SpringerLink
Log in

Studying the effect of partial drainage on the response of soft clays reinforced with sand column groups

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The drained and undrained response of soft clays reinforced with granular columns has been the subject of numerous geotechnical research efforts to date. Although these studies have been essential for the development of design methodologies, the actual/true response of reinforced clay systems under realistic loading rates is likely governed by partially drained conditions that have yet to be investigated. Partial drainage occurs as a result of inevitable radial flow from the clay to the columns throughout the loading phase. Ignoring the positive effect of partial drainage on the short-term stability of foundations and/or embankments on a clay substratum reinforced with free draining columns may lead to over conservative designs. The objective of this study is to investigate the impact of partial drainage on the response of soft clays reinforced with sand column groups. To address this issue, four partially drained triaxial tests were conducted at different strain rates on normally consolidated soft clays reinforced with dense sand columns in a square configuration. Results included the effect of partial drainage on the total deviatoric stress, excess pore water pressure dissipation, volumetric strain, and stress concentration ratio. The results were bracketed between the fully drained and fully undrained responses/graphs that served as upper and lower bounds, respectively. A plot of the normalized improvement index vs tfailure/t50 showed full mobilization of strength at a time ratio of 15. Numerical modeling using finite difference of the pore water pressure dissipation during shearing was conducted. The consolidation results obtained from the numerical analyses were compared to measurements from the experimental program. The calculated degree of consolidation from the finite difference analysis correlated very well with the measured levels of consolidation during the tests. The results from the test program and the associated analyses presented in this paper contribute to enhancing our current understanding of the response of reinforced clay systems and may be a step on the road towards improving existing design methodologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data and materials

The authors are ready to provide data upon request whenever the journal reviewers/editors ask for.

Code availability

Available upon request as well.

References

  1. AlMikati A, Najjar S, Sadek S (2020) The drained response of soft clays reinforced with sand column groups. In: Geo-Congress 2020: Foundations, Soil Improvement, and Erosion. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, pp 411–420

  2. AlMikati A, Najjar S, Sadek S (2021) Large-scale instrumented triaxial setup for investigating the response of soft clay reinforced with sand column groups. Int J Geomech. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andreou P, Frikha W, Frank R, Canou J, Papadopoulos V, Dupla JC (2008) Experimental study on sand and gravel columns in clay. Proc Inst Civ Eng Ground Improv 161(4):189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aslani M, Nazariafshar J, Ganjian N (2019) Experimental study on shear strength of cohesive soils reinforced with stone columns. Geotech Geol Eng 37(3):2165–2188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Atkinson JH, Evans JS, Ho EWL (1985) Non-uniformity of triaxial samples due to consolidation with radial drainage. Geotechnique 35(3):353–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bachus RC, Barksdale RD (1984) Vertical and lateral behavior of model stone columns. Renforcement en place des sols et des roches. Colloque International, pp 99–104

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barron RA (1948) Consolidation of fine-grained soils by drain wells

  8. Black J, Sivakumar V, Madhav MR, McCabe B (2006) An improved experimental test set-up to study the performance of granular columns. Geotech Test J 29(3):193–199

    Google Scholar 

  9. Black J, Sivakumar V, McKinley JD (2007) Performance of clay samples reinforced with vertical granular columns. Can Geotech J 44(1):89–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bo MW, Wong KS, Choa V, Arulrajah A, Horpibulsuk S (2016) Step loading compression of ultra-soft soil under radial drainage conditions. Mar Georesour Geotechnol 34(7):648–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bou Lattouf HE (2013) The effect of drainage conditions on the load response of soft clays reinforced with granular columns. Masters dissertation, American University of Beirut

  12. Casagrande A (1936) The determination of pre-consolidation load and it's practical significance. In: Proc. Int. Conf. Soil Mech. Found. Eng. Cambridge, MA, 1936, Vol. 3, p 60

  13. Charles JA, Watts KA (1983) Compressibility of soft clay reinforced with granular columns. In: Proceedings of the 8th European conference on soil mechanics and foundation engineering, Helsinki, pp 347–352

  14. Cimentada A, Da Costa A, Cañizal J, Sagaseta C (2011) Laboratory study on radial consolidation and deformation in clay reinforced with stone columns. Can Geotech J 48(1):36–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fattah MY, Shlash KT, Al-Waily MJM (2011) Stress concentration ratio of model stone columns in soft clays. Geotech Test J 34(1):50–60

    Google Scholar 

  16. Han J, Ye S (1991) Field tests of soft clay stabilized by stone columns in coastal areas in China. In: Proc., 4th Int. Deep Foundations Institute Conf, vol 1, pp 243–248

  17. Han J, Ye SL (2001) Simplified method for consolidation rate of stone column reinforced foundations. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 127(7):597–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hansbo S (1980) Consolidation of fine-grained soils by prefabricated drains. In: Proc. of. the. 10th ICSMFE, vol. 3, pp 677–682

  19. Hird CC, Pyrah IC, Russel D (1992) Finite element modelling of vertical drains beneath embankments on soft ground. Geotechnique 42(3):499–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Indraratna B, Redana IW (2000) Numerical modeling of vertical drains with smear and well resistance installed in soft clay. Can Geotech J 37(1):132–145

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Indraratna B, Ngo NT, Rujikiatkamjorn C, Sloan SW (2015) Coupled discrete element–finite difference method for analysing the load-deformation behaviour of a single stone column in soft soil. Comput Geotech 63:267–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Juran I, Guermazi A (1988) Settlement response of soft soils reinforced by compacted sand columns. J Geotech Eng 114(8):930–943

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Laouche M, Karech T, Rangeard D, Martinez J (2021) Experimental study of the effects of installation of sand columns in compressible clay using a reduced model. Geotech Geol Eng 39(3):2301–2312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lei GH, Xu LD, Zheng Q, Ng CWW (2017) Role of equal-strain assumption in unit-cell theory for consolidation with vertical drains. J Central South Univ 24(12):2914–2923

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leo CJ (2004) Equal strain consolidation by vertical drains. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 130(3):316–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. McKelvey D, Sivakumar V, Bell A, Graham J (2004) Modelling vibrated stone columns in soft clay. Proc Inst Civ Eng Geotech Eng 157(3):137–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Miranda M, Da Costa A, Castro J, Sagaseta C (2017) Influence of geotextile encasement on the behaviour of stone columns: laboratory study. Geotext Geomembr 45(1):14–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mitchell RJ (1970) On the yielding and mechanical strength of Leda clays. Can Geotech J 7(3):297–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Muir Wood D, Hu W, Nash DF (2000) Group effects in stone column foundations: model tests. Geotechnique 50(6):689–698

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Najjar SS, Sadek S, Maakaroun T (2010) Effect of sand columns on the undrained load response of soft clays. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 136(9):1263–1277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Najjar SS (2013) A state-of-the-art review of stone/sand-column reinforced clay systems. Geotech Geol Eng 31(2):355–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Najjar S, Sadek S, Bou Lattouf H (2013) The drained strength of soft clays with partially penetrating sand columns at different area replacement ratios. In: 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, pp 939–942

  33. Najjar SS, Sadek S, Bou Lattouf H, Maalouf Y (2020) Drained triaxial response of clay reinforced with sand columns. Proc Inst Civ Eng Ground Improv 173(3):170–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Olson RE (1986) State of the art: consolidation testing. Consolidation of soils: testing and evaluation. ASTM International

    Google Scholar 

  35. Rayess AZ (2015) Triaxial response of natural clay reinforced with sand columns under partially drained conditions. Master's thesis, American University of Beirut, Beirut, Lebanon

  36. Seah TH, Juirnarongrit T (2003) Constant rate of strain consolidation with radial drainage. Geotech Test J 26(4):432–443

    Google Scholar 

  37. Sivakumar V, McKelvey D, Graham J, Hughes D (2004) Triaxial tests on model sand columns in clay. Can Geotech J 41(2):299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Skempton AW (1954) The pore-pressure coefficients A and B. Geotechnique 4(4):143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Sridharan A, Prakash K, Asha SR (1995) Consolidation behavior of soils. Geotech Test J 18(1):58–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Tan SA, Tjahyono S, Oo KK (2008) Simplified plane-strain modeling of stone-column reinforced ground. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 134(2):185–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Terzaghi K (1943) Theoretical soil mechanics. Wiley, New York, pp 235–344

    Google Scholar 

  42. Zhou H, Diao Y, Zheng G, Han J, Jia R (2017) Failure modes and bearing capacity of strip footings on soft ground reinforced by floating stone columns. Acta Geotech 12(5):1089–1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the University Research Board (URB) at the American University of Beirut for funding this research program.

Funding

The authors would like to acknowledge the support of the University Research Board (URB) at the American University of Beirut for funding this research program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, American University of Beirut, Bliss Street, Beirut, Lebanon

    Abdurrahman Almikati, Shadi Najjar & Salah Sadek

Authors
  1. Abdurrahman Almikati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Shadi Najjar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Salah Sadek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors listed contributed to this work.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abdurrahman Almikati.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Ethics approval

Authors approve that no data/information was taken from previous works unless cited.

Consent to participate

Authors agree to participate.

Consent for publication

Authors are happy to participate in this journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Almikati, A., Najjar, S. & Sadek, S. Studying the effect of partial drainage on the response of soft clays reinforced with sand column groups. Acta Geotech. 18, 395–412 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01506-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-022-01506-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation