Log in

Characteristics, source analysis, and health risk of PM2.5 in the urban tunnel environment associated with E10 petrol usage

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The increase in the number of motor vehicles has intensified the impact of traffic sources on air quality. Our aim was to illustrate the characteristics of PM2.5 emissions from vehicles fueled with E10 (a blend of 10% ethanol and 90% gasoline). A 21-day PM2.5 sampling in a fully enclosed urban tunnel and the component analysis were completed, and the characteristics, sources, and health risks of tunnel PM2.5 were studied. Moreover, the PM2.5 pH and its sensitivity were investigated by the thermodynamic model (ISORROPIA-II). In addition, exposure models were used to assess the health risks of different heavy metals in PM2.5 to humans through respiratory pathways. The two-point Cu/Sb ratio (entrance: 4.0 ± 1.4; exit: 4.4 ± 1.7) was close to the diagnostic criteria indicating a significant impact from brake wear. NO3, NH4+, and SO42− constituted the main components of water-soluble ions in PM2.5 of the tunnel, accounting for 83.0–84.6% of the total concentration of inorganic ions. The organic carbon/elemental carbon ratio of the tunnel was greater than 2, indicating that the contribution of gasoline vehicle exhaust was significant. The average emission factors of PM2.5 in the fleet was 31.4 ± 16.6 mg/(veh·km). The pH value of PM2.5 in a tunnel environment (4.6 ± 0.3) was more acidic than that in an urban environment (4.9 ± 0.6). The main sensitive factors of PM2.5 pH in the urban atmosphere and tunnel environment were total ammonia (sum of gas and aerosol, NH3) and temperature, respectively. The results of the health risk assessment showed that Pb posed a potential carcinogenic risk, while As and Cd presented unacceptable risks for tunnel workers. The non-carcinogenic risk index of heavy metals of PM2.5 in the tunnel environment exceeded the safety threshold.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  • Arimoto R, Duce RA, Savoie DL, Prospero JM, Talbot R, Cullen JD, Tomza U, Lewis NF, Ray BJ (1996) Relationships among aerosol constituents from Asia and the North Pacific during pem-west. Geophys Res 101(D1):2011–2023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Aslam R, Sharif F, Baqar M, Shahzad L (2022) Source identification and risk assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in air and dust samples of Lahore City. Sci Rep 12:2459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bougiatioti A, Nikolaou P, Stavroulas I, Kouvarakis G, Weber R, Nenes A, Kanakidou M, Mihalopoulos N (2016) Particle water and pH in the eastern Mediterranean: source variability and implications for nutrient availability. Atmos Chem Phys 16:4579–4591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cesari D, De Benedetto GE, Bonasoni P, Busetto M, Dinoi A, Merico E, Contini D (2018) Seasonal variability of PM2.5 and PM10 composition and sources in an urban background site in southern Italy. Sci Total Environ 612:202–213

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Charron A, Polo-Rehn L, Besombes JL, Golly B, Buisson C, Chanut H, Marchand N, Guillaud G, Jaffrezo JL (2019) Identification and quantification of particulate tracers of exhaust and non-exhaust vehicle emissions. Atmos Chem Phys 19:5187–5207

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Lee SC, Ho KF, Louie PKK (2006) On-road particulate matter (PM2.5) and gaseous emissions in the Shing Mun Tunnel. Hong Kong, Atmos Environ 40:4235–4245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng Y, Yu QQ, Liu JM, Sun YW, Liang LL, Du ZY, Geng GN, Ma WL, Qi H, Zhang Q, He KB (2021) Formation of secondary inorganic aerosol in a frigid urban atmosphere. Front Environ Sci Eng 16(2):18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi JK, Ban SJ, Kim YP, Kim YH, Yi SM, Zoh KD (2015) Molecular marker characterization and source appointment of particulate matter and its organic aerosols. Chemosphere 134:482–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chung Y, Dominici F, Wang Y, Coull BA, Bell ML (2015) Associations between long-term exposure to chemical constituents of fine particulate matter (PM2.5) and mortality in medicare enrollees in the Eastern United States. Environ Health Perspect 123:467–474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng JJ, **ng ZY, Zhuang BL, Du K (2014) Comparative study on long-term visibility trend and its affecting factors on both sides of the Taiwan Strait. Atmos Res 143:266–278

