Log in

Differentiation of rural households’ consciousness in land use activities: A case from Bailin Village, Sha**ba District of Chongqing Municipality, China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

What rural households think and what kind of strategies they take, the basic driving force in land use activities, contribute greatly to the increase of their own revenues, the development of agricultural yields, and even the prosperity of rural areas. Differentiation in rural household behaviors and their consciousness in land use activities is widespread in rural China nowadays. It is important to understand the changing characteristics and laws of land use behaviors of rural households driven by their consciousness, so as to regulate their land use activities. In most empirical studies of land use change at rural household level, the land use consciousness, which acts directly on land use behaviors, is often neglected. In our research, the changes of land use behaviors of rural households are analyzed, through identifying how the land use consciousness affect the land use objectives, land management scales and land inputs of all the rural households in Bailin Village of Chongqing Municipality in the western mountainous China. Also, how the land use consciousness of different rural households comes into being under external stimuli is examined and the self-adjustment process of their consciousness according to their own conditions is also discussed. Finally, broad policy instruments are suggested to promote the rationalization of rural households’ land use consciousness and the standardization of their land use behaviors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adhikari B, Salvatore D F, Lovett J C, 2004. Household characteristics and forest dependency: Evidence from common property forest management in Nepal. Ecological Economics, 48(2): 245–257. doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2003.08.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbieri A, Bilsborrow R, Pan W, 2005. Farm household lifecycles and land use in the Ecuadorian Amazon. Population and Environment, 27(1): 1–27. doi: 10.1007/s11111-005-0013-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryceson D F, 2002. The scramble in Africa: Reorienting rural livelihoods. World Development, 30(5): 725–739.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burton R J F, 2004. Reconceptualizing the ‘behavioral approach’ in agricultural studies: A socio-psychological perspective. Journal of Rural Studies, 20(3): 359–371. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2003.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chayanov A, 1986. The theory of rural economy. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Chengwen, Lu Yan, 2006. An empirical study on farmers’ land consciousness in the process of urbanization: A case study in Hunan Provence. Issues in Agricultural Economy, (5): 29–34. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Qiong, Cai Yunlong, Liu Fenggui et al., 2013. Farmers’ perception to farmland conversion: A questionnaire survey in **ning City, Qinghai Province, China. Chinese Geographical Science, 23(5): 634–646. doi: 10.1007/s11769-013-0624-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chongqing Statistics Bureau, 2011. Chongqing Statistical Yearbook 2010. Bei**g: China Statics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Démurger S, Fournier M, Yang W Y, 2010. Rural households’ decisions towards income diversification: Evidence from a township in northern China. China Economic Review, 21(1): 32–44. doi:10.1016/j.chieco.2010.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolisca F, McDaniel J M, Shannon D A et al., 2009. Modeling farm households for estimating the efficiency of policy instruments on sustainable land use in Haiti. Land Use Policy, 26(1): 130–138. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2008.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards-Jones G, 2007. Modelling farmer decision-making: Concepts, progress and challenges. Animal Science, 82(6): 783–790. doi:10.1017/ASC2006112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans T P, Manire A, Castro F D, 2001. A dynamic model of household decision-making and parcel level land cover change in the eastern Amazon. Ecological Modeling, 143(1–2): 95–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fei X T, 2001. RuralLife in China: Jiang Village Economy. Bei**g: The Commercial Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greiner R, Gregg D, 2011. Farmers’ intrinsic motivations, barriers to the adoption of conservation practices and effectiveness of policy instruments: Empirical evidence from northern Australia. Land Use Policy, 28(1): 257–265. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasem S, Thapa G B, 2011. Crop diversification in Thailand: Status, determinants, and effects on income and use of inputs. Land Use Policy, 28(3): 618–628. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E F, Meyfroidt P, 2010. Land use transitions: Socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy, 27(2): 108–118. doi:10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.09.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landry J, Chirwa P W, 2011. Analysis of the potential socio-economic impact of establishing plantation forestry on rural communities in Sanga District, Niassa Province, Mozambique. Land Use Policy, 28(3): 542–551. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.11.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu **, Wang Wangmao, Li Guohong, 2008. Basic consensus and application of land use strategy study. China Land Science, 22(7): 22–26. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lizarralde G, 2011. Stakeholder participation and incremental housing in subsidized housing projects in Colombia and South Africa. Habitat International, 35(2): 175–187. doi: 10.1016/j.habitatint.2010.08.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mei Donghai, 2007. Chinese peasants’ awareness of land in the transformation period of society: An report on the survey in Zhejiang Province, Hubei Province and Chongqing Municipality. China Rural Survey, (1): 36–46. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris C, Potter C, 1995. Recruiting the new conservationists: Farmers’ adoption of agri-environmental schemes in the UK. Journal of Rural Studies, 11(1): 51–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega D L, Wang H H, Olynk-widmar N J et al., 2014. Chinese producer behavior: Aquaculture farmers in southern China. China Economic Review, 28: 17–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfeifera C, Jongeneel R A, Sonneveld M et al., 2009. Landscape properties as drivers for farm diversification: A Dutch case study. Land Use Policy, 26(4): 1106–1115. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.01.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popkin S, 1979. The Rational Rural: The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppenborg P, Koellner T, 2013. Do attitudes toward ecosystem services determine agricultural land use practice? An analysis of farmers’ decision-making in a South Korean watershed. Land Use Policy, 31(1): 422–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmit C, Rounsevell M D A, 2006. Are agricultural land use patterns influenced by farmer imitation?. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 115(1–4): 113–127. doi: 10.1016/j. agee.2005.12.019

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott J C, 2001. The Moral Economy of the Rural. Nan**g: Yilin Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Viaggi D, Raggi M, Paloma S G, 2011. Farm-household investment behavior and the CAP decoupling: Methodological issues in assessing policy. Journal of Policy Modeling, 33(1): 127–145. doi:10.1016/j.jpolmod.2010.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Cheng, Jiang Fuxia, Wang Li**, 2012. A multi-cognitive study of farmer’s land-use consciousness in the perspective of integrative rural and urban development. Journal of Yunnan Normal University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 44(2): 60–66. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Li**, Wang Cheng, Li **ba District, Chongqing City. Geographical Research, 31(5): 945–954. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Willock J, Deary I J, Edwards-Jones G et al., 1999. The role of attitudes and objectives in farmer decision making: Business and environmentally-oriented behavior in Scotland. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 50(2): 286–303. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1999.tb00814.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou **g, Yang Qingyuan, **n Guixin et al., 2010. The impact of rural households’ concurrent business behaviors response on the housing land-use pattern in poor mountain area: Based on a survey of 568 households in Yunyang County, Chongqing. Geographical Research, 29(10): 1767–1779. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Peixin, Qu Futian, Liu Hongbin, 2007. Analysis on farmer’s consciousness and demand on rural environment: A case study in the rural fringe areas of Nan**g outskirts. Journal of Nan**g Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), 7(3): 50–54. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li** Wang.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. XDJK2013B023), Zhejiang Natural Science Foundation (No. LQ13D010003)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, C., Wang, L., Jiang, F. et al. Differentiation of rural households’ consciousness in land use activities: A case from Bailin Village, Sha**ba District of Chongqing Municipality, China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 25, 124–136 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-014-0688-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-014-0688-z

Keywords

Navigation