. HEALTHCOM project special series. Porter Novelli, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Emtage NF, Cedamon JL, Mangaoang EO (2004) Community survey policy workshop proceedings and recommendations for policy reforms. ACIAR Smallholder Forestry Project, College of Forestry, Leyte State University, Baybay, Leyte, Philippines

  • Gordon M, Gravoso R, Mangaoang E, Balbarino E (2007) Development of an extension ‘Primer’ on tree registration policy in Leyte: an example of a collaborative material design. Ann Trop Res 29(3):25–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Gravoso RS, Stuart TH (2000) Upland farmers’ comprehension of visual messages on environmental protection. J Appl Commun 63(3):30–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Haaland A (1984) Pretesting communication materials: with special emphasis on child health and nutrition education. UNICEF, Rangoon

    Google Scholar 

  • Herbohn JL, Harrison SR, Mangaoang EO (2004) Improving financial returns to smallholder tree farmers in the Philippines, ASEM/2003/052 main project document. The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger RA (1988) Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. Sage, Beverly Hills

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Services (1984) Pretesting in health communications: methods, examples and resources for improving health messages and materials. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

  • US Department of Health and Human Services (2002) Making health communication programs work: a planner’s guide. National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank the farmers and staff of LGUs, CENROs, and other agencies who participated in the FGDs. We also express our appreciation to Domingo ‘Bebot’ Flandez for designing the illustrations based on the feedbacks generated in the FGDS.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rotacio Gravoso.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gravoso, R., Mangaoang, E., Gerona, M.A. et al. Users’ Reactions to the Primer on Tree Registration Policies: Lessons for Designing Extension Materials and Improving Information Flow. Small-scale Forestry 8, 275–287 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-009-9083-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-009-9083-5

Keywords

Navigation