Log in

An approach to optimize the location of LNAPL recovery wells using the concept of a LNAPL specific yield

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Environmental Science and Pollution Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Leakage of hydrocarbon fuel (light nonaqueous-phase liquid, LNAPL) from petroleum processing facilities and storage tanks may result in significant subsurface contamination. Remediating the contaminated areas represent considerable challenges, especially when remediation resources are limited and site data are incomplete. A reasonable management strategy under this scenario may be to identify sites where LNAPL recovery operations should be located that would provide the largest LNAPL recovery initially while minimizing the LNAPL remaining in the subsurface (entrapped and residual LNAPL), which may serve as future sources for groundwater contamination. To accomplish this objective, we use estimates of subsurface recoverable and total LNAPL specific volumes and LNAPL transmissivities to generate GIS maps that can be combined to highlight locations where to develop LNAPL recovery operations. When the approach is applied to a LNAPL-contaminated area in Iran, we were able to narrow the locations for potential LNAPL recovery operations. Specifically, we combine maps of the LNAPL specific yield, an introduced term, and the LNAPL transmissivity where the LNAPL specific yield is the ratio of the recoverable to total LNAPL specific volumes. The LNAPL specific yield is a relative measure of the amount of LNAPL that potentially can be recovered while minimizing residual LNAPL in soils. The approach can be applied to sites where the recoverable and total LNAPL specific volumes and LNAPL transmissivities can be estimated using data from boreholes in the contaminated area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abriola LM, Pinder GF (1985) A multiphase approach to the modeling of porous media contamination by organic compounds, 2, numerical simulation. Water Resour Res 21:19–26

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • API (American Petroleum Institute) (2007) LNAPL distribution and recovery model (LDRM). In: Distribution and recovery of petroleum hydrocarbon liquids in porous media. API Publ. No. 4760, vol 1. American Petroleum Institute, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Baehr AL, Corapcioglu MY (1987) A compositional multiphase model for groundwater contamination by petroleum products, 2, numerical solution. Water Resour Res 23:201–214

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bashi-Azghadi SN, Kerachian R (2010) Locating monitoring wells in groundwater systems using embedded optimization and simulation models. Sci Total Environ 408:2189–2198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Carsel RF, Parrish RS (1988) Develo** joint probability distribution of soil water retention characteristics. Water Resour Res 24:755–769

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dokou Z, Karatzas GP (2013) Multi-objective optimization for free-phase LNAPL recovery using evolutionary computation algorithms. Hydrol Sci J 58:671–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebrahimi F, Nakhaei M, Nassery HR, Khodaei K, Kisi O et al (2019) Light non-aqueous phase liquids simulation using artificial intelligence models: Esmaeilabad aquifer case study. Groundw Sustain Dev 8:245–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Farr AM, Houghtalen RJ, McWhorter DD et al (1990) Volume estimation of light nonaqueous phase liquids in porous media. Groundwater 28:48–56

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Faust CR (1985) Transport of immiscible fluids within and below the unsaturated zone – a numerical model. Water Resour Res 21:587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITRC (Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council) (2009) Evaluating LNAPL remedial technologies for achieving project goals. In: www.itrcweb.org (ed) LNAPL-2. Interstate Technology & Regulatory Council, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Jeong J, Charbeneau RJ (2014) An analytical model for predicting LNAPL distribution and recovery from multi-layered soils. J Contam Hydrol 156:52–61

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaluarachchi JJ, Parker JC (1989) An efficient finite element method for modeling multiphase flow in porous media. Water Resour Res 25:43–54

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaluarachchi JJ, Parker JC, Lenhard RJ et al (1990) A numerical model for areal migration of water and light hydrocarbon in unconfined aquifer. Adv Water Resour 13:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuppusamy T, Sheng J, Parker JC, Lenhard RJ et al (1987) Finite element analysis of multiphase immiscible flow through soils. Water Resour Res 23:625–631

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhard RJ, Parker JC (1990) Estimation of free hydrocarbon volume from fluid levels in monitoring wells. Groundwater 28:57–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhard RJ, Oostrom M, Dane JH et al (2004) A constitutive model for air-NAPL-water flow in the vadose zone accounting for immobile, non-occluded (residual) NAPL in strongly water-wet porous media. J Contam Hydrol 73:283–304

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lenhard RJ, Rayner JL, Davis GB et al (2017) A practical tool for estimating subsurface LNAPL distributions and transmissivity using current and historical fluid levels in groundwater wells: effects of entrapped and residual LNAPL. J Contam Hydrol 205:1–11

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JC, Lenhard RJ (1989) Vertical integration of three-phase flow equations for analysis of light hydrocarbon plume movement. Transp Porous Media 5:187–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker JC, Lenhard RJ, Kuppusamy T et al (1987) A parametric model for constitutive properties governing multiphase flow in porous media. Water Resour Res 23:618–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Pruess K, Battistelli A (2002) TMVOC, a numerical simulator for three-phase non-isothermal flows of multicomponent hydrocarbon mixtures in saturated-unsaturated heterogeneous media, 2.1 ed. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin X, Huang G, Yu H et al (2009a) Enhancing remediation of LNAPL recovery through a response-surface-based optimization approach. J Environ Eng 135:999–1008

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Qin XS, Huang GH, He L et al (2009b) Simulation and optimization technologies for petroleum waste management and remediation process control. J Environ Manag 90:54–76

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rieben H (1955) The geology of the Tehran plain. Am J Sci 253:617–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sookhak Lari K, Safavi H (2008) A simulation-optimization model for “air praring” and “pump and treat” groundwater remediation technologies. J Environ Inf 12:44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sookhak Lari K, Johnson CD, Rayner JL, Davis GB et al (2018) Field-scale multi-phase LNAPL remediation: validating a new computational framework against sequential field pilot trials. J Hazard Mater 345:87–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sookhak Lari K, Rayner JL, Davis GB et al (2019) Toward optimizing LNAPL remediation. Water Resour Res 55:923–936. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018WR023380

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Genuchten MT (1980) A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Science Society of America 44:892–898

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatemeh Ebrahimi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Marcus Schulz

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Highlights

• We introduce the concept of LNAPL specific yield (LSY) to maximize the LNAPL recovery rate and minimize the residual LNAPL in the subsurface.

• The use of inverse modeling to determine of van Genuchten parameters can save time and cost of measurements.

• The combination of LNAPL transmissivity and LNAPL specific yield maps to locate LNAPL recovery wells can remove the most LNAPL in the shortest time.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ebrahimi, F., Lenhard, R.J., Nakhaei, M. et al. An approach to optimize the location of LNAPL recovery wells using the concept of a LNAPL specific yield. Environ Sci Pollut Res 26, 28714–28724 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06052-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-019-06052-7

Keywords

Navigation