Abstract
How to simultaneously reduce environmental pollution and CO2 emissions is a challenging issue for various countries, particularly in China. Unlike traditional urbanization process that inevitably deteriorates environment, China initiated a New-Type Urbanization (NTU) strategy in 2014 following four principles: people-centeredness, optimal layout, ecological civilization, and cultural inheritance. Previous studies conduct research on NTU’s influencing pollution and carbon reduction (PCR), respectively, while ignoring synergistic governance. The research objectives of this study are to investigate the potential mechanisms of NTU’s influencing PCR and co-benefits for PCR. By leveraging 30 provincial-level data from China spanning 2005 to 2019, we comprehensively construct an index and assess NTU from six domains: population, economic, environmental, spatial, equitable, and social urbanizations and combine a coupling coordination model with a 2-way fixed effects model for empirical analysis. Our findings demonstrate that (1) NTU tends to significantly suppress pollution and carbon emissions, and this finding is reliable after several robustness tests and solving endogeneity with relief degree of land surface as an instrumental variable (IV). (2) The reducing effects seem to be achieved by promoting talent agglomeration, facilitating economic agglomeration and strengthening environmental regulations. (3) NTU tends to have both current and time-lag effects on pollution and carbon reduction, and their co-benefits are mainly influenced by the time-lag effect. Accordingly, policy recommendations are recommended: governments need to plan urbanization rationally, including strengthening public infrastructure and social welfare, pursuing the strategy of introducing talents, planning land and resource use rationally and efficiently, and strengthening environmental regulations. In addition, a mechanism should be developed to reduce pollution and carbon in an integrated manner for the long term. Our study broadens the horizons for international scholars engaged in sustainable urbanization research, enriching the array of research methodologies.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data sets supporting the results of this article are included within the article.
References
Abu Abdulai I, Kuusaana ED, Ahmed A (2023) Toward sustainable urbanization: understanding the dynamics of urban sprawl and food (in)security of indigenous households in peri-urban Wa, Ghana. J Urban Aff. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2023.2224023
Acemoglu D, Aghion P, Bursztyn L, Hemous D (2012) The environment and directed technical change. Am Econ Rev 102:131–166. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.1.131
Alimujiang A, Jiang P (2020) Synergy and co-benefits of reducing CO2 and air pollutant emissions by promoting electric vehicles-a case of Shanghai. Energy Sustain Dev 55:181–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esd.2020.02.005
Almulhim AI, Cobbinah PB (2023) Can rapid urbanization be sustainable? The case of Saudi Arabian cities. Habitat Int 139:102884
Arthur WB, Ermoliev YM, Kaniovski YM (1987) Path-dependent processes and the emergence of macro-structure. Eur J Oper Res 30(3):294–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(87)90074-9
Batool Z, Raza SMF, Ali S, Ul Abidin SZ (2022) ICT, renewable energy, financial development, and CO2 emissions in develo** countries of East and South Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(23):35025–35035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18664-7
Bhanarkar AD, Purohit P, Rafaj P, Amann M, Bertok I, Cofala J, Rao PS, Vardhan BH, Kiesewetter G, Sander R, Schopp W, Majumdar D, Srivastava A, Deshmukh S, Kawarti A, Kumar R (2018) Managing future air quality in megacities: Co-benefit assessment for Delhi. Atmos Environ 186:158–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.atmosenv.2018.05.026
Brandi C, Blumer D, Morin JF (2019) When do international treaties matter for domestic environmental legislation? Glob Environ Polit 19(4):14–44. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00524
Chen S, Chen T (2014) Air quality and public health:an example of sulfur dioxide emissions from thermal power plants. Econ Res J 08:158–169+183 ((in Chinese))
Çoban G, Uzun O (2023) Determination of environmental indicators in the context of sustainable urbanization: the case of Türkiye. J Archit Sci Appl 8(1):301–314. https://doi.org/10.30785/mbud.1207529
Dong ZYZ, **a CY, Fang K, Zhang WW (2022) Effect of the carbon emissions trading policy on the co-benefits of carbon emissions reduction and air pollution control. Energy Policy 165:112998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2022.112998
Duranton G, Puga DJ (2004) Micro-foundations of urban agglomeration economies. In: Henderson JV, Thisse JF (eds) Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 1st edn. Elsevier, Cambridge, pp 2063–2117
Fahad S, Bai DB, Liu LC, Baloch ZA (2022) Heterogeneous impacts of environmental regulation on foreign direct investment: do environmental regulation affect FDI decisions? Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(4):5092–5104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-15277-4
Guan YR, Shan YL, Huang Q, Chen HL, Wang D, Hubacek K (2021) Assessment to China’s recent emission pattern shifts. Earth Future 9(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2021ef002241
Haggett P (1965) Locational analysis in human geography. Arnold, London
Han XY, Cao TY, Sun T (2019) Analysis on the variation rule and influencing factors of energy consumption carbon emission intensity in China’s urbanization construction. J Clean Prod 238:117958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117958
