Abstract
The aim of this study was to provide a new method for dynamic and continuous assessment of ecosystem service value (ESV) and reveal the impact of land use change on ESV in Dasi River Basin within **an’s startup area from replacing old growth drivers with new ones. Based on four remote sensing images from 2002 to 2020, four ecological indicators were extracted, and the ecological environmental quality index (EEQI) was obtained through the approach of principal component analysis (PCA). Then, the traditional ESV evaluation method was modified by using the EEQI, grain yield, the biomass factor of cropland ecosystem, and the consumer price index (CPI). Finally, the impact of land use change on ESV was further analyzed based on the improved evaluation model. The result showed that (1) during 2002–2020, the area of forestland, grassland, and built-up land showed an increasing trend. The area of cropland and bare land showed a decreasing trend, and the water body area showed a slightly decreasing trend. (2) The total ESVS overall increased by 2.1759 × 107 yuan; the increased ESVS from air quality regulation, maintain biodiversity, and climate regulation were the main reasons for the increased of total ESVS, with contribution rates of 53.18%, 12.46%, and 11.29% respectively. (3) The sensitivity of ecosystem services to land use change showed a decreasing trend, and the order of elasticity index of different land use types was cropland > water body > forestland > grassland > bare land. The conversion of cropland and bare land to forestland was the main type of ESVs increase, with contribution rates of 18.35% and 10.13%, respectively. The cropland reclamation and built-up land expansion were the most significant land use changes that lead to the decline of ESVS, with contribution rates of 20.14% and 19.03% respectively. (4) The ESV showed a significant positive auto-correlation in terms of spatial distribution. The area of high–high region was mainly distributed in water body, forestland, and its surrounding areas. The area of low–low region was mainly distributed in built-up land and wasteland areas where human disturbance is relatively serious. The high–low and low–high regions were affected by landscape transition process and randomly distributed around the low–low and high–high regions, respectively. This study cannot only put forward a new method for the dynamic continuous evaluation of ESV, but also provide a reference for the rational allocation of land resources in the startup area to realize the balanced development of regional environment and economy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geograph Anal 27:93–115. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1995.tb00338.x
Anselin L (2003) GeoDa 0.9 user’s guide. spatial analysis laboratory (SAL). Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois, Urbana Champaign, IL
Anselin L, Rey SJ (2014) Modern spatial econometrics in practice: a guide to geoDa. GeoDaSpace, and PySAL. GeoDa Press LLC, Chicago, IL
Bai Y, Ochuodho T, Yang J (2019) Impact of land use and climate change on water-related ecosystem services in Kentucky, USA. Ecol Indic 102:51–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.01.079
Bateman IJ, Harwood AR, Mace GM, Watson RT, Abson DJ, Andrews B, Binner A, Crowe A, Day BH, Dugdale S, Fezzi C, Foden J, Hadley D, Haines-Young R, Hulme M, Kontoleon A, Lovett AA, Munday P, Pascual U, Paterson J, Perino G, Sen A, Siriwardena G, Soest D, Termansen M (2013) Bringing ecosystem services into economic decision-making: landuse in the United Kingdom. Science 341:45–50. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1234379
Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R, Farber S, Grasso M, Hannon B, Limburg K, Naeem S, O’Neill RV, Paruelo J, Raskin RG, Sutton P, van den Belt M (1997) The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 387:253–260. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(98)00020-2
Costanza R, Stern D, Fisher B, He LN, Ma CB (2004) Influential publications in ecological economics: a citation analysis. Ecol Econ 50:261–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.06.001
Costanza R, de Groot R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner RK (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Global Environ Change 26:152–158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.002
Crist EP (1985) A TM tasseled cap equivalent transformation for reflectance factor data. Remote Sens Environ 17:301–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/0034-4257(85)90102-6
Das M, Das A (2019) Dynamics of urbanization and its impact on urban ecosystem services: a study of a medium size town of west Bengal, eastern India. J Urban Manag 8:420–434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2019.03.002
Daily (1997) Nature’s services: societal dependence on natural ecosystems. Island Press, Washington DC
De Groot RS, Wilson MA, Boumans RM (2002) A typology for the classification and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol Econ 41:393–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.015
Ding Q, Wang L, Fu M, Huang N (2020) An integrated system for rapid assessment of ecological quality based on remote sensing data. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:32779–32795. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-09424-6
García-Nieto AP, Geijzendorffer IR, Baró F, Roche PK, Bondeau A, Cramer W (2018) Impacts of urbanization around Mediterranean cities: changes in ecosystem service supply. Ecol Indic 91:589–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.03.082
Gashaw T, Tulu T, Argaw M, Worqlul AW, Tolessa T, Kindu M (2018) Estimating the impacts of land use/land cover changes on ecosystem service values: the case of the Andassa watershed in the Upper Blue Nile basin of Ethiopia. Ecosyst Serv 31:219–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.05.001
Gedefaw AA, Atzberger C, Bauer T, Agegnehu SK, Mansberger R (2020) Analysis of land cover change detection in Gozamin District, Ethiopia: from remote sensing and DPSIR perspectives. Sustainability 12:4534–4559. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12114534
Guerry AD, Polasky S, Lubchenco J, Chaplin-Kramer R, Daily GC, Griffin R, Ruckelshaus M, Bateman IJ, Duraiappah A, Elmqvist T, Feldman MW, Folke C, Hoekstra J, Kareiva PM, Keeler BL, Li SZ, Mckenzie E, Ouyang ZY, Reyers B, Ricketts TH, Rockstrom J, Tallis H, Vira B (2015) Natural capital and ecosystem services informing decisions: from promise to practice. P Natl Acad Sci USA 112:7348–7355. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1503751112
Guo HL, Zhang BW, Bai YF, He XH (2017) Ecological environment assessment based on remote sensing in Zhengzhou. Earth Environ Sci 94:12190–12199. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/94/1/012190
Gupta K, Kumar P, Pathan SK, Sharma KP (2012) Urban neighborhood green index – a measure of green spaces in urban areas. Landscape Urban Plan 105:325–335. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2012.01.003
Hasan SS, Zhen L, Miah MG, Ahamed T (2020) Impact of land use change on ecosystem services: a review. Environ Dev 34:100527–100541. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100527
Hou J, Qin TL, Liu SS, Wang JW, Dong BQ, Yan S, Nie HJ (2021) Analysis and prediction of ecosystem service values based on land use/cover change in the Yiluo River Basin. Sustainability 13:6432–6446. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13116432
Hu XS, Xu HQ (2018) A new remote sensing index for assessing the spatial heterogeneity in urban ecological quality: a case from Fuzhou city, China. Ecol Indic 89:11–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.02.006
**g YQ, Zhang F, He YF, Kung H, Johnson VC, Arikena M (2020) Assessment of spatial and temporal variation of ecological environment quality in Ebinur lake wetland national nature reserve, **njiang, China. Ecol Indic 110:105874–105884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2019.105874
Kertész Á, Nagy LA, Balázs B (2019) Effect of land use change on ecosystem services in Lake Balaton Catchment. Land Use Policy 80:430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.04.005
Li K, Hou Y, Andersen PS, **n R, Rong YJ, Skov-petersen H (2021) Identifying the potential areas of afforestation projects using cost-benefit analysis based on ecosystem services and farmland suitability: a case study of the grain for green project in **an, China. Sci Total Environ 787:147542–147557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147542
Ma SM, Huang J, Chai YY (2021) Proposing a GEE-based spatiotemporally adjusted value transfer method to assess land-use changes and their impacts on ecosystem service values in the Shenyang metropolitan area. Sustainability 13:12694–12714. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132212694
Mao YY, Hou LL, Zhang ZD (2021) Spatial-temporal evolution and relationship between urbanization level and ecosystem service from a dual-scale perspective: a case study of the Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration. Sustainability 13:8537–8557. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13158537
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis. Island Press, Washington D C
Moran PA (1948) The interpretation of statistical maps. J Roy Stat Soc B 10:243–251. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2517-6161.1948.tb00012.x
Mortoja MG, Yigitcanlar T (2020) Local drivers of anthropogenic climate change: quantifying the impact through a remote sensing approach in Brisbane. Remote Sens 12:2270–2294. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs12142270
Msofe NK, Sheng L, Li Z, Lyimo J (2020) Impact of land use/cover change on ecosystem service values in the Kilombero Valley floodplain, Southeastern Tanzania. Forests 11:109–126. https://doi.org/10.3390/f11010109
Posner SM, McKenzie E, Ricketts TH (2016) Policy impacts of ecosystem services knowledge. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 113:1760–1765. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1502452113
Rai R, Zhang Y, Paudel B, Acharya B, Basnet L (2018) Land use and land cover dynamics and assessing the ecosystem service values in the trans-boundary Gandaki River Basin, Central Himalayas. Sustainability 10:3052–3074. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093052
Rapport DJ, Gaudet C, Karr JR, Baron JS, Bohlen C, Jackson W, Jones B, Naiman RJ, Norton B, Pollock MM (1998) Evaluating landscape health: integrating societal goal sand biophysical process. J Environ Manage 53:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1006/jema.1998.0187
Remme RP, Edens B, Schröter M, Hein L (2015) Monetary accounting of ecosystem services: a test case for Limburg province, the Netherlands. Ecol Econ 112:116–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.02.015
Shan W, ** XB, Ren J, Wang YC, Xu ZG, Fan YT, Gu ZM, Hong CQ, Lin JH, Zhou YK (2019) Ecological environment quality assessment based on remote sensing data for land consolidation. J Clean Prod 239:118126–118139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118126
Sobrino J, Jiménez-Muñoz JC, Paolini L (2004) Land surface temperature retrieval from LANDSAT TM 5. Remote Sens Environ 90:434–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2004.02.003
Solomon N, Segnon AC, Birhane E (2019) Ecosystem service values changes in response to land-use/land-cover dynamics in dry Afromontane forest in Northern Ethiopia. Int J Env Res Pub He 16:4653–4668. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph16234653
Song W, Deng XZ (2017) Land-use/land-cover change and ecosystem service provision in China. Sci Total Environ 576:705–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.078
Tan Z, Guan QY, Lin JK, Yang LQ, Luo HP, Ma YR, Tian J, Wang QZ, Wang N (2020) The response and simulation of ecosystem services value to land use/land cover in an oasis, northwest China. Ecol Indic 118:106711–106721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106711
Talukdar S, Singha P, Shahfahad MS, Praveen B, Rahman A (2020) Dynamics of ecosystem services (ESs) in response to land use land cover (LU/LC) changes in the lower Gangetic plain of India. Ecol Indic 112:106121–106135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2020.106121
Tolessa T, Kidane M, Bezie A (2021) Assessment of the linkages between ecosystem service provision and land use/land cover change in Fincha Watershed, north-western Ethiopia. Heliyon 7:7673–7685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07673
Turner KG, Odgaard MV, Bøcher PK, Dalgaard T, Svenning JC (2014) Bundling ecosystem services in Denmark: trade-offs and synergies in a cultural landscape. Landscape Urban Plan 125:89–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.007
Wang HC, Wei BL, Wang L (2021) Analyzing land cover dynamics using hierarchical classification in Binzhou city, China. J Indian Soc Remote 49:1393–1405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12524-021-01327-4
Wang Y, Li XM, Zhang Q, Li JF, Zhou XW (2018) Projections of future land use changes: multiple scenarios-based impacts analysis on ecosystem services for Wuhan city, China. Ecol Indic 94:430–445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.06.047
Woldeyohannes A, Cotter M, Biru W, Kelboro G (2020) Assessing changes in ecosystem service values over 1985–2050 in response to land use and land cover dynamics in Abaya-Chamo basin, Southern Ethiopia. Land 9:37–59. https://doi.org/10.3390/land9020037
**e GD, Lu CX, Leng YF, Zheng D, Li SC (2003) Ecological assets valuation of the Tibetan Plateau. J Nat Resour 18:189–196. https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2003.02.010
**e GD, **ao Y, Zhen L (2005) Study on ecosystem services value of food production in China. Chin J Eco-Agric 13:10–13
**e GD, Zhang CX, Zhen L, Zhang LM (2017) Dynamic changes in the value of china’s ecosystem services. Ecosyst Serv 26:146–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.06.010
**e GD, Zhen L, Lu CX, **ao Y, Chen C (2008) Expert knowledge based valuation method of ecosystem services in China. J Nat Resour 23:911–919. https://doi.org/10.11849/zrzyxb.2008.05.019
Xu HQ (2013) Creation and application of urban remote sensing ecological index. Acta Ecol Sin 33:7853–7862. https://doi.org/10.5846/stxb201208301223
Zawadzki J, Przeździecki K, Miatkowski Z (2016) Determining the area of influence of depression cone in the vicinity of lignite mine by means of triangle method and landsat TM/ETM+ satellite images. J Environ Manage 166:605–614. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.11.010
Zhao X, Yi P, **a JJ, He WJ, **n G (2022) Temporal and spatial analysis of the ecosystem service values in the Three Gorges Reservoir Area of China based on land use change. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29:26549–26563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-021-17827-2
Zhou DY, Tian YY, Jiang GH (2018) Spatio-temporal investigation of the interactive relationship between urbanization and ecosystem services: case study of the **g**ji urban agglomeration, China. Ecol Indic 95:152–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.07.007
Zhou FC, Han XZ, Tang SH, Song XM, Wang H (2021) An improved model for evaluating ecosystem service values using land use/cover and vegetation parameters. J Meteor Res 35:147–156. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13351-021-9199-x
Zhu DY, Chen T, Zhen N, Niu RQ (2020) Monitoring the effects of open-pit mining on the eco-environment using a moving window-based remote sensing ecological index. Environ Sci Pollut Res 27:15716–15728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-08054-2
Acknowledgements
Great thanks to the editor and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments to improve our manuscript.
Funding
The research was funded by the **an Water Science and Technology Program (Grant No.: JNSWKJ202103).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Haocheng Wang: writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, and data curation; Lin Wang: writing—original draft preparation and writing—review and editing; Aihua Jiang: funding acquisition, formal analysis, and investigation; Baoli Wei: software and data curation; Chuan Song, data curation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
Not applicable.
Informed consent
I am free to contact any of the people involved in the research to seek further clarification and information.
Consent for publication
The authors grant the journal/publisher the sole and exclusive license of the full copyright in the contribution.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
Additional information
Responsible Editor: Marcus Schulz
Publisher's note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Wang, H., Wang, L., Jiang, A. et al. Assessing impact of land use change on ecosystem service value in Dasi River Basin of China based on an improved evaluation model. Environ Sci Pollut Res 30, 6965–6985 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22666-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-22666-w