Log in

Breaking water carbon nexus by the natural biological system: ultimate solution for ESG challenges

  • Short Research and Discussion Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Clean water supply has become an enormous challenge in pursuance of the global warming process. Water technologies have traditionally created carbon emissions and chemical reactions that pollute the landscape, aquifers, and the air. The need for carbon footprint reduction and corporate ESG consideration has led to adopt a more environmentally friendly water treatment and management system. The Natural Biological System (NBS) is a nature-based technology for sewage and waste stream treatment and management, rehabilitating affected water bodies, reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, and rebalancing eco-systems. The NBS is a patent-tailored solution with the ability of large-scale water treatment and a negative carbon footprint promoting the user ESG rating. From Chile to India, the NBS is changing the global water-energy equation, reducing dependence on energy and maintenance, freeing up valuable water resources for on-site usage, and restoring nature’s ability to preserve and protect itself and to stop the escalating climate change effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data will be available upon request.

Notes

  1. United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund.

  2. Source: https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/progress-report/

  3. Source: https://www.unicef.org/media/95381/file/Urban%20Water%20Scarcity%20guidance%20note.pdf

  4. Source: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247153

  5. https://www.epa.gov/air-emissions-inventories/2017-national-emissions-inventory-nei-data

  6. https://mic.org.il/en/solutions/ayala/

  7. According to Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg3/

  8. Source: https://www.rivernetwork.org/category/news/

  9. MWH = Mega watt-hour.

  10. Source: https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/climate-solutions/cities-pollution

  11. MLD = Million Liters a Day.

  12. PM10 = Inhalable particles, with diameters that are generally 10 µm and smaller.

References

  • Alfa D, Rathilal S, Pillay VL, Pikwa K, Chollom MN (2016) Development and evaluation of a small-scale water disinfection system. J Water Sanit Hyg Dev 6:389–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Armstrong W, Armstrong J (2014) Plant internal oxygen transport (Diffusion and convection) and measuring and modelling oxygen gradients. Plant Cell Monogr 21:267–297

  • Bekiros S, Boubaker S, Nguyen DK, Uddin GS (2017) Black swan events and safe havens: the role of gold in globally integrated emerging markets. J Int Money Financ 73:317–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brix H, Sorrel BK, Orr PT (1992) Internal pressurization and convective gas flow in some emergent freshwater macrophytes. Limnol Oceanogr 37:1420–1433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai Y, Cai J, Xu L, Tan Q, Xu Q (2019) Integrated risk analysis of water-energy nexus systems based on systems dynamics, orthogonal design and copula analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 99:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen G (2021) What Can We Learn from the financial market about sustainability. Environ Syst Decis 41:4

    Google Scholar 

  • Dullo BW, Grootjans AP, Senbeta AF, Fritz C (2017) Radial oxygen loss by the cushion plant Eriocaulon schimperi prevents methane emissions from an East-African Mountain mire. Plant Biol 19(5):736–741

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz C, Pancotto VA, Elzenga JTM, Visser E, Grootjans AP, Pol A, Lturraspe R, Roelofs JGM, Smolders AJP (2011) Zero methane emission bogs: extreme rhizosphere oxygenation by cushion plants in Patagonia. New Phytol 190:398–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammer DA, Knight RL (1994) Designing constructed wetlands for nitrogen removal. Water Sci Technol 29:15–27

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kadlec RH, Wallace SD (2009) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Leigh NG, Lee H (2019) Sustainable and resilient urban water systems: the role of decentralization and planning. Sustainability 11:918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oertlé E, Hugi C, Wintgens T, Karavitis C (2019) Poseidon decision support tool for water reuse. Water 11:153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reddy KR, Delaune RD (2008) Biogeochemistry of wetlands: science and applications. Taylor and Francis Group

  • Saunders DL, Kalff J (2001) Nitrogen retention in wetlands, lakes and rivers. Hydrobiologia 443:205–212

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Zhou S, Chiang PC, Shah KJ (2019) Evaluation and optimization of enhanced coagulation process: water and energy nexus. Water-Energy Nexus 2(1):25–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang S, Wong CL, Ellis KV (1997) An optimization model for the selection of wastewater and sludge treatment alternatives. Water Environ J 11:14–20

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tseng LY, Robinson AK, Zhang X, Xu X, Southon J, Hamilton AJ, Sobhani R, Stenstrom MK, Rosso D (2016) Identification of preferential paths of fossil carbon within water resource recovery facilities via radiocarbon analysis. Environ Sci Technol 50(22):12166–12178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Whiting GJ, Chanton JB (1993) Primary production control of methane emission from wetlands. Nature 364:794–795

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Gil Cohen and Eli Cohen state that their contribution to this article is equal.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gil Cohen.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

The authors declare that there is not ethical approval needed associate to this paper.

Consent to participate

Approved by the authors.

Consent for publication

The authors approve publication of this paper.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Philippe Garrigues

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• The need for carbon-free water treatment is achieved by the parent of the Natural Biological System (NBS).

• The NBS is cost-effective and environmentally friendly compared to other water treatment systems.

• The NBS is social friendly that use local resources increasing the natural surroundings of urban areas and increasing housing value.

• The NBS is an ESG solution to the growing needs of pure water for drinking and agriculture. .

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cohen, G., Cohen, E. Breaking water carbon nexus by the natural biological system: ultimate solution for ESG challenges. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 64736–64746 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26916-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26916-3

Keywords

Navigation