Log in

Empirical prediction of hydraulic aperture of 2D rough fractures: a systematic numerical study

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Earth Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study aims to propose an empirical prediction model of hydraulic aperture of 2D rough fractures through numerical simulations by considering the influences of fracture length, average mechanical aperture, minimum mechanical aperture, joint roughness coefficient (JRC) and hydraulic gradient. We generate 600 numerical models using successive random additions (SRA) algorithm and for each model, seven hydraulic gradients spanning from 2.5 × 10−7 to 1 are considered to fully cover both linear and nonlinear flow regimes. As a result, a total of 4200 fluid flow cases are simulated, which can provide sufficient data for the prediction of hydraulic aperture. The results show that as the ratio of average mechanical aperture to fracture length increases from 0.01 to 0.2, the hydraulic aperture increases following logarithm functions. As the hydraulic gradient increases from 2.5 × 10−7 to 1, the hydraulic aperture decreases following logarithm functions. When a relatively low hydraulic gradient (i.e., 5 × 10−7) is applied between the inlet and the outlet boundaries, the streamlines are of parallel distribution within the fractures. However, when a relatively large hydraulic gradient (i.e., 0.5) is applied between the inlet and the outlet boundaries, the streamlines are disturbed and a number of eddies are formed. The hydraulic aperture predicted using the proposed empirical functions agree well with the calculated results and is more reliable than those available in the preceding literature. In practice, the hydraulic aperture can be calculated as a first-order estimation using the proposed prediction model when the associated parameters are given.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Amadei B, Illangasekare T (1992). Analytical solutions for steady and transient flow in non-homogeneous and anisotropic rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 29(6): 561–572

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Awual M R, Yaita T, Kobayashi T, Shiwaku H, Suzuki S (2020). Improving cesium removal to clean-up the contaminated water using modified conjugate material. J Environ Chem Eng, 8(2): 103684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Babadagli T, Ren X, Develi K (2015). Effects of fractal surface roughness and lithology on single and multiphase flow in a single fracture: an experimental investigation. Int J Multiph Flow, 68: 40–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N (1974). Review of a new shear strength criterion for rock joints. Eng Geol, 11(11): 287–332

    Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Bandis S, Bakhtar K (1985). Strength, deformation and conductivity coupling of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 22(3): 121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barton N, Choubey V (1977). The shear strength of rock joints in theory and practice. Rock Mech, 10(1–2): 1–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bisdom K, Bertotti G, Nick H M (2016). The impact of in-situ stress and outcrop-based fracture geometry on hydraulic aperture and upscaled permeability in fractured reservoirs. Tectonophysics, 690: 63–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown E (1981). Rock characterization, testing & monitoring: ISRM suggested methods. Biospectroscopy, 18(6): 109

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S R, Scholz C H (1985). Broad bandwidth study of the topography of natural rock surfaces. J Geophys Res, 90(B14): 12575–12582

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cao C, Xu Z, Chai J, Li Y (2019). Radial fluid flow regime in a single fracture under high hydraulic pressure during shear process. J Hydrol (Amst), 579: 124142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cardona A, Finkbeiner T, Santamarina J C (2021). Natural rock fractures: from aperture to fluid flow. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 54(11): 5827–5844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y D, Liang W G, Lian H J, Yang J F, Nguyen V P (2017). Experimental study on the effect of fracture geometric characteristics on the permeability in deformable rough-walled fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 98: 121–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y F, Zhou J Q, Hu S H, Hu R, Zhou C B (2015). Evaluation of forchheimer equation coefficients for non-darcy flow in deformable rough-walled fractures. J Hydrol (Amst), 529: 993–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz P, Quadros E, Fo D, Marrano A (1982). Evaluation of opening and hydraulic conductivity of rock discontinuities. The 23rd U. S Symposium on Rock Mechanics (USRMS), Berkeley: California

  • Dang W, Wu W H K, Konietzky H, Qian J (2019). Effect of shear-induced aperture evolution on fluid flow in rock fractures. Comput Geotech, 114: 103152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foias C, Manley O, Rosa R, Temam R (2002). Navier-Stokes equations and turbulence. Phys Today, 55(10): 54–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Y, Kulatilake P H S W, Tang H, **ong C (2014). Investigation of natural rock joint roughness. Comput Geotech, 55: 290–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ge Z, Yuan T, Li Y (2019). Numerical study on the mechanism of fluid flow through single rough fractures with different JRC. Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 49(1): 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Gong F C, Guo T K, Sun W, Li Z M, Yang B, Chen Y M, Qu Z Q (2020). Evaluation of geothermal energy extraction in Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) with multiple fracturing horizontal wells (MFHW). Renew Energy, 151: 1339–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo T K, Zhang Y L, He J Y, Gong F C, Chen M, Liu X Q (2021). Research on geothermal development model of abandoned high temperature oil reservoir in north China oilfield. Renew Energy, 177: 1–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hakami E (1995). Aperture distribution of rock fractures. Dissertation for Doctoral Degree. Stockholm: Royal Institute of Technology

