Abstract
During the 2018 Professors in Instructional Design (PIDT) Conference, faculty representing over a dozen institutions met to discuss curricular initiatives that were being implemented across programs, and the challenges and benefits of these initiatives. The discussion focused on several areas, including: interdisciplinary/multidisciplinary programs and courses, online programs, and undergraduate initiatives. The outcome of these conversations led faculty to gather information from across these institutions to highlight and share ways that their respective programs have promoted the field through innovative partnerships, projects, and programs within the broader community. It is anticipated that this summary will serve as a catalyst for other programs to propose and share their own innovative program plans and encourage individuals to attend future PIDT conferences.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boise State University. (2019). Goals and strategies for focus on effectiveness. Retrieved July 30, 2018 from https://academics.boisestate.edu/provost/goals-and-strategies/
McDonald, J. K., West, R. E. Rich, P. J., & Pfleger, P. I. (2019). “It’s so wonderful having different majors working together”: The development of an interdisciplinary design thinking minor. TechTrends, 63(4), 440–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-018-0325-2 Available online at: https://rdcu.be/5xGE
Purdue Repository for Online Teaching and Learning. (n.d.). Retrieved April 9, 2019 from https://www.purdue.edu/innovativelearning/supporting-instruction/portal
The White House. (2016). FACT SHEET: President Obama Announces Computer Science for All Initiative. Retrieved from: https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2016/01/30/fact-sheet-president-obama-announces-computer-science-all-initiative-0
West, R. E. (2012). PIDT: The “unconference” for discussion of ideas and professional networking. Educational Technology, 52(5), 45–47.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest. This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Richardson, J.C., Brush, T., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. et al. Innovations in Instructional Design and Technology Programs: a View from PIDT 2018. TechTrends 64, 432–438 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00445-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-019-00445-8