Abstract
Merrill’s first principles of instruction (FPI) are considered as fundamental principles for improving instructional effectiveness regardless of context, approach, or audience. However, very little research explores in detail the process of implementing FPI in course design. In this case study, we provide specific descriptions of how we applied Merrill’s FPI in an online course redesign project. Using the rapid prototy** approach, we analyzed the needs of the redesign project, developed the project objectives and plans, and conducted a parallel processes of design, development, and implementation of the new course features. Thirteen redesign tasks were identified, prioritized, and completed to enhance the application of FPI. Students indicated in the course evaluation forms that the redesigned course presented the connections between theories and practice more effectively. We discus this study’s implications for the application of FPI and the rapid prototy** model and make suggestions for future research.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
AECT (2012). AECT Standards, 2012 version. Retrieved August 25, 2021, from https://www.aect.org/docs/AECTstandards2012.pdf
Alexander, B., Ashford-Rowe, K., Barajas-Murphy, N., Dobbin, G., Knott, J., McCormack, M., Pomerantz, J., Seilhamer, R., & Weber, N. (2019). EDUCAUSE horizon report: 2019 higher education edition. EDUCAUSE.
Brown, A., & Green, T. G. (2020). The essentials of instructional design: Connecting fundamental principles with process and practice (4th ed.). Routledge.
Cai, Q., & Robinson, D. (2021). Design, redesign and continuous refinement of an online graduate course: A case study for implementing universal design for learning. Journal of Formative Design in Learning, 5(1), 16–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41686-020-00053-3
CAST (2018). Universal design for learning guidelines version 2.2. http://udlguidelines.cast.org/binaries/content/assets/udlguidelines/udlg-v2-2/udlg_graphicorganizer_v2-2_numbers-yes.pdf. Accessed 23 Apr 2021.
Cheung, W. S., & Hew, K. F. (2015). Applying “first principles of instruction” in a blended learning course. In K. C. Li, T. L. Wong, S. K. Cheung, J. Lam, & K. K. Ng (Eds.), Technology in education: Transforming educational practices with technology (pp. 127–135). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-46158-7
Crawley, A. (2012). Supporting online students: A guide to planning, implementing and evaluating services. John Wiley & Sons.
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Sage Publications.
Desrosier, J. (2011). Rapid prototy** reconsidered. The Journal of Continuing Higher Education, 59, 135–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/07377363.2011.614881
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2014). Systematic design of instruction (8th ed.). Pearson.
Frick, T. W., Chadha, R., Watson, C., Wang, Y., & Green, P. (2009). College student perceptions of teaching and learning quality. Educational Technology Research and Development, 57, 705–720. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-007-9079-9
Frick, T. W., Chadha, R., Watson, C., & Zlatkovska, E. (2010). Improving course evaluations to improve instruction and complex learning in higher education. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(2), 115–136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-009-9131-z
Gardner, J. L. (2011). Testing the efficacy of Merrill’s first principles of instruction in improving student performance in introductory biology courses. (Utah State University). ProQuest dissertations and theses, Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/862644295?accountid=4840. Accessed 23 Mar 2021
Gardner, J., & Jeon, T. (2009). Creating task-centered instruction for web-based instruction: Obstacles and solutions. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 38(1), 21–34.
Gardner, J., Barclay, M., Kong, Y., & LeVally, C. (2020). Designing an accelerated graduate evaluation course using the first principles of instruction and interactive media. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 48(4), 493–517. https://doi.org/10.1177/0047239519893049
Gibbons, A. S. (2003). What and how do designers design? TechTrends, 47(5), 22–25.
Hall, J. A., Lei, J., & Wang, Q. (2020). The first principles of instruction: An examination of their impact on preservice teachers’ TPACK. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68, 3115–3142. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09866-2
Hoffman, E. S. (2014). Beyond the flipped classroom: Redesigning a research methods course for e3 instruction. Contemporary Issues in Education Research, 7(1), 51–62.
Jalilehvand, M. (2016). Study the impact of Merrill’s first principles of instruction on students’ creativity. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 313–317.
Klein, J. D., & Mendenhall, A. (2018). Applying the first principles of instruction in a short-term, high volume, rapid production of online professional development modules. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30, 93–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12528-017-9166-9
Lee, S., & Koszalka, T. A. (2016). Course-level implementation of first principles, goal orientations, and cognitive engagement: A multilevel mediation model. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(2), 365–375.
Lo, C. K., & Hew, K. F. (2017). Using “first principles of instruction” to design secondary school mathematics flipped classroom: The findings of two exploratory studies. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 20(1), 222–236.
Lo, C. K., Lie, C. W., & Hew, K. F. (2018). Applying “first principles of instruction” as a design theory of the flipped classroom: Findings from a collective study of four secondary school subjects. Computers & Education, 118, 150–165.
Merrill, D. (2002). First principles of instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(3), 43–59.
Merrill, D. (2020). First principles of instruction (revised edition). Association for Educational Communications & Technology.
Nelson, K. R. (2015). Application of Merrill’s first principles of instruction in a museum education context. Journal of Museum Education, 40(3), 304–312.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Sage.
Quality Matters Program. (2018). Standards from the quality matters higher education rubric, 6th Edition. Retrieved April 5, 2021, https://www.qualitymatters.org/sites/default/files/PDFs/StandardsfromtheQMHigherEducationRubric.pdf
Rauchfuss, G. H. (2010). How principled are designers? A study of instructional designers use of first principles [Capella University]. ProQuest Dissertations and Theses.
Reigeluth, C. M., & Carr-Chellman, A. A. (Eds.). (2009). Instructional design theories and models: Building a common knowledge base (Vol. 3). Routlege, Taylor and Francis.
Sugar, W. A., Hoard, B., Brown, A., & Daniels, L. (2012). Identifying multimedia production competencies and skills of instructional design and technology professionals: An analysis of recent job posting. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 40(3), 227–249. https://doi.org/10.2190/ET.40.3.b
Tiruneh, D. T., Weldeslassie, A. G., Kassa, A., Tefera, Z., De Cock, M., & Elen, J. (2016). Systematic design of a learning environment for domain-specific and domain-general critical thinking skills. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64(3), 481–505.
Tripp, S. D., & Bichelmeyer, B. (1990). Rapid prototy**: An alternative instructional design strategy. Educational Technology Research and Development, 38(1), 31–44.
Tu, W., & Snyder, M. M. (2017). Develo** conceptual understanding in a statistics course: Merrill’s first principles and real data at work. Educational Technology Research and Development, 65(3), 579–595.
Wedman, J., & Tessmer, M. (1993). Instructional designers’ decisions and priorities: A survey of design practice. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(2), 43–57.
Wiethe-Körprich, M., & Bley, S. (2017). Prospective educators as consumers of empirical research: An authentic assessment approach to make their competencies visible. Empirical Research in Vocational Education and Training, 9(8). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40461-017-0052-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Human Participants and Informed Consent
This study was conducted on already available data and the author received an IRB approval with Towson University.
Conflict of Interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cai, Q., Moallem, M. Applying Merrill’s First Principles of Instruction to Redesign an Online Graduate Course through the Rapid Prototy** Approach. TechTrends 66, 212–222 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00658-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-021-00658-w