Log in

Anatomische Prothese bei Frakturfolgen am proximalen Humerus

Anatomic shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae of the proximal humerus

  • Übersicht
  • Published:
Obere Extremität Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Hintergrund

Nach proximaler Humerusfraktur zeigen sich diverse Frakturfolgen, die teils konservativ, häufig aber auch operativ behandelt werden.

Ziel der Arbeit

Aktuelle Indikationen für die anatomische Prothese bei Frakturfolgen am proximalen Humerus werden dargestellt.

Material und Methoden

Aktuelle Literatur zur Behandlung von Frakturfolgen am proximalen Humerus mittels anatomischer Prothetik wird analysiert.

Ergebnisse und Schlussfolgerung

Der Großteil der Frakturfolgen nach proximaler Humerusfraktur wird humeruskopferhaltend oder mittels inverser Schulterprothese behandelt. Das Indikationsspektrum für die Implantation einer anatomischen Prothese beschränkt sich auf wenige Fälle, größtenteils bei Humeruskopfnekrose oder größeren Impressionsdefekten des Humeruskopfs. Eine intakte und funktionsfähige Rotatorenmanschette sowie ein stabiles, zentriertes Schultergelenk sind für den klinischen Erfolg essentiell.

Abstract

Background

Following proximal humeral fractures, several different fracture sequelae may occur. Treatment can be nonoperative, but surgical treatment is commonly needed.

Objectives

To present current indications for anatomic prosthesis for the treatment of proximal humeral fracture sequelae.

Materials and methods

Analysis of the current literature regarding treatment of proximal humeral fracture sequelae with anatomic shoulder arthroplasty.

Results and conclusions

The majority of proximal humeral fracture sequelae are treated with humeral head-preserving strategies or with reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. The indication for the implantation of an anatomic shoulder prosthesis is limited to a few cases with humeral head necrosis or humeral head impression fractures. An intact and functioning rotator cuff as well as a stable and centered humeral head are essential for clinical success.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Thailand)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Abb. 1

Literatur

  1. Audigé L, Graf L, Flury M et al (2019) Functional improvement is sustained following anatomical and reverse shoulder arthroplasty for fracture sequelae: a registry-based analysis. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 139:1561–1569

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Boileau P, Chuinard C, Le Huec J‑C, Walch G, Trojani C (2006) Proximal humerusfracture sequelae. Impact of a new radiographic classification on arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 442:121–130. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.blo.0000195679.87258.6e

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Boileau P, Trojani C, Walch G et al (2001) Shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of the sequelae of fractures of the proximal humerus. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10:299–308

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Carlock KD, Konda SR, Bianco IR et al (2021) Repair of proximal humerus fracture nonunions using a standardized treatment algorithm: a case series. Eur J Orthop Sports Traumatol 31:1151–1159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Coifman BUH, Scheibel M (2022) Disolcation arthropathy of the shoulder. J Clin Med 11:2019

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Frank JK, Siegert P, Plachel F et al (2022) The evolution of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty—from the first steps to novel implant designs and surgical techniques. J Clin Med 11:1512

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Han X, Zhuang J, Yu W et al (2020) Conversion to hemi-shoulder arthroplasty or reverse total shoulder arthroplasty after failed plate osteosynthesis of proximal humerus fractures: a retrospective study. J Internat Med Res 48(8):1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Holschen M, Siemes MK, Witt KA et al (2018) Five-year outcome after conversion of a hemiarthroplasty when used for the treatment of a proximal humeral fracture to a reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 100-B:761–766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Katthagen JC, Hennecke D, Jensen G et al (2014) Arthroscopy after locked plating of proximal humeral fractures: Implant removal, capsular release, and intra-articular findings. Arthroscopy 30(9):1061–1067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Königshausen M, Mempel E, Rausch V et al (2019) Combined fractures of the humeral head and the glenoid. Obere Extrem 14:118–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kozak T, Bauer S, Walch G et al (2021) An update on reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: current indications, new designs, same old problems. EFORT Open Rev 6:189–201

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Krukenberg A, Imiolczyk JP, Moroder P et al (2018) Schulterendoprothetik. Z Orthop Unfall 156:227–238

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lill H, Voigt C, Jensen G et al (2015) Corrective osteosynthesis of proximal humeral fractures. Technique and postoperative results. Unfallchirurg 118:18–28

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Märtens N, Heinze M, Awiszus F et al (2021) Long-term survival and failure analysis of anatomical stemmed and stemless arthroplasties. Bone Joint J 103-B(7):1292–1300

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mechlenburg I, Rasmussen S, Unbehaun D et al (2020) Patients undergoing shoulder arthroplasty for failed nonoperative treatment of proximal humeral fracture have low implant survival and low patient-reported outcomes: 837 cases from the Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry. Acta Orthop 91(3):319–325

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Nowak LL, Hall J, McKee MD et al (2019) A higher reoperation rate following arthroplasty for failed fixation versus primary arthroplasty for the treatment of proximal humeral fractures. Bone Joint J 101-B:1272–1279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Reuther F, Mühlhäuser B, Wahl D et al (2010) Functional outcomes of shoulder hemiarthroplasty for fractures: a multicentric analysis. Injury 41(6):606–612

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmalzl J, Graf A, Kimmeyer M et al (2022) Treatment of avascular necrosis of the humeral head—postoperative results and a proposed modification of the classification. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 22:396

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. C. Katthagen.

Ethics declarations

Interessenkonflikt

J.C. Katthagen, P.A. Michel und M.J. Raschke geben an, dass kein Interessenkonflikt besteht.

Für diesen Beitrag wurden von den Autor/-innen keine Studien an Menschen oder Tieren durchgeführt. Für die aufgeführten Studien gelten die jeweils dort angegebenen ethischen Richtlinien.

Additional information

figure qr

QR-Code scannen & Beitrag online lesen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Katthagen, J.C., Michel, P.A. & Raschke, M.J. Anatomische Prothese bei Frakturfolgen am proximalen Humerus. Obere Extremität 18, 19–23 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-023-00728-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11678-023-00728-w

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Navigation