SpringerLink
Log in

Lifecycle carbon footprint and cost assessment for coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, storage, and utilization technology in China

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers in Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, utilization, and storage technology has the potential to reduce CO2 emissions, but its carbon footprint and cost assessment are still insufficient. In this paper, coal mining to oil production is taken as a life cycle to evaluate the carbon footprint and levelized costs of direct-coal-to-liquid and indirect-coal-to-liquid coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology under three scenarios: non capture, process capture, process and public capture throughout the life cycle. The results show that, first, the coupling carbon capture utilization and storage technology can reduce CO2 footprint by 28%–57% from 5.91 t CO2/t oil of direct-coal-to-liquid and 24%–49% from 7.10 t CO2/t oil of indirect-coal-to-liquid. Next, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 648–1027 $/t of oil, whereas that of indirect-coal-to-liquid is 653–1065 $/t of oil. When coupled with the carbon capture utilization and storage technology, the levelized cost of direct-coal-to-liquid is 285–1364 $/t of oil, compared to 1101–9793 $/t of oil for indirect-coal-to-liquid. Finally, sensitivity analysis shows that CO2 transportation distance has the greatest impact on carbon footprint, while coal price and initial investment cost significantly affect the levelized cost of coal-to-liquid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. National Bureau of Statistics, China. China Energy Statistical Yearbook 2021. Bei**g: China Statistics Press, 2022 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang L, Shen Q, Wang M, et al. Driving factors and predictions of CO2 emission in China’s coal chemical industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2019, 210: 1131–1140

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yao X, Fan Y, Xu Y, et al. Is it worth to invest? — An evaluation of CTL-CCS project in China based on real options. Energy, 2019, 182: 920–931

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jaramillo P. A life cycle comparison of coal and natural gas for electricity generation and the production of transportation fuels. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania: Carnegie Mellon University, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  5. Guo M, Xu Y. Coal-to-liquids projects in China under water and carbon constraints. Energy Policy, 2018, 117: 58–65

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fan J L, Xu M, Wei S, et al. Carbon reduction potential of China’s coal-fired power plants based on a CCUS source-sink matching model. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2021, 168: 105320

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kawai E, Ozawa A, Leibowicz B D. Role of carbon capture and utilization (CCU) for decarbonization of industrial sector: A case study of Japan. Applied Energy, 2022, 328: 120183

    Google Scholar 

  8. Li K, Shen S, Fan J L, et al. The role of carbon capture, utilization and storage in realizing China’s carbon neutrality: A source-sink matching analysis for existing coal-fired power plants. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 2022, 178: 106070

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wang F, Harindintwali J D, Yuan Z Z, et al. Technologies and perspectives for achieving carbon neutrality. Innovation, 2021, 2(4): 100180

    Google Scholar 

  10. Budinis S, Krevor S, Dowell N M, et al. An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2018, 22: 61–81

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fan J L, Wei S, Yang L, et al. Comparison of the LCOE between coal-fired power plants with CCS and main low-carbon generation technologies: Evidence from China. Energy, 2019, 176: 143–155

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bassano C, Deiana P, Vilardi G, et al. Modeling and economic evaluation of carbon capture and storage technologies integrated into synthetic natural gas and power-to-gas plants. Applied Energy, 2020, 263: 114590

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yang S, **ao Z, Deng C, et al. Techno-economic analysis of coal-to-liquid processes with different gasifier alternatives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2020, 253: 120006

    Google Scholar 

  14. Mantripragada H C. Techno-economic evaluation of coal-to-liquids (CTL) plants and their effects on environment and resources. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jaramillo P, Griffin W M, Matthews H S. Comparative analysis of the production costs and life-cycle GHG emissions of FT liquid fuels from coal and natural gas. Environmental Science & Technology, 2008, 42(20): 7559–7565

    Google Scholar 

  16. Gao D, Ye C, Ren X, et al. Life cycle analysis of direct and indirect coal liquefaction for vehicle power in China. Fuel Processing Technology, 2018, 169: 42–49

    Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang Y, Li J, Yang X. Comprehensive competitiveness assessment of four coal-to-liquid routes and conventional oil refining route in China. Energy, 2021, 235: 121442

    Google Scholar 

  18. El Joumri L, Labjar N, Dalimi M, et al. Life cycle assessment (LCA) in the olive oil value chain: A descriptive review. Environmental Development, 2023, 45: 100800

    Google Scholar 

  19. IPCC. Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  20. Fu K, Qi S. Accounting method and application of provincial electricity carbon emission responsibility in China. China Population Resources and Environment, 2014, 24(4): 27–34 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Shan Y, Guan D, Liu J, et al. Methodology and applications of city level CO2 emission accounts in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2017, 161: 1215–1225

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ministry of Ecology and Environment (MEE), China. Notice on key tasks related to the management of greenhouse gas emission reports for enterprises in 2022. 2022-03-15, available at the website of MEE (in Chinese)

  23. National Bureau of Statistics, China. China Statistical Yearbook 2021. Bei**g: China Statistics Press, 2022 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  24. National Bureau of Statistics, China. China Transport Statistical Yearbook 2021. Bei**g: China Statistics Press, 2022 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  25. National Bureau of Statistics, China. CPI moderately rising in 2022, PPI growth falling back. 2023-01-18, available at the website of National Bureau of Statistics (in Chinese)

  26. Zhang Y, Cheng M, Liu X. Research on greenhouse gas emissions during the life cycle of coal railway transportation in China. Resources Science, 2021, 43(03): 601–611 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Jiang G. Research on comprehensive evaluation and optimization of China’s energy transport corridor system. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Bei**g: China University of Mining and Technology, 2021 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Gan A, Men L, Chen K. Carbon footprint prediction and policy recommendations for China’s international ship** industry. Water Transport Management, 2014, 36(10): 9–11 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wu X. The First Exploration of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Geological Storage in China on a Large Scale. Bei**g: Science Press, 2013 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Chinese Academy of Sciences. The Administrative Center for China’s Agenda 21—China carbon capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) technology assessment report. 2021 (in Chinese)

  31. Huang J. Assessment Report on Carbon Capture, Utilization and Storage Technologies in China. Bei**g: Science Press, 2021 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Cai B, Li Q, Liu G, et al. Carbon dioxide capture, utilization and storage (CCUS) report in China. Institute of Environmental Planning, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, China, 2020 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ouyang X, Lin B. Levelized cost of electricity (LCOE) of renewable energies and required subsidies in China. Energy Policy, 2014, 70: 64–73

    Google Scholar 

  34. IEA, OECD. Projected costs of generating electricity 2015 edition. International Energy Agency, Nuclear Energy Agency and Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, France, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jiaotong Baike Network. Unified railway freight rate (national railway freight price list). 2022 (in Chinese)

  36. Ministry of Transport (MoT) of the People’s Republic of China. Statistical bulletin on the development of the transportation industry in 2021. 2022-05-22, available at the website of the website of MoT (in Chinese)

  37. China Logistics Information Center (CLIC). China highway logistics freight rate weekly index report. 2023-04-28, available at the website of CLIC (in Chinese)

  38. Fu C, Bai X F, Ding H, et al. Basic requirements for coal quality in China’s power coal and coal chemical industry. Coal Quality Technology, 2019, 34(05): 1–8 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Qinhuangdao Coal Network. Overall stabilization of coal prices in 2022. 2023 (in Chinese)

  40. CCTD. Resource base of index business. 2021 (in Chinese)

  41. China International E-Coumerce Network. Commodity Price Index (CPPI) 2022. 2022 (in Chinese)

  42. Li G, Liu Z, Liu T, et al. Techno-economic analysis of a coal to hydrogen process based on ash agglomerating fluidized bed gasification. Energy Conversion and Management, 2018, 164: 552–559

    Google Scholar 

  43. Wang Y, Li G, Liu Z, et al. Techno-economic analysis of biomass-to-hydrogen process in comparison with coal-to-hydrogen process. Energy, 2019, 185: 1063–1075

    Google Scholar 

  44. China Price Information Network. Latest year’s price data. 2021-07-13, available at the website of Chinaprice (in Chinese)

  45. Fan J L, Yu P, Li K, et al. A levelized cost of hydrogen (LCOH) comparison of coal-to-hydrogen with CCS and water electrolysis powered by renewable energy in China. Energy, 2022, 242: 23003

    Google Scholar 

  46. Kearns D, Liu H, Consoli C. Technology readiness and costs of CCS. Global CCS Institute, Australia. 2021

    Google Scholar 

  47. Zhao Y, Li J, Zhang S, et al. Amidoxime-functionalized magnetic mesoporous silica for selective sorption of U(VI). RSC Advances, 2014, 4(62): 32710–32717

    Google Scholar 

  48. Dahowski R T, Davidson C L, Li X C, et al. Examining CCS deployment potential in China via application of an integrated CCS cost curve. Energy Procedia, 2013, 37: 2487–2494

    Google Scholar 

  49. Sichuan United Environment Exchange. Domestic market. 2022-12-31, available at the website of Carbon Emission Trading (in Chinese)

  50. The No.1 Source for Oil & Energy New. Oil price charts WTI crude. 2021-12-31, available at the website of oilprice

  51. Hu, Y, Hao M. Study on the development characteristics and cost boundaries of CCUS industry. Oil and Gas Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(03): 15–22+2 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Guloran Turan Alex Zapantis. The global statue of CCS 2021. Global CCS Institute, Australia, 2021

    Google Scholar 

  53. Mantripragada H C, Rubin E S. CO2 implications of coal-to-liquids (CTL) plants. International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control, 2013, 16: 50–60

    Google Scholar 

  54. Mantripragada H C, Rubin E S. Techno-economic evaluation of coal-to-liquids (CTL) plants with carbon capture and sequestration. Energy Policy, 2011, 39(5): 2808–2816

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zhou L, Duan M, Yu Y. Exergy and economic analyses of indirect coal-to-liquid technology coupling carbon capture and storage. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2018, 174: 87–95

    Google Scholar 

  56. Budinis S, Krevor S, Dowell N M, et al. An assessment of CCS costs, barriers and potential. Energy Strategy Reviews, 2018, 22: 61–81

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 72174196 and 71874193), Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining (China University of Mining and Technology) (Grant Nos. SKLCRSM21KFA05 and SKLCRSM22KFA09), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (Grant No. 2022JCCXNY02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Sustainable Development and Energy Policy Research, School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Bei**g, 100083, China

    **g**g **e, Kai Li, **gli Fan & Yujiao **an

  2. State Key Laboratory of Coal Resources and Safe Mining, China University of Mining and Technology, Bei**g, 100083, China

    **gli Fan & Yujiao **an

  3. The Administrative Centre for China’s Agenda 21, Ministry of Science and Technology, Bei**g, 100038, China

    Xueting Peng

  4. The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou), Carbon Neutrality and Climate Change Thrust, Guangzhou, 511400, China

    Jia Li

  5. Jiangmen Laboratory of Carbon Science and Technology, The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, Jiangmen, 529199, China

    Jia Li

  6. School of Management, China University of Mining and Technology, Bei**g, 100083, China

    Yujiao **an

Authors
  1. **g**g **e
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kai Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. **gli Fan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xueting Peng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Jia Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Yujiao **an
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to **gli Fan or Yujiao **an.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

**e, J., Li, K., Fan, J. et al. Lifecycle carbon footprint and cost assessment for coal-to-liquid coupled with carbon capture, storage, and utilization technology in China. Front. Energy 17, 412–427 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-023-0879-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11708-023-0879-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation