Log in

Formation of Relational Poverty Governance and its Impacts: How Chinese Local Governments Implement Poverty Alleviation Programs

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Chinese Political Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study considers how the Chinese government’s strategy of relational poverty governance has permitted its gaining control over parts of the country where its authority was fragile. President **’s interest in targeted poverty alleviation has led success of this strategy to become a major concern of local governments. Based on fieldwork undertaken in China during the period 2016–2020, the article shows that state-managed political mobilization and rigid bureaucratic governance strategies are not the only means through which political power is exercised; relational poverty governance is another basis of the exercise of state power in rural communities. Mechanisms whereby three levels of state power—symbolic, bureaucratic, and moral—are executed in relational governance are identified. Through practical operations that include emotional interactions, paired assistance systems, and moral supervision, the state regains control in remote areas and strives to achieve successful governance. The article concludes by discussing the policy effectiveness of relational poverty governance and its implications for rural governance in contemporary China.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (France)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Here, “Three Wests” refers to the Dingxi and Hexi regions of Gansu Province, and the **haigu region of Ningxia Hui Autonomous Region.

  2. “Secretaries at five levels assuming leadership” refers to provincial, municipal, county, town, and village party branch secretaries bearing responsibility for poverty alleviation.

  3. The CCP’s revolutionary tradition has included encouraging cadres (esp. those with party membership) to establish PKRs with poor households (jieqiongqin) since the revolutionary years. See, for example, Perry 2002. This method has been well institutionalized and broadly used in the TPA program.

  4. Internal government document of County H, January 22, 2018.

  5. See “Implementation Opinions of the CCP Shaanxi Provincial Committee and People’s Government of Shaanxi on Winning the Three-Year Battle against Poverty,” September 4, 2018.

  6. Internal government document, County H, October 20, 2018.

  7. Internal government document, County H, August 16, 2017.

  8. Interview with Y, a township-level cadre, November 28, 2016.

  9. See, ** J.-P., “Speech at a Symposium on Resolving Prominent Problems in Poverty Alleviation.” Retrieved from Chinanews.com (March 6, 2020): http://www.chinanews.com/gn/2020/03-06/9116635.shtml.

  10. Internal government document, County H, March 28, 2016.

  11. Internal government document, County H, May 13, 2017.

  12. Internal government document, County H, June 5, 2017.

  13. Interview with L, a county-level cadre, August 12, 2020.

  14. Internal government document of County H, June 28, 2017.

  15. Interview with S, a village cadre, July 25, 2017.

  16. The case was cited from “New Folk Customs Construction Materials of Village J, Town X,” Internal Materials of Village J, 2019.

  17. Fieldnote by the authors, County H, August 3, 2019.

  18. Fieldnote by the authors, County A, May 10, 2017.

  19. Here, the suspended (or embedded) regime does not mean that the regime itself is in decline (or not), but refers to the suspension (or embedding) of state power that withdraws from (or penetrates) local communities.

References

  1. Barbalet, J. 2021. Tripartite guanxi: Resolving kin and non-kin discontinuities in Chinese connections. Theory and Society 50 (1): 151–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Deng, Y., and K. O’Brien. 2013. Relational repression in China: Using social ties to demobilize protesters. The China Quarterly 215: 533–552.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fei, X.-T. 2015. From the soil: The foundations of Chinese society (xiangtu zhongguo). Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ferguson, J. 1990. The anti-politics machine: “Development”, depoliticization and bureaucratic power in Lesotho. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  5. Gao, H., and A. Tyson. 2020. Poverty relief in China: A comparative analysis of kinship contracts in four provinces. Journal of Contemporary China 29 (126): 901–915.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Guo, D. 2020. **’s leadership and party-centred governance in China. Chinese Political Science Review 5: 439–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Guo, Z., L. Li, and K. Zhang. 2018. From the “suspended” regime to the “sinking” regime: Research on the impact of precision poverty alleviation on grassroots governance (cong xuanfuxing zhengquan dao xiachenxing zhengquan: **gzhunfupin dui jicengzhili de yingxiangyanjiu). China Rural Studies 1: 83–101.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gu, Y., X. Qin, Z. Wang, C. Zhang, and S. Guo. 2020. Global justice index report. Chinese Political Science Review 5: 253–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heide, J. B. 1994. Interorganizational governance in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing 58 (1): 71–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hernandez-Trillo, F. 2016. Poverty alleviation in federal systems: The case of México. World Development 87: 204–214.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hu, A., L.-L. Hu, and Z.-X. Chang. 2006. China’s economic growth and poverty reduction 1978-2004 (zhongguo **gjizengzhang yu jianshaopinkun 1978-2004). Journal of Tsinghua University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) 5: 105–115.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hu, J., and T. Wu. 2020. Emotional mobilization of Chinese veterans: Collective activism, flexible governance and dispute resolution. Journal of Contemporary China 30 (129): 451–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Huang, C.-W. 2016. Research on China’s path of development-oriented poverty reduction: Review and prospect. (Zhongguo fupinkaifa daoluyanjiu: shu** yu zhanwang. Journal of China Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition) 5: 5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Korpi, W., and J. Palme. 1998. The paradox of redistribution and strategies of equality: Welfare state institutions, inequality, and poverty in the western countries. American Sociological Review 63 (5): 661–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Li, F. 2012. Making revolution on the mind: Fanxin and the exercise of thought-power in the land reform movement of northern China (1946-48). Frontiers of Literary Studies in China 6 (4): 598–620.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Li, M., and Z. Wu. 2021. Power and poverty in China: Why some counties perform better in poverty alleviation? Journal of Chinese Political Science. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-021-09765-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Li, P., and H. Wei. 2016. Annual Report on Poverty Reduction of China 2016 (zhongguo fupinkaifa baogao 2016). Bei**g: Social Science Academic Press.

