Abstract
Under the dual constraints of China’s carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals, as well as ecological protection and high-quality development of the Yellow River Basin, clarifying the embodied carbon emissions and responsibility sharing of inter-provincial trade is crucial to the carbon reduction strategy of the Yellow River Basin. This paper uses the MRIO (multi-regional input–output) model to measure the production-side and consumption-side responsibility sharing of nine provinces in the Yellow River Basin in 2012 and 2017, revealing the amount and direction of the embodied carbon transfer between provinces, and finally introduces the share of provincial value added as the responsibility sharing factor to compare and analyze the differences between the three responsibility sharing methods. The results show the following: (1) The embodied carbon emissions on the production side in most provinces of the Yellow River Basin were larger than that on the consumption side, with the most significant differences in Shanxi, Inner Mongolia, and Shandong, among which local demand carbon emissions and intermediate product transfer out of carbon emissions were the main causes of production-side carbon emissions. (2) In general, all provinces except Shaanxi were net carbon transfer-in regions, and the embodied carbon was mainly transferred to Bei**g, Jiangsu, Guangdong, Zhejiang, and Hebei. (3) Shared responsibility for carbon emissions was jointly determined by the volume of embodied carbon trade and the ability to obtain value added, which lay between production and consumption side responsibility shares. (4) The Yellow River Basin had a large responsibility-sharing factor and embodied carbon trade, and thus needs to take more responsibility for emission reduction. This study is expected to provide scientific support for the strategy of differentiated emission reduction in the Yellow River Basin and enrich the regional carbon accounting methods.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Available upon request.
References
Ahmad N, Wyckoff A (2003) Carbon dioxide emissions embodied in international trade of goods. OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/18151965
Duan Y, Yan B (2019) Economic gains and environmental losses from international trade: a decomposition of pollution intensity in China’s value-added trade. Energy Econ 83:540–554. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.08.002
Eidelman ED, Arkhipov AV (2020) Field emission from carbon nanostructures: models and experiment. Phys Usp 63(7):648–667. https://doi.org/10.3367/UFNe.2019.06.038576
Ghosh S, Dinda S, Das Chatterjee N, Dutta S, Bera D (2022) Spatial-explicit carbon emission-sequestration balance estimation and evaluation of emission susceptible zones in an Eastern Himalayan city using Pressure-Sensitivity-Resilience framework: An approach towards achieving low carbon cities. J Clean Prod 336:18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2022.130417
Khan Z, Ali M, **yu L, Shahbaz M, Siqun Y (2020) Consumption-based carbon emissions and trade nexus: evidence from nine oil exporting countries. Energy Econ 89:104806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104806
Koopman R, Wang Z, Wei S-J (2014) Tracing value-added and double counting in gross exports. Am Econ Rev 104(2):459–494. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.104.2.459
Lenzen M, Murray J, Sack F, Wiedmann T (2007) Shared producer and consumer responsibility — Theory and practice. Ecol Econ 61(1):27–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2006.05.018
Li YY, Li H (2022) China’s inter-regional embodied carbon emissions: An industrial transfer perspective. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(3):4062–4075. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15694-5
Liddle B (2018) Consumption-based accounting and the trade-carbon emissions nexus in Asia: a heterogeneous, common factor panel analysis. Sustainability 10(10):13. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10103627
Liu LC, Liang QM, Wang Q (2015) Accounting for China’s regional carbon emissions in 2002 and 2007: production-based versus consumption-based principles. J Clean Prod 103:384–392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.07.009
Lv KJ, Feng X, Kelly S, Zhu L, Deng MZ (2019) A study on embodied carbon transfer at the provincial level of China from a social network perspective. J Clean Prod 225:1089–1104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.233
Ortiz M, Cadarso MA, Lpez LA (2020) The carbon footprint of foreign multinationals within the European Union. J Ind Ecol 24(6):1287–1299. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13017
Peters GP (2008) From production-based to consumption-based national emission inventories. Ecol Econ 65(1):13–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.10.014
Qi XX, Huang XJ, Song YY, Chuai XW, Wu CY, Wang DY (2021) The transformation and driving factors of multi-linkage embodied carbon emission in the Yangtze River Economic Belt. Ecol Indic 126:12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2021.107622
Ran C, Xu X, Zhang S (2022) Embodied carbon emissions transfers via inter-regional trade: evidence from value-added extended decomposition model in China. Heliyon 8(9):e10521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e10521
Sánchez-Chóliz J, Duarte R (2004) CO2 emissions embodied in international trade: evidence for Spain. Energy Policy 32(18):1999–2005. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00199-X
Shan YL, Huang Q, Guan DB, Hubacek K (2020) China CO2 emission accounts 2016–2017. Sci Data 7(1):9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41597-020-0393-y
Spaiser V, Scott K, Owen A, Holland R (2019) Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions in the sustainable development Goals Agenda. Int J Sustain Dev World Ecol 26(4):282–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1559252
Spaiser V, Scott K, Owen A, Holland R (2019) Consumption-based accounting of CO2 emissions in the sustainable development Goals Agenda. International Journal of Sustainable Development World Ecology 26(4):282–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504509.2018.1559252
Wang W (2018) Calculation on net value of carbon emission transfer between China’s provinces and responsibility sharing. J Environ Econ 3(1):19–36. https://doi.org/10.19511/j.cnki.jee.2018.01.003
Wang P, Zhu BZ, Tao XP, **e R (2017) Measuring regional energy efficiencies in China: a meta-frontier SBM-Undesirable approach. Nat Hazards 85(2):793–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-016-2605-5
Wang Z, Li C, Liu Q, Niu B, Peng S, Deng L, Kang P, Zhang X (2019) Pollution haven hypothesis of domestic trade in China: a perspective of SO2 emissions. Sci Total Environ 663:198–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.287
Wang XP, Yu JQ, Song JZ, Di XL, Wang RR (2021) Structural evolution of China’s intersectoral embodied carbon emission flow network. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(17):21145–21158. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11882-x
Wiedmann T, Wilting HC, Lenzen M, Lutter S, Palm V (2011) Quo Vadis MRIO? Methodological, data and institutional requirements for multi-region input–output analysis. Ecol Econ 70(11):1937–1945. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.06.014
Wu R, Geng Y, Dong HJ, Fujita T, Tian X (2016) Changes of CO2 emissions embodied in China-Japan trade: drivers and implications. J Clean Prod 112:4151–4158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.07.017
Xu XL, Mu MJ, Wang Q (2017) Recalculating CO2 emissions from the perspective of value-added trade: An input-output analysis of China’s trade data. Energy Policy 107:158–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.04.026
Xu Q, Dong YX, Yang R, Zhang HO, Wang CJ, Du ZW (2019) Temporal and spatial differences in carbon emissions in the Pearl River Delta based on multi-resolution emission inventory modeling. J Clean Prod 214:615–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.280
Xu X, Wang Q, Ran C, Mu M (2021) Is burden responsibility more effective? A value-added method for tracing worldwide carbon emissions. Ecol Econ 81:106889. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2020.106889
Yuan XL, Sheng XR, Chen LP, Tang YZ, Li Y, Jia YS, Qu DF, Wang QS, Ma Q, Zuo J (2022) Carbon footprint and embodied carbon transfer at the provincial level of the Yellow River Basin. Sci Total Environ 803:11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149993
Zhang ZK, Guan DB, Wang R, Meng J, Zheng HR, Zhu KF, Du HB (2020) Embodied carbon emissions in the supply chains of multinational enterprises. Nat Clim Chang 10(12):1096–1101. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-020-0895-9
Zhao YH, Wang S, Liu Y, Zhang ZH, Zhang YF, Li H (2017) Identifying the economic and environmental impacts of China’s trade in intermediates within the Asia-Pacific region. J Clean Prod 149:164–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.085
Zheng L, Zhao YH, Shi QL, Qian ZL, Wang S, Zhu JZ (2022) Global value chains participation and carbon emissions embodied in exports of China: Perspective of firm heterogeneity. Sci Total Environ 813:20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152587
Zheng H, Zhang Z, Wei W, Song M, Dietzenbacher E, Wang X, Meng J, Shan Y, Ou J, Guan D (2020) Regional determinants of China’s consumption-based emissions in the economic transition. Environ Res Lett 15(7).https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab794f.
Zhong ZQ, Jiang L, Zhou P (2018) Transnational transfer of carbon emissions embodied in trade: Characteristics and determinants from a spatial perspective. Energy 147:858–875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.008
Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge the participatory contribution of all respondents to this study.
Funding
This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant number 42201302) and the “Double First-Class” University Construction Project of Lanzhou University (grant number 561120213).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception, material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Zhong Ma, Yanxia Kang, Wei**g Ma, **ngxing Niu, **gwen Kou, and Haijiang Yang. The frst draft of the manuscript was written by Yanxia Kang, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: V.V.S.S. Sarma
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Ma, Z., Kang, Y., Ma, W. et al. The fairness of shared responsibility for embodied carbon emission: a case study of the Yellow River Basin, China. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31397-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31397-5