Log in

Map** the trends and prospects of battery cathode materials based on patent landscape

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers in Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Advancing portable electronics and electric vehicles is heavily dependent on the cutting-edge lithium-ion (Li-ion) battery technology, which is closely linked to the properties of cathode materials. Identifying trends and prospects of cathode materials based on patent analysis is considered a kernel to optimize and refine battery related markets. In this paper, a patent analysis is performed on 6 popular cathode materials by comprehensively considering performance comparison, development trend, annual installed capacity, technology life cycle, and distribution among regions and patent assignees. In the technology life cycle, the cathode materials majorly used in electric vehicle have entered maturity stage, while the lithium cobalt oxide (LCO) cathode that is widely used in portable electronics is still in the growth stage. In global patent distributions, China holds more than 50% of total patents. In the top 10 patent assignees of 6 cathode materials, 2 institutes are from China with the rest being Japan (6) and Republic of Korea (2), indicating that the technology of cathode materials in China is relatively scattered while cathode research is highly concentrated in Japan and Republic of Korea. Moreover, the patent distribution has to consider practical issues as well as the impacts of core patents. For example, the high cost discourages the intention of applying international patents. This paper is expected to stimulate battery research, understand technical layout of various countries, and probably forecast innovative technology breakthroughs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yang C. Running battery electric vehicles with extended range: Coupling cost and energy analysis. Applied Energy, 2022, 306: 118116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Li M, Lu J, Chen Z, et al. 30 years of lithium-ion batteries. Advanced Materials, 2018, 30(33): 1800561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mennel J A, Chidambaram D. A review on the development of electrolytes for lithium-based batteries for low temperature applications. Frontiers in Energy, 2023, 17(1): 43–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmuch R, Wagner R, Hörpel G, et al. Performance and cost of materials for lithium-based rechargeable automotive batteries. Nature Energy, 2018, 3(4): 267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haji Akhoundzadeh M, Panchal S, Samadani E, et al. Investigation and simulation of electric train utilizing hydrogen fuel cell and lithium-ion battery. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2021, 46: 101234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Aguilar P, Groß B. Battery electric vehicles and fuel cell electric vehicles, an analysis of alternative powertrains as a mean to decarbonise the transport sector. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2022, 53: 102624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cano Z P, Banham D, Ye S, et al. Batteries and fuel cells for emerging electric vehicle markets. Nature Energy, 2018, 3(4): 279–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. da Silva Lima L, Quartier M, Buchmayr A, et al. Life cycle assessment of lithium-ion batteries and vanadium redox flow batteries-based renewable energy storage systems. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 2021, 46: 101286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang Y. The discovery of cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries from the view of interdisciplinarity. Interdisciplinary Materials, 2022, 1(3): 323–329

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Whittingham M S. Chalcogenide battery. US Patent, 4009052, 1977-2-22

  11. Monroe D. Building a better battery. MRS Bulletin, 2020, 45(3): 246–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Mizushima K, Jones P C, Wiseman P J, et al. LixCoO2 (0 < x ⩽ 1): A new cathode material for batteries of high energy density. Materials Research Bulletin, 1980, 15(6): 783–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Winter M, Barnett B, Xu K. Before Li ion batteries. Chemical Reviews, 2018, 118(23): 11433–11456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liang Y, Zhao C Z, Yuan H, et al. A review of rechargeable batteries for portable electronic devices. InfoMat, 2019, 1(1): 6–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thackeray M M, David W I F, Bruce P G, et al. Lithium insertion into manganese spinels. Materials Research Bulletin, 1983, 18(4): 461–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Thackeray M M, Lee E, Shi B, et al. Review—From LiMn2O4 to partially-disordered Li2MnNiO4: The evolution of lithiated-spinel cathodes for Li-ion batteries. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2022, 169(2): 020535

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Iskandar Radzi Z, Helmy Arifin K, Zieauddin Kufian M, et al. Review of spinel LiMn2O4 cathode materials under high cut-off voltage in lithium-ion batteries: Challenges and strategies. Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry, 2022, 920: 116623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Padhi A K, Nanjundaswamy K S, Goodenough J B. Phosphoolivines as positive-electrode materials for rechargeable lithium batteries. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 1997, 144(4): 1188–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Tian J, **ong R, Shen W, et al. State-of-charge estimation of LiFePO4 batteries in electric vehicles: A deep-learning enabled approach. Applied Energy, 2021, 291: 116812

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yang X G, Liu T, Wang C Y. Thermally modulated lithium iron phosphate batteries for mass-market electric vehicles. Nature Energy, 2021, 6(2): 176–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsubara Y, Ueda M, Inoue H, et al. Lithium-nickel-cobalt composite oxide for secondary batteries comprises composite oxide of lithium, nickel, cobalt and at least one from aluminium, iron, manganese and boron. Japan Patent, PCT/JP97/02803, 1998-2-19

