SpringerLink
Log in

Improving agricultural green total factor productivity in China: do environmental governance and green low-carbon policies matter?

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Strengthening environmental governance and green low-carbon policies is a key measure to improve agriculture green total factor productivity and develop sustainable agriculture. Against this background, this study explores the relationship between agriculture green total factor productivity (AGTFP), environmental governance, and green low carbon policies based on panel data of 30 Chinese provinces from 2005 to 2019, and the system generalized method of moments model is adopted. The empirical results are as follows: (1) Environmental governance will not only directly affect AGTFP, but also indirectly affect AGTFP by influencing green technology innovation. (2) Environmental governance can strengthen the promotion of green low-carbon policies to AGTFP. (3) There are regional differences in causality among AGTFP, environmental governance, and green low-carbon policies. These empirical results offer Chinese policymakers scientific and normative recommendations for improving AGTFP and develo** sustainable green agriculture.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Germany)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adetutu MO, Ajayi V (2020) The impact of domestic and foreign R&D on agricultural productivity in sub-Saharan Africa. World Dev 125:104690

    Google Scholar 

  • Adnan N, Nordin SM, Ali M (2018) A solution for the sunset industry: adoption of green fertiliser technology amongst Malaysian paddy farmers. Land Use Policy 79:575–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal A, Lemos MC (2007) A greener revolution in the making? Environmental governance in the 21st century. Environ: Sci Policy Sustain Dev 49(5):36–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Ahmad M, Jiang P, Majeed A, Umar M, Khan Z, Muhammad S (2020) The dynamic impact of natural resources, technological innovations and economic growth on ecological footprint: an advanced panel data estimation. Resour Policy 69:101817

    Google Scholar 

  • Ang F, Kerstens PJ (2017) Decomposing the Luenberger–Hicks–Moorsteen total factor productivity indicator: an application to US agriculture. Eur. J. Oper. Res 260(1):359–375

    Google Scholar 

  • Ann TW, Wu Y, Zheng B, Zhang X, Shen L (2014) Identifying risk factors of urban-rural conflict in urbanization: a case of China. Habitat Int 44:177–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan P (2020) The Chinese governance system: its strengths and weaknesses in a comparative development perspective. China Econ. Rev 61:101430

    Google Scholar 

  • Berrone P, Fosfuri A, Gelabert L, Gomez-Mejia LR (2013) Necessity as the mother of 'green'inventions: institutional pressures and environmental innovations. Strateg. Manag. J 34(8):891–909

    Google Scholar 

  • Biresselioglu ME, Kilinc D, Onater-Isberk E, Yelkenci T (2016) Estimating the political, economic and environmental factors' impact on the installed wind capacity development: a system GMM approach. Renew. Energ 96:636–644

    Google Scholar 

  • Braungardt S, Elsland R, Eichhammer W (2016) The environmental impact of eco-innovations: the case of EU residential electricity use. Environ. Econ. Policy Stud 18(2):213–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Breusch TS, Pagan AR (1980) The Lagrange multiplier test and its applications to model specification in econometrics. Rev Econ Stud 47(1):239–253

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen J, Cheng S, Song M (2018a) Changes in energy-related carbon dioxide emissions of the agricultural sector in China from 2005 to 2013. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev 94:748–761

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Kahn ME, Liu Y, Wang Z (2018b) The consequences of spatially differentiated water pollution regulation in China. J Environ Econ Manage 88:468–485

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Miao J, Zhu Z (2021) Measuring green total factor productivity of China's agricultural sector: a three-stage SBM-DEA model with non-point source pollution and CO2 emissions. J. Clean. Prod 318:128543

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y, Yao Z, Zhong K (2022) Do environmental regulations of carbon emissions and air pollution foster green technology innovation: evidence from China's prefecture-level cities. J. Clean. Prod 350:131537

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Diao P, Zhang Z, ** Z (2018) Dynamic and static analysis of agricultural productivity in China. China Agric. Econ. Rev 10(2):293–312

    Google Scholar 

  • Dogan E, Sebri M, Turkekul B (2016) Exploring the relationship between agricultural electricity consumption and output: new evidence from Turkish regional data. Energ Policy 95:370–377

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong K, Hochman G, Zhang Y, Sun R, Li H, Liao H (2018a) CO2 emissions, economic and population growth, and renewable energy: empirical evidence across regions. Energy Econ 75:180–192

    Google Scholar 

  • Dong K, Sun R, Hochman G, Li H (2018b) Energy intensity and energy conservation potential in China: a regional comparison perspective. Energy 155:782–795

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for Granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ. Model 29(4):1450–1460

    Google Scholar 

  • Fang L, Hu R, Mao H, Chen S (2021) How crop insurance influences agricultural green total factor productivity: evidence from Chinese farmers. J. Clean. Prod 321:128977

    Google Scholar 

  • Gao J, Song G, Sun X (2020) Does labor migration affect rural land transfer? Evid from China. Land Use Policy 99:105096

    Google Scholar 

  • Graham J, Amos B, Plumptre T (2003) Governance principles for protected areas in the 21st century. Institute on Governance[C]//The Fifth World Parks Congress Durban, South Africa 6

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha W, Yi J, Yuan Y, Zhang J (2016) The dynamic effect of rural-to-urban migration on inequality in source villages: system GMM estimates from rural China. China Econ. Rev 37:27–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamid S, Wang K (2022) Environmental total factor productivity of agriculture in South Asia: a generalized decomposition of Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicator. J. Clean. Prod 351:131483

    Google Scholar 

  • Han H, Ding T, Nie L, Hao Z (2020) Agricultural eco-efficiency loss under technology heterogeneity given regional differences in China. J. Clean. Prod 250:119511

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang X, Feng C, Qin J, Wang X, Zhang T (2022) Measuring China's agricultural green total factor productivity and its drivers during 1998–2019. Sci. Total Environ 829:154477

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang LT, Qu FT, Feng SY (2012) Agricultural technical efficiency measurement under the environmental constraints. Nat. Resour. Res 27(9):1580–1589

    Google Scholar 

  • Liao J, Yu C, Feng Z, Zhao H, Wu K, Ma X (2021) Spatial differentiation characteristics and driving factors of agricultural eco-efficiency in Chinese provinces from the perspective of ecosystem services. J. Clean. Prod 288:125466

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Fei R (2015) Analyzing inter-factor substitution and technical progress in the Chinese agricultural sector. Eur J Agron 66:54–61

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Gao Y (2022) Measurement and impactor analysis of agricultural carbon emission performance in Changjiang economic corridor. Alex. Eng. J 61(1):873–881

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Li Y (2022) Environmental regulation and green innovation: evidence from China's carbon emissions trading policy. Finance Res. Lett 48:103051

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu M, Yang L (2021) Spatial pattern of China's agricultural carbon emission performance. Ecol. Indic 133:108345

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu D, Zhu X, Wang Y (2021a) China's agricultural green total factor productivity based on carbon emission: an analysis of evolution trend and influencing factors. J. Clean. Prod 278:123692

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Y, Wang A, Wu Y (2021b) Environmental regulation and green innovation: evidence from China's new environmental protection law. J. Clean. Prod 297:126698

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu S, Lei P, Li X, Li Y (2022) A nonseparable undesirable output modified three-stage data envelopment analysis application for evaluation of agricultural green total factor productivity in China. Sci. Total Environ 838:155947

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Ma G, Tan Y (2021) Impact of environmental regulation on agricultural green total factor productivity——analysis based on the panel threshold model. J. Agric. Econ 5:77–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Meisterling K, Samaras C, Schweizer V (2009) Decisions to reduce greenhouse gases from agriculture and product transport: LCA case study of organic and conventional wheat. J. Clean. Prod 17(2):222–230

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Namahoro JP, Wu Q, Zhou N, Xue S (2021) Impact of energy intensity, renewable energy, and economic growth on CO2 emissions: evidence from Africa across regions and income levels. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev 147:111233

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Newton P, Gomez AEA, Jung S, Kelly T, de Araújo Mendes T, Rasmussen LV, dos Reis JC, de Aragão Ribeiro Rodrigues R, Tipper T, van der Horst D, Watkins C (2016) Overcoming barriers to low carbon agriculture and forest restoration in Brazil: the Rural Sustentável project. World Dev. Perspect 4:5–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Niu Z, Chen C, Gao Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Zhao K (2022) Peer effects, attention allocation and farmers' adoption of cleaner production technology: taking green control techniques as an example. J. Clean. Prod 339:130700

    Google Scholar 

  • Ogunkan DV (2022) Achieving sustainable environmental governmence in Nigeria:a review for policy consideration. Urban Governance 2:212–220

    Google Scholar 

  • Paavola J (2007) Institutions and environmental governance: a reconceptualization. Ecol Econ 63(1):93–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Pan D, Ruiyao Y (2013) Regional disparity and dynamic distribution evolution of agricultural productivity growth in China under environmental pollution constraint. Forum on Sci and Technol in China 5:60–67

    Google Scholar 

  • Pesaran MH (2004) General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. Cambridge Working Papers. Economics 69(7):1240

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahman MM, Nepal R, Alam K (2021) Impacts of human capital, exports, economic growth and energy consumption on CO2 emissions of a cross-sectionally dependent panel: evidence from the newly industrialized countries (NICs). Environ Sci Policy 121:24–36

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rana MMP, Piracha A (2020) Supplying water to the urban poor: government's roles and challenges of participatory water governance. Cities 106:102881

    Google Scholar 

  • Ren XS, Liu YJ, Zhao GH (2020) The impact and transmission mechanism of economic agglomeration on carbon intensity. China Popul. Resour. Environ 30:95–106

    Google Scholar 

  • Safdar S, Khan A, Andlib Z (2022) Impact of good governance and natural resource rent on economic and environmental sustainability: an empirical analysis for South Asian economies. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res 29(55):82948–82965

    Google Scholar 

  • Shahbaz M, Raghutla C, Song M, Zameer H, Jiao Z (2020) Public-private partnerships investment in energy as new determinant of CO2 emissions: the role of technological innovations in China. Energy Econ 86:104664

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheng Y, Zhao Y, Zhang Q, Dong W, Huang J (2022) Boosting rural labor off-farm employment through urban expansion in China. World Dev 151:105727

    Google Scholar 

  • Song M, Fisher R, Kwoh Y (2019) Technological challenges of green innovation and sustainable resource management with large scale data. Technol Forecast Soc Change 144:361–368

    Google Scholar 

  • Sultana N, Rahman MM, Khanam R, Islam KZ (2022) The causative factors of environmental degradation in South Asia. J Asian Econ 79:101452

    Google Scholar 

  • Sun B, Zhang L, Yang L, Zhang F, Norse D, Zhu Z (2012) Agricultural non-point source pollution in China:causes and mitigation measures. Ambio 41(4):370–379

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sun Y, Chang H, Vasbieva DG, Andlib Z (2022) Economic performance, investment in energy resources, foreign trade, and natural resources volatility nexus: evidence from China's provincial data. Resour Policy 78:102913

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang M, Walsh G, Lerner D, Fitza MA, Li Q (2018) Green innovation, managerial concern and firm performance: an empirical study. Bus Strateg Environ 27(1):39–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Tellez-Rio A, García-Marco S, Navas M, López-Solanilla E, Tenorio JL, Vallejo A (2015) N2O and CH4 emissions from a fallow–wheat rotation with low N input in conservation and conventional tillage under a Mediterranean agroecosystem. Sci. Total Environ 508:85–94

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vignola R, Harvey CA, Bautista-Solis P, Avelino J, Rapidel B, Donatti C, Martinez R (2015) Ecosystem-based adaptation for smallholder farmers: definitions, opportunities and constraints. Agric Ecosyst Environ 211:126–132

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinholis MMB, Saes MSM, Carrer MJ, de Souza FHM (2021) The effect of meso-institutions on adoption of sustainable agricultural technology: a case study of the Brazilian Low Carbon Agriculture Plan. J. Clean. Prod 280:124334

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Zameer H, Feng Y, Jiao Z, Xu L, Gedikli A (2019) Revisiting Chinese resource curse hypothesis based on spatial spillover effect: a fresh evidence. Resour Policy 64:101521

