Abstract
Numerous studies have confirmed that electromagnetic disturbances before earthquakes can be observed by satellites. In this study, we use the C-value method that includes the acoustic whistle signature; pre-seismic ionospheric electromagnetic disturbance signals were acquired based on the CSES-01 satellite electric field data, and the maximum value of C in the earthquake preparation zones increased continuously from 2.0 three days before the earthquake and reached a maximum weight of 3.0 on the day of the earthquake, after the earthquake, it gradually decreased and recovered to about 2.0; its the C values fluctuated between −2 and 3, it is different from the C values range −2–12 of the previous seismic case study using the DEMETER satellite, which may be related to the orbital altitude and revisit period of the satellite. Then, the C values were normalized, and the time series analysis of the obtained θ values were done, and the results showed that: In the pregnant zone, the background variation of the disturbance amplitude θ is within 2σ, and the maximum disturbance amplitude of θ starts to increase gradually from the seventh period (one period of 5 days, i.e., 35–39 days before the earthquake), it reached 2σ by the fourth pre-seismic cycle (20–24 days before the earthquake), and then dropped sharply to about 1.5σ in the third pre-seismic cycle (15–19 days before the earthquake), after two cycles of increase, the θ over the epicenter reached a maximum of 2.1σ at the time of the earthquake (combining the time of the earthquake and the satellite flight characteristics, the epicenter period is defined as January 25–January 29, 2020, and this defines the study time period line), and the θ decreases to within 2 times the standard range after the earthquake; The negative value of the disturbance amplitude θ in the central region of the pregnant seismic zone during the earthquake shows the transient energy release process. Through comparison, the θ values obtained by normalization based on the C-value method takes into account the variation of the background field, and the result can better reflect the energy change of the ionospheric field before the earthquakes.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ampferer M, Denisenko V V, Hausleitner W, Krauss S, Stangl G, Boudjada M Y, Biernat H K. 2010. Decrease of the electric field penetration into the ionosphere due to low conductivity at the near ground atmospheric layer. Ann Geophys, 28: 779–787
An Z H, Du X B, Fan Y Y, Liu J, Tan D C, Chen J Y, **e T. 2011. A study of the electric field before the Wenchuan 8.0 earthquake of 2008 using both space-based and ground-based observational data (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 54: 2876–2884
Berthelier J J, Godefroy M, Leblanc F, Malingre M, Menvielle M, Lagoutte D, Brochot J Y, Colin F, Elie F, Legendre C, Zamora P, Benoist D, Chapuis Y, Artru J, Pfaff R. 2006. Ice, the electric field experiment on DEMETER. Planet Space Sci, 54: 456–471
Bhattacharya S, Sarkar S, Gwal A K, Parrot M. 2009. Electric and magnetic field perturbations recorded by DEMETER satellite before seismic events of the 17th July 2006 M7.7 earthquake in Indonesia. J Asian Earth Sci, 34: 634–644
Bliokh P. 2000. Atmospheric and ionospheric electromagnetic phenomena associated with earthquakes. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys, 62: 225–227
Diego P, Huang J, Piersanti M, Badoni D, Zeren Z, Yan R, Rebustini G, Ammendola R, Candidi M, Guan Y B, Lei J, Masciantonio G, Bertello I, De Santis C, Ubertini P, Shen X, Picozza P. 2021. The electric field detector on board the China Seismo Electromagnetic Satellite-in-orbit results and validation. Instruments, 5: 1
Dobrovolsky I P, Zubkov S I, Miachkin V I. 1979. Estimation of the size of earthquake preparation zones. Pure Appl Geophys, 117: 1025–1044
Du A M, Zhou Z J, Xu W Y, Yang S F. 2014. Generation mechanisms of ULF electromagnetic emissions before the ML=7.1 earthquake at Hotan of **njiang (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 47: 832–837
Gokhberg M B, Morgounov V A, Yoshino T, Tomizawa I. 1982. Experimental measurement of electromagnetic emissions possibly related to earthquakes in Japan. J Geophys Res, 87: 7824–7828
Grimalsky V V, Hayakawa M, Ivchenko V N, Rapoport Y G, Zadorozhnii V I. 2003. Penetration of an electrostatic field from the lithosphere into the ionosphere and its effect on the D-region before earthquakes. J Atmos Sol-Terr Phys, 65: 391–407
Han Y, Yuan J, Huang J, Li Z, Shen X. 2022. Automatic detection of electric field VLF electromagnetic wave abnormal disturbance on Zhangheng-1 satellite. Atmosphere, 13: 807
Hayakawa M, Ito T, Smirnova N. 1999. Fractal analysis of ULF geomagnetic data associated with the Guam Earthquake on August 8, 1993. Geophys Res Lett, 26: 2797–2800
Hayakawa M, Molchanov O A. 2004. Summary report of NASDA’s earthquake remote sensing frontier project. Phys Chem Earth Parts A B C, 29: 617–625
Hu Y P, Zeren Z M, Huang J P, Zhao S F, Guo F, Wang Q, Shen X H. 2020. Algorithms and implementation of wave vector analysis for the electromagnetic waves recorded by the CSES satellite (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 63: 1751–1765
Huang J P, Lei J G, Li S X, Zeren Z M, Li C, Zhu X H, Yu W H. 2018. The Electric Field Detector (EFD) onboard the Zh-1 satellite and first observational results. Earth Planet Phys, 2: 469–478
Huang Q, Ikeya M. 1999a. Experimental study on the propagation of seismic electromagnetic signals (SEMS) using a mini-geographic model of the Taiwan Strait. Episodes, 22: 289–294
Huang Q, Ikeya M. 1999b. Seismic electromagnetic signals (SEMS) explained by a simulation experiment using electromagnetic waves. Phys Earth Planet Inter, 109: 107–114
Li M, Shen X, Parrot M, Zhang X, Zhang Y, Yu C, Yan R, Liu D, Lu H, Guo F, Huang J. 2020. Primary joint statistical seismic influence on ionospheric parameters recorded by the CSES and DEMETER satellites. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 125: e28116
Li Z, Li J, Huang J, Yin H, Jia J. 2022a. Research on Pre-Seismic feature recognition of spatial electric field data recorded by CSES. Atmosphere, 13: 179
Li Z, Yang B, Huang J, Yin H, Yang X, Liu H, Zhang F, Lu H. 2022b. Analysis of pre-earthquake space electric field disturbance observed by CSES. Atmosphere, 13: 934
Molchanov O A, Mazhaeva O A, Golyavin A N, Hayakawa M. 1993. Observation by the Intercosmos-24 satellite of ELF-VLF electromagnetic emissions associated with earthquakes. Annales Geophys, 11: 431–440
Ouyang X Y, Parrot M, Bortnik J. 2020. ULF wave activity observed in the nighttime ionosphere above and some hours before strong earthquakes. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 125: e28396
Park C G, Dejnakarintra M. 1973. Penetration of thundercloud electric fields into the ionosphere and magnetosphere: 1. Middle and subauroral latitudes. J Geophys Res, 78: 6623–6633
Parrot M. 1994. Statistical study of ELF/VLF emissions recorded by a low-altitude satellite during seismic events. J Geophys Res, 99: 23339–23347
Parrot M, Mogilevsky M M. 1989. VLF emissions associated with earthquakes and observed in the ionosphere and the magnetosphere. Phys Earth Planet Inter, 57: 86–99
Piersanti M, Materassi M, Battiston R, Carbone V, Cicone A, D’Angelo G, Diego P, Ubertini P. 2020a. Magnetospheric-ionospheric-lithospheric coupling model.1: Observations during the 5 August 2018 Bayan earthquake. Remote Sens, 12: 3299
Piersanti M, Pezzopane M, Zhima Z, Diego P, **ong C, Tozzi R, Pignalberi A, D’Angelo G, Battiston R, Huang J, Picozza P, Rui Y, Shen X, Sparvoli R, Ubertini P, Yang Y, Zoffoli S. 2020b. Can an impulsive variation of the solar wind plasma pressure trigger a plasma bubble? A case study based on CSES, SWARM and THEMIS Data. Adv Space Res, 67: 35–45
