SpringerLink
Log in

Re-examining Infrastructure: Considerations for How Non-Instructional Interventions Can Support Teaching and Learning Affordances in Online Learning Environments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TechTrends Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper explores systemic challenges facing P-12 online education and the role of non-instructional interventions in addressing them. While not exclusively centered on the COVID-19 pandemic, it acknowledges how the global crisis highlighted existing systemic issues in online education. By examining foundational support, needs analysis, and support strategies, this paper proposes interventions to improve the online learning experience. Ultimately, the paper aims to promote equity and effectiveness in P-12 online education for all stakeholders. We present practical, achievable strategies, that are applicable now and in future emergency scenarios to support P-12 online teaching and learning initiatives.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ames, K., Harris, L. R., Dargusch, J., & Bloomfield, C. (2020). ‘So you can make it fast or make it up’: K–12 teachers’ perspectives on technology’s affordances and constraints when supporting distance education learning. The Australian Educational Researcher, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-020-00395-8

  • An, H., Mongillo, G., Sung, W., & Fuentes, D. (2022). Factors affecting online learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic: The lived experiences of parents, teachers, and administrators in U.S. high-needs K-12 schools. Journal of Online Learning Research,8(2), 203–234.

    Google Scholar 

  • An, Y., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Yang, J., Conan, J., Kinard, W., & Daughrity, L. (2021). Examining K-12 teachers’ feelings, experiences, and perspectives regarding online teaching during the early stage of the Covid-19 pandemic. Educational Technology Research and Development,69(5), 2589–2613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-021-10008-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, L. (2010). Identifying and addressing teaching challenges in K-12 online environments. Distance Learning,7(2), 13–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archambault, L., Kennedy, K., Shelton, C., Dalal, M., McAllister, L., & Huyett, S. (2016). Incremental progress: Re-examining field experiences in K-12 online learning contexts in the United States. Journal of Online Learning Research,2(3), 303–326.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aslan, S., Li, Q., Bonk, C. J., & Nachman, L. (2022). An overnight educational transformation: How did the pandemic turn early childhood education upside down? Online Learning,26(2), 52–77. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v26i2.2748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour, M. K. (2013). The landscape of K-12 online learning: Examining what is known. In M.G. Moore (Ed.), Handbook of distance education (3rd ed., pp. 574–593). Routledge.

  • Beaunoyer, E., Dupéré, S., & Guitton, M. J. (2020). COVID-19 and digital inequalities: Reciprocal impacts and mitigation strategies. Computers in Human Behavior, 106424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106424

  • Borup, J., & Drysdale, J. (2014). On-site and online facilitators: Current and future direction for research. In R. Ferdig & K. Kennedy (Eds.), Handbook of research on K-12 online and blended learning (pp. 325–346). ETC Press.

  • Borup, J., West, R. E., Graham, C. R., & Davies, R. S. (2014). The adolescent community of engagement framework: A lens for research on K-12 online learning. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,22(1), 107–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Budhrani, K., Martin, F., Malabanan, O., & Espiritu, J. L. (2021). How did parents balance it all? Work-from-home parents’ engagement in academic and support roles during remote learning. Journal of Online Learning Research,7(2), 153–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, S., Chang, A., Day, L., Fazlullah, A., Liu, J., McBride, L., Mudalige, T., & Weiss, D. (2020). Closing the K-12 digital divide in the age of distance learning. Common Sense Media. https://www.commonsensemedia.org/sites/default/files/research/report/common_sense_media_report_final_7_1_3pm_web.pdf

  • Coburn, C. E., Penuel, W. R., & Geil, K. (2013). Research-practice partnerships at the district level: A new strategy for leveraging research for educational improvement. William T. Grant Foundation.

  • Crouse, T., Rice, M., & Mellard, D. (2018). Learning to serve students with disabilities online: Teachers’ perspectives. Journal of Online Learning Research,4(2), 123–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtis, H., & Werth, L. (2015). Fostering student success and engagement in a K-12 online school. Journal of Online Learning Research,1(2), 163–190.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, S., Mullan, J., & Feldman, P. (2017). Rebooting learning for the digital age: What next for technology-enhanced higher education? (pp. 49–50). Higher Education Policy Institute.