  18. Li, X., X. Zhang, and L. Tang. 2005. Poverty alleviation funds: Targeting and deviation (woguo zhongyangcaizheng fupinzi** de miaozhunfenxi). Journal of China Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition) 3: 1–6.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Liao, X., and W.-H. Tsai. 2019. Clientelistic state corporatism: The united front model of “pairing-up” in the ** era. China Review 19 (1): 31–56.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liao, X., W.-H. Tsai, and Z.-W. Lin. 2020. Penetrating the grassroots: First-secretaries-in-residence and rural politics in contemporary China. Problems of Post-Communism 67 (2): 169–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lin, J. Y., and C. Monga. 2017. Beating the odds: Jump-starting develo** countries. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Lin, M., and P. Tao. 2008. The governance of poverty in China in the past thirty years: Review and forecast (zhongguo pinkunzhili sanshinian huiguyuqianzhan). Journal of Gansu Administration Institute 6: 51–56.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lorentzen, P. L. 2013. Regularizing rioting: Permitting public protest in an authoritarian regime. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 8 (2): 127–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Lusch, R. F., and J. R. Brown. 1996. Interdependency, contracting, and relational behavior in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing 60: 19–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Mann, M. 1993. The sources of social power II: The rise of classes and nation-states, 1760-1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  26. Mertha, A. 2009. Fragmented authoritarianism 2.0: Political pluralization in the Chinese policy process. The China Quarterly 200: 995–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Migdal, J. S. 2001. State in society: Studying how states and societies transform and constitute one another. New York: Cambridge University Press.

  28. Moyo, D. 2009. Dead aid: Why aid is not working and how there is a better way for Africa. London: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Nathan, A. J. 2003. China’s changing of the guard: Authoritarian resilience. Journal of Democracy 14 (1): 6–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. O’Brien, K., and Y. Deng. 2017. Preventing protest one person at a time: Psychological coercion and relational repression in China. China Review 17 (2): 179–201.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Perry, E. 2002. Moving the masses: Emotion work in the Chinese revolution. Mobilization: An International Quarterly 2: 111–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Perry, E. 2011. From mass campaigns to managed campaigns: Constructing a new socialist countryside. In Mao’s invisible hand: The political foundations of adaptive governance in China, eds. S. Heilmann, and E. Perry, 30–61. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Perry, G. E., J. H. Lopez, W. F. Maloney, O. Arias, and L. Servén. 2006. Poverty reduction and growth: Virtuous and vicious circles. Washington: World Bank Publications. https://doi.org/elibrary.worldbank.org/doi/abs/10.1596/978-0-8213-6511-3.

  34. Poppo, L., K. Z. Zhou, and T. Zenger. 2003. The economic and social embeddedness of relational governance: An empirical study exploring origins and effectiveness. Paper presented at the Academy of Management 2003 Annual Meetings, Seattle, WA.

  35. Rank, M. R. 2004. One nation, underprivileged: Why American poverty affects us all. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  36. Tsai, L.-L. 2007. Solidary groups, informal accountability, and local public goods provision in rural China. American Political Science Review 101 (2): 355–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Tsai, W.-H., and X. Liao. 2020. Mobilizing cadre incentives in policy implementation: Poverty alleviation in a Chinese county. China Information 34 (1): 45–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wang, Y. 2016. Drip** the digits down: Technical governance in the rural targeted poverty alleviation (shuzi xiaxiang: nongcun **gzhunfupin zhongde jishuzhili). Sociological Studies 6: 119–142.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Wei, C., and X. Zhao. 2018. Conventional governance, campaign-style enforcement and China’s poverty alleviation practices (changguizhili yundongshizhili yu zhongguo fupinshijian). Journal of China Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition) 5: 58–69.

    Google Scholar 

  40. White, T. 1990. Postrevolutionary mobilization in China: The one-child policy reconsidered. World Politics 43 (1): 53–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Yang, J. 2013. Song wennuan, ‘sending warmth’: Unemployment, new urban poverty, and the affective state in China. Ethnography 14 (1): 104–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ye, C., and X. Zou. 2012. Poverty targeting: Performance evaluation and mechanism design (fupin **gu de jixiao**gu yu zhidusheji). Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition) 1: 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zaheer, A., and N. Venkatraman. 1995. Relational governance as an interorganizational strategy: An empirical test of the role of trust in economic exchange. Strategic Management Journal 16 (5): 373–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zeng, Q. 2020. Managed campaign and bureaucratic institutions in China: Evidence from the targeted poverty alleviation program. Journal of Contemporary China 29 (123): 400–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang, L. 2007. The course of poverty reduction in China 1949-2005 (zhongguo fupinkaifa licheng 1949-2005). Bei**g: China Financial & Economic Publishing House.

  46. Zhou, X. 2012. On campaign-style governance: Rethinking the institutional logic of China’s state governance (yundongxing zhilijizhi: zhongguoguojiazhili de zhiduluoji zaisikao). Open Times 9: 105–125.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the National Social Science Foundation of China (No. 21CSH086). We would like to thank the editorial board of Journal of Chinese Political Science for their helpful comments on the earlier version of the article. We are especially grateful for insightful comments from Jack Barbalet, and the two anonymous reviewers. Any remaining errors are ours.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wei Chen.

Ethics declarations

Disclosure Statement

No potential conflict of interest was reported by the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xu, H., Xu, M. & Chen, W. Formation of Relational Poverty Governance and its Impacts: How Chinese Local Governments Implement Poverty Alleviation Programs. J OF CHIN POLIT SCI 27, 295–317 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-022-09788-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11366-022-09788-1

Keywords

Navigation