Píša D, Němec F, Santolík O, Parrot M, Rycroft M. 2013. Additional attenuation of natural VLF electromagnetic waves observed by the DEMETER Spacecraft resulting from preseismic activity. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 118: 5286–5295
Qian G, Zeren Z M, Zhang X M, Shen X H. 2016. Spatio-temporal evolution of electromagnetic field pre- and post-earthquakes (in Chinese). Acta Seismol Sin, 38: 259–271
Pulinets S A, Boyarchuk K A. 2004. Ionospheric Precursors of Earthquakes. New York: Springer. 174, 195
Virts K S, Wallace J M, Hutchins M L, Holzworth R H. 2013. Highlights of a new Ground-Based, hourly global lightning climatology. Bull Amer Meteorol Soc, 94: 1381–1391
Smirnova N, Hayakawa M, Gotoh K, Volobuev D. 2001. Scaling characteristics of ULF geomagnetic fields at the Guam seismoactive area and their dynamics in relation to the earthquake. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 1: 119–126
Wang X Y, Yang D H, Zhou Z H, Cui J, Zhou N, Shen X H. 2021. Features of topside ionospheric background over China and its adjacent areas obtained by the ZH-1 satellite (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 64: 391–409
Sunda S, Vyas B M. 2013. Local time, seasonal, and solar cycle dependency of longitudinal variations of TEC along the crest of EIA over India. J Geophys Res-Space Phys, 118: 6777–6785
Yang Y Y, Zeren Z M, Shen X H, Chu W, Huang J P, Wang Q, Ran R, Xu S, Lu H X, Liu D P. 2019. The First Intense Geomagnetic Storm Event Recorded by the China Seismo-Electromagnetic Satellite. Space Weather, 18, doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2019SW002243
Zhang X M, Battiston R, Shen X H, Zeren Z M, Ouyang X Y, Qian J D, Liu J, Huang J P, Miao Y Q. 2010. Automatic collecting technique of low frequency electromagnetic signals and its application in earthquake study. In: Bi Y, Williams M A, eds. Knowledge Science, Engineering and Management. KSEM 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin: Springer. 366–377
Zhang X M, Shen X H, Parrot M, Ouyang X Y, Liu J, Qian J, Zhao S, Miao Y. 2012. Phenomena of electrostatic perturbations before strong earthquakes (2005–2010) observed on DEMETER. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci, 12: 75–83
Zhang X M, Frolov V, Shen X H, Wang Y L, Zhou C, Lu H X, Huang J P, Ryabov A, Zhai D L. 2020. The electromagnetic emissions and plasma modulations at middle latitudes related to SURA-CSES experiments in 2018. Radio Sci, 55: e2019RS007040
Zeren Z M, Shen X H, Zhang X M, Cao J B, Huang J P, Ouyang X Y, Liu J, Lu B Q. 2012. Possible ionospheric electromagnetic perturbations induced by the Ms7.1 Yushu earthquake. Earth Moon Planets, 108: 231–241
Zeren Z M, Shen X H, Cao J B, Zhang X M, Huang J P, Liu J, Ouyang X Y, Zhao S F. 2012. Statistical analysis of ELF/VLF magnetic field disturbances before major earthquakes (in Chinese). Chin J Geophys, 55: 3699–3708
Acknowledgements
This work made use of the data from the CSES mission, a project funded by the China National Space Administration (CNSA) and China Earthquake Administration (CEA). We thank Professor Xuemin ZHANG of the Institute of Earthquake Forecasting, China Earthquake Administration, for her guidance and comments during the research process of the paper, and thank Dr. Bo**g ZHU of Yunnan Observatories, CAS for polishing the English. We thank the reviewers for their suggestions and hard work. This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 42104159), the APSCO Earthquake Project (Phase II), ISSI-BJ International Team (Grant No. 2019-33), Dragon 5 Cooperation Proposal (Grant No. #59308).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Huang, J., Zhang, F., Li, Z. et al. Disturbance identification of electric field data observed by the CSES-01 satellite before earthquakes. Sci. China Earth Sci. 66, 1814–1824 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-022-1048-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11430-022-1048-8