Log in

Molecular Identification of Aedes, Armigeres, and Culex Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) Using Mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit I Genes in Myanmar

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Acta Parasitologica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Mosquitoes are important vectors that carry disease-causing agents that can affect humans and animals. DNA barcoding is a complementary identification which can be used to validate morphological characterization of mosquito species. The objectives of this study were to identify the mitochondrial sequence of the COI gene and to construct a molecular phylogeny based on the genetic divergence of the mosquito species studied.

Methods

In this study, DNA extraction and the amplification of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit I genes (COI) were performed on pooled mosquito samples collected in Nay Pyi Taw area, Myanmar.

Results

Fragments of the COI gene showed 99–100% identity with sequences of Aedes aegypti, Armigeres subalbatus, Culex pipiens complex, and Cx. quinquefasciatus, respectively, deposited in GenBank. This study categorized two haplotypes from each Ar. subalbatus and Cx. pipiens complex COI gene sequence, as well as three haplotypes from Cx. quinquefasciatus COI gene sequences. The highest haplotype diversity and nucleotide diversity were observed in the Ar. subalbatus population (Hd = 1.0000; π = 0.0033), followed by the Cx. pipiens complex and Cx. quinquefasciatus populations.

Conclusion

This study provides useful information on the molecular identification and genetic diversity of mosquito vectors with medical and veterinary significance, which may assist in the improvement of mosquito control programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Harbach RE (2007) The Culicidae (Diptera): a review of taxonomy, classification and phylogeny. Zootaxa 1668(1):591–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Reidenbach KR, Cook S, Bertone MA, Harbach RE, Wiegmann BM, Besansky NJ (2009) Phylogenetic analysis and temporal diversification of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) based on nuclear genes and morphology. BMC Evol Biol 9:298. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-9-298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Bortolus A (2008) Error cascades in the biological sciences: the unwanted consequences of using bad taxonomy in ecology. Ambio 37(2):114–118. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2008)37[114:ecitbs]2.0.co;2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Batovska J, Blacket MJ, Brown K, Lynch SE (2016) Molecular identification of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in southeastern Australia. Ecol Evol 6(9):3001–3011. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2095

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Hebert PDN, Cywinska A, Ball SL, deWaard JR (2003) Biological identifications through DNA barcodes. Proc Biol Sci 270:313–321

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Hemmerter S, Slapeta J, van den Hurk AF, Cooper RD, Whelan PI, Russell RC, Johansen CA, Beebe NW (2007) A curious coincidence: mosquito biodiversity and the limits of the Japanese encephalitis virus in Australasia. BMC Evol Biol 7:100. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2148-7-100

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Aung ST, Wai SS, Htun LL, Bawm S (2018) Investigation of seasonal distribution of mosquito species in Nay Pyi Taw area, Myanmar. S Asian J Life Sci 6:7–13. https://doi.org/10.17582/journal.sajls/2018/6.1.7.13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R (1994) DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Mol Mar Biol Biotechnol 3(5):294–299

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K (2018) MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol Biol Evol 35(6):1547–1549. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msy096

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Leigh JW, Bryant D (2015) Popart: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods Ecol Evol 6(9):1110–1116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Futami K, Valderrama A, Baldi M, Minakawa N, Marín Rodríguez R, Chaves LF (2015) New and common haplotypes shape genetic diversity in Asian tiger mosquito populations from Costa Rica and Panamá. J Econ Entomol 108(2):761–768

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith JL, Fonseca DM (2004) Rapid assays for identification of members of the Culex (Culex) pipiens complex, their hybrids, and other sibling species (Diptera: culicidae). Am J Trop Med Hyg 70:339–345

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Womack M (1993) The yellow fever mosquito, Aedes aegypti. Wing Beats 5:4

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chaves LF, Imanishi N, Hoshi T (2015) Population dynamics of Armigeres subalbatus (Diptera: Culicidae) across a temperate altitudinal gradient. Bull Entomol Res 105(6):589–597

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rajavel AR (1992) Larval habitat of Armigeres subalbatus (COQ) and its characteristics in Pondicherry. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 23:470–473

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Liu H, Lu HJ, Liu ZJ, **g J, Ren JQ, Liu YY, Lu F, ** NY (2013) Japanese encephalitis virus in mosquitoes and swine in Yunnan province, China 2009–2010. Vector Borne Zoonotic Dis 13(1):41–49. https://doi.org/10.1089/vbz.2012.1016

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Das P, Bhattacharya S, Palit CA, Das S, Ghosh KK, Hati AK (1983) Diurnal man-biting activity of Armigeres subalbatus (Coquillet, 1898) in a village in West Bengal. Indian J Med Res 78:794–798

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Cheong WH, Mak JW, Naidu S, Mahadevan S (1981) Armigeres subalbatus incriminated as an important vector of the dog heartworm Dirofilaria immitis and the bird Cardiofilaria in urban Kuala Lumpur. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 12(4):611–612

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Poh KC, Chaves LF, Reyna-Nava M, Roberts CM, Fredregill C, Bueno R, Debboun M, Hamer GL (2019) The influence of weather and weather variability on mosquito abundance and infection with West Nile virus in Harris County, Texas, USA. Sci Total Environ 675:260–272

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Reisen WK, Lothrop HD, Lothrop B (2003) Factors influencing the outcome of mark-release-recapture studies with Culex tarsalis (Diptera: Culicidae). J Med Entomol 40(6):820–829

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Jones CE, Lounibos LP, Marra PP, Kilpatrick AM (2012) Rainfall influences survival of Culex pipiens (Diptera: Culicidae) in a residential neighborhood in the mid-atlantic United States. J Med Entomol 49(3):467–473. https://doi.org/10.1603/me11191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Miller BR, Crabtree MB, Savage HM (1996) Phylogeny of fourteen Culex mosquito species, including the Culex pipiens complex, inferred from the internal transcribed spacers of ribosomal DNA. Insect Mol Biol 5:93–107

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Weitzel T, Collado A, Jöst A, Pietsch K, Storch V, Becker N (2009) Genetic differentiation of populations within the Culex pipiens complex and phylogeny of related species. J Am Mosq Control Assoc 25(1):6–17. https://doi.org/10.2987/08-5699.1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Nelms BM, Kothera L, Thiemann T, Macedo PA, Savage HM, Reisen WK (2013) Phenotypic variation among Culex pipiens complex (Diptera: Culicidae) populations from the Sacramento Valley, California: horizontal and vertical transmission of West Nile virus, diapause potential, autogeny, and host selection. Am J Trop Med Hyg 89(6):1168–1178. https://doi.org/10.4269/ajtmh.13-0219

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Sanogo YO, Kim CH, Lampman R, Halvorsen JG, Gad AM, Novak RJ (2008) Identification of male specimens of the Culex pipiens complex (Diptera: Culicidae) in the hybrid zone using morphology and molecular techniques. J Med Entomol 45(2):203–209. https://doi.org/10.1603/0022-2585(2008)45[203:iomsot]2.0.co;2

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported in part by KAKENHI (grant number 17H04638) from MEXT (the Japanese Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology. The authors would like to express our gratitude to the staffs of the Laboratory of Parasitology, Department of Disease Control, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Hokkaido University, Japan, and the Department of Pharmacology and Parasitology, University of Veterinary Science, Myanmar, for their assistance with mosquito collection and laboratory work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saw Bawm.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Ethical approval

Sample collection in this study was approved by the Ethics Committee of University of Veterinary Science, Nay Pyi Taw, Myanmar (approval no. 308/Katha (postgraduate)/2016.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

11686_2023_721_MOESM1_ESM.pptx

Fig. S1 The phylogenetic relationship of COI sequences of Cx. pipiens complex and Cx. quinquefasciatus (Cx. pipiens complex subgroup) detected in this study and reference sequences. The phylogenetic tree was constructed by the Maximum Likelihood method based on Tamura–Nei model. The bold taxa represent the sequences obtained from the current study. GenBank accession number of each sequence is given. Bootstrap values were computed independently for the purposes of 1000 replicates (PPTX 41 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Aung, S.T., Bawm, S., Chel, H.M. et al. Molecular Identification of Aedes, Armigeres, and Culex Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) Using Mitochondrial Cytochrome Oxidase Subunit I Genes in Myanmar. Acta Parasit. 68, 862–868 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-023-00721-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11686-023-00721-x

Keywords

Navigation