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ding J, Zhao PS, Su J, Dong Q, Du X, Zhang YF (2019) Aerosol pH and its driving factors in Bei**g. Atmos Chem Phys 19:7939–7954

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong Z, Jiang N, Duan S, Zhang L, Li S, Zhang R (2019) Size distributions and size-segregated chemical profiles of particulate matter in a traffic tunnel of East-Central China. Atmos Pollut Res 10(6):1873–1883

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fang T, Zeng LH, Gao D, Verma V, Stefaniak AB, Weber RJ (2017) Ambient size distributions and lung deposition of aerosol dithiothreitol-measured oxidative potential: contrast between soluble and insoluble particles. Environ Sci Technol 51:6802–6811

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fountoukis C, Nenes A (2007) ISORROPIA II: a computationally efficient thermodynamic equilibrium model for K+-Ca2+-Mg2+-NH4+-Na+-SO42–NO3–Cl–H2O aerosols. Atmos Chem Phys 7:4639–4659

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gaga EO, Arı A, Akyol N, Uzmez OO, Kara M, Chow JC, Odabasi M (2018) Determination of real-world emission factors of trace metals, EC, OC, BTEX, and semivolatile organic compounds (PAHs, PCBs and PCNs) in a rural tunnel in Bilecik, Turkey. Sci Total Environ 643:1285–1296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Wei YT, Shi GL, Yu HF, Zhang ZC, Song SJ, Wang W, Liang DN, Feng YC (2020) Roles of RH, aerosol pH and sources in concentrations of secondary inorganic aerosols, during different pollution periods. Atmos Environ 241:11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillies JA, Gertler AW, Sagebiel JC, Dippel WA (2001) On-road particulate matter (PM2.5 and PM10) emissions in the Sepulveda Tunnel. Los Angeles, California, Environ Sci Technol 35:1054–1063

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Tang M, Wang X, Yu Z, Wei F, Zhang X, ** M, Wang J, Xu D, Chen Z et al (2022) Characteristics, sources, and health risks of trace metals in PM2.5. Atmos Environ 289:119314

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gysel M, Crosier J, Top** DO, Whitehead JD, Bower KN, Cubison MJ, Coe H (2007) Closure between chemical composition and hygroscopic growth of aerosol particles during TORCH2. Atmos Chem Phys 2007:731–735

    Google Scholar 

  • Handler M, Puls C, Zbiral J, Marr I, Puxbaum H, Limbeck A (2008) Size and composition of particulate emissions from motor vehicles in the Kaisermuhlen-Tunnel. Vienna, Atmos Environ 42:2173–2186

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hao Q, Jiang N, Zhang R, Yang L, Li S (2020) Characteristics, sources, and reactions of nitrous acid during winter at an urban site in the Central Plains Economic Region in China. Atmos Chem Physics 20:7087–7102

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Harrison RM, Jones AM, Gietl J, Yin JX, Green DC (2012) Estimation of the contributions of brake dust, tire wear, and resuspension to nonexhaust traffic particles derived from atmospheric measurements. Environ Sci Technol 46:6523–6529

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • He LY, Hu M, Zhang YH, Huang XF, Yao TT (2008) Fine particle emissions from on-road vehicles in the Zhujiang Tunnel. China, Environ Sci Technol 42:4461–4466

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hennigan CJ, Izumi J, Sullivan AP, Weber RJ, Nenes A (2015) A critical evaluation of proxy methods used to estimate the acidity of atmospheric particles. Atmos Chem Phys 15:2775–2790

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ho CS, Peng JF, Lv ZY, Sun B, Yang L, Zhang JS, Guo JL, Zhang QJ, Du ZF, Mao HJ (2023) Tunnel measurements reveal significant reduction in traffic-related light-absorbing aerosol emissions in China. Sci Total Environ 856:59212

  • Hu J, **a J, Li D, Lei X, He H, Li J, Tan S, Yuan X, Qian Y (2023) Characteristics and sources analysis of carbonaceous aerosols in urban and rural areas of Nanchong City. Pol J Environ Stud 32(6):5599–5609

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang HL, Huang YS (2009) Particulate matter emissions from on-road vehicles in a freeway tunnel study. Atmos Environ 43:4014–4022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jamriska M, Morawska L, Thomas S, He C (2004) Diesel bus emissions measured in a tunnel study. Environ Sci Technol 38:6701–6709

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jeong CH, Wang JM, Hilker N, Debosz J, Sofowote U, Su YS, Noble M, Healy RM, Munoz T, Dabek-Zlotorzynska E, Celo V, White L, Audette C, Herod D, Evans GJ (2019) Temporal and spatial variability of traffic-related PM2.5 sources: comparison of exhaust and non-exhaust emissions. Atmos Environ 198:55–69

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jia SG, Chen WH, Zhang Q, Krishnan P, Mao JY, Zhong BQ, Huang MJ, Fan Q, Zhang JP, Chang M, Yang LM, Wang XM (2020) A quantitative analysis of the driving factors affecting seasonal variation of aerosol pH in Guangzhou, China. Sci Total Environ 725:9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang N, Yin SS, Guo Y, Li JY, Kang PR, Zhang RQ, Tang XY (2018a) Characteristics of mass concentration, chemical composition, source apportionment of PM2.5 and PM10 and health risk assessment in the emerging megacity in China. Atmos Pollut Res 9:309–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang N, Duan S, Xue Y, Zhang R, Ke W (2018b) Comparative major components and health risks of toxic elements and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons of PM2.5 in winter and summer in Zhengzhou: based on three-year data. Atmos Res 213:173–184

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly FJ, Fussell JC (2012) Size, source and chemical composition as determinants of toxicity attributable to ambient particulate matter. Atmos Environ 60:504–526

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kioumourtzoglou MA, Schwartz J, James P, Dominici F, Zanobetti A (2016) PM2.5 and mortality in 207 US cities modification by temperature and city characteristics. Epidemiology 27:221–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Kristensson A, Johansson C, Westerholm R, Swietlicki E, Gidhagen L, Wideqvist U, Vesely V (2004) Real-world traffic emission factors of gases and particles measured in a road tunnel in Stockholm. Sweden, Atmos Environ 38:657–673

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lall R, Thurston GD (2006) Identifying and quantifying transported vs. local sources of New York City PM2.5 fine particulate matter air pollution. Atmos Environ 40:333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laschober C, Limbeck A, Rendl J, Puxbaum H (2004) Particulate emissions from on-road vehicles in the Kaisermuhlen-tunnel (Vienna, Austria). Atmos Environ 38:2187–2195

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence S, Sokhi R, Ravindra K, Mao H, Prain HD, Bull ID (2013) Source apportionment of traffic emissions of particulate matter using tunnel measurements. Atmos Environ 77:548–557

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Li F, Yan J, Wei Y, Zeng J, Wang X, Chen X, Zhang C, Li W, Chen M, Lu G (2021) PM2.5-bound heavy metals from the major cities in China: spatiotemporal distribution, fuzzy exposure assessment and health risk management. J Clean Prod 286:124967

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wang S, Lohmann R, Na Yu, Zhang C, Gao Yi, Zhao J, Ma L (2015) Source apportionment of gaseous and particulate PAHs from traffic emission using tunnel measurements in Shanghai. China Atmos Environ 107:129–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu JW, Chen YJ, Cao HB, Zhang AC (2019) Burden of typical diseases attributed to the sources of PM2.5- bound toxic metals in Bei**g: an integrated approach to source apportionment and QALYs. Environ Int 131:105041

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu PF, Zhao XX, Zhang CL, Chen H, Wang JH, Xue LK, Chen JM, Mu YJ (2021) Fine particle pH and its influencing factors during summer at Mt. Tai: comparison between mountain and urban sites. Atmos Environ 261:8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu ZG, Zhan CL, Liu HX, Liu S, Quan JH, Liu XL, Zhang JQ, Qu CK (2023a) Source-specific health risk of PM2.5-bound metals in a typical industrial city, Central China, 2021–2022. Atmosphere 14(9):1406

  • Liu XH, Zhu RC, ** BQ, Zu L, Wang YJ, Wei YB, Zhang RQ (2023b) Emission characteristics and light absorption apportionment of carbonaceous aerosols: a tunnel test conducted in an urban with fully enclosed use of E10 petrol. Environ Res 216:114701

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lu KD, Fuchs H, Hofzumahaus A, Tan ZF, Wang HC, Zhang L, Schmitt SH, Rohrer F, Bohn B, Broch S, Dong HB, Gkatzelis GI, Hohaus T, Holland F, Li X, Liu Y, Liu YH, Ma XF, Novelli A, Schlag P, Shao M, Wu YS, Wu ZJ, Zeng LM, Hu M, Kiendler-Scharr A, Wahner A, Zhang YH (2019) Fast photochemistry in wintertime haze: consequences for pollution mitigation strategies. Environ Sci Technol 53:10676–10684

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mancilla Y, Mendoza A (2012) A tunnel study to characterize PM2.5 emissions from gasoline-powered vehicles in Monterrey. Mexico, Atmos Environ 59:449–460

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manno E, Varrica D, Dongarra G (2006) Metal distribution in road dust samples collected in an urban area close to a petrochemical plant at Gela. Sicily, Atmos Environ 40:5929–5241

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Martinsson J, Abdul Azeem H, Sporre MK, Bergstrom R, Ahlberg E, Ostrom E, Kristensson A, Swietlicki E, Eriksson Stenstrom K (2017) Carbonaceous aerosol source apportionment using the Aethalometer model – evaluation by radiocarbon and levoglucosan analysis at a rural background site in southern Sweden. Atmos Chem Phys 17:4265–4281

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nazir R, Shaheen N, Shah MH (2011) Indoor/outdoor relationship of trace metals in the atmospheric particulate matter of an industrial area. Atmos Res 101:765–772

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pant P, Shi Z, Pope FD, Harrison RM (2017) Characterization of traffic-related particulate matter emissions in a road tunnel in Birmingham, UK: Trace Metals and Organic Molecular Markers. Aerosol Air Qual Res 17(1):117–130

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qu Y, Liu X-Q, Liu H-K, Wang Q-Y, Zhu C-S, Zhou Y, Zhang RJ, Cao JJ (2021) PM2.5 elements in the rural area of **g-**-Ji Region in China: source identification and health risk assessment. Aerosol Sci Eng 5:429–439

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi GL, Xu J, Peng X, **ao ZM, Chen K, Tian YZ, Guan XB, Feng YC, Yu HF, Nenes A, Russell AG (2017) pH of aerosols in a polluted atmosphere: source contributions to highly acidic aerosol. Environ Sci Technol 51:4289–4296

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Song SJ, Gao M, Xu WQ, Shao JY, Shi GL, Wang SX, Wang YX, Sun YL, McElroy MB (2018) Fine-particle pH for Bei**g winter haze as inferred from different thermodynamic equilibrium models. Atmos Chem Phys 18:7423–7438

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sternbeck J, Sjodin A, Andreasson K (2002) Metal emissions from road traffic and the influence of resuspension - results from two tunnel studies. Atmos Environ 36:4735–4744

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun J, Liu L, Xu L, Wang Y, Wu Z, Hu M, Shi Z, Li Y, Zhang X, Chen J (2018) Key Role of nitrate in phase transitions of urban particles: implications of important reactive surfaces for secondary aerosol formation, Journal of Geophysical Research. D Atmospheres: JGR 123(2):1234–1243

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • US EPA (2009) Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Volume Ι: human health evaluation manual (Part F)[EB]. Office of Superfund Remediation & Tech. Innovation. Washington D. C., EPA-540-R-070–002. https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part-f

  • US EPA. Risk assessment guidance for super fund volume I: human health evaluation manual (part A)[EB]. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response. Washington D. C., 1989,EPA/540/1–89/002.https://www.epa.gov/risk/risk-assessment-guidance-superfund-rags-part

  • Wang Q, Jiang N, Yin SS, Li X, Yu F, Guo Y, Zhang RQ (2017) Carbonaceous species in PM2.5 and PM10 in urban area of Zhengzhou in China: seasonal variations and source apportionment. Atmos Res 191:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang SB, Yan QS, Yu F, Wang Q, Yang LM, Zhang RQ, Yin SS (2018) Distribution and source of chemical elements in size-resolved particles in Zhengzhou, China: effects of regional transport. Aerosol Air Qual Res 18(2):371–385

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Watson JG, Chow JC, Houck JE (2001) PM2.5 chemical source profiles for vehicle exhaust, vegetative burning, geological material, and coal burning in Northwestern Colorado during 1995. Chemosphere 43:1141–1151

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Weber RJ, Guo HY, Russell AG, Nenes A (2016) High aerosol acidity despite declining atmospheric sulfate concentrations over the past 15 years. Nat Geosci 9:282–285

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wiseman CLS, Zereini F, Puttmann W (2013) Traffic-related trace element fate and uptake by plants cultivated in roadside soils in Toronto. Canada, Sci Total Environ 442:86–95

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Xu J, Jia C, Yu H, Xu H, Ji D, Wang C, **ao H, He J (2021) Characteristics, sources, and health risks of PM2.5- bound trace elements in representative areas of Northern Zhejiang Province. China. Chemosphere 272:129632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ye T, Murphy JG (2019) The sensitivity of PM2.5- acidity to meteorological parameters and chemical composition changes: 10-year records from six Canadian monitoring sites. Atmos Chem Phys 19(14):9309–9320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young TM, Heeraman DA, Sirin G, Ashbaugh LL (2002) Resuspension of soil as a source of airborne lead near industrial facilities and highways. Environ Sci Technol 36:2484–2890

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang YL, Wang XM, Li GH, Yang WQ, Huang ZH, Zhang Z, Huang XY, Deng W, Liu TY, Huang ZZ, Zhang ZY (2015) Emission factors of fine particles, carbonaceous aerosols and traces gases from road vehicles: recent tests in an urban tunnel in the Pearl River Delta. China Atmos Environ 122:876–884

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Y, Shuai CY, Bian J, Chen X, Wu Y, Shen LY (2019) Socioeconomic factors of PM2.5 concentrations in 152 Chinese cities: decomposition analysis using LMDI. J Clean Prod 218:96–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao S, Tian H, Luo L, Liu H, Xue Y (2021) Temporal variation characteristics and source apportionment of metal elements in PM2.5 in urban Bei**g during 2018–2019. Environ Pollut 268(Pt B):115856

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zou JN, Liu ZR, Hu B, Huang XJ, Wen TX, Ji DS, Liu JY, Yang Y, Yao Q, Wang YS (2018) Aerosol chemical compositions in the North China Plain and the impact on the visibility in Bei**g and Tian**. Atmos Res 201:235–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52170117); the Key Research and Development Special Project of Henan Province (212102310065); the Open Research Fund of State Environmental Protection Key Laboratory of Vehicle Emission Control and Simulation, Chinese Research Academy of Environmental Sciences (VECS2022K05); and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Public-interest Scientific Institution (2022YSKY-05).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Jiang N. and Lv Q. conceptualized and planned the study. Zhu R., Jiang N., Lv Z., Zhang R., and Qu G. performed the experiments and data analysis, and Lv Z. prepared the original draft of the manuscript. Zhu R. and Jiang N. supervised the study, acquired funding, and reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors have read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rencheng Zhu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Gerhard Lammel

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• Characteristics of PM2.5 were analyzed from vehicles fueled with E10.

• The PM2.5 emission factor was 31.4 mg/(veh·km) in the tunnel.

• The PM2.5 pH in the tunnel was sensitive to temperature.

• As and Cd in the PM2.5 posed significant health risks to tunnel workers.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 19.9 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, N., Lv, Z., Zhang, R. et al. Characteristics, source analysis, and health risk of PM2.5 in the urban tunnel environment associated with E10 petrol usage. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 30454–30466 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33194-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-33194-0

Keywords

Navigation