Log in

Evaluation of the oral bioaccessibility of legacy and emerging brominated flame retardants in indoor dust

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Indoor dust is the main source of human exposure to brominated flame retardants (BFRs). In this study, in vitro colon-extended physiologically-based extraction test (CE-PBET) with Tenax as a sorptive sink was applied to evaluate the oral bioaccessibility of twenty-two polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDEs) and seven novel BFRs (NBFRs) via indoor dust ingestion. The mean bioaccessibilities of two NBFRs pentabromotoluene (PBT) and 1,2-Bis(2,4,6-tribromophenoxy) ethane (BTBPE) were first proposed, reaching 36.0% and 26.7%, respectively. In order to maintain homeostasis of the gastrointestinal tract, 0.4 g Tenax was added in CE-PEBT, which increased BFRs bioaccessibility by up to a factor of 1.4–1.9. The highest bioaccessibility of legacy PBDEs was tri-BDEs (73.3%), while 2-ethylhexyl-tetrabromo-benzoate (EHTBB), one of penta-BDE alternatives, showed the highest (62.2%) among NBFRs. The influence of food nutrients, liquid to solid (L/S) ratio, and octanol–water partition coefficient (Kow) on bioaccessibility was assessed. The oral bioaccessibility of BFRs increased with existence of protein or carbohydrate while lipid did the opposite. The bioaccessibilities of PBDEs and NBFRs were relatively higher with 200:1 L/S ratio. PBDEs bioaccessibility generally decreased with increasing LogKow. No significant correlation was observed between NBFRs bioaccessibility and LogKow. This study comprehensively evaluated the bioaccessibilities of legacy and emerging BFRs via dust ingestion using Tenax-assisted CE-PBET, and highlighted the significance to fully consider potential influencing factors on BFRs bioaccessibility in further human exposure estimation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price includes VAT (United Kingdom)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this research article and its supplementary information files.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the volunteers in Shanghai for sampling, and all the assistants in Jiaxing Tongji Research Institute of Environment during the chemical and instrumental analysis.

Funding

This study was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21777124 and No. 92043302).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Conceptualization, methodology, software, writing—original draft: Dong Niu. Investigation, writing—review and editing: Yao **ao. Validation: Shiyan Chen. Investigation: **nyu Du. Supervision and funding acquisition: Yanling Qiu. Data curation: Zhiliang Zhu. Project administration and funding acquisition: Daqiang Yin. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yanling Qiu.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Constantini Samara

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• The CE-PBETin vitro method to evaluate BFRs bioaccessibility was optimized.

• Tenax as a sorptive sink increased BFRs bioaccessibility by 1.4–1.9 times.

• The bioaccessibilities of two NBFRs PBT and BTBPE were first reported.

• Protein or carbohydrate increased the oral bioaccessibility of BFRs.

• PBDEs bioaccessibility significantly decreased with increasing LogKow (p < 0.05).

Supplementary information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 490 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Niu, D., **ao, Y., Chen, S. et al. Evaluation of the oral bioaccessibility of legacy and emerging brominated flame retardants in indoor dust. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 99735–99747 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29304-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29304-z

Keywords

Navigation