    Google Scholar 

  • Hou J C, Cao M C, Liu P K (2018). Development and utilization of geothermal energy in China: current practices and future strategies. Renew Energy, 125: 401–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang N, Liu R C, Jiang Y J (2017). Numerical study of the geometrical and hydraulic characteristics of 3D self-affine rough fractures during shear. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 45: 127–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang N, Liu R C, Jiang Y J, Cheng Y, Li B (2019). Shear-flow coupling characteristics of a three-dimensional discrete fracture network-fault model considering stress-induced aperture variations. J Hydrol (Amst), 571: 416–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Javadi M, Sharifzadeh M, Shahriar K, Mitani Y (2014). Critical Reynolds number for nonlinear flow through rough-walled fractures: the role of shear processes. Water Resour Res, 50(2): 1789–1804

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ju Y, Dong J B, Gao F, Wang J G (2019). Evaluation of water permeability of rough fractures based on a self-affine fractal model and optimized segmentation algorithm. Adv Water Resour, 129: 99–111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim J, Cho W, Chung I M, Heo J H (2007). On the stochastic simulation procedure of estimating critical hydraulic gradient for gas storage in unlined rock caverns. Geosci J, 11(3): 249–258

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kulatilake P H S W, Balasingam P, Park J, Morgan R (2006). Natural rock joint roughness quantification through fractal techniques. Geotech Geol Eng, 24(5): 1181–1202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumari W G P, Ranjith P G (2019). Sustainable development of enhanced geothermal systems based on geotechnical research - a review. Earth Sci Rev, 199: 102955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence J (1993). Introduction to Neural Networks. California Scientific Software

  • Li B, Jiang Y (2013). Quantitative estimation of fluid flow mechanism in rock fracture taking into account the influences of JRC and Reynolds number. J Min Mater Process Inst Jpn, 129 (7): 479–484 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Li Y, Zhao Z, Liu R (2019). A mechanical-hydraulic-solute transport model for rough-walled rock fractures subjected to shear under constant normal stiffness conditions. J Hydrol (Amst), 579: 124153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li B, Liu R, Jiang Y (2016a). Influences of hydraulic gradient, surface roughness, intersecting angle, and scale effect on nonlinear flow behavior at single fracture intersections. J Hydrol (Amst), 538: 440–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li J L, Li X H, Zhang B, Sui B, Wang P C, Zhang M (2021). Effect of lower surface roughness on nonlinear hydraulic properties of fractures. Geofluids, 2021: 6612378

    Google Scholar 

  • Li X, Feng Z J, Han G, Elsworth D, Marone C, Saffer D, Cheon D S (2016b). Breakdown pressure and fracture surface morphology of hydraulic fracturing in shale with H2O, CO2 and N2. Geomechanics Geophys Geo-Energy Geo-Resour, 2(2): 63–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu E (2005). Effects of fracture aperture and roughness on hydraulic and mechanical properties of rocks: implication of seismic characterization of fractured reservoirs. J Geophys Eng, 2(1): 38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H H, Bodvarsson G S, Lu S L, Molz F J (2004). A corrected and generalized successive random additions algorithm for simulating fractional levy motions. Math Geol, 36(3): 361–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu H H, Molz F J (1996). Discrimination of fractional Brownian movement and fractional Gaussian noise structures in permeability and related property distributions with range analyses. Water Resour Res, 32(8): 2601–2605

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J W, Wei K H, Xu S W, Cui J, Ma J, **ao X L, ** B D, He X S (2021a). Surfactant-enhanced remediation of oil-contaminated soil and groundwater: a review. Sci Total Environ, 756: 144142