  • Diamond, J. B., & Spillane, J. P. (2016). School leadership and management from a distributed perspective: A 2016 retrospective and prospective. Management in Education,30(4), 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020616665938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farmer, T., & West, R. (2019). Exploring the concerns of online K-12 teachers. Journal of Online Learning Research,5(1), 97–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fenty, N.S., & Allio, A. (2017). Using distance learning to impact access of diverse learners to advanced placement programs. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 18(2), 39–56. https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/using-distance-learning-impact-access-diverse/docview/1955987034/se-2

  • Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Houghton-Mifflin Co.

  • Greene, K., & Hale, W. (2017). The state of 21st century learning in the K-12 world of the United States: Online and blended learning opportunities for American elementary and secondary students. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia,26(2), 131–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. E. (2009). Learning, teaching, and scholarship in a digital age: Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher,38(4), 246–259. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X09336671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guitton, M. J. (2020). Cyberpsychology research and COVID-19. Computers in Human Behavior,111, 106357. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E., & Walejko, G. (2008). The participation divide: Content creation and sharing in the digital age. Information, Community and Society,11(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180801946150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hartshorne, R., Baumgartner, E., Kaplan-Rakowski, R., Mouza, C., & Ferdig, R. E. (2020). Special issue editorial: Preservice and inservice professional development during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,28(2), 137–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hase, S., & Ellis, E. (2018). Problems with online learning are systemic, not technical. In J. Stephenson (Ed.), Teaching & learning online: New pedagogies for new technologies (pp. 27–34). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315042527

  • Hobbs, V. (2004). The promise and the power of online learning in rural education. Rural School and Community Trust.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2020). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. Educause Review. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teaching-and-online-learning

  • Kaden, U. (2020). COVID-19 school closure-related changes to the professional life of a K–12 teacher. Education Sciences,10(6), 165. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10060165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy, K., & Archambault, L. (2012). Offering preservice teachers field experiences in K-12 online learning: A national survey of teacher education programs. Journal of Teacher Education,63(3), 185–200. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487111433651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kentnor, H. E. (2015). Distance education and the evolution of online learning in the United States. In D. J. Flinders & C. M. Moroye (Eds.), Curriculum and teaching dialogue (pp. 21–34). Information Age Publishing.

  • LaFrance, J. A., & Beck, D. (2014). Map** the terrain: Educational leadership field experiences in K-12 virtual schools. Educational Administration Quarterly.,50(1), 160–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X13484037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, M., & Figueroa, R. (2012). Internal and external indicators of virtual learning success a guide to success in K-12 virtual learning. Distance Learning,9(1), 21–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowenthal, P. R., & Dennen, V. P. (2017). Social presence, identity, and online learning: Research development and needs. Distance Education,38(2), 137–140. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2017.1335172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lowes, S., & Lin, P. (2015). Learning to learn online: Using locus of control to help students become successful online learners. Journal of Online Learning Research,1(1), 17–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo, T., Hibbard, L., Franklin, T., & Moore, D. R. (2017). Preparing teacher candidates for virtual field placements via an exposure to K-12 online teaching. Journal of Information Technology Education: Research,16(16), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.28945/3626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Machusky, J. A., & Herbert-Berger, K. G. (2022). Understanding online learning infrastructure in US K-12 schools: A review of challenges and emerging trends. International Journal of Educational Research,114, 101993. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2022.101993

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, T., & Yan, Z. (2017). Diverse delivery methods and strong psychological benefits: A review of online formative assessment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,33(6), 562–574. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mu**a, D. M. (2005). Distance education in high schools: Benefits, challenges, and suggestions. The Clearing House,78(3), 105–108. https://doi.org/10.3200/TCHS.78.3.105-109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nacu, D., Martin, C. K., & Pinkard, N. (2018). Designing for 21st century learning online: A heuristic method to enable educator learning support roles. Educational Technology Research and Development,66(4), 1029–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9603-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niess, M. L., & Gillow-Wiles, H. (2017). Expanding teachers’ technological pedagogical reasoning with a systems pedagogical approach. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 33(3), 77–95. https://doi.org/10.14742/ajet.3473