He M, Zhu XH, Li HL (2023) How does carbon emissions trading scheme affect steel enterprises’ pollution control performance? A quasi natural experiment from China. Sci Total Environ 858:159871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159871
Hegazy IR (2021) Towards sustainable urbanization of coastal cities: the case of Al-Arish City, Egypt. Ain Shams Eng J 12(2):2275–2284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asej.2020.07.027
Huang YM, Ul Abidin SZ, Raza SMF (2023) Investigation of resource curse hypothesis: the role of renewable energy and urbanization in realizing environmental sustainability in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(37):86927–86939. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28300-7
Huo H, Zhang Q, Guan DB, Su X, Zhao HY, He KB (2014) Examining air pollution in china using production- and consumption-based emissions accounting approaches. Environ Sci Technol 48(24):14139–14147. https://doi.org/10.1021/es503959t
** XR, Li XX, Feng Z, Wu JS, Wu KN (2020) Linking ecological efficiency and the economic agglomeration of China based on the ecological footprint and nighttime light data. Ecol Indic 111:106035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.106035
Kwiringira JN, Kabumbuli R, Zakumumpa H, Mugisha J, Akugizibwe M, Ariho P, Rujumba J (2021) Re-conceptualizing sustainable urban sanitation in Uganda: why the roots of ‘Slumification’ must be dealt with. BMC Public Health 21(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11029-8
Lei XY, Yang Y, Alharthi M, Rasul F, Raza SMF (2022) Immense reliance on natural resources and environmental challenges in G-20 economies through the lens of COP-26 targets. Resour Policy 79:103101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2022.103101
Li J, Li FD, Li J (2022) Does New-Type Urbanization help reduce haze pollution damage? Evidence from China’s county-level panel data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(31):47123–47136. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-19272-1
Lin BQ, Zhu JP (2021) Impact of China’s New-Type Urbanization on energy intensity: a city-level analysis. Energy Econ 99:105292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105292
Liu XH (2018) Dynamic evolution, spatial spillover effect of technological innovation and haze pollution in China. Energy Environ 29(6):968–988. https://doi.org/10.1177/0958305x18765249
Liu XP, Zhang XL (2021) Industrial agglomeration, technological innovation and carbon productivity: evidence from China. Resour Conserv Recycl 166:105330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2020.105330
Lucas R (1988) On the mechanics of economic development. J Monet Econ 22:3–42
Luo X, Yang J, Sun W, He BJ (2021) Suitability of human settlements in mountainous areas from the perspective of ventilation: a case study of the main urban area of Chongqing. J Clean Prod 310:127467. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127467
Miao L, Wang H (2017) Reverse migration in China: contemporary Chinese returnees. International Migration of China. Springer, Singapore, pp 53–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-6074-8_3
Neves SA, Marques AC, Patricio M (2020) Determinants of CO2 emissions in European Union countries: does environmental regulation reduce environmental pollution? Econ Anal Policy 68:114–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2020.09.005
Patti AL (2006) Economic clusters and the supply chain: a case study. Supply Chain Manag 11(3):266–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/13598540610662176
Porter ME, Van der Linde C (1995) Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. J Econ Perspect 9(4):97–118. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.97
Rahman MM, Alam K (2021) Clean energy, population density, urbanization and environmental pollution nexus: evidence from Bangladesh. Renew Energy 172:1063–1072. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2021.03.103
Shan YL, Guan YR, Hang Y, Zheng HR, Li YX, Guan DB, Li JS, Zhou Y, Li L, Hubacek K (2022) City-level emission peak and drivers in China. Sci Bull 67(18):1910–1920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scib.2022.08.024
Shao J, Wang LH (2023) Can New-Type Urbanization improve the green total factor energy efficiency? Evidence from China. Energy 262:125499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2022.125499
Shapiro JS, Walker R (2018) Why is pollution from US manufacturing declining? The roles of environmental regulation, productivity, and trade. Am Econ Rev 108(12):3814–3854. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20151272
Shi CC, Shi QL, Guo F (2019) Environmental slogans and action: the rhetoric of local government work reports in China. J Clean Prod 238:117886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117886
Shi XL, Chen Y, **a MH, Zhang YL (2022b) Effects of the talent war on urban innovation in China: a difference-in-differences analysis. Land 11(9):1485. https://doi.org/10.3390/land11091485
Shi QR, Zheng B, Zheng YX, Tong D, Liu Y, Ma HC, Hong CP, Geng GN, Guan DB, He KB, Zhang Q (2022a) Co-benefits of CO2 emission reduction from China’s clean air actions between 2013–2020. Nat Commun 13(1). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-32656-8
Tang K, Liu YC, Zhou D, Qiu Y (2021) Urban carbon emission intensity under emission trading system in a develo** economy: evidence from 273 Chinese cities. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(5):5168–5179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-10785-1
Tang ZX, Batool Z, Ali S, Haseeb M, Jain V, Raza SMF, Chakrabarti P (2023) Impact of technology on the relation between disaggregated energy consumption and CO2 emission in populous countries of Asia. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30(26):68327–68338. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26980-9
UN-Habitat (2022) World cities report: envisaging the future of cities. UN-Habitat. https://unhabitat.org/world-cities-report-2022-envisaging-the-future-of-cities. Accessed 4 Aug 2022
Urbański M (2022) Comparing push and pull factors affecting migration. Economies 10(1):21
Wang ZH, Sun YF, Wang B (2019) How does the new-type urbanisation affect CO2 emissions in China? An empirical analysis from the perspective of technological progress. Energy Econ 80:917–927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2019.02.017
Wang XL, Zhang TY, Nathwani J, Yang FM, Shao QL (2022) Environmental regulation, technology innovation, and low carbon development: revisiting the EKC Hypothesis, Porter Hypothesis, and Jevons’ Paradox in China’s iron & steel industry. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 176:121471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.121471
Wang RY, Cai WG, Ren H, Ma XR (2023) Heterogeneous effects of the talent competition on urban innovation in China: evidence from prefecture-level cities. Land 12(3):719. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12030719
World Health Organization (2021) WHO global air quality guidelines: particulate matter (PM2. 5 and PM10), ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide and carbon monoxide. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/345329. Accessed 22 Sep 2021
Wu XG, Treiman DJ (2007) Inequality and equality under Chinese socialism: the Hukou system and intergenerational occupational mobility. Am J Sociol 113(2):415–445. https://doi.org/10.1086/518905
Wu XX, Huang Y, Gao J (2022) Impact of industrial agglomeration on New-Type Urbanization: evidence from Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration of China. Int Rev Econ Financ 77:312–325. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2021.10.002
Yan B, Wang F, Dong MR, Ren J, Liu J, Shan J (2022) How do financial spatial structure and economic agglomeration affect carbon emission intensity? Theory extension and evidence from China. Econ Model 108:105745. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2021.105745
Yang J, Guo HX, Liu BB, Shi R, Zhang B, Ye WL (2018) Environmental regulation and the pollution haven hypothesis: do environmental regulation measures matter? J Clean Prod 202:993–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.144
Yang XH, Jia Z, Yang ZM (2023) How New-Type Urbanization pilots reduce carbon emissions: a technology progress paths perspective. J Clean Prod 401:136663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.136663
Yu BB (2021) Ecological effects of New-Type Urbanization in China. Renew Sust Energ Rev 135:110239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110239
Zhang P (2021) Target interactions and target aspiration level adaptation: how do government leaders tackle the “environment-economy” nexus? Public Adm Rev 81(2):220–230. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.13184
Zhang F, Deng XZ, Phillips F, Fang CL, Wang C (2020) Impacts of industrial structure and technical progress on carbon emission intensity: evidence from 281 cities in China. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 154:119949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.119949
Zhang Y, Wei TY, Tian WT, Zhao K (2022) Spatiotemporal differentiation and driving mechanism of coupling coordination between New-Type Urbanization and ecological environment in China. Sustainability 14(18):11780. https://doi.org/10.3390/su141811780
Zhang W, Xu Y, Streets DG, Wang C (2023) Can New-Type Urbanization realize low-carbon development? A spatiotemporal heterogeneous analysis in 288 cities and 18 urban agglomerations in China. J Clean Prod 420:138426
Zhao HL, Lin BQ (2019) Will agglomeration improve the energy efficiency in China’s textile industry: evidence and policy implications. Appl Energy 237:326–337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.12.068
Zhao C, Wang B (2022) How does New-Type Urbanization affect air pollution? Empirical evidence based on spatial spillover effect and spatial Durbin model. Environ Int 165:107304. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2022.107304
Zhou K, Liu HC, Wang Q (2019) The impact of economic agglomeration on water pollutant emissions from the perspective of spatial spillover effects. J Geogr Sci 29(12):2015–2030. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-019-1702-2
Funding
This work was supported by National Social Science Fund of China (Nr. 22BJL037).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
**anchun Liao and Ziqiang Lin: conceptualization. Ziqiang Lin: methodology, software, data curation, writing, and original draft preparation. **anchun Liao and Meicun Li: supervision and validation. **anchun Liao and Meicun Li: reviewing and editing.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.
Consent for publication
Written informed consent for publication was obtained from all participants.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Eyup Dogan
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liao, X., Lin, Z. & Li, M. New-Type Urbanization on pollution and carbon reduction impact mechanism and co-benefits analysis. Environ Sci Pollut Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30610-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-30610-9