Log in

Optimal due-date assignment problem with learning effect and resource-dependent processing times

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we consider a single-machine earliness-tardiness scheduling problem with due-date assignment, in which the processing time of a job is a function of its position in a sequence and its resource allocation. The due date assignment methods studied include the common due date, and the slack due date, which reflects equal waiting time allowance for the jobs. For each combination of due date assignment method and processing time function, we provide a polynomial-time algorithm to find the optimal job sequence, due date values, and resource allocations that minimize an integrated objective function, which includes earliness, tardiness, due date assignment, and total resource consumption costs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adamopoulos G.I., Pappis C.P.: Single machine scheduling with flow allowances. J. Operat. Res. Soc. 47, 1280–1285 (1996)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Baker K.R., Scudder G.D.: Sequencing with earliness and tardiness penalties: a review. Operat. Res. 38, 22–36 (1990)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Biskup D.: Single-machine scheduling with learning considerations. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 115, 173–178 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Biskup D.: A state-of-the-art review on scheduling with learning effects. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 188, 315–329 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Dambreville F.: Cross-entropic learning of a machine for the decision in a partially observable universe. J. Global Optim. 37, 541–555 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Gordon V.S., Proth J.M., Chu C.B.: A survey of the state of- the-art of common due date assignment and scheduling research. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 139, 1–25 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Gordon V.S., Proth J.M., Chu C.B.: Due date assignment and scheduling: SLK, TWK and other due date assignment models. Product. Plan. Control 13, 117–132 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Floudas C.A., Pardalos P.M.: Encyclopedia of optimization, 2nd ed. Springer, Berlin (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Graham R.L., Lawler E.L., Lenstra J.K., Rinnooy Kan A.H.G.: Optimization and approximation in deterministic sequencing and scheduling: a survey. Ann. Discret. Math. 5, 287–326 (1979)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Hadda H.: A (\({\frac{4}{3}}\))-approximation algorithm for a special case of the two machine flow shop problem with several availability constraints. Optim. Lett. 3, 583–592 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Hardy G.H., Littlewood J.E., Polya G.: Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1934)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Lee C.-Y., Yu G.: Parallel-machine scheduling under potential disruption. Optim. Lett. 2, 27–37 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Leyvand Y., Shabtay D., Steiner G.: A unified approach for scheduling with convex resource consumption functions using positional penalties. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 206, 301–312 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Mosheiov G.: Scheduling problems with a learning effect. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 132, 687–693 (2001)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Mosheiov G., Sidney J.B.: Scheduling with general job-dependent learning curves. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 147, 665–670 (2003)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Panwalker S.S., Smith M.L., Seidmann A.: Common due-date assignment to minimize total penalty for the one machine scheduling problem. Operat. Res. 30, 391–399 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Panwalkar S.S., Rajagopalan R.: Single-machine sequencing with controllable processing times. Eur. J. Operat. Res. 59, 298–302 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Pardalos P.M., Resende M.G.C.: Handbook of applied optimization. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Pardalos P.M.: Complexity in numerical optimization. World Scientific, Singapore (1993)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Pinedo M.: Scheduling: theory, algorithms, and systems. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Setamaa-Karkkainen A., Miettinen K., Vuori J.: Heuristic for a new multiobjective scheduling problem. Optim. Lett. 1, 213–225 (2007)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Shabtay D., Steiner G.: A survey of scheduling with controllable processing times. Discret. Appl. Math. 155, 1643–1666 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Shabtay D., Steiner G.: The single-machine earliness-tardiness scheduling problem with due date assignment and resource-dependent processing times. Ann. Operat. Res. 159, 25–40 (2008)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang J.-B., Li J.-X.: Single machine past-sequence-dependent setup times scheduling with general position-dependent and time-dependent learning effects. Appl. Math. Model. 35, 1388–1395 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. Wang J.-B., Sun L.-H., Sun L.-Y.: Single machine scheduling with a learning effect and discounted costs. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 49, 1141–1149 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang J.-B., Wang M.-Z.: Single machine multiple common due dates scheduling with general job-dependent learning curves. Comput. Math. Appl. 60, 2998–3002 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Wang J.-B., Wang M.-Z.: A revision of machine scheduling problems with a general learning effect. Math. Comput. Model. 53, 330–336 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang J.-B., Wang M.-Z.: Worst-case behavior of simple sequencing rules in flow shop scheduling with general position-dependent learning effects. Ann. Operat. Res. 191, 155–169 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang J.-B., Wang M.-Z.: Single-machine scheduling with nonlinear deterioration. Optim. Lett. 6, 87–98 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang, J.-B., Ji, P., Cheng, T.C.E., Wang, D.: Minimizing makespan in a two-machine flow shop with effects of deterioration and learning. Optim. Lett. doi:10.1007/s11590-011-0334-y

  31. Wang, J.-B., Wang, X.-Y., Sun, L.-H., Sun, L.-Y.: Scheduling jobs with truncated exponential learning functions. Optim. Lett. doi:10.1007/s11590-011-0433-9

  32. Wang D., Wang M.-Z., Wang J.-B.: Single-machine scheduling with learning effect and resource-dependent processing times. Comput. Indus. Eng. 59, 458–462 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu L.: Machine learning problems from optimization perspective. J. Global Optimiz. 47, 369–401 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Yin N., Wang X.-Y.: Single-machine scheduling with controllable processing times and learning effect. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 54, 743–748 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhao C.-L., Tang H.-Y.: A note on two-machine no-wait flow shop scheduling with deteriorating jobs and machine availability constraints. Optim. Lett. 5, 183–190 (2011)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan-Yuan Lu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lu, YY., Li, G., Wu, YB. et al. Optimal due-date assignment problem with learning effect and resource-dependent processing times. Optim Lett 8, 113–127 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-012-0467-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-012-0467-7

Keywords

Navigation