  • Obilade, T. T. (2015). Affordances then and now: Implications for designing instruction. Distance Learning,12(3), 9–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pella, S. (2015). Pedagogical reasoning and action: Affordances of practice-based teacher professional development. Teacher Education Quarterly,42(3), 81–101.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, L., Scharber, C., Thuesen, A., & Baskin, K. (2020). A rapid response to COVID-19: One district’s pivot from technology integration to distance learning. Information and Learning Sciences,121(5/6), 461–469. https://doi.org/10.1108/ILS-04-2020-0131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Picciano, A. G., Seaman, J., Shea, P., & Swan, K. (2012). Examining the extent and nature of online learning in American K-12 education: The research initiatives of the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation. The Internet and Higher Education,15(2), 127–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2011.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pulham, E., & Graham, C. R. (2018). Comparing K-12 online and blended teaching competencies: A literature review. Distance Education,39(3), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2018.1476840

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimers, F., Schleicher, A., Saavedra, J., & Tuominen, S. (2020). Supporting the continuation of teaching and learning during the COVID-19 Pandemic. OECD. https://globaled.gse.harvard.edu/files/geii/files/supporting-the-continuation-of-teachingand-learning-during-the-covid-19-pandemic.pdf

  • Rice, K. L. (2006). A comprehensive look at distance education in the K–12 context. Journal of Research on Technology in Education,38(4), 425–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2006.10782468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rice, K. (2009). Priorities in K–12 distance education: A Delphi study examining multiple perspectives on policy, practice, and research. Journal of Educational Technology & Society,12(3), 163–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rice, K., & Dawley, L. (2009). The status of professional development for K-12 online teachers: Insights and implications. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,17(4), 523–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sadler, T. D., Friedrichsen, P., Zangori, L., & Ke, L. (2020). Technology-supported professional development for collaborative design of COVID-19 instructional materials. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,28(2), 171–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefaniak, J. (2021). Needs assessment for learning and performance: Theory, process, and practice. Routledge.

  • Stone, D. E., & Zheng, G. (2014). Learning management systems in a changing environment. In V. X. Wang (Ed.), Handbook of research on education and technology in a changing society (pp. 756–767). IGI Global.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, M. T., & Perumean-Chaney, S. (2011). The benefits of online teaching for traditional classroom pedagogy: A case study for improving face-to-face instruction. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching,7(3), 393–400.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sugar, W. (2014). Studies of ID practices: A review and synthesis of research in ID current practices. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03605-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Tawfik, A. A., Shepherd, C. E., Gatewood, J., & Gish-Lieberman, J. J. (2021). First and second order barriers to teaching in K-12 online learning. TechTrends,65(6), 925–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00648-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tessmer, M. (1991). Back to the future: The environment analysis stage of front-end analysis. Performance and Instruction,30(1), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/pfi.4170300104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trust, T., & Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and TeacherEducation,28(2), 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tseng, V. (2012). Partnerships: Shifting the dynamics between research and practice. William T. Grant Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Lancker, W., & Parolin, Z. (2020). COVID-19, school closures, and child poverty: A social crisis in the making. The Lancet Public Health,5(5), e243–e244. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2468-2667(20)30084-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Tiem, D. M., Moseley, J. L., & Dessinger, J. C. (2012). Fundamentals of performance improvement. (3rd ed.). Pfeiffer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, C. L., Kohler, K. L., & Piper, R. E. (2021). Teachers’ preparedness and professional learning about using educational technologies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Online Learning Research,7(2), 113–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Webb, M., & Cox, M. (2004). A review of pedagogy related to information and communications technology. Technology, Pedagogy and Education,13(3), 235–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14759390400200183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whalen, J. (2020). Should teachers be trained in emergency remote teaching? Lessons learned from the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education,28(2), 189–199.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Georgia, 850 College Station Road, Athens, GA, 30602, USA

    Lauren M. Bagdy & Jill E. Stefaniak

Authors
  1. Lauren M. Bagdy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jill E. Stefaniak
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lauren M. Bagdy.

Ethics declarations

Research Involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Not applicable.

Informed Consent

Not applicable.

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bagdy, L.M., Stefaniak, J.E. Re-examining Infrastructure: Considerations for How Non-Instructional Interventions Can Support Teaching and Learning Affordances in Online Learning Environments. TechTrends (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00976-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-024-00976-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation