Log in

Facebook post data: a primer for educational research

  • Development Article
  • Published:
Educational technology research and development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Facebook is widely used and researched. However, though the data generated by educational technology tools and social media platforms other than Facebook have been used for research purposes, very little research has used Facebook posts as a data source—with most studies relying on self-report studies. While it has historically been impractical (or impossible) to use Facebook as a data source, the CrowdTangle platform allows academic researchers to freely access the massive collection of posts on public Facebook pages and groups. In this paper, we first outline how interactions and textual features in these public Facebook data in concert with established methods from educational data mining and learning analytics can be used to scrutinize educational discourse and knowledge sharing at scale. We then provide a primer that offers considerations for researchers before collecting these data (i.e., conducting research ethically and framing the study). The tutorial also covers matters directly pertaining to using CrowdTangle: accessing the CrowdTangle platform, uploading or identifying pages (or groups), and downloading historical data and it includes code using the statistical software and programming language R. We conclude with ideas for future directions for using Facebook posts as data with a focus on how educational researchers can leverage the scale of the available data and the time periods for which data is available to study educational affairs (i.e., issues or topics) and individuals (i.e., people or organizations) and to scrutinize how Facebook itself is used.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The analytic code and other files (except for the historical data, which must be accessed through CrowdTangle) is available at https://osf.io/jhnrb/?view_only=43f2da07eee14feb90fcb1755bbdbcfe.

Notes

  1. Resources for getting started with CrowdTangle https://www.crowdtangle.com/resources/best_practices.

  2. See for example < blinded for peer review>.

References

  • Akgunduz, D., & Akinoglu, O. (2016). The effect of blended learning and social media-supported learning on the students’ attitude and self-directed learning skills in science education. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 15(2), 106–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al Baghal, T., Sloan, L., Jessop, C., Williams, M. L., & Burnap, P. (2020). Linking twitter and survey data: The impact of survey mode and demographics on consent rates across three UK studies. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 517–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Almatrafi, O., Johri, A., & Rangwala, H. (2018). Needle in a haystack: Identifying learner posts that require urgent response in MOOC discussion forums. Computers & Education, 118, 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, S. (2012). A review of research on facebook as an educational environment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(6), 1093–1106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ayers, J. W., Chu, B., Zhu, Z., Leas, E. C., Smith, D. M., Dredze, M., & Broniatowski, D. A. (2021). Spread of misinformation about face masks and COVID-19 by automated software on facebook. JAMA Internal Medicine, 181(9), 1251–1253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, N. (2021). The social life of literacy education: How the 2018 #phonicsdebate is resha** the field. The Australian Educational Researcher. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-021-00451-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bodily, R., Leary, H., & West, R. E. (2019). Research trends in instructional design and technology journals. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(1), 64–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowman, N. D., & Akcaoglu, M. (2014). “I see smart people!“: Using facebook to supplement cognitive and affective learning in the university mass lecture. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter, J., Tani, T., Morrison, S., & Keane, J. (2020). Exploring the landscape of educator professional activity on Twitter: An analysis of 16 education-related Twitter hashtags. Professional Development in Education, 48(5), 784–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chugh, R., & Ruhi, U. (2018). Social media in higher education: A literature review of facebook. Education and Information Technologies, 23(2), 605–616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CrowdTangle Team. (2021). CrowdTangle. Facebook, MenloPark, California, UnitedStates. https://crowdtangle.com

  • Dedrick, A., Merten, J. W., Adams, T., Wheeler, M., Kassie, T., & King, J. L. (2020). A content analysis of pinterest belly fat loss exercises: Unrealistic expectations and misinformation. American Journal of Health Education, 51(5), 328–337.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, N. K. M., Scholz, M., Myers, M. A., Rae, S. M., Elmansouri, A., Hall, S., & Border, S. (2019). Reviewing the role of Instagram in education: Can a photo sharing application deliver benefits to medical and dental anatomy education? Medical Science Educator, 29(4), 1117–1128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Estrellado, R. A., Freer, E. A., Mostipak, J., Rosenberg, J. M., & Velásquez, I. C. (2020). Data science in education using R. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Fiesler, C., & Proferes, N. (2018). “Participant” perceptions of Twitter research ethics. Social Media + Society, 4(1), 2056305118763366.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, C., Pardos, Z. A., Baker, R. S., Williams, J. J., Smyth, P., Yu, R., & Warschauer, M. (2020). Mining big data in education: Affordances and challenges. Review of Research in Education, 44(1), 130–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gleason, B. (2016). New literacies practices of teenage Twitter users. Learning, Media and Technology, 41(1), 31–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gramlich, J. (2021). 10 facts about Americans and Facebook. Retrieved from https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/06/01/facts-about-americans-and-facebook/.

  • Greenhalgh, S. P., & Koehler, M. J. (2017). 28 Days later: Twitter hashtags as “just in time” teacher professional development. TechTrends, 61(3), 273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhalgh, S. P., Koehler, M. J., Rosenberg, J. M., & Willet, K. B. S. (2020). Considerations for using social media data in learning design and technology research. In Research methods in learning design and technology (pp.64–77). Routledge.

  • Greenhow, C., & Gleason, B. (2014). Social scholarship: Reconsidering scholarly practices in the age of social media. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(3), 392–402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C., Galvin, S. M., Brandon, D. L., & Askari, E. (2020). A decade of research on K–12 teaching and teacher learning with social media: Insights on the state of the field. Teachers College Record, 122(6), 1–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/016146812012200602

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hakimi, L., Eynon, R., & Murphy, V. A. (2021). The ethics of using digital trace data in education: A thematic review of the research landscape. Review of Educational Research. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543211020116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawksey, M. (2014). Need a better Twitter Archiving Google Sheet? TAGS v 6.0 is here! [Blogpost]. Retrieved from https://mashe.hawksey.info/2014/10/need-a-better-twitter-archiving-googlesheet-tags-v6-0-is-here.

  • Kennewell, S. (2001). Using affordances and constraints to evaluate the use of information and communications technology in teaching and learning. Journal of Information Techology for Teacher Education, 10(1–2), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmons, R., & Rosenberg, J. (2022). Trends and topics in educational technology. TechTrends, 66(2), 134–140. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-022-00713-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2018). Public internet data mining methods in instructional design, educational technology, and online learning research. TechTrends, 62(5), 492–500.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimmons, R., Rosenberg, J., & Allman, B. (2021). Trends in educational technology: What Facebook, Twitter, and Scopus can tell us about current research and practice. TechTrends, 65(2), 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kitto, K., Cross, S., Waters, Z., & Lupton, M. (2015). Learning analytics beyond the LMS: The connected learning analytics toolkit. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 11–15).

  • Krumm, A., Means, B., & Bienkowski, M. (2018). Learning analytics goes to school: A collaborative approach to improving education. Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Krutka, D. G., Heath, M. K., & Willet, K. B. S. (2019). Foregrounding technoethics: Toward critical perspectives in technology and teacher education. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 27(4), 555–574.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krutka, D. G., Smits, R. M., & Willhelm, T. A. (2021). Don’t be evil: Should we use Google in schools? TechTrends, 65(4), 421–431.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemay, D. J., Baek, C., & Doleck, T. (2021). Comparison of learning analytics and educational data mining: A topic modeling approach. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence., 2, 100016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liljekvist, Y. E., Randahl, A. C., van Bommel, J., & Olin-Scheller, C. (2021). Facebook for professional development: Pedagogical content knowledge in the centre of teachers’ online communities. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(5), 723–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lundin, M., Lantz-Andersson, A., & Hillman, T. (2020). Teachers’ identity work in a professional facebook group. Journal of Information Technology Research, 19, 205–222. https://doi.org/10.28945/4540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Y., & Pardos, Z. (2018). Diagnosing university student subject proficiency and predicting degree completion in vector space. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (Vol.32, No.1).

  • Manca, S., Caviglione, L., & Raffaghelli, J. (2016). Big data for social media learning analytics: Potentials and challenges. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 12(2).

  • Martin, F., Wang, C., Petty, T., Wang, W., & Wilkins, P. (2018). Middle school students’ social media use. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 21(1), 213–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moser, C., Groenewegen, P., & Huysman, M. (2013). Extending social network analysis with discourse analysis: Combining relational with interpretive data. In The Influence of Technology on Social Network Analysis and Mining (pp.547–561). Springer.

  • Niu, L. (2019). Using Facebook for academic purposes: Current literature and directions for future research. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 56(8), 1384–1406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oshima, J., Oshima, R., & Matsuzawa, Y. (2012). Knowledge building discourse explorer: A social network analysis application for knowledge building discourse. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60(5), 903–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardos, Z. A., & Nam, A. J. H. (2020). A university map of course knowledge. PLoS ONE, 15(9), e0233207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, J., Yu, R., Rodriguez, F., Baker, R., Smyth, P., & Warschauer, M. (2018). Understanding student procrastination via mixture models. International Educational Data Mining Society.

  • Perrotta, C., Gulson, K. N., Williamson, B., & Witzenberger, K. (2021). Automation, APIs and the distributed labour of platform pedagogies in Google classroom. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 97–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team (2021). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing.

  • Romero-Hall, E., Kimmons, R., & Veletsianos, G. (2018). Social media use by instructional design departments. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 34(5).

  • Rosenberg, J. M., & Nguyen, H. (2021). How K-12 school districts communicated during the COVID-19 pandemic: A study using Facebook data. In Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp.1–4).

  • Rosenberg, J. M., Reid, J. W., Dyer, E. B., Koehler, M. J., Fischer, C., & McKenna, T. J. (2020). Idle chatter or compelling conversation? The potential of the social media-based #NGSSchat network for supporting science education reform efforts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 57(9), 1322–1355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg, J. M., Borchers, C., Stegenga, S. M., Burchfield, M. A., Anderson, D., & Fischer, C. (2022). How educational institutions reveal students’ personally identifiable information on Facebook. Learning, Media and Technology. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439884.2022.2140672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schrader, D. E. (2015). Constructivism and learning in the age of social media: Changing minds and learning communities. New Directions for Teaching and Learning., 2015(144), 23–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, P., & Land, S. (2019). Patterns of knowledge sharing in an online affinity space for diabetes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 67(2), 247–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton, C. C., Koehler, M. J., Greenhalgh, S. P., & Carpenter, J. P. (2021). Lifting the veil on Teachers Pay Teachers. Com: An investigation of educational marketplace offerings and downloads. Learning, Media and Technology, 47(2), 268–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siemens, G., & Baker, R. S. D. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp.252–254).

  • Staudt Willet, K. B. (2019). Revisiting how and why educators use Twitter: Tweet types and purposes in #Edchat. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 51(3), 273–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staudt Willet, K. B., & Carpenter, J. P. (2020). Teachers on reddit? Exploring contributions and interactions in four teaching-related subreddits. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(2), 216–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stier, S., Breuer, J., Siegers, P., & Thorson, K. (2020). Integrating survey data and digital trace data: Key issues in develo** an emerging field. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 503–516.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Supovitz, J., & Reinkordt, E. (2017). Keep your eye on the metaphor: The framing of the common core on Twitter. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(30), 1–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taecharungroj, V. (2013). Homework on social media: Benefits and outcomes of Facebook as a pedagogic tool. International Journal of e-Education, e-Business, e-Management and e-Learning, 3(3), 258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Théro, H., & Vincent, E. M. (2022). Investigating Facebook’s interventions against accounts that repeatedly share misinformation. Information Processing & Management, 59(2), 102804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trust, T., Krutka, D. G., & Carpenter, J. P. (2016). “Together we are better”: Professional learning networks for teachers. Computers & Education, 102, 15–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufekci, Z. (2014). Big questions for social media big data: Representativeness, validity and other methodological pitfalls. In The Eighth International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.

  • van Bommel, J., Randahl, A. C., Liljekvist, Y., & Ruthven, K. (2020). Tracing teachers’ transformation of knowledge in social media. Teaching and Teacher Education, 87, 102958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veletsianos, G., & Kimmons, R. (2016). Scholars in an increasingly open and digital world: How do education professors and students use Twitter? The Internet and Higher Education, 30, 1–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vivakaran, M. V., & Maraimalai, N. (2019). Networked learning and learning analytics: A study on the employment of Facebook in a virtual training program. Interactive Learning Environments, 27(2), 242–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vraga, E. K., & Tully, M. (2020). Who is exposed to news? It depends on how you measure: Examining self-reported versus behavioral news exposure measures. Social Science Computer Review, 38(5), 550–566.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watters, A. (2014). The monsters of education technology. CreateSpace.

  • Williamson, B. (2021). Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e) valuation of higher education. Critical Studies in Education, 62(1), 50–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willis, L., & Exley, B. (2018). Using an online social media space to engage parents in student learning in the early-years: Enablers and impediments. Digital Education Review, 33, 87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu, J. Y. (2021). Learning analytics on structured and unstructured heterogeneous data sources: Perspectives from procrastination, help-seeking, and machine-learning defined cognitive engagement. Computers & Education, 163, 104066.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmer, M. (2020). But the data is already public: On the ethics of research in Facebook. In The Ethics of Information Technologies (pp. 229–241). Routledge.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joshua M. Rosenberg.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author(s) have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Research involving human and animal rights

This work did not involve human participants and so was not subject to ethics/Institutional Review Board approval.

Informed consent

Because this work did not involve human participants, obtaining informed consent was not relevant.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (RMD 8 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borchers, C., Rosenberg, J.M. & Swartzentruber, R.M. Facebook post data: a primer for educational research. Education Tech Research Dev 71, 2345–2364 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10269-2

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-023-10269-2

Keywords

Navigation