Log in

Glioma cell line proliferation controlled by different chemical functional groups in vitro

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Glioma cell line C6 cultured on silicon surfaces modified by different chemical functional groups, including mercapto (-SH), carboxyl (-COOH), amino (-NH2), hydroxyl (-OH) and methyl (-CH3) groups, was studied here to investigate the influence of surface chemistry on the cell proliferation, adhesion and apoptosis. AFM confirmed the similar characteristic of different functional groups occupation. The adhering C6 exhibited morphological changes in response to different chemical functional groups. The C6 adhered to -COOH, -NH2, -OH and -CH3 surfaces and flattened morphology, while those on -SH surface exhibited the smallest contact area with mostly rounded morphology, which led to the death of cancer cells. The results of MTT assay showed that the -COOH and -NH2 groups promoted cell proliferation, while the -SH significantly inhibited the proliferation. Compared with other chemical functional groups, the -SH group exhibited its unique effect on the fate of cancer cells, which might provide means for the design of biomaterials to prevent and treat glioma.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Spain)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

References

  1. Goodenberger M L, Jenkins R B. Genetics of adult glioma. Cancer Genetics, 2012, 205(12): 613–621

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mamelak A N, Jacoby D B. Targeted delivery of antitumoral therapy to glioma and other malignancies with synthetic chlorotoxin (TM-601). Expert Opinion on Drug Delivery, 2007, 4(2): 175–186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Fu Y J, Du J, Yang R J, et al. Potential adenovirus-mediated gene therapy of glioma cancer. Biotechnology Letters, 2010, 32(1): 11–18

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Reuss D, von Deimling A. Hereditary tumor syndromes and gliomas. Gliomas: Recent Results in Cancer Research, 2009, 171: 83–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Iwami K-I, Natsume A, Wakabayashi T. Gene therapy for high-grade glioma. Neurologia Medico-Chirurgica, 2010, 50(9): 727–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ruzevick J, Jackson C, Phallen J, et al. Clinical trials with immunotherapy for high-grade glioma. Neurosurgery Clinics of North America, 2012, 23(3): 459–470

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Faucheux N, Schweiss R, Lützow K, et al. Self-assembled monolayers with different terminating groups as model substrates for cell adhesion studies. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(14): 2721–2730

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Medema J P, Vermeulen L. Microenvironmental regulation of stem cells in intestinal homeostasis and cancer. Nature, 2011, 474(7351): 318–326

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Du J, Yarema K J. Carbohydrate engineered cells for regenerative medicine. Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews, 2010, 62(7–8): 671–682

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Keselowsky B G, Collard D M, García A J. Surface chemistry modulates focal adhesion composition and signaling through changes in integrin binding. Biomaterials, 2004, 25(28): 5947–5954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Curran J M, Chen R, Hunt J A. Controlling the phenotype and function of mesenchymal stem cells in vitro by adhesion to silane-modified clean glass surfaces. Biomaterials, 2005, 26(34): 7057–7067

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Scotchford C A, Gilmore C P, Cooper E, et al. Protein adsorption and human osteoblast-like cell attachment and growth on alkylthiol on gold self-assembled monolayers. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research, 2002, 59(1): 84–99

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Murray P, Vasilev K, Fuente Mora C, et al. The potential of small chemical functional groups for directing the differentiation of kidney stem cells. Biochemical Society Transactions, 2010, 38(4): 1062–1066

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ren Y J, Zhang H, Huang H, et al. In vitro behavior of neural stem cells in response to different chemical functional groups. Biomaterials, 2009, 30(6): 1036–1044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu X, Wang Y, He J, et al. Various fates of neuronal progenitor cells observed on several different chemical functional groups. Frontiers of Materials Science, 2011, 5(4): 358–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yu X-L, Xu S-J, Shao J-D, et al. Different fate of cancer cells on several chemical functional groups. Surface and Coatings Technology, doi: 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.08.054

  17. Kearns S M, Laywell E D, Kukekov V K, et al. Extracellular matrix effects on neurosphere cell motility. Experimental Neurology, 2003, 182(1): 240–244

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lisi A, Rieti S, Cricenti A, et al. ELF non ionizing radiation changes the distribution of the inner chemical functional groups in human epithelial cell (HaCaT) culture. Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine, 2006, 25(4): 281–289

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Yin C, Liao K, Mao H Q, et al. Adhesion contact dynamics of HepG2 cells on galactose-immobilized substrates. Biomaterials, 2003, 24(5): 837–850

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Rahmany M B, Van Dyke M. Biomimetic approaches to modulate cellular adhesion in biomaterials: A review. Acta Biomaterialia, doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.11.019

  21. Keselowsky B G, Collard D M, García A J. Surface chemistry modulates fibronectin conformation and directs integrin binding and specificity to control cell adhesion. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A, 2003, 66(2): 247–259

    Google Scholar 

  22. Cho Y, Shi R, Borgens R B. Chitosan produces potent neuroprotection and physiological recovery following traumatic spinal cord injury. The Journal of Experimental Biology, 2010, 213(9): 1513–1520

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nomura H, Zahir T, Kim H, et al. Extramedullary chitosan channels promote survival of transplanted neural stem and progenitor cells and create a tissue bridge after complete spinal cord transection. Tissue Engineering Part A, 2008, 14(5): 649–665

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials. Biomaterials, 2000, 21(7): 667–681

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Atkinson H, Chalmers R. Delivering the goods: viral and non-viral gene therapy systems and the inherent limits on cargo DNA and internal sequences. Genetica, 2010, 138(5): 485–498

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Klug S J, Ressing M, Koenig J, et al. TP53 codon 72 polymorphism and cervical cancer: a pooled analysis of individual data from 49 studies. The Lancet Oncology, 2009, 10(8): 772–784

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to **ang-Dong Kong.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xu, SJ., Cui, FZ., Yu, XL. et al. Glioma cell line proliferation controlled by different chemical functional groups in vitro . Front. Mater. Sci. 7, 69–75 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-013-0195-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11706-013-0195-7

Keywords

Navigation