Abstract
Landscape ecological risk (LER) is an effective index to identify regional ecological risk and measure regional ecological security. The localized shared socioeconomic pathways (LSSPs) can provide multi-scenario parameters of social and economic development for LER research. The research of LER under LSSPs is of scientific significance and practical value in curbing the breeding and spread of LER risk areas. In this study, land-cover raster files from 2010 to 2020 were used as the foundational data. Future land use simulation (FLUS), regression, and Markov chain models were used to predict the land cover patterns under the five LSSP scenarios in the **angjiang River Basin (XJRB) in 2030. Thus, an evaluation model was established, and the LER of the watershed was evaluated. We found that the rate of land cover change (LCC) in the XJRB between 2010 and 2020 had a higher intensity (increasing at an average of 18.89% per decade) than that projected under the LSSPs for 2020–2030 (averaging an increase of 8.58% per decade). Among the growth rates of all land use types in the XJRB, that of urban land was the highest (33.3%). From 2010 to 2030, the LER in the XJRB was classified as lower risk (33.73%), lowest risk (33.11%), and moderate risk (24.13%) for each decade. Finally, the LER exhibited significant heterogeneity among different scenarios. Specifically, the percentages of regions characterized by the highest (9.77%) and higher LER (9.75%) were notably higher than those in the remaining scenarios. The higher-level risk area under the localized SSP1 demonstrated a clear spatial reduction compared to those of the other four scenarios. In addition, in order to facilitate the differential management and control of LER by relevant departments, risk zoning was carried out at the county level according to the prediction results of LER. And we got three types of risk management regions for the XJRB under the LSSPs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Abijith D, Saravanan S (2022) Assessment of land use and land cover change detection and prediction using remote sensing and CA Markov in the northern coastal districts of Tamil Nadu. India Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(57):86055–86067. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15782-6
Alizadeh MR, Adamowski J, Inam A (2022) Integrated assessment of localized SSP–RCP narratives for climate change adaptation in coupled human-water systems. Sci Total Environ 823:153660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153660
An Q, Wu Q, Li J, **ong B, Chen X (2019) Environmental efficiency evaluation for **angjiang River basin cities based on an improved SBM model and Global Malmquist index. Energy Econ 81:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.03.022
Bian J, Chen W, Zeng J (2023) Ecosystem services, landscape pattern, and landscape ecological risk zoning in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(7):17709–17722. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-23435-5
Bukovsky MS, Gao J, Mearns LO, Mearns LO, O’Neill BC (2021) SSP-based land-use change scenarios: a critical uncertainty in future regional climate change projections. Earth Future 9(3):e2020EF001782. https://doi.org/10.1029/2020EF001782
Chen G, Li X, Liu X, Chen Y, Liang X, Leng J, Xu X, Liao W, Qiu Y, Wu Q, Huang K (2020) Global projections of future urban land expansion under shared socioeconomic pathways. Nat Commun 11(1):537. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-14386-x
Chen J, Dong B, Li H, Zhang S, Peng L, Fang L, Zhang C, Li S (2020b) Study on landscape ecological risk assessment of Hooded Crane breeding and overwintering habitat. Environ Res 187:109649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2020.109649
Chen D, Jiang P, Li M (2021) Assessing potential ecosystem service dynamics driven by urbanization in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. China J Environ Manage 292:112734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112734
Chen G, **e J, Li W, Li X, Chung LCH, Ren C, Liu X (2021b) Future “local climate zone” spatial change simulation in Greater Bay Area under the shared socioeconomic pathways and ecological control line. Build Environ 203:108077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108077
Chen S, Huang Q, Muttarak R, Fang J, Liu T, He C, Liu Z, Zhu L (2022) Updating global urbanization projections under the Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Sci Data 9(1):137. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-022-01209-5
Deng X, Su H, Zhan J (2008) Integration of multiple data sources to simulate the dynamics of land systems. Sensors 8(2):620–634. https://doi.org/10.3390/s8020620
Deng X, Huang J, Rozelle S, Uchida E (2010) Economic growth and the expansion of urban land in China. Urban Stud 47(4):813–843. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009349770
Deng C, Liu J, Liu Y, Li Z, Nie X, Hu X, Wang L, Zhang Y, Zhang G, Zhu D, **ao L (2021) Spatiotemporal dislocation of urbanization and ecological construction increased the ecosystem service supply and demand imbalance. J Environ Manage 288:112478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112478
Doelman JC, Stehfest E, Tabeau A, van Meijl H, Lassaletta L, Gernaat DE, Hermans K, Harmsen M, Daioglou V, Biemans H, Sluis SV, van Vuuren DP (2018) Exploring SSP land-use dynamics using the IMAGE model: regional and gridded scenarios of land-use change and land-based climate change mitigation. Glob Environ Change 48:119–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.11.014
Dong N, You L, Cai W, Li G, Lin H (2018) Land use projections in China under global socioeconomic and emission scenarios: utilizing a scenario-based land-use change assessment framework. Glob Environ Change 50:164–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.04.001
Dong Y, ** G, Deng X (2020) Dynamic interactive effects of urban land-use efficiency, industrial transformation, and carbon emissions. J Clean Prod 270:122547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122547
Fan Z (2022) Simulation of land-cover change in **g-**-Ji region under different scenarios of SSP-RCP. J Geogr Sci 32(3):421–440. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-022-1955-z
Fan J, Wang H, Chen D, Zhang W, Wang C (2010) Discussion on sustainable urbanization in Tibet. Chin Geogr Sci 20:258–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-010-0258-y
Fan Q, Shi Y, Song X, Li H, Sun W, Wu F (2022) Evolution analysis of the coupling coordination of microclimate and landscape ecological risk degree in the **ahuayuan District in recent 20 years. Sustainability 14(3):1893. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031893
Feng Y, Zhai S, Jiang X, Luo J, Yan P, Dong C, Han J (2023) Simulating spatio-temporal pattern of production-living-ecological space and evaluating eco-environment effects in Zhongyuan Urban Agglomeration based on FLUS model and shared socioeconomic pathways. Acta Ecol Sin 43(20):8292–8308. https://doi.org/10.20103/j.stxb.202210192970
Fu J, Liu J, Wang X, Zhang M, Chen W, Chen B (2020) Ecological risk assessment of wetland vegetation under projected climate scenarios in the Sanjiang Plain. China J Environ Manage 273:111108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111108
Fujimori S, Hasegawa T, Masui T, Takahashi K, Herran DS, Dai H, Hijioka Y, Kainuma M (2017) SSP3: AIM implementation of shared socioeconomic pathways. Glob Environ Change 42:268–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.06.009
Gao J, O’Neill BC (2020) Map** global urban land for the 21st century with data-driven simulations and Shared Socioeconomic Pathways. Nat Commun 11(1):2302. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-15788-7
Gong J, Cao E, **e Y, Xu C, Li H, Yan L (2021) Integrating ecosystem services and landscape ecological risk into adaptive management: insights from a western mountain-basin area. China J Environ Manage 281:111817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.111817
Gu B, Zhang X, Bai X, Fu B, Chen D (2019) Four steps to food security for swelling cities. Nature 566(7742):31–33. https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-00407-3
Guo B, Chen K, ** G (2023) Does multi-goal policy affect agricultural land efficiency? A quasi-natural experiment based on the natural resource conservation and intensification pilot scheme. Appl Geogr 161:103141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103141
Guo H, Cai Y, Li B, Wan H, Yang Z (2023) An improved approach for evaluating landscape ecological risks and exploring its coupling coordination with ecosystem services. J Environ Manage 348:119277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.119277
Hope BK (2006) An examination of ecological risk assessment and management practices. Environ Int 32(8):983–995. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2006.06.005
Ji Y, Bai Z, Hui J (2021) Landscape ecological risk assessment based on LUCC—a case study of Chaoyang county. China Forests 12(9):1157. https://doi.org/10.3390/f12091157
** G, Deng X, Zhao X, Guo B, Yang J (2018) Spatiotemporal patterns in urbanization efficiency within the Yangtze River Economic Belt between 2005 and 2014. J Geogr Sci 28:1113–1126. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-018-1545-2
** G, Chen K, Wang P, Guo B, Dong Y, Yang J (2019a) Trade-offs in land-use competition and sustainable land development in the North China Plain. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 141:36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2019.01.004
** X, ** Y, Mao X (2019) Ecological risk assessment of cities on the Tibetan Plateau based on land use/land cover changes–case study of Delingha City. Ecol Indic 101:185–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.12.050
** G, Peng J, Zhang L, Zhang Z (2023) Understanding land for high-quality development. J Geogr Sci 33(2):217–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-023-2079-9
Jones RN (2001) An environmental risk assessment/management framework for climate change impact assessments. Nat Hazards 23(2–3):197–230. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011148019213
Ju H, Niu C, Zhang S, Jiang W, Zhang Z, Zhang X, Yang Z, Cui Y (2021) Spatiotemporal patterns and modifiable areal unit problems of the landscape ecological risk in coastal areas: a case study of the Shandong Peninsula. China J Clean Prod 310:127522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127522
Kang P, Chen W, Hou Y, Li Y (2018) Linking ecosystem services and ecosystem health to ecological risk assessment: a case study of the Bei**g-Tian**-Hebei urban agglomeration. Sci Total Environ 636:1442–1454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.427
Karimian H, Zou W, Chen Y, **a J, Wang Z (2022) Landscape ecological risk assessment and driving factor analysis in Dongjiang river watershed. Chemosphere 307:135835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135835
Landis WG (2003) Twenty years before and hence; ecological risk assessment at multiple scales with multiple stressors and multiple endpoints. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9(5):1317–1326. https://doi.org/10.1080/10807030390248500
Li J, Pu R, Gong H, Luo X, Ye M, Feng B (2017) Evolution characteristics of landscape ecological risk patterns in coastal zones in Zhejiang Province. China Sustainability 9(4):584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040584
Li X, Chen G, Liu X, Liang X, Wang S, Chen Y, Pei F, Xu X (2017) A new global land-use and land-cover change product at a 1-km resolution for 2010 to 2100 based on human–environment interactions. Ann Am Assoc Geogr 107(5):1040–1059. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2017.1303357
Li Z, Jiang W, Wang W, Chen Z, Ling Z, Lv J (2020) Ecological risk assessment of the wetlands in Bei**g-Tian**-Hebei urban agglomeration. Ecol Indic 117:106677. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106677
Li X, Li S, Zhang Y, O’Connor PJ, Zhang L, Yan J (2021) Landscape ecological risk assessment under multiple indicators. Land 10(7):739. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10070739
Liang X, Liu X, Li X, Chen Y, Tian H, Yao Y (2018) Delineating multi-scenario urban growth boundaries with a CA-based FLUS model and morphological method. Landsc Urban Plan 177:47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.04.016
Liang X, Guan Q, Clarke KC, Liu S, Wang B, Yao Y (2021) Understanding the drivers of sustainable land expansion using a patch-generating land use simulation (PLUS) model: a case study in Wuhan. China Comput Environ Urban Syst 85:101569. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101569
Lin X, Wang Z (2023) Landscape ecological risk assessment and its driving factors of multi-mountainous city. Ecol Indic 146:109823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109823
Liu X, Liang X, Li X, Xu X, Ou J, Chen Y, Li S, Wang S, Pei F (2017) A future land use simulation model (FLUS) for simulating multiple land use scenarios by coupling human and natural effects. Landsc Urban Plan 168:94–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.019
Mogollón JM, Beusen AHW, Van Grinsven HJM, Westhoek H, Bouwman AF (2018) Future agricultural phosphorus demand according to the shared socioeconomic pathways. Glob Environ Change 50:149–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2018.03.007
Mörtberg UM, Balfors B, Knol WC (2007) Landscape ecological assessment: A tool for integrating biodiversity issues in strategic environmental assessment and planning. J Environ Manage 82(4):457–470. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2006.01.005
Peng J, Dang W, Liu Y, Zong M, Hu X (2015) Review on landscape ecological risk assessment. Acta Geographica Sinica 70(04):664–677. https://doi.org/10.11821/dlxb201504013
Peng J, Zong M, Hu Y, Liu Y, Wu J (2015) Assessing landscape ecological risk in a mining city: a case study in Liaoyuan City China. Sustainability 7(7):8312–8334. https://doi.org/10.3390/su7078312
Qian Y, Dong Z, Yan Y, Tang L (2022) Ecological risk assessment models for simulating impacts of land use and landscape pattern on ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 833:155218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.155218
Ran P, Hu S, Frazier AE, Qu S, Yu D, Tong L (2022) Exploring changes in landscape ecological risk in the Yangtze River Economic Belt from a spatiotemporal perspective. Ecol Indic 137:108744. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108744
Suter GW II, Vermeire T, Munns WR, Sekizawa J (2003) Framework for the integration of health and ecological risk assessment. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 9(1):281–301. https://doi.org/10.1080/713609865
Verburg PH, Soepboer W, Veldkamp A, Limpiada R, Espaldon V, Mastura SS (2002) Modeling the spatial dynamics of regional land use: the CLUE-S model. Environ Manage 30:391–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-002-2630-x
Wang H, Liu X, Zhao C, Chang Y, Liu Y, Zang F (2021) Spatial-temporal pattern analysis of landscape ecological risk assessment based on land use/land cover change in Baishuijiang National nature reserve in Gansu Province. China Ecol Indic 124:107454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107454
Wang S, Tan X, Fan F (2022a) Landscape ecological risk assessment and impact factor analysis of the Qinghai-Tibetan Plateau. Remote Sens 14(19):4726. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs14194726
Wang Y, Chai J, Zhang H, Yang B (2022b) Evaluating construction land use efficiency under carbon emission constraints: a comparative study of China and the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(33):49998–50009. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19475-6
Wang G, Ran G, Chen Y, Zhang Z (2023) Landscape ecological risk assessment for the Tarim River Basin on the basis of land-use change. Remote Sens 15(17):4173. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs15174173
Wang K, Zheng H, Zhao X, Sang Z, Yan W, Cai Z, Xu Y, Zhang F (2023b) Landscape ecological risk assessment of the Hailar River basin based on ecosystem services in China. Ecol Indic 147:109795. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109795
Wang Y, Chen F, Wei F, Yang M, Gu X, Sun Q, Wang X (2023c) Spatial and temporal characteristics and evolutionary prediction of urban health development efficiency in China: based on super-efficiency SBM model and spatial Markov chain model. Ecol Indic 147:109985. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2023.109985
Wu J, Zhu Q, Qiao N, Wang Z, Sha W, Luo K, Wang H, Feng Z (2021) Ecological risk assessment of coal mine area based on “source-sink” landscape theory–a case study of **shuo mining area. J Clean Prod 295:126371. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.126371
Wu H, Fang S, Zhang C, Hu S, Nan D, Yang Y (2022) Exploring the impact of urban form on urban land use efficiency under low-carbon emission constraints: a case study in China’s Yellow River Basin. J Environ Manage 311:114866. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.114866
**e H, Wen J, Chen Q, Wu Q (2021) Evaluating the landscape ecological risk based on GIS: a case-study in the poyang lake region of China. Land Degrad Dev 32(9):2762–2774. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3951
Xu Q, Guo P, ** M, Qi J (2021a) Multi-scenario landscape ecological risk assessment based on Markov–FLUS composite model. Geomat Nat Hazards Risk 12(1):1449–1466. https://doi.org/10.1080/19475705.2021.1931478
Xu W, Wang J, Zhang M, Li S (2021b) Construction of landscape ecological network based on landscape ecological risk assessment in a large-scale opencast coal mine area. J Clean Prod 286:125523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125523
Yan Z, You N, Wang L, Lan C (2023) Assessing the impact of road network on urban landscape ecological risk based on corridor cutting degree model in Fuzhou. China Sustain 15(2):1724. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15021724
Yang B, Wang Z, Zou L, Zou L, Zhang H (2021) Exploring the eco-efficiency of cultivated land utilization and its influencing factors in China’s Yangtze River Economic Belt, 2001–2018. J Environ Manage 294:112939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112939
Yin C, Nie Y, Li Y, Zhou Y, Yu L, Qin H, Yu J (2023) Multifunctional trade-off and compensation mechanism of arable land under the background of rural revitalization: a case study in the West Mountain Regions of Hubei Province. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(42):96329–96349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29146-9
