Log in

Disturbance identification of electric field data observed by the CSES-01 satellite before earthquakes

  • Article
  • Published:
Science China Earth Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Numerous studies have confirmed that electromagnetic disturbances before earthquakes can be observed by satellites. In this study, we use the C-value method that includes the acoustic whistle signature; pre-seismic ionospheric electromagnetic disturbance signals were acquired based on the CSES-01 satellite electric field data, and the maximum value of C in the earthquake preparation zones increased continuously from 2.0 three days before the earthquake and reached a maximum weight of 3.0 on the day of the earthquake, after the earthquake, it gradually decreased and recovered to about 2.0; its the C values fluctuated between −2 and 3, it is different from the C values range −2–12 of the previous seismic case study using the DEMETER satellite, which may be related to the orbital altitude and revisit period of the satellite. Then, the C values were normalized, and the time series analysis of the obtained θ values were done, and the results showed that: In the pregnant zone, the background variation of the disturbance amplitude θ is within 2σ, and the maximum disturbance amplitude of θ starts to increase gradually from the seventh period (one period of 5 days, i.e., 35–39 days before the earthquake), it reached 2σ by the fourth pre-seismic cycle (20–24 days before the earthquake), and then dropped sharply to about 1.5σ in the third pre-seismic cycle (15–19 days before the earthquake), after two cycles of increase, the θ over the epicenter reached a maximum of 2.1σ at the time of the earthquake (combining the time of the earthquake and the satellite flight characteristics, the epicenter period is defined as January 25–January 29, 2020, and this defines the study time period line), and the θ decreases to within 2 times the standard range after the earthquake; The negative value of the disturbance amplitude θ in the central region of the pregnant seismic zone during the earthquake shows the transient energy release process. Through comparison, the θ values obtained by normalization based on the C-value method takes into account the variation of the background field, and the result can better reflect the energy change of the ionospheric field before the earthquakes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ampferer M, Denisenko V V, Hausleitner W, Krauss S, Stangl G, Boudjada M Y, Biernat H K. 2010. Decrease of the electric field penetration into the ionosphere due to low conductivity at the near ground atmospheric layer. Ann Geophys, 28: 779–787

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • An Z H, Du X B, Fan Y Y, Liu J, Tan D C, Chen J Y, **e T. 2011. A study of the electric field before the Wenchuan 8.0 earthquake of 2008 using both space-based and ground-based observational data (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 54: 2876–2884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berthelier J J, Godefroy M, Leblanc F, Malingre M, Menvielle M, Lagoutte D, Brochot J Y, Colin F, Elie F, Legendre C, Zamora P, Benoist D, Chapuis Y, Artru J, Pfaff R. 2006. Ice, the electric field experiment on DEMETER. Planet Space Sci, 54: 456–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya S, Sarkar S, Gwal A K, Parrot M. 2009. Electric and magnetic field perturbations recorded by DEMETER satellite before seismic events of the 17th July 2006 M7.7 earthquake in Indonesia. J Asian Earth Sci, 34: 634–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bliokh P. 2000. Atmospheric and ionospheric electromagnetic phenomena associated with earthquakes. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys, 62: 225–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diego P, Huang J, Piersanti M, Badoni D, Zeren Z, Yan R, Rebustini G, Ammendola R, Candidi M, Guan Y B, Lei J, Masciantonio G, Bertello I, De Santis C, Ubertini P, Shen X, Picozza P. 2021. The electric field detector on board the China Seismo Electromagnetic Satellite-in-orbit results and validation. Instruments, 5: 1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobrovolsky I P, Zubkov S I, Miachkin V I. 1979. Estimation of the size of earthquake preparation zones. Pure Appl Geophys, 117: 1025–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Du A M, Zhou Z J, Xu W Y, Yang S F. 2014. Generation mechanisms of ULF electromagnetic emissions before the ML=7.1 earthquake at Hotan of **njiang (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 47: 832–837

    Google Scholar 

  • Gokhberg M B, Morgounov V A, Yoshino T, Tomizawa I. 1982. Experimental measurement of electromagnetic emissions possibly related to earthquakes in Japan. J Geophys Res, 87: 7824–7828

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grimalsky V V, Hayakawa M, Ivchenko V N, Rapoport Y G, Zadorozhnii V I. 2003. Penetration of an electrostatic field from the lithosphere into the ionosphere and its effect on the D-region before earthquakes. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys, 65: 391–407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Han Y, Yuan J, Huang J, Li Z, Shen X. 2022. Automatic detection of electric field VLF electromagnetic wave abnormal disturbance on Zhangheng-1 satellite. Atmosphere, 13: 807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayakawa M, Ito T, Smirnova N. 1999. Fractal analysis of ULF geomagnetic data associated with the Guam Earthquake on August 8, 1993. Geophys Res Lett, 26: 2797–2800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayakawa M, Molchanov O A. 2004. Summary report of NASDA’s earthquake remote sensing frontier project. Phys Chem Earth Parts A B C, 29: 617–625

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu Y P, Zeren Z M, Huang J P, Zhao S F, Guo F, Wang Q, Shen X H. 2020. Algorithms and implementation of wave vector analysis for the electromagnetic waves recorded by the CSES satellite (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 63: 1751–1765

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang J P, Lei J G, Li S X, Zeren Z M, Li C, Zhu X H, Yu W H. 2018. The Electric Field Detector (EFD) onboard the Zh-1 satellite and first observational results. Earth Planet Phys, 2: 469–478

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q, Ikeya M. 1999a. Experimental study on the propagation of seismic electromagnetic signals (SEMS) using a mini-geographic model of the Taiwan Strait. Episodes, 22: 289–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang Q, Ikeya M. 1999b. Seismic electromagnetic signals (SEMS) explained by a simulation experiment using electromagnetic waves. Phys Earth Planet Inter, 109: 107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Shen X, Parrot M, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Yu C, Yan R, Liu D, Lu H, Guo F, Huang J. 2020. Primary joint statistical seismic influence on ionospheric parameters recorded by the CSES and DEMETER satellites. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 125: e28116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Li J, Huang J, Yin H, Jia J. 2022a. Research on Pre-Seismic feature recognition of spatial electric field data recorded by CSES. Atmosphere, 13: 179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Z, Yang B, Huang J, Yin H, Yang X, Liu H, Zhang F, Lu H. 2022b. Analysis of pre-earthquake space electric field disturbance observed by CSES. Atmosphere, 13: 934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molchanov O A, Mazhaeva O A, Golyavin A N, Hayakawa M. 1993. Observation by the Intercosmos-24 satellite of ELF-VLF electromagnetic emissions associated with earthquakes. Annales Geophys, 11: 431–440

    Google Scholar 

  • Ouyang X Y, Parrot M, Bortnik J. 2020. ULF wave activity observed in the nighttime ionosphere above and some hours before strong earthquakes. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 125: e28396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park C G, Dejnakarintra M. 1973. Penetration of thundercloud electric fields into the ionosphere and magnetosphere: 1. Middle and subauroral latitudes. J Geophys Res, 78: 6623–6633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrot M. 1994. Statistical study of ELF/VLF emissions recorded by a low-altitude satellite during seismic events. J Geophys Res, 99: 23339–23347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parrot M, Mogilevsky M M. 1989. VLF emissions associated with earthquakes and observed in the ionosphere and the magnetosphere. Phys Earth Planet Inter, 57: 86–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piersanti M, Materassi M, Battiston R, Carbone V, Cicone A, D’Angelo G, Diego P, Ubertini P. 2020a. Magnetospheric-ionospheric-lithospheric coupling model.1: Observations during the 5 August 2018 Bayan earthquake. Remote Sens, 12: 3299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Piersanti M, Pezzopane M, Zhima Z, Diego P, **ong C, Tozzi R, Pignalberi A, D’Angelo G, Battiston R, Huang J, Picozza P, Rui Y, Shen X, Sparvoli R, Ubertini P, Yang Y, Zoffoli S. 2020b. Can an impulsive variation of the solar wind plasma pressure trigger a plasma bubble? A case study based on CSES, SWARM and THEMIS Data. Adv Space Res, 67: 35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Píša D, Němec F, Santolík O, Parrot M, Rycroft M. 2013. Additional attenuation of natural VLF electromagnetic waves observed by the DEMETER Spacecraft resulting from preseismic activity. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 118: 5286–5295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qian G, Zeren Z M, Zhang X M, Shen X H. 2016. Spatio-temporal evolution of electromagnetic field pre- and post-earthquakes (in Chinese). Acta Seismol Sin, 38: 259–271

    Google Scholar 

  • Pulinets S A, Boyarchuk K A. 2004. Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes. New York: Springer. 174, 195

    Google Scholar 

  • Virts K S, Wallace J M, Hutchins M L, Holzworth R H. 2013. Highlights of a new Ground-Based, hourly global lightning climatology. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc, 94: 1381–1391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smirnova N, Hayakawa M, Gotoh K, Volobuev D. 2001. Scaling characteristics of ULF geomagnetic fields at the Guam seismoactive area and their dynamics in relation to the earthquake. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 1: 119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X Y, Yang D H, Zhou Z H, Cui J, Zhou N, Shen X H. 2021. Features of topside ionospheric background over China and its adjacent areas obtained by the ZH-1 satellite (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 64: 391–409

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunda S, Vyas B M. 2013. Local time, seasonal, and solar cycle dependency of longitudinal variations of TEC along the crest of EIA over India. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 118: 6777–6785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Y Y, Zeren Z M, Shen X H, Chu W, Huang J P, Wang Q, Ran R, Xu S, Lu H X, Liu D P. 2019. The First Intense Geomagnetic Storm Event Recorded by the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite. Space Weather, 18, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002243

  • Zhang X M, Battiston R, Shen X H, Zeren Z M, Ouyang X Y, Qian J D, Liu J, Huang J P, Miao Y Q. 2010. Automatic collecting technique of low frequency electromagnetic signals and its application in earthquake study. In: Bi Y, Williams M A, eds. Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer. 366–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X M, Shen X H, Parrot M, Ouyang X Y, Liu J, Qian J, Zhao S, Miao Y. 2012. Phenomena of electrostatic perturbations before strong earthquakes (2005–2010) observed on DEMETER. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 12: 75–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang X M, Frolov V, Shen X H, Wang Y L, Zhou C, Lu H X, Huang J P, Ryabov A, Zhai D L. 2020. The electromagnetic emissions and plasma modulations at middle latitudes related to SURA-CSES experiments in 2018. Radio Sci, 55: e2019RS007040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeren Z M, Shen X H, Zhang X M, Cao J B, Huang J P, Ouyang X Y, Liu J, Lu B Q. 2012. Possible ionospheric electromagnetic perturbations induced by the Ms7.1 Yushu earthquake. Earth Moon Planets, 108: 231–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeren Z M, Shen X H, Cao J B, Zhang X M, Huang J P, Liu J, Ouyang X Y, Zhao S F. 2012. Statistical analysis of ELF/VLF magnetic field disturbances before major earthquakes (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 55: 3699–3708

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work made use of the data from the CSES mission, a project funded by the China National Space Administration (CNSA) and China Earthquake Administration (CEA). We thank Professor Xuemin ZHANG of the Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, China Earthquake Administration, for her guidance and comments during the research process of the paper, and thank Dr. Bo**g ZHU of Yunnan Observatories, CAS for polishing the English. We thank the reviewers for their suggestions and hard work. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42104159), the APSCO Earthquake Project (Phase II), ISSI-BJ International Team (Grant No. 2019-33), Dragon 5 Cooperation Proposal (Grant No. #59308).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhong Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Huang, J., Zhang, F., Li, Z. et al. Disturbance identification of electric field data observed by the CSES-01 satellite before earthquakes. Sci. China Earth Sci. 66, 1814–1824 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-022-1048-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-022-1048-8

Keywords

Navigation