  22. Liu Z, Yu A, Lee J Y. Synthesis and characterization of LiNi1−xy,CoxMnyO2 as the cathode materials of secondary lithium batteries. Journal of Power Sources, 1999, 81–82: 416–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Whittingham M S. History, evolution, and future status of energy storage. Proceedings of the IEEE, 2012, 100(Special Centennial Issue): 1518–1534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Song L, Zheng Y, **ao Z, et al. Review on thermal runaway of lithium-ion batteries for electric vehicles. Journal of Electronic Materials, 2022, 51(1): 30–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Feng X, Zheng S, He X, et al. Time sequence map for interpreting the thermal runaway mechanism of lithium-ion batteries with LiNixCoyMnzO2 cathode. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2018, 6: 126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yan P, Zheng J, **ao J, et al. Recent advances on the understanding of structural and composition evolution of LMR cathodes for Li-ion batteries. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2015, 3: 26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Liu S, Wang B, Zhang X, et al. Reviving the lithium-manganese-based layered oxide cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. Matter, 2021, 4(5): 1511–1527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mohanty D, Li J, Nagpure S C, et al. Understanding the structure and structural degradation mechanisms in high-voltage, lithium-manganese-rich lithium-ion battery cathode oxides: A review of materials diagnostics. MRS Energy & Sustainability, 2015, 2(1): 15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sathiya M, Rousse G, Ramesha K, et al. Reversible anionic redox chemistry in high-capacity layered-oxide electrodes. Nature Materials, 2013, 12(9): 827–835

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abbas A, Zhang L, Khan S U. A literature review on the state-of-the-art in patent analysis. World Patent Information, 2014, 37: 3–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lee S, Yoon B, Lee C, et al. Business planning based on technological capabilities: Patent analysis for technology-driven roadmap**. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2009, 76(6): 769–786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Qu Z, Zhang S, Zhang C. Patent research in the field of library and information science: Less useful or difficult to explore? Scientometrics, 2017, 111(1): 205–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Abraham B P, Moitra S D. Innovation assessment through patent analysis. Technovation, 2001, 21(4): 245–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Evangelista A, Ardito L, Boccaccio A, et al. Unveiling the technological trends of augmented reality: A patent analysis. Computers in Industry, 2020, 118: 103221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. ** L, Sun X, Ren H, et al. Hotspots and trends of biological water treatment based on bibliometric review and patents analysis. Journal of Environmental Sciences, 2023, 125: 774–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ma S C, Xu J H, Fan Y. Characteristics and key trends of global electric vehicle technology development: A multi-method patent analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2022, 338: 130502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Li D, Alkemade F, Frenken K, et al. Catching up in clean energy technologies: A patent analysis. Journal of Technology Transfer, 2023, 48(2): 693–715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang H, Sun B. Diffusion mechanism of leading technology in the New Energy industry based on the Bass Model. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2021, 9: 586787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Wagner R, Preschitschek N, Passerini S, et al. Current research trends and prospects among the various materials and designs used in lithium-based batteries. Journal of Applied Electrochemistry, 2013, 43(5): 481–496

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Sick N, Krätzig O, Eshetu G G, et al. A review of the publication and patent landscape of anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Energy Storage, 2021, 43: 103231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Ershadi M, Javanbakht M, Kiaei Z, et al. A patent landscape on Fe3O4/graphene-based nanocomposites in lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 46: 103924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Aaldering L J, Leker J, Song C H. Analysis of technological knowledge stock and prediction of its future development potential: The case of lithium-ion batteries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 223: 301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Pu G, Zhu X, Dai J, et al. Understand technological innovation investment performance: Evolution of industry-university-research cooperation for technological innovation of lithium-ion storage battery in China. Journal of Energy Storage, 2022, 46: 103607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mejia C, Kajikawa Y. Emerging topics in energy storage based on a large-scale analysis of academic articles and patents. Applied Energy, 2020, 263: 114625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Golembiewski B, vom Stein N, Sick N, et al. Identifying trends in battery technologies with regard to electric mobility: Evidence from patenting activities along and across the battery value chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2015, 87: 800–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Feng S, Magee C L. Technological development of key domains in electric vehicles: Improvement rates, technology trajectories and key assignees. Applied Energy, 2020, 260: 114264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Altenburg T, Corrocher N, Malerba F. China’s leapfrogging in electromobility. A story of green transformation driving catch-up and competitive advantage. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2022, 183: 121914

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Clarivate. Derwent World Patents Index (DWPI). 2023-1-31, available at website of Clarivate

  49. Clarivate. Derwent Patents Citation Index. 2023-1-31, available at website of Clarivate

  50. Chen X, Song W J, Niu Y T. New energy lithium battery series report. 2023-1-31, available at website of Dfcfw (in Chinese)

  51. Qianzhan Website. Analysis of global lithium battery cathode material on market size and competition pattern in 2022. 2023-1-31, available at website of Qianzhan (in Chinese)

  52. Celine B, Lukasz B, Samantha W. As lithium-ion battery materials evolve, suppliers face new challenges. 2023-1-31, available at website of Spglobal

  53. Whittingham M S. Lithium batteries and cathode materials. Chemical Reviews, 2004, 104(10): 4271–4302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zu C X, Li H. Thermodynamic analysis on energy densities of batteries. Energy & Environmental Science, 2011, 4(8): 2614–2624

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Luo Y, Wei H, Tang L, et al. Nickel-rich and cobalt-free layered oxide cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Materials, 2022, 50: 274–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Ding Y, Cano Z P, Yu A, et al. Automotive Li-ion batteries: Current status and future perspectives. Electrochemical Energy Reviews, 2019, 2(1): 1–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Vaalma C, Buchholz D, Weil M, et al. A cost and resource analysis of sodium-ion batteries. Nature Reviews. Materials, 2018, 3(4): 18013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wu X, Song K, Zhang X, et al. Safety issues in lithium-ion batteries: Materials and cell design. Frontiers in Energy Research, 2019, 7: 65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Su Y, Zhang Q, Chen L, et al. Stress accumulation in Ni-rich layered oxide cathodes: Origin, impact, and resolution. Journal of Energy Chemistry, 2022, 65: 236–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang H, Liu H, Piper L F J, et al. Oxygen loss in layered oxide cathodes for Li-ion batteries: Mechanisms, effects, and mitigation. Chemical Reviews, 2022, 122(6): 5641–5681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Su Y, Zhao J, Chen L, et al. Interfacial degradation and optimization of Li-rich cathode materials. Chinese Journal of Chemistry, 2021, 39(2): 402–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Lyu Y, Wu X, Wang K, et al. An overview on the advances of LiCoO2 cathodes for lithium-ion batteries. Advanced Energy Materials, 2021, 11(2): 2000982

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Global Market Insights. Lithium iron phosphate (LFP) battery market. 2023-6-6, available at website of Gminsights

  64. Fastmarkets. NCM batteries expected to keep largest EV market share: Cobalt Congress 2023. 2023-6-6, available at website of Fastmarkets

  65. Goodenough J B, Mizushima K, Wiseman P J, et al. Electrochemical cell and method of making ion conductors for said cell. US Patent, 0017400, 1980-10-15

  66. Reddy M V, Mauger A, Julien C M, et al. Brief history of early lithium-battery development. Materials, 2020, 13(8): 1884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Blomgren G E. The development and future of lithium-ion batteries. Journal of the Electrochemical Society, 2017, 164(1): A5019–A5025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Chen S, **ong J, Qiu Y, et al. A bibliometric analysis of lithium-ion batteries in electric vehicles. Journal of Energy Storage, 2023, 63: 107109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Kong L, Tang C, Peng H J, et al. Advanced energy materials for flexible batteries in energy storage: A review. SmartMat, 2020, 1(1): 1007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Eftekhari A. Lithium batteries for electric vehicles: From economy to research strategy. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2019, 7(6): 5602–5613

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  71. Pelegov D V, Pontes J. Main drivers of battery industry changes: Electric vehicles—A market overview. Batteries, 2018, 4(4): 65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. Vernon R. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1966, 80(2): 190–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Haupt R, Kloyer M, Lange M. Patent indicators for the technology life cycle development. Research Policy, 2007, 36(3): 387–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Lee M T, Su W N. Search for the develo** trends by patent analysis: A case study of lithium-ion battery electrolytes. Applied Sciences, 2020, 10(3): 952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Aaldering L J, Song C H. Tracing the technological development trajectory in post-lithium-ion battery technologies: A patent-based approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 241: 118343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Malhotra A, Zhang H, Beuse M, et al. How do new use environments influence a technology’s knowledge trajectory? A patent citation network analysis of lithium-ion battery technology Research Policy, 2021, 50(9): 104318

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements This work was supported by the Shaanxi Provincial Philosophy and Social Science Research Project (Grant No. 2023QN0169), the National and Regional Research projects of the Ministry of Education, China (Grant No. 2021-G37), and the 2023 **’an International Studies University Graduate Research Project.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chen Yang.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, C., Mu, XY. Map** the trends and prospects of battery cathode materials based on patent landscape. Front. Energy 17, 822–832 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-023-0900-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-023-0900-x

Keywords

Navigation