SpringerLink
Log in

Pollution and electricity price in the EU Central and Eastern European countries: a sectoral approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Pollution and energy crisis are actual issues in Europe, including the EU Central and Eastern European states. In this context, the objective of this paper is to assess the impact of economic growth and electricity prices for non-household consumers on pollution. The empirical findings reveal the U pattern for energy industry and inverted U pattern for manufacturing in the period 2007–2021 in the EU countries from Central and Eastern Europe. Renewable energy consumption reduces the CO2 and GHG emissions in energy industry. FDI and electricity prices determine the reduction in GHG and CO2 emissions in both sectors. These results are the basis for policy recommendations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Canada)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data are publicly available and authors provided their source into the manuscript.

References

  • Acevedo-Ramos JA, Valencia CF, Valencia CD (2023) The Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis for Colombia: impact of economic development on greenhouse gas emissions and ecological footprint. Sustain 15(4):3738

    Google Scholar 

  • Acheampong AO, Adams S, Boateng E (2019) Do globalization and renewable energy contribute to carbon emissions mitigation in Sub-Saharan Africa? Sci Total Environ 677:436–446

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Adams S, Acheampong AO (2019) Reducing carbon emissions: the role of renewable energy and democracy. J Clean Prod 240:118245

    Google Scholar 

  • Adebayo TS (2020) Revisiting the EKC hypothesis in an emerging market: an application of ARDL-based bounds and wavelet coherence approaches. SN Applied Sciences 2(12):1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Adesina KS, Mwamba JWM (2019) Does economic freedom matter for CO2 emissions? Lessons from Africa. J Dev Areas 53(3):1–14. https://doi.org/10.1353/jda.2019.0044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alotaibi A, Alajlan N (2021) Using quantile regression to analyze the relationship between socioeconomic indicators and carbon dioxide emissions in G20 countries. Sustainability 13(13):7011. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13137011

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Alvarado R, Murshed M, Cifuentes-Faura J, Işık C, Hossain MR, Tillaguango B (2023) Nexuses between rent of natural resources, economic complexity, and technological innovation: the roles of GDP, human capital and civil liberties. Resources Policy 85:103637

    Google Scholar 

  • Amin N, Shabbir MS, Song H, Farrukh MU, Iqbal S, Abbass K (2023) A step towards environmental mitigation: do green technological innovation and institutional quality make a difference? Technol Forecast Soc Change 190:122413

    Google Scholar 

  • Ansari, M.A., Haider, S. and Khan, N.A. (2020) Does trade openness affects global carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from the top CO2 emitters, Manag Environ Qual, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 32-53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-12-2018-0205

  • Arellano M, Bond S (1991) Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Rev Econ Stud 58(2):277–297

    Google Scholar 

  • Bader Y, Ganguli S (2019) Analysis of the association between economic growth, environmental quality and health standards in the Gulf Cooperation Council during 1980-2012. Manag Environ Qual 30(5):1050–1071. https://doi.org/10.1108/MEQ-03-2018-0061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Belaïd F, Al-Sarihi A, Al-Mestneer R (2023) Balancing climate mitigation and energy security goals amid converging global energy crises: the role of green investments. Renew Energ 205:534–542

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørnskov C (2020) Economic freedom and the CO2 Kuznets Curve. Available at SSRN 3508271. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3508271

  • Chen L (2022) How CO2 emissions respond to changes in government size and level of digitalization? Evidence from the BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:457–467

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Zhao J, Lai Z, Wang Z, **a H (2019) Exploring the effects of economic growth, and renewable and non-renewable energy consumption on China’s CO2 emissions: evidence from a regional panel analysis. Renew Energ 140:341–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheon S, Kim J, Kim J (2017) An analysis on the influence of economic freedom index, renewable energy generation ratio, energy consumption and GDP on CO2 emission. J Korean Soc Miner Energy Resour Eng 54(3):242–252

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chung CY, Yang J, Yang X, He J (2022) Long-term effects of ambient air pollution on lung cancer and COPD mortalities in China: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. Environ Impact Assess Rev 97:106865

    Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes-Faura J (2021) Environmental policies to combat climate change in europe and possible solutions: European green deal and circular economy. Int J Sustain Policy Pract 17(2):27–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes-Faura J (2022a) European Union policies and their role in combating climate change over the years. Air Qual Atmos Health 15(8):1333–1340

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Cifuentes-Faura J (2022b) Circular economy and sustainability as a basis for economic recovery post-COVID-19. Circ Econ Sustain 2(1):1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Degand E (2011) China and India: economic development and environmental issues. In: EIAS newsletter (March/April). European Institute for Asian Studies, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Diaz N, Ninomiya K, Noble J, Dornfeld D (2012) Environmental impact characterization of milling and implications for potential energy savings in industry. Procedia CIRP 1:518–523

    Google Scholar 

  • Do T, Dinh H (2020) Short-and long-term effects of GDP, energy consumption, FDI, and trade openness on CO2 emissions. Accounting 6(3):365–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Inglesi-Lotz R (2020) The impact of economic structure to the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis: evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:12717–12724

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Seker F (2016) Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energ 94:429–439

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dong K, Dong X, Jiang Q (2020) How renewable energy consumption lower global CO2 emissions? Evidence from countries with different income levels. World Econ 43(6):1665–1698

    Google Scholar 

  • Farooq S, Ozturk I, Majeed MT, Akram R (2022) Globalization and CO2 emissions in the presence of EKC: a global panel data analysis. Gondw Res 106:367–378

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Haug AA, Ucal M (2019) The role of trade and FDI for CO2 emissions in Turkey: non-linear relationships. Energy Econ 81:297–307

    Google Scholar 

  • Hu H, ** countries. Appl Energy 211:1229–1244

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang Y, Haseeb M, Usman M, Ozturk I (2022) Dynamic association between ICT, renewable energy, economic complexity and ecological footprint: is there any difference between E-7 (develo**) and G-7 (developed) countries? Technol Soc 68:101853

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibrahim RL, Ajide KB (2021) Nonrenewable and renewable energy consumption, trade openness, and environmental quality in G-7 countries: the conditional role of technological progress. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28(33):45212–45229

    Google Scholar 

  • Itoo HH, Ali N (2023) Analyzing the causal nexus between CO2 emissions and its determinants in India: evidences from ARDL and EKC approach. Manag Environ Qual 34(1):192–213

    Google Scholar 

  • Jahanger A, Hossain MR, Usman M, Onwe JC (2023) Recent scenario and nexus between natural resource dependence, energy use and pollution cycles in BRICS region: does the mediating role of human capital exist? Resour Policy 81:103382

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain M (2017) Does sustainable “economic development path” pair with “climatic mortification”: testimony from bric and other develo** nations. Amity Glob Bus Rev 12(1):91–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain M, Kaur S (2022) Carbon emissions, inequalities and economic freedom: an empirical investigation in selected South Asian economies. Int J Soc Econ 49(6):882–913

    Google Scholar 

  • Jamil K, Liu D, Gul RF, Hussain Z, Mohsin M, Qin G, Khan FU (2022) Do remittance and renewable energy affect CO2 emissions? An empirical evidence from selected G-20 countries. Energy & Environment 33(5):916–932

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang L, Lin C, Lin P (2014) The determinants of pollution levels: firm-level evidence from Chinese manufacturing. J Comp Econ 42(1):118–142

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang R, Liu B (2023) How to achieve carbon neutrality while maintaining economic vitality: An exploration from the perspective of technological innovation and trade openness. Sci Total Environ 868:161490.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.161490

  • Joshi P, Beck K (2018) Democracy and carbon dioxide emissions: assessing the interactions of political and economic freedom and the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Res Soc Sci 39:46–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahia M, Ben Jebli M, Belloumi M (2019) Analysis of the impact of renewable energy consumption and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions in 12 MENA countries. Clean Technol Environ Policy 21:871–885

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kais S, Sami H (2016) An econometric study of the impact of economic growth and energy use on carbon emissions: panel data evidence from fifty-eight countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 59:1101–1110

    Google Scholar 

  • Katircioglu S, Katircioglu S (2018) Testing the role of fiscal policy in the environmental degradation: the case of Turkey. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25:5616–5630

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim AB (2023) 2023 Index of economic freedom. The Heritage Foundation. Available at: https://www.heritage.org/index/about

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim YS (2015) Electricity consumption and economic development: are countries converging to a common trend? Energy Econ 49:192–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Laplante B, Smits K (1998) Estimating industrial pollution in Latvia. ECSSD Rural Development and Environment Sector, Working Paper, 4

  • Lawson LA (2020) GHG emissions and fossil energy use as consequences of efforts of improving human well-being in Africa. J Environ Manage 273:111136

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lazăr D, Minea A, Purcel AA (2019) Pollution and economic growth: evidence from Central and Eastern European countries. Energy Econ 81:1121–1131

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitão NC, Lorente DB (2020) The linkage between economic growth, renewable energy, tourism, CO2 emissions, and international trade: the evidence for the European Union. Energies 13(18):4838

    Google Scholar 

  • Liddle B (2018) Consumption-based accounting and the trade-carbon emissions nexus. Energy Econ 69:71–78

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorente DB, Mohammed KS, Cifuentes-Faura J, Shahzad U (2023) Dynamic connectedness among climate change index, green financial assets and renewable energy markets: novel evidence from sustainable development perspective. Renew Energ 204:94–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Makhdum MSA, Usman M, Kousar R, Cifuentes-Faura J, Radulescu M, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2022) How do institutional quality, natural resources, renewable energy, and financial development reduce ecological footprint without hindering economic growth trajectory? Evidence from China. Sustain 14(21):13910

    Google Scholar 

  • Massagony A, Budiono (2022) Is the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis valid on CO2 emissions in Indonesia? Int J Environ Stud 80(1):20–31

    Google Scholar 

  • McWilliams B, Sgaravatti G, Tagliapietra S and Zachmann G (2022) A grand bargain to steer through the European Union’s energy crisis (Vol. 22, No. 14, pp. 2022-2009). Bruegel.

  • Milin IA, Mungiu Pupazan MC, Rehman A, Chirtoc IE, Ecobici N (2022) Examining the relationship between rural and urban populations’ access to electricity and economic growth: a new evidence. Sustain 14(13):8125

    Google Scholar 

  • Naseem S, Guang Ji T (2021) A system-GMM approach to examine the renewable energy consumption, agriculture and economic growth’s impact on CO2 emission in the SAARC region. GeoJournal 86(5):2021–2033

    Google Scholar 

  • Nasir MA, Huynh TLD, Tram HTX (2019) Role of financial development, economic growth & foreign direct investment in driving climate change: a case of emerging ASEAN. J Environ Manage 242:131–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Nathaniel SP, Iheonu CO (2019) Carbon dioxide abatement in Africa: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy consumption. Sci Total Environ 679:337–345

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Naudé W (2011) Climate change and industrial policy. Sustain 3(7):1003–1021

    Google Scholar 

  • Naz S, Sultan R, Zaman K, Aldakhil AM, Nassani AA, Abro MMQ (2019) Moderating and mediating role of renewable energy consumption, FDI inflows, and economic growth on carbon dioxide emissions: evidence from robust least square estimator. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26(3):2806–2819

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ozcan B (2013) The nexus between carbon emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in Middle East countries: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy 62:1138–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pata UK, Aydin M (2020) Testing the EKC hypothesis for the top six hydropower energy-consuming countries: Evidence from Fourier Bootstrap ARDL procedure. J Clean Prod 264:121699

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2015) Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econom Rev 34(6–10):1089–1117

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH, Yamagata T (2008) Testing slope homogeneity in large panels. J Econom 142(1):50–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Qadeer A, Anis M, Ajmal Z, Kirsten KL, Usman M, Khosa RR et al (2022) Sustainable development goals under threat? Multidimensional impact of COVID-19 on our planet and society outweigh short term global pollution reduction. Sustain Cities Soc 83:103962

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafindadi AA, Usman O (2019) Globalization, energy use, and environmental degradation in South Africa: startling empirical evidence from the Maki-cointegration test. J Environ Manage 244:265–275

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafindadi AA, Muye IM, Kaita RA (2018) The effects of FDI and energy consumption on environmental pollution in predominantly resource-based economies of the GCC. Sustain Energy Technol Assess 25:126–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Rafique MZ, Li Y, Larik AR, Monaheng MP (2020) The effects of FDI, technological innovation, and financial development on CO2 emissions: evidence from the BRICS countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27(19):23899–23913

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sadiq M, Wen F, Bashir MF, Amin A (2022) Does nuclear energy consumption contribute to human development? Modeling the effects of public debt and trade globalization in an OECD heterogeneous panel. J Clean Prod 375:133965

    Google Scholar 

  • Sajeev A, Kaur S (2020) Environmental sustainability, trade and economic growth in India: implications for public policy. Int Trade, Politics and Development 4(2):141–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Saqib N, Ozturk I, Usman M, Sharif A, Razzaq A (2022) Pollution haven or halo? How European countries leverage FDI, energy, and human capital to alleviate their ecological footprint. Gondw Res 116:136–148

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2018) Empirical study of the environmental Kuznets curve and environmental sustainability curve hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana and USA. J Clean Prod 201:98–110

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Khan S, Ali A, Bhattacharya M (2017) The impact of globalization on CO2 emissions in China. Singap Econ Rev 62(04):929–957

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Nasir MA, Roubaud D (2018) Environmental degradation in France: the effects of FDI, financial development, and energy innovations. Energy Econ 74:843–857

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahnazi R, Shabani ZD (2021) The effects of renewable energy, spatial spillover of CO2 emissions and economic freedom on CO2 emissions in the EU. Renew Energ 169:293–307

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma GD, Shahbaz M, Singh S, Chopra R, Cifuentes-Faura J (2023) Investigating the nexus between green economy, sustainability, bitcoin and oil prices: contextual evidence from the United States. Resour Policy 80:103168

    Google Scholar 

  • Simionescu M, Cifuentes-Faura J (2023) Sustainability policies to reduce pollution in energy supply and waste sectors in the V4 countries. Util Policy 82:101551

    Google Scholar 

  • Simionescu M, Rădulescu M, Cifuentes-Faura J (2023b) Renewable energy consumption-growth nexus in European countries: a sectoral approach. Eval Rev 47(2):287–319

    Google Scholar 

  • Simionescu M, Radulescu M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Cifuentes-Faura J (2023a) Pollution, political instabilities and electricity price in the CEE countries during the war time. J Environ Manage 343:118206

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sinha A, Sengupta T, Alvarado R (2020) Interplay between technological innovation and environmental quality: formulating the SDG policies for next 11 economies. J Clean Prod 242:118549

    Google Scholar 

  • Sørensen B (2011) Life-cycle analysis of energy systems: from methodology to applications. Royal Society of Chemistry

    Google Scholar 

  • Stefanski R (2013) Structural transformation and pollution. In: Paper presented at the University of Surrey Economics Seminar. March 8

  • Talbi B, Jebli MB, Bashir MF, Shahzad U (2022) Does economic progress and electricity price induce electricity demand: a new appraisal in context of Tunisia. J Public Aff 22(1):e2379

    Google Scholar 

  • Tan-Soo JS, Zhang XB, Qin P, **e L (2019) Using electricity prices to curb industrial pollution. J Environ Manage 248:109252

    Google Scholar 

  • Uche E, Das N, Bera P, Cifuentes-Faura J (2023) Understanding the imperativeness of environmental-related technological innovations in the FDI–environmental performance nexus. Renew Energ 206:285–294

    Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Radulescu M (2022) Examining the role of nuclear and renewable energy in reducing carbon footprint: does the role of technological innovation really create some difference? Sci Total Environ 841:156662

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Jahanger A, Ahmad P (2023) Are Mercosur economies going green or going away? An empirical investigation of the association between technological innovations, energy use, natural resources and GHG emissions. Gondw Res 113:53–70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Jahanger A, Makhdum MSA, Radulescu M, Balsalobre-Lorente D, Jianu E (2022) An empirical investigation of ecological footprint using nuclear energy, industrialization, fossil fuels and foreign direct investment. Energies 15(17):6442

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Usman M, Makhdum MSA, Kousar R (2021) Does financial inclusion, renewable and non-renewable energy utilization accelerate ecological footprints and economic growth? Fresh evidence from 15 highest emitting countries. Sustain Cities Soc 65:102590

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Tran N, Van Tran Q, Do LTT, Dinh LH, Do HTT (2019) Trade off between environment, energy consumption and human development: do levels of economic development matter? Energy 173:483–493

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang J, Usman M, Saqib N, Shahbaz M, Hossain MR (2023c) Asymmetric environmental performance under economic complexity, globalization and energy consumption: Evidence from the World’s largest economically complex economy. Energy 279:128050. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2023.128050

  • Wang M, Hossain MR, Mohammed KS, Cifuentes-Faura J, Cai X (2023b) Heterogenous effects of circular economy, green energy and globalization on CO2 emissions: policy based analysis for sustainable development. Renew Energ 211:789–801

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Usman M, Radulescu M, Cifuentes-Faura J, Balsalobre-Lorente D (2023a) Achieving ecological sustainability through technological innovations, financial development, foreign direct investment, and energy consumption in develo** European countries. Gondw Res 119:138–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Z, Gao L, Wei Z, Majeed A, Alam I (2022) How FDI and technology innovation mitigate CO2 emissions in high-tech industries: evidence from province-level data of China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(3):4641–4653

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Wood J, Herzog I (2014) Economic freedom and air quality. Fraser Institute, Vancouver, Canada, April

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Abban OJ, Boadi AD, Charles O (2022) The effects of energy price, spatial spillover of CO2 emissions, and economic freedom on CO2 emissions in Europe: a spatial econometrics approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(42):63782–63798

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • **uhui J, Raza MY (2022) Delving into Pakistan’s industrial economy and carbon mitigation: an effort toward sustainable development goals. Energ Strat Rev 41:100839

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang R, Yang L, Yao Y, Zheng C (2013) Gray relational analysis of industrial structure and carbon emission intensity: based on Guangzhou data. In: Proceedings of the 2013 international conference on business computing and global information, pp 1186–9

  • Zhang M, Mu H, Ning Y, Song Y (2009) Decomposition of energy-related CO2 emission over 1991–2006 in China. Ecol Econ 68(7):2122–2128

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Fu H, **e S, Cifuentes-Faura J, Nasilloyevich UB (2023) Role of green finance and regional environmental efficiency in China. Renew Energ 214:407–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.05.076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou X, Zhang J, Li J (2013) Industrial structural transformation and carbon dioxide emissions in China. Energy Policy 57:43–51

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Business and Administration, University of Bucharest, Bucharest, Romania

    Mihaela Simionescu

  2. Institute for Economic Forecasting, Romanian Academy, Bucharest, Romania

    Mihaela Simionescu

  3. Department of Finance, Accounting and Economics, University of Pitesti, Pitești, Romania

    Magdalena Radulescu

  4. Institute of Doctoral and Post-Doctoral Studies, University Lucian Blaga of Sibiu, Sibiu, Romania

    Magdalena Radulescu

  5. Faculty of Economics and Business, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain

    Javier Cifuentes-Faura

Authors
  1. Mihaela Simionescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Magdalena Radulescu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Javier Cifuentes-Faura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Mihaela Simionescu: data collection; formal analysis; material preparation; Magdalena Radulescu: investigation, discussion of results, conclusions; Javier Cifuentes-Faura: investigation; writing the original draft. All authors approved the manuscript to be submitted for publication.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Magdalena Radulescu.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

Not applicable

Consent to participate

Not applicable

Consent for publication

All authors approved the manuscript to be submitted for publication.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Roula Inglesi-Lotz

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Simionescu, M., Radulescu, M. & Cifuentes-Faura, J. Pollution and electricity price in the EU Central and Eastern European countries: a sectoral approach. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 95917–95930 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29109-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-29109-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation