Log in

Effects of mating status on copulation investment by male bushcricket Gampsocleis gratiosa (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera)

  • Published:
Science in China Series C: Life Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Male’s copulation investment, including spermatophore and sperm investment were very high in the Chinese bushcricket Gampsocleis gratiosa. The effects of mating status of both males and females on male’s copulation investment were examined in this study. The fresh weight of spermatophylax increased positively with the weight of males’ body. This indicated that the nutritional investment during copulation depended on male’s quality. Spermatophore investment showed insignificant differences in every copulation protocols. This finding supported the paternal investment hypothesis, that is, males contributed to their offspring with little attention to their partners. Sperm releasing per ejaculation varied significantly among the trials. Males decreased 54.19% sperm in second mating than in its first mating, demonsrated that males regarded the first mating highly, and were more prudent in subsequent mating. These males’ strategies may contribute to the viability of the offspring.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Thornhill R. Sexual selection and paternal investment in insects. Am Nat, 1976, 110: 153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zeh D W, Smith R L. Paternal investment by terrestrial arthropods. Am Zool, 1985, 25: 785–805

    Google Scholar 

  3. Gwynne D T. Male mating effort, confidence of paternity, and insect sperm competition. In: Smith R L, ed. Sperm Competition and the Evolution of Animal Mating Systems. London: Academic Press, 1984. 117–149

    Google Scholar 

  4. Simmons L W, Graig M, Llorens T, Schinzig M, Hosken D. Bushcricket spermatophores vary in accord with sperm competition and parental investment theory. Proc R Soc Lond B, 1993, 251: 183–186

    Google Scholar 

  5. Wedell N. Sperm protection and mate assessment in the bushcricket Coptaspis sp 2. Anim Behav, 1998, 56: 357–363

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Parker G A. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Biol Rev, 1970, 45: 525–567

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gage R A, Barnard J C. Male crickets increase sperm number in relation to competition and female size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 1996, 38: 349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parker G A. Why are there so many tiny sperm? Sperm competition and the maintenance of two sexes. J Theo Biol, 1982, 96: 281–294

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Parker G A. Sperm competition games: Raffles and roles. Proc R Soc Lond B, 1990a, 242: 120–126

    Google Scholar 

  10. Parker G A. Sperm competition games: Sneaks and extra pair copulations. Proc R So. Lond B, 1990, 242: 127–133

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cook P A, Gage M J G. Effects of risks of sperm competition on the numbers of eupyrene and apyrene sperm ejaculated by the moth Plodia interpunctella (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 1995, 36: 261–268

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jia Z Y, Jiang Z G. Effects of nutrition on the reproductive investment in Gampocleis gratiosa males. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 1999, 45: 37–43

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jia Z Y, Jiang Z G. Ethograms and mating behaviors of Gelerifictorus micado and Gampsocleis gratiosa. Acta Zoologica Sinica, 1999, 45: 49–56

    Google Scholar 

  14. Jia Z Y, Jiang Z G, Sakaluk S K. Nutritional condition influences investment by male katydids in nuptial food gifts. Ecol Entomo, 2000, 25: 115–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Vahed K, Gilbert F S. Differences across taxa in nuptial gift size correlate with differences in sperm number and ejaculate volume in bushcrickets (Orthoptera: Tettigoniidae). Proc R Soc Lond B, 1996, 263: 1257–1265

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rice W R. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution, 1989, 43: 223–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Freckleton R P. On the misuse of residuals in ecology: Regression of residuals vs. multiple regression. J Anim Ecol, 2002, 71: 542–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gwynne D T. The katydid spermatophore: Evolution of a parental investment. In: Baily W J, Rentz D C F, eds. The Tettigoniidae: Biology, Systematics and Evolution. Bathurst: Crawford House Press, 1990. 27–40

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gage M J G. Risk of sperm competition directly affects ejaculate size in the Mediterranean fruit fly. Anim Behav, 1991, 42: 1036–1037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gage M J G, Baker R R. Ejaculate size varies with socio-sexual situation in an insect. Ecol Entomol, 1991, 16: 331–337

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kang Le.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gao, Y., Kang, L. Effects of mating status on copulation investment by male bushcricket Gampsocleis gratiosa (Tettigoniidae, Orthoptera). SCI CHINA SER C 49, 349–353 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-006-2003-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11427-006-2003-4

Keywords

Navigation