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R C, He M, Huang N, Jiang Y J, Yu L Y (2020). Threedimensional double-rough-walled modeling of fluid flow through self-affine shear fractures. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng, 12(1): 41–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R C, Jiang Y J, Li B (2016c). Effects of intersection and dead-end of fractures on nonlinear flow and particle transport in rock fracture networks. Geosci J, 20(3): 415–426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R C, **g H W, Li X Z, Yin Q, Xu Z G, He M, Taylor T (2021b). An experimental study on fractal pore size distribution and hydromechanical properties of granites after high temperature treatment. Fractals, 29(4): 1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R C, Li B, Jiang Y J (2016a). Critical hydraulic gradient for nonlinear flow through rock fracture networks: the roles of aperture, surface roughness, and number of intersections. Adv Water Resour, 88: 53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R C, Wang Y S, Li B, **g H W, Li S C, Yang H Q (2022). Linear and nonlinear fluid flow responses of connected fractures subject to shearing under constant normal load and constant normal stiffness boundary conditions. Comput Geotech, 141: 104517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Jiang Y, Li B, Wang X (2015). A fractal model for characterizing fluid flow in fractured rock masses based on randomly distributed rock fracture networks. Comput Geotech, 65: 45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Li B, Jiang Y (2016b). Critical hydraulic gradient for nonlinear flow through rock fracture networks: the roles of aperture, surface roughness, and number of intersections. Adv Water Resour, 88(Feb): 53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu R, Yu L, Jiang Y (2017). Quantitative estimates of normalized transmissivity and the onset of nonlinear fluid flow through rough rock fractures. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 50: 1063–1071

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomize G (1951). Flow in Fractured Rock. Moscow: Gosemergoizdat, 127–129 (in Russian)

    Google Scholar 

  • Louis C, Maini Y (1969). Determination of in-situ hydraulic parameters in jointed rock. International Society of Rock Mechanics Proceedings, 1: 1–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuki K, Kimura Y, Sakaguchi K, Kizaki A, Giwelli A (2010). Effect of shear displacement on the hydraulic conductivity of a fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 47(3): 436e449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCulloch W S, Pitts W (1943). A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys, 5(4): 115–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers N O (1962). Characterization of surface roughness. Wear, 5(3): 182–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowamooz A, Radilla G, Fourar M (2009). Non-Darcian two-phase flow in a transparent replica of a rough-walled rock fracture. Water Resour Res, 45(7): W07406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odling N E (1994). Natural fracture profiles, fractal dimension and joint roughness coefficients. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 27(3): 135–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsson R, Barton N (2001). An improved model for hydromechanical coupling during shearing of rock joints. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 38(3): 317–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patir N, Cheng H S (1978). An average flow model for determining effects of three-dimensional roughness on partial hydrodynamic lubrication. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 100(1): 12–17

    Google Scholar 

  • Power W L, Tullis T E (1991). Euclidean and fractal models for the description of rock surface roughness. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 28(6): A344

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasouli V, Hosseinian A (2011). Correlations developed for estimation of hydraulic parameters of rough fractures through the simulation of JRC flow channels. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 44(4): 447–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renshaw C E (1995). On the relationship between mechanical and hydraulic apertures in rough-walled fractures. J Geophys Res, 100(B12): 24629–24636

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rumelhart D E, Hinton G E, Williams R J (1986). Learning representations by back propagating errors. Nature, 323(6088): 533–536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scesi L, Gattinoni P (2007). Roughness control on hydraulic conductivity in fractured rocks. Hydrogeol J, 15(2): 201–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidhuber J (2015). Deep learning in neural networks: an overview. Neural Netw, 61: 85–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmittbuhl J, Steyer A, Jouniaux L, Toussaint R (2008). Fracture morphology and viscous transport. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 45(3): 422–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Snow D T (1970). The frequency and apertures of fractures in rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 7(1): 23–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Z H, Wang L Q, Zhou J Q, Wang C S (2020). A new method for determining the hydraulic aperture of rough rock fractures using the support vector regression. Eng Geol, 271: 105618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan J, Rong G, Zhan H B, He R H, Sha S, Li B W (2020). An innovative method to evaluate hydraulic conductivity of a single rock fracture based on geometric characteristics. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 53(10): 4767–4786

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsang Y W, Witherspoon P A (1981). Hydromechanical behavior of a deformable rock fracture subject to normal stress. J Geophys Res, 86(B10 NB10): 9287–9298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tse R, Cruden D M (1979). Estimating joint roughness coefficients. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 16(5): 303–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waite M E, Ge S, Spetzler H (1999). A new conceptual model for fluid flow in discrete fractures: an experimental and numerical study. J Geophys Res, 104: 13049–13059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh J (1981). Effect of pore pressure and confining pressure on fracture permeability. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr, 18(5): 429–435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L C, Cardenas M B (2014). Non-Fickian transport through twodimensional rough fractures: assessment and prediction. Water Resour Res, 50(2): 871–884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L C, Cardenas M B, Slottke D T, Ketcham R A, Sharp J M Jr (2015a). Modification of the Local Cubic Law of fracture flow for weak inertia, tortuosity, and roughness. Water Resour Res, 51(4): 2064–2080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Tian Y, Yu X Y, Wang C, Yao B W, Wang S H, Winterfeld P H, Wang X, Yang Z Z, Wang Y H, Cui J Y, Wu Y S (2017). Advances in improved/enhanced oil recovery technologies for tight and shale reservoirs. Fuel, 210: 425–445

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang M, Chen Y F, Ma G W, Zhou J Q, Zhou C B (2016). Influence of surface roughness on nonlinear flow behaviors in 3D self-affine rough fractures: Lattice Boltzmann simulations. Adv Water Resour, 96: 373–388

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y K, Zhang Z Y, Liu X Q, Xue K S (2023). Relative permeability of two-phase fluid flow through rough fractures: the roles of fracture roughness and confining pressure. Adv Water Resour, 175: 104426

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z C, Li S C, Qiao L P, Zhang Q S (2015b). Finite element analysis of the hydro-mechanical behavior of an underground crude oil storage facility in granite subject to cyclic loading during operation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 73: 70–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Witherspoon P A, Wang J S Y, Iwai K, Gale J E (1980). Validity of cubic law for fluid-flow in a deformable rock fracture. Water Resour Res, 16(6): 1016–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Z H, Pan S R, Chen F W, Long G D, Zhang C Q, Yu P S (2021). A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst, 32(1): 4–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **e L Z, Gao C, Ren L, Li C B (2015). Numerical investigation of geometrical and hydraulic properties in a single rock fracture during shear displacement with the Navier-Stokes equations. Environ Earth Sci, 73(11): 7061–7074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **ong X, Li B, Jiang Y, Koyama T, Zhang C (2011). Experimental and numerical study of the geometrical and hydraulic characteristics of a single rock fracture during shear. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 48: 1292–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **ong X, Li B, Jiang Y, Koyama T, Zhang C (2013). Experimental and numerical study of the geometrical and hydraulic characteristics of a single rock fracture during shear. Seismic Safety Evaluation of Concrete Dams, 22: 513–538

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z Y, Lo S C, Di C C (2001). Reassessing the joint roughness coefficient (JRC) estimation using Z2. Rock Mech Rock Eng, 34(3): 243–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ye Z, Liu H H, Jiang Q, Zhou C (2015). Two-phase flow properties of a horizontal fracture: the effect of aperture distribution. Adv Water Resour, 76(feb): 43–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeo I W, de Freitas M H, Zimmerman R W (1998). Effect of shear displacement on the aperture and permeability of a rock fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 35(8): 1051–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Q, Ma G W, **g H W, Wang H D, Su H J, Wang Y C, Liu R C (2017). Hydraulic properties of 3D rough-walled fractures during shearing: an experimental study. J Hydrol (Amst), 555: 169–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin Q, Nie X X, Wu J Y, Wang Q, Bian K Q, **g H W (2023). Experimental study on unloading induced shear performances of 3D saw-tooth rock fractures. Int J Min Sci Technol, 33(4): 463–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu L, Zhang J, Liu R C, Li S C, Liu D, Wang X L (2022). Estimation of the representative elementary volume of three-dimensional fracture networks based on permeability and trace map analysis: a case study. Eng Geol, 309: 106848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Chai J R (2020). Effect of surface morphology on fluid flow in rough fractures: a review. J Nat Gas Sci Eng, 79: 103343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao X, Liu W, Cai Z Q, Han B, Qian T W, Zhao D Y (2016). An overview of preparation and applications of stabilized zero-valent iron nanoparticles for soil and groundwater remediation. Water Res, 100: 245–266

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao Y L, Zhang L Y, Wang W J, Tang J Z, Lin H, Wan W (2017). Transient pulse test and morphological analysis of single rock fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 91: 139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman R W, Bodvarsson G S (1996). Hydraulic conductivity of rock fractures. Transp Porous Media, 23(1): 1–30

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou L C, **g L, Cvetkovic V (2015). Roughness decomposition and nonlinear fluid flow in a single rock fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 75: 102–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zou L C, **g L, Cvetkovic V (2017). Shear-enhanced nonlinear flow in rough-walled rock fractures. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci, 97: 33–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study has been partially funded by National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2022YFE0128300), National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 52379114 and 52379113), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (No. BK20211584), the Assistance Program for Future Outstanding Talents of the China University of Mining and Technology (No. 2023WLKXJ187) and the Postgraduate Research & Practice Innovation Program of Jiangsu Province (No. KYCX23_2746). These supports are gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Shuchen Li or Richeng Liu.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, X., Li, S., Liu, R. et al. Empirical prediction of hydraulic aperture of 2D rough fractures: a systematic numerical study. Front. Earth Sci. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-023-1089-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-023-1089-3

Keywords

Navigation