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L, Morabito M, Payne CT, Robinson G (2020) Identifying institutional barriers and policy implications for sustainable energy technology adoption among large organizations in California. Energ Policy 146:111768

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang H, Cui H, Zhao Q (2021) Effect of green technology innovation on green total factor productivity in China: evidence from spatial durbin model analysis. J. Clean. Prod 288:125624

    Google Scholar 

  • Wangzhou K, Wen JJ, Wang Z, Wang H, Hao C, Andlib Z (2022) Revealing the nexus between tourism development and CO2 emissions in Asia: does asymmetry matter? Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 29(52):79016–79024

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Wang X, Bin P (2022a) Agriculture carbon-emission reduction and changing factors behind agricultural eco-efficiency growth in China. J. Clean. Prod 334:130193

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Li N, Mu H, Ahmad M, Meng X (2022b) Population aging, renewable energy budgets and environmental sustainability: does health expenditures matter? Gondwana Res 106:303–314

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, Zhou X, Deng X (2022c) Modeling farmers' adoption of low-carbon agricultural technology in Jianghan Plain, China: an examination of the theory of planned behavior. Technol Forecast Soc Change 180:121726

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasmeen H, Wang Y, Zameer H, Solangi YA (2019) Does oil price volatility influence real sector growth? Empirical evidence from Pakistan. Energ Rep 5:688–703

    Google Scholar 

  • Yasmeen H, Wang Y, Zameer H, Solangi YA (2020) Decomposing factors affecting CO2 emissions in Pakistan: insights from LMDI decomposition approach. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res 27(3):3113–3123

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Yu D, Liu L, Gao S, Yuan S, Shen Q, Chen H (2022) Impact of carbon trading on agricultural green total factor productivity in China. J. Clean. Prod 367:132789

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zameer H, Wang Y (2018) Energy production system optimization: evidence from Pakistan. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 82:886–893

    Google Scholar 

  • Zameer H, Yasmeen H, Wang R, Tao J, Malik MN (2020) An empirical investigation of the coordinated development of natural resources, financial development and ecological efficiency in China. Resourc Policy 65:101580

    Google Scholar 

  • Zameer H, Wang Y, Saeed MR (2021b) Net-zero emission targets and the role of managerial environmental awareness, customer pressure, and regulatory control toward environmental performance. Bus Strateg Environ 30(8):4223–4236

    Google Scholar 

  • Zameer H, Wang Y, Vasbieva DG, Abbas Q (2021a) Exploring a pathway to carbon neutrality via reinforcing environmental performance through green process innovation, environmental orientation and green competitive advantage. J. Environ. Manage 296:113383

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Liu Y (2022) Influence of digital finance and green technology innovation on China's carbon emission efficiency: empirical analysis based on spatial metrology. Sci. Total Environ 838:156463

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J, Jiang Q, Dong X, Dong K (2020) Would environmental regulation improve the greenhouse gas benefits of natural gas use? A Chinese Case Stud. Energ Econ 87:104712

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou F, Wang X (2022) The carbon emissions trading scheme and green technology innovation in China: a new structural economics perspective. Econ Anal Policy 74:365–381

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou H, Xu G (2022) Research on the impact of green finance on China's regional ecological development based on system GMM model. Resour Policy 75:102454

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their kind comments and valuable suggestions.

Availability of data and materials

The authors do not have permission to share data.

Funding

This study was supported in part by the National Social Science Foundation of China with ratification number 21BGL022.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Economics, Sichuan Agricultural University, Chengdu, China

    Mengqian Tang, Andi Cao, Lili Guo & Houjian Li

Authors
  1. Mengqian Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Andi Cao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lili Guo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Houjian Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Mengqian Tang: methodology, writing—original draft preparation, reviewing and editing; Andi Cao: methodology, writing—reviewing and editing; Lili Guo: investigation, reviewing and editing; Houjian Li: conceptualization, methodology, writing—original draft preparation, reviewing and editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Houjian Li.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent to publish

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: Arshian Sharif

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tang, M., Cao, A., Guo, L. et al. Improving agricultural green total factor productivity in China: do environmental governance and green low-carbon policies matter?. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 52906–52922 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26090-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-26090-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation