Abstract
The challenge of achieving success in environmental projects persists for many organizations, and the reasons behind it are unclear. This study is aimed at investigating such reasons by testing the impact of corporate environmental identity, project complexity, and environmental intensity on environmental project success. The study seeks to provide practical recommendations to organizations to enhance their efforts to reduce environmental pollution. The study obtained data from sixteen experts of environmental project managers and applied the fuzzy AHP, fuzzy hierarchical models, and fuzzy TOPSIS techniques for empirical findings. The findings show that organizational identity for the environment and environment project complexity are the key triggers for the success of the environment in the Chinese context. Moreover, it is discovered that team functional diversity is critical to team absorptive capability. This research identified links that offer managers information on prospective selection and project improvement models, with enhanced capacity in leadership dimensions leading to increased project management success. The study also suggested several implications for environmental project success and develo** pro-environmental behavior among project managers.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data that support the findings of this study are openly available on request.
References
Agri PJ, Joyo M, Ram N, Magsi H (2018) Risk assessment of climate variability on rice productivity in Sindh province of Pakistan. Agril Engg, Vet Sci 34:68–77
Agyekum EB, Amjad F, Mohsin M, Ansah MNS (2021) A bird’s eye view of Ghana’s renewable energy sector environment: a multi-criteria decision-making approach. Util Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2021.101219
Asif M (2009) Sustainable energy options for Pakistan. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13(4):903–909
Bai X, Zhang S, Li C et al (2023) A carbon neutrality capacity index for evaluating carbon sink contributions. Environ Sci Ecotechnol 15:100237. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ese.2023.100237
Chambers N, Cifter A (2022) Working capital management and firm performance in the hospitality and tourism industry. Int J Hosp Manag 102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2022.103144
Cheng MY, Cao MT, Herianto JG (2020) Symbiotic organisms search-optimized deep learning technique for map** construction cash flow considering complexity of project. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals 138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chaos.2020.109869
Dikmen I, Atasoy G, Erol H et al (2022) A decision-support tool for risk and complexity assessment and visualization in construction projects. Comput Ind 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compind.2022.103694
Gao H, Hsu P-H, Li K, Zhang J (2016) The real effect of smoking bans: evidence from corporate innovation. SSRN Electron J. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2820474
Gao H, Shi D, Zhao B (2021) Does good luck make people overconfident? Evidence from a natural experiment in the stock market. J Corp Financ 68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.101933
Guillot-Soulez C, Saint-Onge S, Soulez S (2022) Green certification and organizational attractiveness: the moderating role of firm ownership. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 29:189–199. https://doi.org/10.1002/CSR.2194
Guo B, Feng Y, Hu F (2023) Have carbon emission trading pilot policy improved urban innovation capacity? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-25699-x
He Q, **a P, Hu C, Li B (2022) Public information, actual intervention and inflation expectations. Transform Bus Econ 21:644–666
Iqbal M, Suzianti A (2021) New product development process design for small and medium enterprises: a systematic literature review from the perspective of open innovation. J Open Innov Technol Mark Complex 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/JOITMC7020153
Kaufmann C, Kock A (2022) Does project management matter? The relationship between project management effort, complexity, and profitability. Int J Proj Manag 40:624–633. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2022.05.007
Li C, Umair M (2023) Does green finance development goals affects renewable energy in China. Renew Energy 203:898–905. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.066
Liang Y, Li J, Xue Y et al (2021) Benzene decomposition by non-thermal plasma: a detailed mechanism study by synchrotron radiation photoionization mass spectrometry and theoretical calculations. J Hazard Mater 420:126584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2021.126584
Liu F, Umair M, Gao J (2023) Assessing oil price volatility co-movement with stock market volatility through quantile regression approach. Resour Policy 81:103375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2023.103375
Melaina M, Penev M, Heimiller D (2013) Resource assessment for hydrogen production: hydrogen production potential from fossil and renewable energy resources. Nat Renew Energ Lab. https://doi.org/10.2172/1260322
Mohsin M, Hanif I, Taghizadeh-Hesary F et al (2021a) Nexus between energy efficiency and electricity reforms: a DEA-based way forward for clean power development. Energy Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.112052
Mohsin M, Nurunnabi M, Zhang J et al (2020) The evaluation of efficiency and value addition of IFRS endorsement towards earnings timeliness disclosure. Int J Financ Econ. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.1878
Mohsin M, Rasheed AK, Saidur R (2018) Economic viability and production capacity of wind generated renewable hydrogen. Int J Hydrogen Energy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.12.113
Mohsin M, Taghizadeh-Hesary F, Panthamit N et al (2021b) Develo** low carbon finance index: evidence from developed and develo** economies. Financ Res Lett 43:101520. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101520
Nachbagauer A (2021) Managing complexity in projects: extending the Cynefin framework. Proj Leadersh Soc 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2021.100017
Nguyen T, Verreynne ML, Steen J, Torres de Oliveira R (2023) Government support versus international knowledge: investigating innovations from emerging-market small and medium enterprises. J Bus Res 154. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2022.113305
Pan W, Cao H, Liu Y (2023) “Green” innovation, privacy regulation and environmental policy. Renew Energy 203:245–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2022.12.025
Sánchez-Medina AJ, Arteaga-Ortiz J, Naumchik RM, Pellejero M (2020) The intention to quit entrepreneurship in tourism SMEs: the effect of work addiction. Int J Hosp Manag 89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2019.102400
Shao B, Dina Pariona-Cabrera P, Guo Y et al (2021) An examination of anti-violence human resource management practices in the context of health care and aged care. Hum Resour Manag J. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12427
Uddin M, Hoque N, Mowla MM et al (2022) Challenges and pathways to green supply chain management: evidence from manufacturing sectors in an emerging economy. Int Soc Sci J 72:655–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/ISSJ.12333
Umair M, Dilanchiev A (2022) Economic recovery by develo** business starategies: mediating role of financing and organizational culture in small and medium businesses. Proc B 683
Wu L, Yoon S, Ye K (2021) Modeling contractors’ ecological protection efforts determination for expressway construction projects. Environ Impact Assess Rev 91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2021.106669
Wu Q, Yan D, Umair M (2022) Assessing the role of competitive intelligence and practices of dynamic capabilities in business accommodation of SMEs. Econ Anal Policy. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eap.2022.11.024
**ng Z, Huang J, Wang J (2023) Unleashing the potential: exploring the nexus between low-carbon digital economy and regional economic-social development in China. J Clean Prod 413:137552. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137552
**ong L, Bai X, Zhao C et al (2022) High-resolution data sets for global carbonate and silicate rock weathering carbon sinks and their change trends. Earth’s Futur 10:e2022EF002746. https://doi.org/10.1029/2022EF002746
Xu B, Wang W, Zhang X et al (2017) Bright and efficient light-emitting diodes based on MA/Cs double cation perovskite nanocrystals. J Mater Chem C 5:6123–6128. https://doi.org/10.1039/C7TC01300K
Xu D, Li J, Liu J et al (2022) Advances in continuous flow aerobic granular sludge: a review. Process Saf Environ Prot 163:27–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2022.05.018
Yi H, Meng X, Linghu Y, Zhang Z (2022) Can financial capability improve entrepreneurial performance? Evidence from rural China. Ekon Istraživanja / Econ Res 36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1331677X.2022.2091631
Yin L, Wang L, Huang W et al (2022) Haze grading using the convolutional neural networks. Atmosphere (Basel) 13. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13040522
Yu B, Zhou X (2023) Urban administrative hierarchy and urban land use efficiency: evidence from Chinese cities. Int Rev Econ Financ 88:178–195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.06.033
Zhang S, Zhou Z, Luo R et al (2022) A low-carbon, fixed-tour scheduling problem with time windows in a time-dependent traffic environment. Int J Prod Res 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2153940
Zhou L, ** F, Wu B et al (2023) Do fake followers mitigate influencers’ perceived influencing power on social media platforms? The mere number effect and boundary conditions. J Bus Res 158:113589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113589
Zhu G, Liu Y, Wang L et al (2023) The isotopes of precipitation have climate change signal in arid Central Asia. Glob Planet Change 225:104103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2023.104103
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, methodology, and writing—original draft: Wei Liu; data curation, visualization, and editing: Ya Qi.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical approval and consent to participate
We declare that we have no human participants, human data, or human issues.
Consent for publication
We do not have any individual person’s data in any form.
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Liu, W., Qi, Y. How does corporate organizational identity, environmental project complexity and environmental project effort matter for project success?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 113622–113635 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28972-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-28972-1