Log in

Does ecological footprint matter for the shape of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evidence from European countries

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The study empirically examines the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypotheses by investigating the relationship between ecological footprint, economic growth, energy consumption, and population growth. The study uses ecological footprint as a measurement of environmental degradation which is a more comprehensive indicator and considers all factors responsible for environmental degradation. Kee** in view the problem of cross-sectional dependence, a more efficient estimation tools like pooled mean group and augmented mean group have been used to estimate the long-run parameters for 22 European countries from 1995 through 2015. Results of the study found a quadratic relationship between income growth and ecological footprint and support validity of EKC. Energy consumption positively contributes to ecological footprint, while population growth plays no significant role in determining environmental quality. The long-run estimates of the study are validated through robustness analysis by employing dynamic ordinary least square (DOLS) and fully modified ordinary least square (FMOLS) techniques. Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) panel non-causality test indicated that there is a unidirectional causality running from GDP to ecological footprint while bidirectional causality running between energy consumption and ecological footprint. The study identified that population growth in European region is not a severe issue as compared to intensive energy consumption. Policies which restrict emission, deforestation, and water pollution should be adopted for sustainability of environment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan for providing scholarship for the whole study duration of corresponding author. The valuable suggestions of Houda Hafidi, Centre for Environmental Economics Montpellier, were quite helpful in improving the quality of this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. This study is the part of doctoral theses by Muhammad Saqib and is supervised by Francois Benhmad. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Muhammad Saqib and Francois Benhmad. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Muhammad Saqib, and Francois Benhmad commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Muhammad Saqib.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Ethical approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Editorial Responsibility: Nicholas Apergis

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saqib, M., Benhmad, F. Does ecological footprint matter for the shape of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 13634–13648 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11517-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11517-1

Keywords

Navigation