Log in

Who Should Do NOTES? Initial Endoscopic Performance of Laparoscopic Surgeons Compared to Gastroenterologists and Untrained Individuals

  • 2008 ssat plenary presentation
  • Published:
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery

Abstract

Introduction

Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) is a multidisciplinary surgical technique. If conventional endoscopic instrumentation can be easily mastered, surgeons with laparoscopic experience could head NOTES interventions.

Materials and Methods

Thirty individuals were tested for endoscopic dexterity. Group 1 included seven gastroenterologists, group 2 included 12 laparoscopically experienced surgeons lacking endoscopic experience, and group 3 included 11 interns who had no hands-on endoscopic or surgical experience. Each individual repeated an easy (T1), medium (T2), and difficult (T3) task ten times with endoscopic equipment on a NOTES skills-box.

Results

Group 3 had significantly poorer performances for all three tasks compared to the other groups. No significant differences were seen between groups 1 and 2 for T1 and T2. The initial T3 performance of group 1 was better than that of group 2, but their performance after repetition was not statistically different. Groups 2 and 3 improved significantly with repetition, and group 2 eventually performed as well as group 1.

Conclusions

The data indicate that laparoscopic surgeons quickly learned to handle the endoscopic equipment. This suggests that a lack of endoscopic experience does not handicap laparoscopic surgeons when performing endoscopic tasks. Based on their knowledge of anatomy and the complication management acquired during surgical education, surgeons are well equipped to take the lead in interdisciplinary NOTES collaborations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kalloo AN, Singh VK, Jagannath SB, Niiyama H, Hill SL, Vaughn CA, Magee CA, Kantsevoy SV. Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavity. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60:114–117.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ponsky JL. Endoluminal surgery: past, present and future. Surg Endosc 2006;20(Suppl 2):S500–S502.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Rattner DW, Hawes R. What is NOSCAR? Surg Endosc 2007;21:1045–1046.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. EURO-NOTES Foundation. Endoscopy 2008;40:450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ponsky JL. Gastroenterologists as surgeons: what they need to know. Gastrointest Endosc 2005;61:454.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Hazey JW, Narula VK, Renton DB, Reavis KM, Paul CM, Hinshaw KE, Muscarella P, Ellison EC, Melvin WS. Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: initial clinical trial. Surg Endosc 2008;22:16–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Marescaux J, Dallemagne B, Perretta S, Wattiez A, Mutter D, Coumaros D. Surgery without scars: report of transluminal cholecystectomy in a human being. Arch Surg 2007;142:823–826.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Rao GV, Reddy DN, Banerjee R. NOTES: human experience. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2008;18:361–370.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Zornig C, Mofid H, Emmermann A, Alm M, von Waldenfels HA, Felixmuller C. Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients. Surg Endosc 2008;22(6):1427–1429.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Zorron R, Filgueiras M, Maggioni LC, Pombo L, Lopes CG, Lacerda OA. NOTES transvaginal cholecystectomy: report of the first case 1. Surg Innov 2007;14:279–283.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vosburgh KG, San Jose ER. Natural orifice transluminal endoscopic surgery (NOTES): an opportunity for augmented reality guidance. Stud Health Technol Inform 2007;125:485–490.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Aggarwal R, Tully A, Grantcharov T, Larsen CR, Miskry T, Farthing A, Darzi A. Virtual reality simulation training can improve technical skills during laparoscopic sal**ectomy for ectopic pregnancy. BJOG 2006;113:1382–1387.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Grantcharov TP, Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Rosenberg J. Learning curves and impact of previous operative experience on performance on a virtual reality simulator to test laparoscopic surgical skills. Am J Surg 2003;185:146–149.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Swanstrom L, Zheng B. Spatial orientation and off-axis challenges for NOTES. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2008;18:315–324.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver J. Wagner.

Additional information

No grant support for this project.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wagner, O.J., Hagen, M., Morel, P. et al. Who Should Do NOTES? Initial Endoscopic Performance of Laparoscopic Surgeons Compared to Gastroenterologists and Untrained Individuals. J Gastrointest Surg 12, 1724–1729 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0649-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-008-0649-x

Keywords

Navigation