Zhai T, Wang J, Fang Y, Qin Y, Huang L, Chen Y (2020) Assessing ecological risks caused by human activities in rapid urbanization coastal areas: towards an integrated approach to determining key areas of terrestrial-oceanic ecosystems preservation and restoration. Sci Total Environ 708:135153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135153
Zhang P, Liu Y, Pan Y, Yu Z (2013) Land use pattern optimization based on CLUE-S and SWAT models for agricultural non-point source pollution control. Math Comput Model 58(3–4):588–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2011.10.061
Zhang L, ** G, Wei X, **e P, Liu G, Liu Y (2019) Multiscale analysis of patch and landscape characteristics of forest fragmentation in Liaoning Province, China. Reg Envir Chang 19:1175–1186. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-019-01476-w
Zhang F, ** G, Li J, Wang C, Xu N (2020a) Study on dynamic total factor carbon emission efficiency in China’s urban agglomerations. Sustainability 12(7):2675. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12072675
Zhang W, Chang WJ, Zhu ZC, Hui Z (2020b) Landscape ecological risk assessment of Chinese coastal cities based on land use change. Appl Geogr 117:102174. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102174
Zhang F, Deng X, **e L, Xu N (2021) China’s energy-related carbon emissions projections for the shared socioeconomic pathways. Resour Conserv Recycl 168:105456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.105456
Zhang D, **g P, Sun P, Ren H, Ai Z (2022a) The non-significant correlation between landscape ecological risk and ecosystem services in **’an Metropolitan Area. China Ecol Indic 141:109118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.109118
Zhang S, Zhong Q, Cheng D, Xu C, Chang Y, Lin Y, Li B (2022b) Coupling coordination analysis and prediction of landscape ecological risks and ecosystem services in the Min River Basin. Land 11(2):222. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11020222
Zhang S, Zhong Q, Cheng D, Xu C, Chang Y, Lin Y, Li B (2022c) Landscape ecological risk projection based on the PLUS model under the localized shared socioeconomic pathways in the Fujian Delta region. Ecol Indic 136:108642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108642
Zhang D, Yang W, Kang D, Zhang H (2023a) Spatial-temporal characteristics and policy implication for non-grain production of cultivated land in Guanzhong Region. Land Use Pol 125:106466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2022.106466
Zhang Y, Yi L, **e B, Li J, **ao J, **e J, Liu Z (2023b) Analysis of ecological quality changes and influencing factors in **angjiang River Basin. Sci Rep 13(1):4375. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-31453-7
Zhou Z, Quan B, Deng Z (2023) Effects of land use changes on ecosystem service value in **angjiang River Basin. China Sustain 15(3):2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032492
Zhu Z, Wang K, Lei M, Li X, Li X, Jiang L, Gao X, Li S, Liang J (2022) Identification of priority areas for water ecosystem services by a techno-economic, social and climate change modeling framework. Water Res 221:118766. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2022.118766
Zhu Z, Li X, Bu Q, Yan Q, Wen L, Chen X, Li X, Yan M, Jiang L, Chen G, Li S, Gao X, Zeng G, Liang J (2023) Land–water transport and sources of nitrogen pollution affecting the structure and function of riverine microbial communities. Environ Sci Technol 57(7):2726–2738. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.2c04705
Zhuang H, Chen G, Yan Y, Li B, Zeng L, Ou J, Liu K, Liu X (2022) Simulation of urban land expansion in China at 30 m resolution through 2050 under shared socioeconomic pathways. Gisci Remote Sens 59(1):1301–1320. https://doi.org/10.1080/15481603.2022.2110197
Funding
This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant numbers 71974070, 41501593).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The manuscript was reviewed and approved for publication by all authors. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. Zhengyu Zhang: methodology, software, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; Han Yu: conceptualization, writing—review, result analysis; Nianci He: writing—original draft, writing—review and editing; Gui **: resources, funding acquisition, conceptualization, supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulz
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, Z., Yu, H., He, N. et al. Future land use simulation model-based landscape ecological risk prediction under the localized shared socioeconomic pathways in the **angjiang River Basin, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 31, 22774–22789 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32621-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-32621-6