Abstract
The study empirically examines the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypotheses by investigating the relationship between ecological footprint, economic growth, energy consumption, and population growth. The study uses ecological footprint as a measurement of environmental degradation which is a more comprehensive indicator and considers all factors responsible for environmental degradation. Kee** in view the problem of cross-sectional dependence, a more efficient estimation tools like pooled mean group and augmented mean group have been used to estimate the long-run parameters for 22 European countries from 1995 through 2015. Results of the study found a quadratic relationship between income growth and ecological footprint and support validity of EKC. Energy consumption positively contributes to ecological footprint, while population growth plays no significant role in determining environmental quality. The long-run estimates of the study are validated through robustness analysis by employing dynamic ordinary least square (DOLS) and fully modified ordinary least square (FMOLS) techniques. Dumitrescu and Hurlin (2012) panel non-causality test indicated that there is a unidirectional causality running from GDP to ecological footprint while bidirectional causality running between energy consumption and ecological footprint. The study identified that population growth in European region is not a severe issue as compared to intensive energy consumption. Policies which restrict emission, deforestation, and water pollution should be adopted for sustainability of environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets used and analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Adu DT, Denkyirah EK (2018) Economic growth and environmental pollution in West Africa: testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kjss.2017.12.008
Ahmad N, Du L, Lu J, Wang J, Li HZ, Hashmi MZ (2017) Modelling the CO2 emissions and economic growth in Croatia: is there any environmental Kuznets curve? Energy 123:164–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.12.106
Ahmed K, Long W (2012) Environmental Kuznets curve and Pakistan: an empirical analysis. Procedia Economics and Finance 1:4–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2212-5671(12)00003-2
Ahmed A, Uddin GS, Sohag K (2016) Biomass energy, technological progress and the environmental Kuznets curve: evidence from selected European countries. Biomass Bioenergy 90:202–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.04.004
Alam MM, Murad MW, Noman AHM, Ozturk I (2016) Relationships among carbon emissions, economic growth, energy consumption and population growth: testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Brazil, China, India and Indonesia. Ecol Indic 70:466–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.06.043
Ali W, Abdullah A, Azam M (2017) Re-visiting the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis for Malaysia: fresh evidence from ARDL bounds testing approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 77:990–1000. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.11.236
Al-Mulali U, Saboori B, Ozturk I (2015) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Vietnam. Energy Policy 76:123–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.019
Al-Mulali U, Solarin SA, Ozturk I (2016a) Investigating the presence of the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC) hypothesis in Kenya: an autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) approach. Nat Hazards 80(3):1729–1747. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-2050-x
Al-Mulali U, Ozturk I, Solarin SA (2016b) Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in seven regions: the role of renewable energy. Ecol Indic 67:267–282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.059
Apergis N, Ozturk I (2015) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Asian countries. Ecol Indic 52:16–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.11.026
Arouri MEH, Youssef AB, M'henni H, Rault C (2012) Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Middle East and north African countries. Energy Policy 45:342–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.02.042
Aye GC, Edoja PE (2017) Effect of economic growth on CO2 emissions in develo** countries: evidence from a dynamic panel threshold model. Cogent Economics & Finance 5(1):1379239. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2017.1379239
Azam M, Khan AQ (2016) Testing the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis: a comparative empirical study for low, lower-middle, upper-middle and high-income countries. Renew Sust Energ Rev 63:556–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.05.052
Begum RA, Sohag K, Abdullah SMS, Jaafar M (2015) CO2 emissions, energy consumption, economic and population growth in Malaysia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 41:594–601. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.07.205
Bento JPC, Moutinho V (2016) CO2 emissions, non-renewable and renewable electricity production, economic growth, and international trade in Italy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 55:142–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.151
Beşe E, Kalayci S (2019). Environmental Kuznets curve (EKC): empirical relationship between economic growth, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: evidence from 3 developed countries. Panoeconomicus, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.2298/PAN180503004B
Bilgili F, Koçak E, Bulut Ü (2016) The dynamic impact of renewable energy consumption on CO2 emissions: a revisited environmental Kuznets curve approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 54:838–845. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.080
Bölük G, Mert M (2015) The renewable energy, growth and environmental Kuznets curve in Turkey: an ARDL approach. Renew Sust Energ Rev 52:587–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.138
Brock WA, Taylor MS (2005). Economic growth and the environment: a review of theory and empirics. In Handbook of economic growth (Vol. 1, pp. 1749–1821). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1574-0684(05)01028-2
Churchill SA, Inekwe J, Ivanovski K, Smyth R (2018) The environmental Kuznets curve in the OECD: 1870–2014. Energy Econ 75:389–399. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2018.09.004
Danish A, Zhang B, Wang B, Wang Z (2017) Role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption on EKC: evidence from Pakistan. J Clean Prod 156:855–864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.203
Destek MA, Sarkodie SA (2019) Investigation of environmental Kuznets curve for ecological footprint: the role of energy and financial development. Sci Total Environ 650:2483–2489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.017
Dinda S, Coondoo D (2006) Income and emission: a panel data-based cointegration analysis. Ecol Econ 57(2):167–181. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.03.028
Dogan E, Seker F (2016) Determinants of CO2 emissions in the European Union: the role of renewable and non-renewable energy. Renew Energy 94:429–439. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2016.03.078
Dogan E, Turkekul B (2016) CO 2 emissions, real output, energy consumption, trade, urbanization and financial development: testing the EKC hypothesis for the USA. Environ Sci Pollut Res 23(2):1203–1213. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-015-5323-8
Dumitrescu EI, Hurlin C (2012) Testing for granger non-causality in heterogeneous panels. Econ Model 29(4):1450–1460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2012.02.014
Eberhardt M, Bond S (2009). Cross-section dependence in nonstationary panel models: a novel estimator. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/17870
Eren BM, Taspinar N, Gokmenoglu KK (2019) The impact of financial development and economic growth on renewable energy consumption: empirical analysis of India. Sci Total Environ 663:189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.01.323
Esteve V, Tamarit C (2012) Threshold cointegration and nonlinear adjustment between CO2 and income: the environmental Kuznets curve in Spain, 1857–2007. Energy Econ 34(6):2148–2156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2012.03.001
Farhani S, Mrizak S, Chaibi A, Rault C (2014) The environmental Kuznets curve and sustainability: a panel data analysis. Energy Policy 71:189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.04.030
Fodha M, Zaghdoud O (2010) Economic growth and pollutant emissions in Tunisia: an empirical analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 38(2):1150–1156. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.11.002
Grossman, G. M., & Krueger, A. B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement (No. w3914). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w3914
He Y, Lin B (2019) Investigating environmental Kuznets curve from an energy intensity perspective: empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 234:1013–1022. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.121
Heidari H, Katircioğlu ST, Saeidpour L (2015) Economic growth, CO2 emissions, and energy consumption in the five ASEAN countries. Int J Electr Power Energy Syst 64:785–791. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2014.07.081
Hove S, Tursoy T (2019) An investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve in emerging economies. J Clean Prod 236:117628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.117628
Iwata H, Okada K, Samreth S (2010) Empirical study on the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 in France: the role of nuclear energy. Energy Policy 38(8):4057–4063. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.03.031
Jalil A, Mahmud SF (2009) Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: a cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy 37(12):5167–5172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.07.044
Jebli MB, Youssef SB (2015) The environmental Kuznets curve, economic growth, renewable and non-renewable energy, and trade in Tunisia. Renew Sust Energ Rev 47:173–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.049
Jebli MB, Youssef SB, Ozturk I (2016) Environmental testing Kuznets curve hypothesis: the role of renewable energy and non-renewable energy consumption in OECD countries. Ecol Indic 60:824–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.08.031
Kang YQ, Zhao T, Yang YY (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions in China: a spatial panel data approach. Ecol Indic 63:231–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.12.011
Khan I, Saqib M, Hafidi H (2019) Poverty and environmental nexus in rural Pakistan: a multidimensional approach. GeoJournal:1–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-019-10090-6
Kuznets S (1955) Economic growth and income inequality. Am Econ Rev 45(1):1–28 https://www.jstor.org/stable/1811581
Lau LS, Choong CK, Eng YK (2014) Investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Malaysia: do foreign direct investment and trade matter? Energy Policy 68:490–497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.002
Lau LS, Choong CK, Ng CF, Liew FM, Ching SL (2019) Is nuclear energy clean? Revisit of environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in OECD countries. Econ Model 77:12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2018.09.015
Li T, Wang Y, Zhao D (2016) Environmental Kuznets curve in China: new evidence from dynamic panel analysis. Energy Policy 91:138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.01.002
Liobikienė G, Butkus M (2017) Environmental Kuznets curve of greenhouse gas emissions including technological progress and substitution effects. Energy 135:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2017.06.120
Liu X, Zhang S, Bae J (2017) The impact of renewable energy and agriculture on carbon dioxide emissions: investigating the environmental Kuznets curve in four selected ASEAN countries. J Clean Prod 164:1239–1247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.086
Lucas, R. E., Wheeler, D., & Hettige, H. (1992). Economic development, environmental regulation, and the international migration of toxic industrial pollution, 1960–88 (Vol. 1062). World Bank Publications
Moutinho V, Varum C, Madaleno M (2017) How economic growth affects emissions? An investigation of the environmental Kuznets curve in Portuguese and Spanish economic activity sectors. Energy Policy 106:326–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.03.069
Mrabet Z, Alsamara M (2017) Testing the Kuznets curve hypothesis for Qatar: a comparison between carbon dioxide and ecological footprint. Renew Sust Energ Rev 70:1366–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.12.039
Nasir M, Rehman FU (2011) Environmental Kuznets curve for carbon emissions in Pakistan: an empirical investigation. Energy Policy 39(3):1857–1864. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.01.025
Omri A, Daly S, Rault C, Chaibi A (2015) Financial development, environmental quality, trade and economic growth: what causes what in MENA countries. Energy Econ 48:242–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.01.008
Ozturk I, Al-Mulali U (2015) Investigating the validity of the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Cambodia. Ecol Indic 57:324–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.05.018
Panayotou T (1993). Empirical tests and policy analysis of environmental degradation at different stages of economic development (No. 992927783402676). International Labour Organization
Panayotou T (1997) Demystifying the environmental Kuznets curve: turning a black box into a policy tool. Environ Dev Econ 2(4):465–484. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X97000259
Pao HT, Tsai CM (2010) CO2 emissions, energy consumption and economic growth in BRIC countries. Energy Policy 38(12):7850–7860. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.045
Pao HT, Yu HC, Yang YH (2011) Modeling the CO2 emissions, energy use, and economic growth in Russia. Energy 36(8):5094–5100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.004
Pedroni P (1999) Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxf Bull Econ Stat 61(S1):653–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0084.0610s1653
Pedroni P (2004) Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite samples of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis. Econometric theory 20(3):597–625. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266466604203073
Pesaran, M. H. (2004). General diagnostic tests for cross section dependence in panels. CESifo Working Paper Series 1229. CESifo Group Munich. https://ssrn.com/abstract=572504
Pesaran MH (2007) A simple panel unit root test in the presence of cross-section dependence. J Appl Econ 22(2):265–312. https://doi.org/10.1002/jae.951
Rasoulinezhad E, Saboori B (2018) Panel estimation for renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, economic growth, CO 2 emissions, the composite trade intensity, and financial openness of the commonwealth of independent states. Environ Sci Pollut Res 25(18):17354–17370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-018-1827-3
Ridzuan S (2019) Inequality and the environmental Kuznets curve. J Clean Prod 228:1472–1481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.284
Saboori B, Sulaiman J, Mohd S (2012) Economic growth and CO2 emissions in Malaysia: a cointegration analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 51:184–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.08.065
Saqib M, Benhmad F (2021). Updated meta-analysis of environmental Kuznets curve: where do we stand? Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2020.106503
Sarkodie SA, Strezov V (2018) Empirical study of the environmental Kuznets curve and environmental sustainability curve hypothesis for Australia, China, Ghana and USA. J Clean Prod 201:98–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.039
Selden TM, Song D (1995) Neoclassical growth, the J curve for abatement, and the inverted U curve for pollution. J Environ Econ Manag 29(2):162–168. https://doi.org/10.1006/jeem.1995.1038
Shafiei S, Salim RA (2014) Non-renewable and renewable energy consumption and CO2 emissions in OECD countries: a comparative analysis. Energy Policy 66:547–556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.064
Shafik N (1994) Economic development and environmental quality: an econometric analysis. Oxf Econ Pap 46(4):757–774 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2663498
Shahbaz M, Lean HH, Shabbir MS (2012) Environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Pakistan: cointegration and granger causality. Renew Sust Energ Rev 16(5):2947–2953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.02.015
Shahbaz M, Mutascu M, Azim P (2013) Environmental Kuznets curve in Romania and the role of energy consumption. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.012
Stern DI (2003). International society for ecological economics internet encyclopedia of ecological economics the environmental Kuznets curve. Department of Economics, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
Tamazian A, Rao BB (2010) Do economic, financial and institutional developments matter for environmental degradation? Evidence from transitional economies. Energy Econ 32(1):137–145. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2009.04.004
Tamazian A, Chousa JP, Vadlamannati KC (2009) Does higher economic and financial development lead to environmental degradation: evidence from BRIC countries. Energy Policy 37(1):246–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.08.025
Tiwari AK, Shahbaz M, Hye QMA (2013) The environmental Kuznets curve and the role of coal consumption in India: cointegration and causality analysis in an open economy. Renew Sust Energ Rev 18:519–527. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2012.10.031
Vincent JR (1997) Testing for environmental Kuznets curves within a develo** country. Environ Dev Econ 2(4):417–431. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355770X97000223
Wackernagel M, Rees W (1998). Our ecological footprint: reducing human impact on the earth (Vol. 9). New Society Publishers
Wang Y, Zhang C, Lu A, Li L, He Y, ToJo J, Zhu X (2017) A disaggregated analysis of the environmental Kuznets curve for industrial CO2 emissions in China. Appl Energy 190:172–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.12.109
Zambrano-Monserrate MA, Silva-Zambrano CA, Davalos-Penafiel JL, Zambrano-Monserrate A, Ruano MA (2018) Testing environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis in Peru: the role of renewable electricity, petroleum and dry natural gas. Renew Sust Energ Rev 82:4170–4178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.11.005
Zhu H, Duan L, Guo Y, Yu K (2016) The effects of FDI, economic growth and energy consumption on carbon emissions in ASEAN-5: evidence from panel quantile regression. Econ Model 58:237–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2016.05.003
Acknowledgments
The authors are grateful to the Higher Education Commission (HEC) of Pakistan for providing scholarship for the whole study duration of corresponding author. The valuable suggestions of Houda Hafidi, Centre for Environmental Economics Montpellier, were quite helpful in improving the quality of this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. This study is the part of doctoral theses by Muhammad Saqib and is supervised by Francois Benhmad. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Muhammad Saqib and Francois Benhmad. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Muhammad Saqib, and Francois Benhmad commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests.
Ethical approval and consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Editorial Responsibility: Nicholas Apergis
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Saqib, M., Benhmad, F. Does ecological footprint matter for the shape of the environmental Kuznets curve? Evidence from European countries. Environ Sci Pollut Res 28, 13634–13648 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11517-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-020-11517-1