Log in

Chitosan microgel: Effect of cross-linking density on pH-dependent release

  • Biotechnology
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Chitosan microgels were prepared by a spray-drying method using glutaraldehyde (GA) as a cross-linker. Two kinds of microgels, so-called soft microgel and hard microgel, were prepared using a chitosan to GA ratio of 1: 0.08, and 1: 0.67, respectively. The surfaces of hard microgels were more even that those of soft microgels. The swelling ratio, a measure of degree of swelling, of the soft microgel was pH-sensitive, and it decreased from 1,765% to 1,230%, when the pH increased from 4.0 to 9.0. The deprotonation of amino groups of chitosan could account for the decrease in swelling ratio. The swelling ratio of hard microgels was almost invariable in response to pH change (4.0 to 9.0), and it was much less than that of soft microgels, possibly due to the high cross-linking density. The degree of release from the soft microgels decreased from 65% to 12% when the pH of medium increased from 4.0 to 6.0. FITC-dextran would readily diffuse out of the microgel, possibly due to the larger meshes of the microgels in a strong acidic condition (e.g., pH 4.0). However, the degree of release increased from 12% to 82% when the pH of medium increased from 6.0 to 9.0. In this pH range, the fluorescence dye is believed to be released mainly by a squeezing-out.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.-Y. Xu, G.-J. Li, Z.-F. Liao and X.-H. He, Polym. Bull., 62, 183 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. M.V. Risbud, A. A. Hardikar, S.V. Bhat and R. R. Bhonde, J. Control Release, 68, 23 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. K. S. Soppimath, A. R. Kulkarni and T.M. Aminabhavi, J. Control Release, 75, 331 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M. K. Kang and J.-C. Kim, Colloid Polym. Sci., 288, 265 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Y. H. Kim, Y. H. Bae and S.W. Kim, J. Control Release, 28, 143 (1994).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Feil, Y. H. Bae and S.W. Kim, Macromolecules, 25, 5528 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Gutowska, Y. H. Bae, J. Feijen and S.W. Kim, J. Control Release, 22, 95 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. C. Alvarez-Lorenzo, L. Bromberg and A. Concheiro, Photochem. Photobiol., 85, 848 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. N. Yui, T. Okano and Y. Skurai, J. Control Release, 26, 141 (1993).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. Qiu and K. Park, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 53, 321 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. S. J. Murdan, J. Control Release, 92, 1 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. H. Li, Z. Yuan, K.Y. Lam, H. P. Lee, J. Chen, J. Hanes and J. Fu, Biosens. Bioelectron., 19, 1097 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Connor and L. J. Huang, Cell Biol., 101, 582 (1985).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. D. C. Drummond, M. Zignani and J.-C. Leroux, Prog. Lipid Res., 39, 409 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. C.-J. Chu, J. Dijkstra, M.-Z. Lai, K. Hong and F. C. Szoka, Pharm. Res., 7, 824 (1990).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. M. L. Huguet, R. J. Neufeld and E. Dellacherie, Process Biochem., 31, 347 (1996).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. C.M. Silva, A. J. Ribeiro, M. Figueiredo, D. Ferreira and F. Veiga, AAPS J., 7, E903 (2005).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. S. Simões, J. N. Moreira, C. Fonseca, N. Düzgüne and M. C. P. Lima, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 56, 947 (2004).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. S.-M. Jo, H.Y. Lee and J.-C. Kim, Int. J. Biol. Macromol., 45, 421 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. R. Pelton, Adv. Colloid Interface Sci., 85, 1 (2000).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. J. K. Oh, D. I. Lee and J.M. Park, Prog. Polym. Sci., 34, 1261 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. H. Zhang, S. Mardyani, W. C.W. Chan and E. Kumacheva, Biomacromolecules, 7, 1568 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. S. Mansouri, P. Lavigne, K. Corsi, M. Benderdour, E. Beaumont and J. C. Fernandes, Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm., 57, 1 (2004).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Thanou, J.C. Verhoef and H.E. Junginger, Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev., 52, 117 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. L. Zhang, Y. **, H. Liu and Y. J. Du, Appl. Polym. Sci., 82, 584 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Z.-X. Xue, G. P. Yang, Z.-P. Zhang and B.-L. He, React. Funct. Polym., 66, 893 (2006).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. J. K. Oh, D. I. Lee and J.M. Park, Prog. Polym. Sci., 34, 1261 (2009).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. B. S. Rao and K. V. R. Murthy, Int. J. Pharm., 231, 97 (2002).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. D. R. Williams, Coord. Chem. Rev., 151, 161 (1996).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **-Chul Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kang, M.K., Hong, S.K., Seo, Y.C. et al. Chitosan microgel: Effect of cross-linking density on pH-dependent release. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 29, 72–76 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0138-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-011-0138-x

Key words

Navigation